Frank Buglioni
Frank Buglioni
How in the hell did this bum become mandatory for a world title ? He sucks!
Re: Frank Buglioni
He wasn't a mandatory.
Re: Frank Buglioni
He's not a bum, he's a professional fighter with an awful lot of heart.diddy wrote:How in the hell did this bum become mandatory for a world title ? He sucks!
Not on Chudinov's level, no. But a good pro nonetheless.
Re: Frank Buglioni
Good based on what ?
A draw with Lee Markham ?
A draw with Lee Markham ?
Re: Frank Buglioni
You're right. He got to this point in his career because he's a bad boxer and shouldn't be in the sport.diddy wrote:Good based on what ?
A draw with Lee Markham ?
I don't know why I bother sometimes.
Re: Frank Buglioni
Dude this is like saying Ronald Hearns or Harry Joe Yorgey are "good". Buglioni has beaten absolutely no one. How these guys get title shots is beyond amazing and shows how broken the system is.Bobbyptsd wrote:You're right. He got to this point in his career because he's a bad boxer and shouldn't be in the sport.diddy wrote:Good based on what ?
A draw with Lee Markham ?
I don't know why I bother sometimes.
Re: Frank Buglioni
Of course they are "good". You don't get even to that point in the sport by being "bad" at boxing.diddy wrote:Dude this is like saying Ronald Hearns or Harry Joe Yorgey are "good". Buglioni has beaten absolutely no one. How these guys get title shots is beyond amazing and shows how broken the system is.Bobbyptsd wrote:You're right. He got to this point in his career because he's a bad boxer and shouldn't be in the sport.diddy wrote:Good based on what ?
A draw with Lee Markham ?
I don't know why I bother sometimes.
"Good" compared to the elite fighters in the world in the weight class? No, they are worse. But there's a frigging huge amount of nuance between guys like Yorgey and Buglioni and a guy who's "Not good".
I don't know why I'm arguing with someone who calls a guy risking his life in the ring for our entertainment a "bum" anyway.
Re: Frank Buglioni


Fedor Chudinov 13 0 0
vs
Frank Buglioni 17 1 1
Super Middleweight
WBA World super middleweight title
Chudinov won by UD
Chudinov down after the bell
He got this shot because he is a popular fighter
He is entertaining and fans like him. He was brave, maybe a little too much in the 12th
Card Hls Here Guys:
http://www.the13thround.com/phpBB2/view ... 5&t=116087
ENJOY!!
Re: Frank Buglioni
Is Buglioni your brother in law or something?
I'm talking world level here. That's how I judge fighters. I don't come here to talk about club fighters.
We obviously have different perspectives.
Bottom line is guys like Buglioni should not be fighting for world titles. Neither should Duhaupas. Or Eric Molina. I'm speaking toward the STRUCTURE of boxing. That broken thing.
I'm talking world level here. That's how I judge fighters. I don't come here to talk about club fighters.
We obviously have different perspectives.
Bottom line is guys like Buglioni should not be fighting for world titles. Neither should Duhaupas. Or Eric Molina. I'm speaking toward the STRUCTURE of boxing. That broken thing.
Re: Frank Buglioni
This wasn't really a title shot, since Chudinov isn't really a champion. He is the WBA Super Middleweight "Regular" Champion.
Andre Ward is the WBA Super Middleweight "Super" Champion, meaning he is the real belt holder.
Andre Ward is the WBA Super Middleweight "Super" Champion, meaning he is the real belt holder.
Re: Frank Buglioni
Then address that structure, don't call professional fighters "bums".diddy wrote:Is Buglioni your brother in law or something?
I'm talking world level here. That's how I judge fighters. I don't come here to talk about club fighters.
We obviously have different perspectives.
Bottom line is guys like Buglioni should not be fighting for world titles. Neither should Duhaupas. Or Eric Molina. I'm speaking toward the STRUCTURE of boxing. That broken thing.
Re: Frank Buglioni
I've addressed that plenty. At world level Buglioni is a bum. He's a high caliber club fighter.Bobbyptsd wrote:Then address that structure, don't call professional fighters "bums".diddy wrote:Is Buglioni your brother in law or something?
I'm talking world level here. That's how I judge fighters. I don't come here to talk about club fighters.
We obviously have different perspectives.
Bottom line is guys like Buglioni should not be fighting for world titles. Neither should Duhaupas. Or Eric Molina. I'm speaking toward the STRUCTURE of boxing. That broken thing.
Re: Frank Buglioni
Ugggh, you're sapping my strength here.diddy wrote:I've addressed that plenty. At world level Buglioni is a bum. He's a high caliber club fighter.Bobbyptsd wrote:Then address that structure, don't call professional fighters "bums".diddy wrote:Is Buglioni your brother in law or something?
I'm talking world level here. That's how I judge fighters. I don't come here to talk about club fighters.
We obviously have different perspectives.
Bottom line is guys like Buglioni should not be fighting for world titles. Neither should Duhaupas. Or Eric Molina. I'm speaking toward the STRUCTURE of boxing. That broken thing.
Fine, "Bum" is a fine word to describe a man who risks his health fighting other men to entertain you. And who is better at it than hundreds of others in his particular division.
That's right, that's perfectly apt.
-
handsofstone
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 23087
- Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28
Re: Frank Buglioni
And it wasnt a world titledigzee wrote:He wasn't a mandatory.
Re: Frank Buglioni
complete lack of respect being shown here for a guy that got a shot and took a beating like a man, try lacing them up yourself mate to get a bit of perspective.diddy wrote:How in the hell did this bum become mandatory for a world title ? He sucks!
-
PredatorHayds
- Welterweight
- Posts: 4888
- Joined: 08 Jul 2015, 08:23
Re: Frank Buglioni
I've got no problem with him getting this shot. With it being only the 'regular' title.
He showed great heart. I haven't seen someone take that much of a beating in a British ring coincidentally since Chudinovs brother.
I was surprised how Fresh Frank looked afterwards.
He's been in two FOTY candidates this year in this one and the Markham fight.
Hopefully see him spend a couple of years at domestic level now. A Markham rematch for the commonwealth would be a great place to start.
He showed great heart. I haven't seen someone take that much of a beating in a British ring coincidentally since Chudinovs brother.
I was surprised how Fresh Frank looked afterwards.
He's been in two FOTY candidates this year in this one and the Markham fight.
Hopefully see him spend a couple of years at domestic level now. A Markham rematch for the commonwealth would be a great place to start.
-
Marlo Stanfield
- Middleweight
- Posts: 447
- Joined: 17 Dec 2013, 14:38
Re: Frank Buglioni
He got mullered for 12 rounds - hardly FOTY candidatePredatorHayds wrote:I've got no problem with him getting this shot. With it being only the 'regular' title.
He showed great heart. I haven't seen someone take that much of a beating in a British ring coincidentally since Chudinovs brother.
I was surprised how Fresh Frank looked afterwards.
He's been in two FOTY candidates this year in this one and the Markham fight.
Hopefully see him spend a couple of years at domestic level now. A Markham rematch for the commonwealth would be a great place to start.
Re: Frank Buglioni
littlepug wrote:complete lack of respect being shown here for a guy that got a shot and took a beating like a man, try lacing them up yourself mate to get a bit of perspective.diddy wrote:How in the hell did this bum become mandatory for a world title ? He sucks!
Frank is a decent British,European level fighter with plenty of guts he's not world class but neither are 99% of boxers
Re: Frank Buglioni
In what way is Buglioni European class? He's Area level.stevedoc wrote:![]()
Frank is a decent British,European level fighter with plenty of guts he's not world class but neither are 99% of boxers
Re: Frank Buglioni
I could see frank fighting for the European belt he's not world class or the best In Europe by anyways but what is euro level now the better European fighters are after world titles leaving the European belt for the likes of smith or frank to fight for itHorse wrote:In what way is Buglioni European class? He's Area level.stevedoc wrote:![]()
Frank is a decent British,European level fighter with plenty of guts he's not world class but neither are 99% of boxers
Re: Frank Buglioni
Current EBU champ is Mohoumadi before that Groves and before that Rebrasse. I'd definitely put Buglioni in there with Mohoumadi or Rebrasse and think he'd have a half decent chance. Is this not Euro level??stevedoc wrote:I could see frank fighting for the European belt he's not world class or the best In Europe by anyways but what is euro level now the better European fighters are after world titles leaving the European belt for the likes of smith or frank to fight for itHorse wrote:In what way is Buglioni European class? He's Area level.stevedoc wrote:![]()
Frank is a decent British,European level fighter with plenty of guts he's not world class but neither are 99% of boxers
Re: Frank Buglioni
Sergey Khomitsky is a European level type of fighter and he beat Buglioni easily.stevedoc wrote:I could see frank fighting for the European belt he's not world class or the best In Europe by anyways but what is euro level now the better European fighters are after world titles leaving the European belt for the likes of smith or frank to fight for it
You might think that he can compete with those fighters, but he hasn't proved that he is that level in the ring.danamba7 wrote:Current EBU champ is Mohoumadi before that Groves and before that Rebrasse. I'd definitely put Buglioni in there with Mohoumadi or Rebrasse and think he'd have a half decent chance. Is this not Euro level??
Buglioni is at English title contender level.
Re: Frank Buglioni
would a comparison with matthew hatton be fair ? another gutsy fighter short on natural ability that needed a bit of luck and some careful matchmaking.
-
handsofstone
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 23087
- Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28
Re: Frank Buglioni
I think ive seen every one of Buglioni's fights and he's always value for money,he's at his best when putting on the pressure but thats also when he's most vulnrable because his defence is almost non existent,he needs to learn to pick his spots better,the Collins seem to have him fighting within himself,not just the Chudinov fight,they want to change his style completely instead of tweaking it and his defence is still poor,luckily he has a solid chin and a massive set of testes because if he didint then the Khomitsky KO loss wouldnt be the only 1 on his ledger
-
PredatorHayds
- Welterweight
- Posts: 4888
- Joined: 08 Jul 2015, 08:23
Re: Frank Buglioni
I enjoyed it. It was non stop action.Marlo Stanfield wrote:He got mullered for 12 rounds - hardly FOTY candidatePredatorHayds wrote:I've got no problem with him getting this shot. With it being only the 'regular' title.
He showed great heart. I haven't seen someone take that much of a beating in a British ring coincidentally since Chudinovs brother.
I was surprised how Fresh Frank looked afterwards.
He's been in two FOTY candidates this year in this one and the Markham fight.
Hopefully see him spend a couple of years at domestic level now. A Markham rematch for the commonwealth would be a great place to start.
Buglioni threw a lot of leather aswell.
There was tension and a bit of drama. It wouldn't win my FOTY but it would be around the number 10 mark of the ones I've seen.