Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?

Chepppaaa
Super Middleweight
Posts: 2626
Joined: 01 Jun 2013, 19:32

Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?

Post by Chepppaaa »

starting @106 pounds with stones in his pockets to make weight, going up to 147.

from minimumweight till super welterweight when he was boxing margarito.

that is 12 divisions !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! that fact along with his mind blowing run in his prime from 2005-2010, i mean, i remember, people couldnt believe when morales was down, the way he beat cotto, hatton and de la hoya, the combination of speed, power and condition, rarely have we ever seen this in boxing.
JCS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6245
Joined: 17 Dec 2004, 13:27

Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?

Post by JCS »

How about that Mayweather guy?
punchoutsb
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5842
Joined: 16 Sep 2009, 01:05

Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?

Post by punchoutsb »

Chepppaaa wrote:starting @106 pounds with stones in his pockets to make weight, going up to 147.

from minimumweight till super welterweight when he was boxing margarito.

that is 12 divisions !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! that fact along with his mind blowing run in his prime from 2005-2010, i mean, i remember, people couldnt believe when morales was down, the way he beat cotto, hatton and de la hoya, the combination of speed, power and condition, rarely have we ever seen this in boxing.
It was an awesome career no doubt, but not because he's gained weight since age 16...that's pretty common really.
Ricky_
Middleweight
Posts: 8896
Joined: 16 Oct 2013, 08:03

Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?

Post by Ricky_ »

I don't think it's possible to make a case for any fighter having a better resume than Pacquiao since Sugar RL.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46556
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?

Post by gilgamesh »

Sure it is. Mayweather is from the same era, and beat Pacquiao by Unanimous Decision. Along with being an Undefeated Boxer who reigned as Champion for 17 years

You could make a case that Pacquiao's overall resume is just as good as his, but I don't think you can make a case that it's better. Not when he went life and death with Juan Manuel Marquez every time they fought, and was ultimately knocked out by him. While Mayweather outboxed him with ease.

I know you'll say...but, but, but Pacquiao was more fun to watch. Yeah he was...but that doesn't make him more accomplished.
caldo2025
Super Welterweight
Posts: 4417
Joined: 16 Dec 2014, 07:37

Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?

Post by caldo2025 »

The Revival wrote:Sure it is. Mayweather is from the same era, and beat Pacquiao by Unanimous Decision. Along with being an Undefeated Boxer who reigned as Champion for 17 years

You could make a case that Pacquiao's overall resume is just as good as his, but I don't think you can make a case that it's better. Not when he went life and death with Juan Manuel Marquez every time they fought, and was ultimately knocked out by him. While Mayweather outboxed him with ease.

I know you'll say...but, but, but Pacquiao was more fun to watch. Yeah he was...but that doesn't make him more accomplished.
You can't base a decision on how they both did against 1 like opponent. I always hated that argument. For instance, Floyd struggled badly with ODH but Manny cut right through him like butter so does that now make Manny better? We will never know who was better than who in their prime but I think that Manny winning World Titles in 7 different weight classes is more impressive than a protected 49-0 record in which Floyd came into most of those fights with distinct advantages and now we know there may be PEDs involved. Manny will be the best in the era to me, no matter what happened when they fought well passed their prime.
Ricky_
Middleweight
Posts: 8896
Joined: 16 Oct 2013, 08:03

Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?

Post by Ricky_ »

The Revival wrote:Sure it is. Mayweather is from the same era, and beat Pacquiao by Unanimous Decision. Along with being an Undefeated Boxer who reigned as Champion for 17 years

You could make a case that Pacquiao's overall resume is just as good as his, but I don't think you can make a case that it's better. Not when he went life and death with Juan Manuel Marquez every time they fought, and was ultimately knocked out by him. While Mayweather outboxed him with ease.

I know you'll say...but, but, but Pacquiao was more fun to watch. Yeah he was...but that doesn't make him more accomplished.


Mayweather doesn't have a single win vs a great fighter in his prime.
stevedoc
Super Middleweight
Posts: 3550
Joined: 24 May 2013, 07:40

Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?

Post by stevedoc »

Roy Jones must be up there middle to heavy weight with wins over Hopkins and toney
zojo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 951
Joined: 29 Dec 2001, 20:00

Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?

Post by zojo »

Chepppaaa wrote:starting @106 pounds with stones in his pockets to make weight, going up to 147.

from minimumweight till super welterweight when he was boxing margarito.

that is 12 divisions !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! that fact along with his mind blowing run in his prime from 2005-2010, i mean, i remember, people couldnt believe when morales was down, the way he beat cotto, hatton and de la hoya, the combination of speed, power and condition, rarely have we ever seen this in boxing.

- Was he still filling his pockets with stones two months later when he weighed more?

- I imagine many professionals (athletes at that) that gain weight from the time they were 16 until they were 34. (from a child to an adult)

- And yet moving from 160 to 201 is only 5 divisions !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (Imagine if we had these many wights hen guys like Henry Armstrong and George Carpentier were around !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!.

- !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
zojo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 951
Joined: 29 Dec 2001, 20:00

Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?

Post by zojo »

Sorry, one more:

- Going from 206 - 247 is only one division !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
digzee
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1582
Joined: 11 Nov 2008, 13:49

Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?

Post by digzee »

caldo2025 wrote:
The Revival wrote:Sure it is. Mayweather is from the same era, and beat Pacquiao by Unanimous Decision. Along with being an Undefeated Boxer who reigned as Champion for 17 years

You could make a case that Pacquiao's overall resume is just as good as his, but I don't think you can make a case that it's better. Not when he went life and death with Juan Manuel Marquez every time they fought, and was ultimately knocked out by him. While Mayweather outboxed him with ease.

I know you'll say...but, but, but Pacquiao was more fun to watch. Yeah he was...but that doesn't make him more accomplished.
You can't base a decision on how they both did against 1 like opponent. I always hated that argument. For instance, Floyd struggled badly with ODH but Manny cut right through him like butter so does that now make Manny better? We will never know who was better than who in their prime but I think that Manny winning World Titles in 7 different weight classes is more impressive than a protected 49-0 record in which Floyd came into most of those fights with distinct advantages and now we know there may be PEDs involved. Manny will be the best in the era to me, no matter what happened when they fought well passed their prime.
Also Manny destroyed Hatton at 140 while Floyd struggled for the first 6 rounds against Ricky, then there's Cotto who Manny outdid Floyd against so yeah its completely pointless comparing common opponents.

Both have great resumes and it has been an honour and pleasure watching them over the last 15+ years, one was the best defensive boxer of his generation and the other arguable the best offensive and most exciting of his generation (although RJJ might have something to say about that).
Ezzard
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11173
Joined: 12 May 2005, 09:20

Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?

Post by Ezzard »

I think his record is better than Leonard's. I think we have to go back to Duran.
stevedoc
Super Middleweight
Posts: 3550
Joined: 24 May 2013, 07:40

Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?

Post by stevedoc »

zojo, wrote:
Chepppaaa wrote:starting @106 pounds with stones in his pockets to make weight, going up to 147.

from minimumweight till super welterweight when he was boxing margarito.

that is 12 divisions !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! that fact along with his mind blowing run in his prime from 2005-2010, i mean, i remember, people couldnt believe when morales was down, the way he beat cotto, hatton and de la hoya, the combination of speed, power and condition, rarely have we ever seen this in boxing.

- Was he still filling his pockets with stones two months later when he weighed more?

- I imagine many professionals (athletes at that) that gain weight from the time they were 16 until they were 34. (from a child to an adult)

- And yet moving from 160 to 201 is only 5 divisions !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (Imagine if we had these many wights hen guys like Henry Armstrong and George Carpentier were around !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!.

- !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
To try and say that Manny's jump from flyweights world champ to light middle champ wasn't extraordinary is futile it is with out doubt the biggest jump any fighter has ever made more than Armstrong or hearns
caldo2025
Super Welterweight
Posts: 4417
Joined: 16 Dec 2014, 07:37

Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?

Post by caldo2025 »

digzee wrote:
Also Manny destroyed Hatton at 140 while Floyd struggled for the first 6 rounds against Ricky, then there's Cotto who Manny outdid Floyd against so yeah its completely pointless comparing common opponents.

Both have great resumes and it has been an honour and pleasure watching them over the last 15+ years, one was the best defensive boxer of his generation and the other arguable the best offensive and most exciting of his generation (although RJJ might have something to say about that).
That's the most sensible way to view it. Though I disliked the opinion that the Floyd/Manny fight happened 5 years too late, I really think that I was dead wrong. It really was too late for that fight and like an overcooked steak, it's sure didn't taste as good as it could have. 5 years earlier would have been epic and it reminds me of a bunch of fights that happened too late. But personally, something inside me tells me if they ever agreed to a rematch, say in 2016, it would be a lot better fight. Maybe that's the Manny fan inside me thinking that but we just didn't see what we needed to see in that first one. Maybe a rematch would be worse, who knows? But I personally feel that they both need to redeem themselves for that performance. Neither guy left it out there IMO>
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?

Post by Counter-puncher »

The Revival wrote:
You could make a case that Pacquiao's overall resume is just as good as his, but I don't think you can make a case that it's better. Not when he went life and death with Juan Manuel Marquez every time they fought, and was ultimately knocked out by him. While Mayweather outboxed him with ease.
.
sure, just talk about Marquez. forget about pygmies of the boxing world like Morales and Barrera, and Hatton, and Cotto.

the answer to the question is yes.
Chepppaaa
Super Middleweight
Posts: 2626
Joined: 01 Jun 2013, 19:32

Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?

Post by Chepppaaa »

punchoutsb wrote:
Chepppaaa wrote:starting @106 pounds with stones in his pockets to make weight, going up to 147.

from minimumweight till super welterweight when he was boxing margarito.

that is 12 divisions !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! that fact along with his mind blowing run in his prime from 2005-2010, i mean, i remember, people couldnt believe when morales was down, the way he beat cotto, hatton and de la hoya, the combination of speed, power and condition, rarely have we ever seen this in boxing.
It was an awesome career no doubt, but not because he's gained weight since age 16...that's pretty common really.
yeah it is so common to start at minmumweight and go up and fight somebody 1 head taller than you at 154 and go up 12 division, oh yeah, it happens all the time, moron.
Chepppaaa
Super Middleweight
Posts: 2626
Joined: 01 Jun 2013, 19:32

Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?

Post by Chepppaaa »

The Revival wrote:Sure it is. Mayweather is from the same era, and beat Pacquiao by Unanimous Decision. Along with being an Undefeated Boxer who reigned as Champion for 17 years

You could make a case that Pacquiao's overall resume is just as good as his, but I don't think you can make a case that it's better. Not when he went life and death with Juan Manuel Marquez every time they fought, and was ultimately knocked out by him. While Mayweather outboxed him with ease.

I know you'll say...but, but, but Pacquiao was more fun to watch. Yeah he was...but that doesn't make him more accomplished.

but pacquiao was more fun to watch
Chepppaaa
Super Middleweight
Posts: 2626
Joined: 01 Jun 2013, 19:32

Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?

Post by Chepppaaa »

digzee wrote:
caldo2025 wrote:
The Revival wrote:Sure it is. Mayweather is from the same era, and beat Pacquiao by Unanimous Decision. Along with being an Undefeated Boxer who reigned as Champion for 17 years

You could make a case that Pacquiao's overall resume is just as good as his, but I don't think you can make a case that it's better. Not when he went life and death with Juan Manuel Marquez every time they fought, and was ultimately knocked out by him. While Mayweather outboxed him with ease.

I know you'll say...but, but, but Pacquiao was more fun to watch. Yeah he was...but that doesn't make him more accomplished.
You can't base a decision on how they both did against 1 like opponent. I always hated that argument. For instance, Floyd struggled badly with ODH but Manny cut right through him like butter so does that now make Manny better? We will never know who was better than who in their prime but I think that Manny winning World Titles in 7 different weight classes is more impressive than a protected 49-0 record in which Floyd came into most of those fights with distinct advantages and now we know there may be PEDs involved. Manny will be the best in the era to me, no matter what happened when they fought well passed their prime.
Also Manny destroyed Hatton at 140 while Floyd struggled for the first 6 rounds against Ricky, then there's Cotto who Manny outdid Floyd against so yeah its completely pointless comparing common opponents.

Both have great resumes and it has been an honour and pleasure watching them over the last 15+ years, one was the best defensive boxer of his generation and the other arguable the best offensive and most exciting of his generation (although RJJ might have something to say about that).
look, roy jones is a no brainer, he is #1 the best boxer ever.

but i am not talking who the best was, i am only talking about career achievemants.

roy could have easily have had a better career than anybody, pac included. i mean when roy was around in his prime he was better than anybody and he would have beaten anybody. so, its just his fault that he never tried more to fight guys like mcclellan, eubank, prime calzaghe, catchweight fight with prime hopkins, maybe even cruiserweight king RIP juan carlos gamez and lets not forget henry maske or dariusz michalchewski. all i am saying, to me that would have boosted his career big time. but, same like floyd, roy was complicated and didnt want to do this and that.

pacquiao, he did everything. at lower weights against quality, even before facing his first big fight against barrera.

than facing prime marquez, in good shape morales, in good shape barrera, in good shape cotto, than guys much bigger or taller opponents than himself, who nobody wanted to face like clottey & margarito, that achievemant for a 5'5 height guy is eminse.

he just faced everybody and always wanted to face the best, he never shyd away from rime marquez, he always said a million times he wanted prime mayweather, he had the greatest career.
Rexob
Middleweight
Posts: 6025
Joined: 20 Mar 2014, 15:17

Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?

Post by Rexob »

Ezzard wrote:I think his record is better than Leonard's. I think we have to go back to Duran.


I agree, Pac-man's record is loads better than Leonards by a long way.
zojo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 951
Joined: 29 Dec 2001, 20:00

Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?

Post by zojo »

stevedoc wrote:
zojo, wrote:
Chepppaaa wrote:starting @106 pounds with stones in his pockets to make weight, going up to 147.

from minimumweight till super welterweight when he was boxing margarito.

that is 12 divisions !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! that fact along with his mind blowing run in his prime from 2005-2010, i mean, i remember, people couldnt believe when morales was down, the way he beat cotto, hatton and de la hoya, the combination of speed, power and condition, rarely have we ever seen this in boxing.

- Was he still filling his pockets with stones two months later when he weighed more?

- I imagine many professionals (athletes at that) that gain weight from the time they were 16 until they were 34. (from a child to an adult)

- And yet moving from 160 to 201 is only 5 divisions !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (Imagine if we had these many wights hen guys like Henry Armstrong and George Carpentier were around !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!.

- !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
To try and say that Manny's jump from flyweights world champ to light middle champ wasn't extraordinary is futile it is with out doubt the biggest jump any fighter has ever made more than Armstrong or hearns

http://boxrec.com/boxer/10604
punchoutsb
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5842
Joined: 16 Sep 2009, 01:05

Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?

Post by punchoutsb »

Chepppaaa wrote:
punchoutsb wrote:
Chepppaaa wrote:starting @106 pounds with stones in his pockets to make weight, going up to 147.

from minimumweight till super welterweight when he was boxing margarito.

that is 12 divisions !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! that fact along with his mind blowing run in his prime from 2005-2010, i mean, i remember, people couldnt believe when morales was down, the way he beat cotto, hatton and de la hoya, the combination of speed, power and condition, rarely have we ever seen this in boxing.
It was an awesome career no doubt, but not because he's gained weight since age 16...that's pretty common really.
yeah it is so common to start at minmumweight and go up and fight somebody 1 head taller than you at 154 and go up 12 division, oh yeah, it happens all the time, moron.
Have you grown at all since age 16? I'm speaking physically, we can all see you haven't mentally.
zojo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 951
Joined: 29 Dec 2001, 20:00

Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?

Post by zojo »

OK, I've mentioned Carpentier twice in this thread (the guy did jump a bunch of weightclasses (from 114lbs to 175lbs).

Anywho, as you all know, his match vs. Dempsey was the first boxing match that had a million dollar gate.

Dempsey got a guaranteed $300,000 and George received a guaranteed $200,000

That's a lot of money back them.

However, I found an inflation calculator online that states that $200,000 in 1921 is "only" worth $2,420,742 today.

I guess the top paid boxers of today are paid pretty well compared to their historical brethren.
ttornado
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?

Post by ttornado »

Chepppaaa wrote: yeah it is so common to start at minmumweight and go up and fight somebody 1 head taller than you at 154 and go up 12 division, oh yeah, it happens all the time, moron.
Not 154
:shame:
150 catchweight
zojo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 951
Joined: 29 Dec 2001, 20:00

Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?

Post by zojo »

ttornado wrote:
Chepppaaa wrote: yeah it is so common to start at minmumweight and go up and fight somebody 1 head taller than you at 154 and go up 12 division, oh yeah, it happens all the time, moron.
Not 154
:shame:
150 catchweight
But, what did those guys weigh come fight time?

Heck, didn't Clotty weigh close to a super-middleweight when he fought Manny?
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?

Post by palooka »

We've been lucky as fans to have seen Manny and Floyd in their primes, both are remarkable boxers and very contrasting styles of fighting.
Post Reply