Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?
Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?
starting @106 pounds with stones in his pockets to make weight, going up to 147.
from minimumweight till super welterweight when he was boxing margarito.
that is 12 divisions !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! that fact along with his mind blowing run in his prime from 2005-2010, i mean, i remember, people couldnt believe when morales was down, the way he beat cotto, hatton and de la hoya, the combination of speed, power and condition, rarely have we ever seen this in boxing.
from minimumweight till super welterweight when he was boxing margarito.
that is 12 divisions !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! that fact along with his mind blowing run in his prime from 2005-2010, i mean, i remember, people couldnt believe when morales was down, the way he beat cotto, hatton and de la hoya, the combination of speed, power and condition, rarely have we ever seen this in boxing.
Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?
How about that Mayweather guy?
-
punchoutsb
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5842
- Joined: 16 Sep 2009, 01:05
Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?
It was an awesome career no doubt, but not because he's gained weight since age 16...that's pretty common really.Chepppaaa wrote:starting @106 pounds with stones in his pockets to make weight, going up to 147.
from minimumweight till super welterweight when he was boxing margarito.
that is 12 divisions !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! that fact along with his mind blowing run in his prime from 2005-2010, i mean, i remember, people couldnt believe when morales was down, the way he beat cotto, hatton and de la hoya, the combination of speed, power and condition, rarely have we ever seen this in boxing.
Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?
I don't think it's possible to make a case for any fighter having a better resume than Pacquiao since Sugar RL.
Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?
Sure it is. Mayweather is from the same era, and beat Pacquiao by Unanimous Decision. Along with being an Undefeated Boxer who reigned as Champion for 17 years
You could make a case that Pacquiao's overall resume is just as good as his, but I don't think you can make a case that it's better. Not when he went life and death with Juan Manuel Marquez every time they fought, and was ultimately knocked out by him. While Mayweather outboxed him with ease.
I know you'll say...but, but, but Pacquiao was more fun to watch. Yeah he was...but that doesn't make him more accomplished.
You could make a case that Pacquiao's overall resume is just as good as his, but I don't think you can make a case that it's better. Not when he went life and death with Juan Manuel Marquez every time they fought, and was ultimately knocked out by him. While Mayweather outboxed him with ease.
I know you'll say...but, but, but Pacquiao was more fun to watch. Yeah he was...but that doesn't make him more accomplished.
Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?
You can't base a decision on how they both did against 1 like opponent. I always hated that argument. For instance, Floyd struggled badly with ODH but Manny cut right through him like butter so does that now make Manny better? We will never know who was better than who in their prime but I think that Manny winning World Titles in 7 different weight classes is more impressive than a protected 49-0 record in which Floyd came into most of those fights with distinct advantages and now we know there may be PEDs involved. Manny will be the best in the era to me, no matter what happened when they fought well passed their prime.The Revival wrote:Sure it is. Mayweather is from the same era, and beat Pacquiao by Unanimous Decision. Along with being an Undefeated Boxer who reigned as Champion for 17 years
You could make a case that Pacquiao's overall resume is just as good as his, but I don't think you can make a case that it's better. Not when he went life and death with Juan Manuel Marquez every time they fought, and was ultimately knocked out by him. While Mayweather outboxed him with ease.
I know you'll say...but, but, but Pacquiao was more fun to watch. Yeah he was...but that doesn't make him more accomplished.
Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?
The Revival wrote:Sure it is. Mayweather is from the same era, and beat Pacquiao by Unanimous Decision. Along with being an Undefeated Boxer who reigned as Champion for 17 years
You could make a case that Pacquiao's overall resume is just as good as his, but I don't think you can make a case that it's better. Not when he went life and death with Juan Manuel Marquez every time they fought, and was ultimately knocked out by him. While Mayweather outboxed him with ease.
I know you'll say...but, but, but Pacquiao was more fun to watch. Yeah he was...but that doesn't make him more accomplished.
Mayweather doesn't have a single win vs a great fighter in his prime.
Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?
Roy Jones must be up there middle to heavy weight with wins over Hopkins and toney
Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?
Chepppaaa wrote:starting @106 pounds with stones in his pockets to make weight, going up to 147.
from minimumweight till super welterweight when he was boxing margarito.
that is 12 divisions !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! that fact along with his mind blowing run in his prime from 2005-2010, i mean, i remember, people couldnt believe when morales was down, the way he beat cotto, hatton and de la hoya, the combination of speed, power and condition, rarely have we ever seen this in boxing.
- Was he still filling his pockets with stones two months later when he weighed more?
- I imagine many professionals (athletes at that) that gain weight from the time they were 16 until they were 34. (from a child to an adult)
- And yet moving from 160 to 201 is only 5 divisions !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (Imagine if we had these many wights hen guys like Henry Armstrong and George Carpentier were around !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!.
- !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?
Sorry, one more:
- Going from 206 - 247 is only one division !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
- Going from 206 - 247 is only one division !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?
Also Manny destroyed Hatton at 140 while Floyd struggled for the first 6 rounds against Ricky, then there's Cotto who Manny outdid Floyd against so yeah its completely pointless comparing common opponents.caldo2025 wrote:You can't base a decision on how they both did against 1 like opponent. I always hated that argument. For instance, Floyd struggled badly with ODH but Manny cut right through him like butter so does that now make Manny better? We will never know who was better than who in their prime but I think that Manny winning World Titles in 7 different weight classes is more impressive than a protected 49-0 record in which Floyd came into most of those fights with distinct advantages and now we know there may be PEDs involved. Manny will be the best in the era to me, no matter what happened when they fought well passed their prime.The Revival wrote:Sure it is. Mayweather is from the same era, and beat Pacquiao by Unanimous Decision. Along with being an Undefeated Boxer who reigned as Champion for 17 years
You could make a case that Pacquiao's overall resume is just as good as his, but I don't think you can make a case that it's better. Not when he went life and death with Juan Manuel Marquez every time they fought, and was ultimately knocked out by him. While Mayweather outboxed him with ease.
I know you'll say...but, but, but Pacquiao was more fun to watch. Yeah he was...but that doesn't make him more accomplished.
Both have great resumes and it has been an honour and pleasure watching them over the last 15+ years, one was the best defensive boxer of his generation and the other arguable the best offensive and most exciting of his generation (although RJJ might have something to say about that).
Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?
I think his record is better than Leonard's. I think we have to go back to Duran.
Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?
To try and say that Manny's jump from flyweights world champ to light middle champ wasn't extraordinary is futile it is with out doubt the biggest jump any fighter has ever made more than Armstrong or hearnszojo, wrote:Chepppaaa wrote:starting @106 pounds with stones in his pockets to make weight, going up to 147.
from minimumweight till super welterweight when he was boxing margarito.
that is 12 divisions !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! that fact along with his mind blowing run in his prime from 2005-2010, i mean, i remember, people couldnt believe when morales was down, the way he beat cotto, hatton and de la hoya, the combination of speed, power and condition, rarely have we ever seen this in boxing.
- Was he still filling his pockets with stones two months later when he weighed more?
- I imagine many professionals (athletes at that) that gain weight from the time they were 16 until they were 34. (from a child to an adult)
- And yet moving from 160 to 201 is only 5 divisions !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (Imagine if we had these many wights hen guys like Henry Armstrong and George Carpentier were around !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!.
- !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?
That's the most sensible way to view it. Though I disliked the opinion that the Floyd/Manny fight happened 5 years too late, I really think that I was dead wrong. It really was too late for that fight and like an overcooked steak, it's sure didn't taste as good as it could have. 5 years earlier would have been epic and it reminds me of a bunch of fights that happened too late. But personally, something inside me tells me if they ever agreed to a rematch, say in 2016, it would be a lot better fight. Maybe that's the Manny fan inside me thinking that but we just didn't see what we needed to see in that first one. Maybe a rematch would be worse, who knows? But I personally feel that they both need to redeem themselves for that performance. Neither guy left it out there IMO>digzee wrote:
Also Manny destroyed Hatton at 140 while Floyd struggled for the first 6 rounds against Ricky, then there's Cotto who Manny outdid Floyd against so yeah its completely pointless comparing common opponents.
Both have great resumes and it has been an honour and pleasure watching them over the last 15+ years, one was the best defensive boxer of his generation and the other arguable the best offensive and most exciting of his generation (although RJJ might have something to say about that).
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?
sure, just talk about Marquez. forget about pygmies of the boxing world like Morales and Barrera, and Hatton, and Cotto.The Revival wrote:
You could make a case that Pacquiao's overall resume is just as good as his, but I don't think you can make a case that it's better. Not when he went life and death with Juan Manuel Marquez every time they fought, and was ultimately knocked out by him. While Mayweather outboxed him with ease.
.
the answer to the question is yes.
Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?
yeah it is so common to start at minmumweight and go up and fight somebody 1 head taller than you at 154 and go up 12 division, oh yeah, it happens all the time, moron.punchoutsb wrote:It was an awesome career no doubt, but not because he's gained weight since age 16...that's pretty common really.Chepppaaa wrote:starting @106 pounds with stones in his pockets to make weight, going up to 147.
from minimumweight till super welterweight when he was boxing margarito.
that is 12 divisions !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! that fact along with his mind blowing run in his prime from 2005-2010, i mean, i remember, people couldnt believe when morales was down, the way he beat cotto, hatton and de la hoya, the combination of speed, power and condition, rarely have we ever seen this in boxing.
Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?
The Revival wrote:Sure it is. Mayweather is from the same era, and beat Pacquiao by Unanimous Decision. Along with being an Undefeated Boxer who reigned as Champion for 17 years
You could make a case that Pacquiao's overall resume is just as good as his, but I don't think you can make a case that it's better. Not when he went life and death with Juan Manuel Marquez every time they fought, and was ultimately knocked out by him. While Mayweather outboxed him with ease.
I know you'll say...but, but, but Pacquiao was more fun to watch. Yeah he was...but that doesn't make him more accomplished.
but pacquiao was more fun to watch
Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?
look, roy jones is a no brainer, he is #1 the best boxer ever.digzee wrote:Also Manny destroyed Hatton at 140 while Floyd struggled for the first 6 rounds against Ricky, then there's Cotto who Manny outdid Floyd against so yeah its completely pointless comparing common opponents.caldo2025 wrote:You can't base a decision on how they both did against 1 like opponent. I always hated that argument. For instance, Floyd struggled badly with ODH but Manny cut right through him like butter so does that now make Manny better? We will never know who was better than who in their prime but I think that Manny winning World Titles in 7 different weight classes is more impressive than a protected 49-0 record in which Floyd came into most of those fights with distinct advantages and now we know there may be PEDs involved. Manny will be the best in the era to me, no matter what happened when they fought well passed their prime.The Revival wrote:Sure it is. Mayweather is from the same era, and beat Pacquiao by Unanimous Decision. Along with being an Undefeated Boxer who reigned as Champion for 17 years
You could make a case that Pacquiao's overall resume is just as good as his, but I don't think you can make a case that it's better. Not when he went life and death with Juan Manuel Marquez every time they fought, and was ultimately knocked out by him. While Mayweather outboxed him with ease.
I know you'll say...but, but, but Pacquiao was more fun to watch. Yeah he was...but that doesn't make him more accomplished.
Both have great resumes and it has been an honour and pleasure watching them over the last 15+ years, one was the best defensive boxer of his generation and the other arguable the best offensive and most exciting of his generation (although RJJ might have something to say about that).
but i am not talking who the best was, i am only talking about career achievemants.
roy could have easily have had a better career than anybody, pac included. i mean when roy was around in his prime he was better than anybody and he would have beaten anybody. so, its just his fault that he never tried more to fight guys like mcclellan, eubank, prime calzaghe, catchweight fight with prime hopkins, maybe even cruiserweight king RIP juan carlos gamez and lets not forget henry maske or dariusz michalchewski. all i am saying, to me that would have boosted his career big time. but, same like floyd, roy was complicated and didnt want to do this and that.
pacquiao, he did everything. at lower weights against quality, even before facing his first big fight against barrera.
than facing prime marquez, in good shape morales, in good shape barrera, in good shape cotto, than guys much bigger or taller opponents than himself, who nobody wanted to face like clottey & margarito, that achievemant for a 5'5 height guy is eminse.
he just faced everybody and always wanted to face the best, he never shyd away from rime marquez, he always said a million times he wanted prime mayweather, he had the greatest career.
Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?
Ezzard wrote:I think his record is better than Leonard's. I think we have to go back to Duran.
I agree, Pac-man's record is loads better than Leonards by a long way.
Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?
stevedoc wrote:To try and say that Manny's jump from flyweights world champ to light middle champ wasn't extraordinary is futile it is with out doubt the biggest jump any fighter has ever made more than Armstrong or hearnszojo, wrote:Chepppaaa wrote:starting @106 pounds with stones in his pockets to make weight, going up to 147.
from minimumweight till super welterweight when he was boxing margarito.
that is 12 divisions !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! that fact along with his mind blowing run in his prime from 2005-2010, i mean, i remember, people couldnt believe when morales was down, the way he beat cotto, hatton and de la hoya, the combination of speed, power and condition, rarely have we ever seen this in boxing.
- Was he still filling his pockets with stones two months later when he weighed more?
- I imagine many professionals (athletes at that) that gain weight from the time they were 16 until they were 34. (from a child to an adult)
- And yet moving from 160 to 201 is only 5 divisions !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (Imagine if we had these many wights hen guys like Henry Armstrong and George Carpentier were around !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!.
- !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
http://boxrec.com/boxer/10604
-
punchoutsb
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5842
- Joined: 16 Sep 2009, 01:05
Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?
Have you grown at all since age 16? I'm speaking physically, we can all see you haven't mentally.Chepppaaa wrote:yeah it is so common to start at minmumweight and go up and fight somebody 1 head taller than you at 154 and go up 12 division, oh yeah, it happens all the time, moron.punchoutsb wrote:It was an awesome career no doubt, but not because he's gained weight since age 16...that's pretty common really.Chepppaaa wrote:starting @106 pounds with stones in his pockets to make weight, going up to 147.
from minimumweight till super welterweight when he was boxing margarito.
that is 12 divisions !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! that fact along with his mind blowing run in his prime from 2005-2010, i mean, i remember, people couldnt believe when morales was down, the way he beat cotto, hatton and de la hoya, the combination of speed, power and condition, rarely have we ever seen this in boxing.
Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?
OK, I've mentioned Carpentier twice in this thread (the guy did jump a bunch of weightclasses (from 114lbs to 175lbs).
Anywho, as you all know, his match vs. Dempsey was the first boxing match that had a million dollar gate.
Dempsey got a guaranteed $300,000 and George received a guaranteed $200,000
That's a lot of money back them.
However, I found an inflation calculator online that states that $200,000 in 1921 is "only" worth $2,420,742 today.
I guess the top paid boxers of today are paid pretty well compared to their historical brethren.
Anywho, as you all know, his match vs. Dempsey was the first boxing match that had a million dollar gate.
Dempsey got a guaranteed $300,000 and George received a guaranteed $200,000
That's a lot of money back them.
However, I found an inflation calculator online that states that $200,000 in 1921 is "only" worth $2,420,742 today.
I guess the top paid boxers of today are paid pretty well compared to their historical brethren.
-
ttornado
- Heavyweight

Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?
Not 154Chepppaaa wrote: yeah it is so common to start at minmumweight and go up and fight somebody 1 head taller than you at 154 and go up 12 division, oh yeah, it happens all the time, moron.
150 catchweight
Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?
But, what did those guys weigh come fight time?ttornado wrote:Not 154Chepppaaa wrote: yeah it is so common to start at minmumweight and go up and fight somebody 1 head taller than you at 154 and go up 12 division, oh yeah, it happens all the time, moron.
![]()
150 catchweight
Heck, didn't Clotty weigh close to a super-middleweight when he fought Manny?
Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?
We've been lucky as fans to have seen Manny and Floyd in their primes, both are remarkable boxers and very contrasting styles of fighting.