Ha ha to be fair I think he meant in the way the close rounds were then judged.jameswilson wrote:'I don't think the knockdown helped him.'brilo33 wrote:khan as good as judge as he is boxer
With insight like that there's a job in politics for him somewhere.
Groves v Jack Poll
Re: Groves v Jack Poll
Re: Groves v Jack Poll
I think people read too much into Jack's stoppage loss. His durability has looked fine apart from that and it wasn't long ago that he fairly beat Dirrell (he seems to get little credit for this), who had tough Sakio Bika all over the place in their fights. Add Groves not looking too hot since the Froch bouts and I was surprised that he was so strongly favored here.
Re: Groves v Jack Poll
i know tongue and cheekFinn wrote:Ha ha to be fair I think he meant in the way the close rounds were then judged.jameswilson wrote:'I don't think the knockdown helped him.'brilo33 wrote:khan as good as judge as he is boxer
With insight like that there's a job in politics for him somewhere.
Re: Groves v Jack Poll
You guys know nothing about boxing.Exoddus wrote:I'm one of two people out of 66 who've picked Jack to win on points.
The fight played out how I thought it would tbh. Jack did win that fight.
Happy boy tonight. Won £300 on dillian whyte abd around £90 on Jack.
Re: Groves v Jack Poll
One thing I do know is bugglioni has no chance against these guys and I'm getting annoyed about them mentioning him as someone who is up in their league. I'm betting big on chudinov.
-
handsofstone
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 23232
- Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28
Re: Groves v Jack Poll
I had it 116-111 Jack but im on the drink and whatnot and had a mate in until late in the fight when he vomited and effed off sharpish and there was a loads of tit for tat rounds where it was give and take,Groves was as brave as ever,his self belief is admirable,Jack again really impressed me with his boxing savvy,i probably give him too much harshness(is that a word? it is now) because of the 1st round KO to Edwards but he's a very capable boxerexpe wrote:Only one fighter was getting a 116-111 in their favour, which is a pretty poor scorecard tbh.jameswilson wrote:You can usually tell with how the scoring is if there's a kd. Very few judges in the USA give even rounds it seems so when I heard 116-111 we all knew. Similar with the first McDonnell Kameda fight given it was 114-113 on all cards.
In a close fight like this,its amazing how a fighters appearence affects the scoring,Groves looked haggard,Jack looked slick so thats prob how went with him in the close rounds even though they were both landing
Jack just a bit cleaner,sharper and more hurtful for me though
Re: Groves v Jack Poll
Exoddus wrote:You guys know nothing about boxing.Exoddus wrote:I'm one of two people out of 66 who've picked Jack to win on points.
![]()
![]()
The fight played out how I thought it would tbh. Jack did win that fight.
Happy boy tonight. Won £300 on dillian whyte abd around £90 on Jack.
-
Boxing Prospect
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 6592
- Joined: 25 Jun 2012, 14:35
Re: Groves v Jack Poll
Groves was fornicating terrible...dude should fornicating retire after that awful. Just awful.
Re: Groves v Jack Poll
crusader wrote:Exoddus wrote:You guys know nothing about boxing.Exoddus wrote:I'm one of two people out of 66 who've picked Jack to win on points.
![]()
![]()
The fight played out how I thought it would tbh. Jack did win that fight.
Happy boy tonight. Won £300 on dillian whyte abd around £90 on Jack.
Re: Groves v Jack Poll
any one staying up for the last Floyd fight. having a 50/50 fight to
-
Boxerbeetle
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 32972
- Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59
Re: Groves v Jack Poll
I'm not sure Groves is a world level fighter, he's already had 3 title shots & come up short each time. He's not likely to fight a weaker champ than Jack either. DeGale is miles ahead of him now.
-
handsofstone
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 23232
- Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28
Re: Groves v Jack Poll
Exoddus wrote:You guys know nothing about boxing.Exoddus wrote:I'm one of two people out of 66 who've picked Jack to win on points.
![]()
![]()
The fight played out how I thought it would tbh. Jack did win that fight.
Happy boy tonight. Won £300 on dillian whyte abd around £90 on Jack.
-
handsofstone
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 23232
- Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28
Re: Groves v Jack Poll
Viks hair is distacting me
-
handsofstone
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 23232
- Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28
Re: Groves v Jack Poll
Salido looking freakishly strong
-
Boxing Prospect
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 6592
- Joined: 25 Jun 2012, 14:35
Re: Groves v Jack Poll
...is there a weaker champion in the sport today?Boxerbeetle wrote:I'm not sure Groves is a world level fighter, he's already had 3 title shots & come up short each time. He's not likely to fight a weaker champ than Jack either. DeGale is miles ahead of him now.
Re: Groves v Jack Poll
I'm pretty sure I've won the last 6 boxing bets I've done in a row. The only bets I have right now are ones I put on months ago. I've got a betting slip from Coral which has a Badou Jack and BJS win double. So I guess that's a winner because the BJS fight wasn't rescheduled within 30 days (now taking place in December). I'll pop over to the shop tomorrow and find out.
The other bet I've got is £45 on Wlad to beat Fury in rounds 1-4 @ 7/1 with lads.
The other bet I've got is £45 on Wlad to beat Fury in rounds 1-4 @ 7/1 with lads.
-
Boxing Prospect
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 6592
- Joined: 25 Jun 2012, 14:35
Re: Groves v Jack Poll
Watch the first one :) (along with Afolabi Vs Ramirez, Zoda Vs Petchchorhae, Matthysse Vs Provodnikov, Kongfah Vs Higa, Kaneko Vs Nakamura)GreedyG wrote:Martinez-Salido - WOW, this is FOTY material.
BS decision of the year!
-
handsofstone
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 23232
- Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28
Re: Groves v Jack Poll
GreedyG wrote:Martinez-Salido - WOW, this is FOTY material.
Thats a def FOTY candidate for me,ive seen a lot of game opponents but those 2 were epic,i cant believe the heart both showed,Salido looks unbelievable for someone with his career(hmmm) Id love to see the punch stats because that was unreal output from 1st to last
The tragedy is this fight will be far under the radar when Mayweather boxes to a easy albeit beautiful shut out
Glowacki-Huck and Santa Cruz-Mares were excellent but this was better IMO
Re: Groves v Jack Poll
so who is supporting berto. go on berto
-
Boxing Prospect
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 6592
- Joined: 25 Jun 2012, 14:35
Re: Groves v Jack Poll
Come on Berto!
-
handsofstone
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 23232
- Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28
Re: Groves v Jack Poll
If Mayweather was to lose to Berto 1 fight away from equaling Marciano's record that would some up the sport of boxingbrilo33 wrote:so who is supporting berto. go on berto
bad promoters damage the sport but on its day theres nothing like it
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 23148
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: Groves v Jack Poll
I don't think George has been right since the first Froch fight. He left a lot of himself in the ring that night. Splitting with Booth wasn't helpful. He wouldn't have had him favouring quantity over quality as he has done in his last three bouts.tobyh5 wrote:Cobra'd?
Re: Groves v Jack Poll
same mayweather.same fight .different name
Re: Groves v Jack Poll
berto feels it. he is gonna do it