morales had the fight.....

Post Reply
boxerbob
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1041
Joined: 30 Oct 2005, 18:11

morales had the fight.....

Post by boxerbob »

knocked out of him by manny

i have never seen morales like that before , he was punched senseless and actually looked happy that it was over.

morales has been a warrior and has earned good money but manny is the man , he fought like a windmill.

not many greats would have beat manny last night
silkov
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7946
Joined: 18 Aug 2003, 14:55

Re: morales had the fight.....

Post by silkov »

boxerbob wrote:knocked out of him by manny

i have never seen morales like that before , he was punched senseless and actually looked happy that it was over.

morales has been a warrior and has earned good money but manny is the man , he fought like a windmill.

not many greats would have beat manny last night
Manny is good but I think Morales is shot, ...too many wars and weight troubles have taken their toll...
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45231
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

Shot is an overused phrase, and I don't think fits the bill in this case at all.
silkov
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7946
Joined: 18 Aug 2003, 14:55

Post by silkov »

jamesmcdonnell wrote:Shot is an overused phrase, and I don't think fits the bill in this case at all.
Well he's lost two in a row now, I'd say that shows something is wrong... he's certainly on the slide...
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45231
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

For fucks sake, one loss was against A LIGHTWEIGHT. That is not indicative that he was on the slide neccesarily.

That would be like Mayweather moving up to Light Middle, losing to someone of the calibre of Vernon Forrest and everyone saying he was shot.
silkov
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7946
Joined: 18 Aug 2003, 14:55

Post by silkov »

jamesmcdonnell wrote:For fucks sake, one loss was against A LIGHTWEIGHT. That is not indicative that he was on the slide neccesarily.

That would be like Mayweather moving up to Light Middle, losing to someone of the calibre of Vernon Forrest and everyone saying he was shot.
Its not just that he lost, its how he lost!... are you saying that he's still in his prime???... I thought he looked on the slide in the last fight with Barrera... Morales at his best would never have got stopped by Manny...
states
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3554
Joined: 26 Jun 2004, 13:40

Post by states »

'Shot', for me implies someone like Holyfield: Incapable of getting off the punches, or moving with anything like the fluency he once did, and getting totally humbled by guys who wouldn't have touched him in his prime, like Donald. Morales has just lost to a very good lightweight, and a top p4p'er. Maybe he is slipping a bit, yet he was still competitive for much of the fight with Manny. He's still going to be favourite against pretty much anyone around 130lb's, which is hardly true of a shot fighter.
steve689
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9660
Joined: 20 Jan 2003, 13:50

Post by steve689 »

Excellent points States, Morales isn't shot he is just shopworn maybe as all the hard fights and wars catch up on him. He gave a fight to a top of his game, prime fighter like Pacquaio for a good 9 rounds so i doubt he is shot. He also outlasted Pacquiao two fights ago in a great battle, the fight with Raheem wasn't a fight where he took a sustained beating he was just undermotivated and out thought in there.
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45231
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

Raheem was also a naturally bigger man and a stick and mover, and Morales is always a bit flat footed at the best of times.

If Pacman had fought the same fight he did last time out, I doubt he would have won. Morales was dominating in the 4th and 5th rounds, it was a carbon copy of their first fight, all the hard shots were coming from Morales, and Pacman was getting forced to lurch in with shots.

Difference is this time Pacman had a plan B and when he put it into practice, he was able to get inside of Morales.

You could see even in the first two rounds (which I thought Pacman stole with the jab) that Pacman wasn't going to fight the same fight as last time.
Loynesy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1767
Joined: 26 Sep 2003, 08:29

Post by Loynesy »

steve689 wrote:Excellent points States, Morales isn't shot he is just shopworn maybe as all the hard fights and wars catch up on him. He gave a fight to a top of his game, prime fighter like Pacquaio for a good 9 rounds so i doubt he is shot. He also outlasted Pacquiao two fights ago in a great battle, the fight with Raheem wasn't a fight where he took a sustained beating he was just undermotivated and out thought in there.
Steve: I genuinely salute your phrasology there. "Shopworn" is the perfect adjective to describe Morales (and indeed many fighters). It isn't "shot" but it means no longer at their best. The old boxing commentators phrase of "old" is somewhere in between (I remember once hearing Jim Watt refer to Ryan Rhodes as old- he was 26 at the time (not Jim))
Post Reply