As long as GGG keeps making the same excuses NOT to fight certain guys that others make not to fight him, I think that "baddest man on the planet" title is pretty safe- and vacant- right now.caldo2025 wrote:I have never wasted a second thinking about GGG vs Floyd because it's the most far fetched fight you could imagine. Why even waste time? Floyd in his prime would never take the fight with this monster so why would i think he'd take the fight at 40? GGG's the P4P #1 right now and anyone that still have Floyd at the top of that imaginary list is an idiot.Badhusker wrote:I asked a simple question. You want Floyd to move up and face GGG, but don't want Crawford to move u up to face Manny, because you want him protected and nurtured. Crawford only has one fight at 140.
Maybe it's just me, but I see a little bit of hypocrisy in that.
GGG's the baddest man on the planet right now, plain and simple. Boxing hasn't seen a talent like this for...maybe ever. So you and KBB can continue with your GGG stinks campaign because you both know the truth. GGG's surpassed your boy.
A career welterweight has no reason to consider fighting a career middleweight unless it is clear that an actual fight can happen.
And since one of them has yet to show that he can even physically make the weight needed to realistically make the fight happen, the question is moot.
As far as what boxing has seen and hasn't seen, I beg to differ.
GGG is good, perhaps great.
He is also a 33 year old fighter, over 9 years into his career, who has yet to fight ANYONE approaching the elite status he is thought to be at.
That's a red flag until he finally fights and beats someone special.