Klitschko V Fury an rematch clause ?

mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23147
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Klitschko V Fury an rematch clause ?

Post by mickey1975 »

coneye wrote:Why would he not want one ,, Tyson would know if he flukes it and wins , the next logical fight would be a MASSIVE rematch making Tyson at least 50-50 purse split
Why would it have to be a fluke? Bute had one he didn't enforce. Did Brewster or Sanders get hunted down?
Leonid
Super Middleweight
Posts: 97
Joined: 24 Oct 2012, 18:15

Re: Klitschko V Fury an rematch clause ?

Post by Leonid »

mickey1975 wrote:
coneye wrote:Why would he not want one ,, Tyson would know if he flukes it and wins , the next logical fight would be a MASSIVE rematch making Tyson at least 50-50 purse split
Why would it have to be a fluke? Bute had one he didn't enforce. Did Brewster or Sanders get hunted down?
Actually, Wlad had a rematch with Brewster and Vitali fought Sanders as a part of their brother avenging brother routine.
Datsue
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Klitschko V Fury an rematch clause ?

Post by Datsue »

Leonid wrote:
mickey1975 wrote:
coneye wrote:Why would he not want one ,, Tyson would know if he flukes it and wins , the next logical fight would be a MASSIVE rematch making Tyson at least 50-50 purse split
Why would it have to be a fluke? Bute had one he didn't enforce. Did Brewster or Sanders get hunted down?
Actually, Wlad had a rematch with Brewster and Vitali fought Sanders as a part of their brother avenging brother routine.

B-B-B-BUT FURY FEARS NO MAN BORN OF WOMAN!!! That means Wlad must be terrified of him & despite the other 30-odd fights he's had in which he's had rematch clauses written into the contract Wlad's written this one in especially in shaking cyrillic because of the kicking he's due!?!?!

Ahem. Sorry. Sometimes the man's fanbase makes it hard to like the boy, you know?
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23147
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Klitschko V Fury an rematch clause ?

Post by mickey1975 »

I'm a fan, but don't think he'll win, but if he does, why will it automatically be a fluke? And getting your big brother to avenge a loss doesn't count!
lillywhite14
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Klitschko V Fury an rematch clause ?

Post by lillywhite14 »

How can you fluke a win in Boxing? Dodgy scoring perhaps?

I've never believed the 'lucky punch' theory. If a punch is thrown, it's generally to hit the opponent, therefore if it manages to knock them out, result!
Post Reply