Fighters that are/were low risk - high reward?

Post Reply
salaambrown
Middleweight
Posts: 56
Joined: 12 Jun 2014, 11:19

Fighters that are/were low risk - high reward?

Post by salaambrown »

It's an odd question, most of the time fighters are high risk-low reward. But are there instances where fighters are low risk - high reward even in terms of media popularity too.
Haye beating Harrison was one instance of low risk - high reward in terms of popularity in the media (not rankings or acheivements lol) , Audley was known to the british public and the fight was sold a a domestic showdown, Haye was always going to win that fight.

Any others come to mind?
ikorolev
Middleweight
Posts: 4895
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 19:08

Re: Fighters that are/were low risk - high reward?

Post by ikorolev »

Chavez Jr, for example for Fonfara.
Lenny Cravats
Super Middleweight
Posts: 8006
Joined: 23 Feb 2013, 10:43

Re: Fighters that are/were low risk - high reward?

Post by Lenny Cravats »

Ronal Wright for Qullin?

I'm thinking along the lines of fellas that used to be good before becoming ancient.

Maybe it was the way it was done, but Green demolishing RJJr helped him get his name out.
Crease
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16865
Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 10:19

Re: Fighters that are/were low risk - high reward?

Post by Crease »

Low risk for high reward? Let's see...

Immediately what comes to my mind is Juergen Braehmer for the Light Heavies - Stevenson or Kovalev. It would be attaining a credible name on their resume along with the WBA Regular World title at that weight class. Braehmer isn't the fighter that some people think he is.

Dereck Chisora for Anthony Joshua. Chisora is a former World Heavyweight title challenger & former European Heavyweight Champion. He's practically a spent-force at the top level nowadays and he'd make for easy picking for AJ. And further proof that he is rapidly surpassing British level fighters.

That's all for now.
ikorolev
Middleweight
Posts: 4895
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 19:08

Re: Fighters that are/were low risk - high reward?

Post by ikorolev »

Sturm has always been lower risk/higher reward for best middleweights which is why he avoided them. Current faded SMW Sturm is still high reward and very low risk for top SMWs, and Fedor Chudinov is collecting that premium.
salaambrown
Middleweight
Posts: 56
Joined: 12 Jun 2014, 11:19

Re: Fighters that are/were low risk - high reward?

Post by salaambrown »

Crease wrote:Low risk for high reward? Let's see...

Immediately what comes to my mind is Juergen Braehmer for the Light Heavies - Stevenson or Kovalev. It would be attaining a credible name on their resume along with the WBA Regular World title at that weight class. Braehmer isn't the fighter that some people think he is.

Dereck Chisora for Anthony Joshua. Chisora is a former World Heavyweight title challenger & former European Heavyweight Champion. He's practically a spent-force at the top level nowadays and he'd make for easy picking for AJ. And further proof that he is rapidly surpassing British level fighters.

That's all for now.
Yep agree, Braehmer is not someone the Boxing fans should be applauding. The definition of milking a world title. Sauerlands have played their part in that too.
Brandon Rios is becoming a high reward fighter, he is very basic and a solid name to have on a resume. Many WW should beat him on movement alone!
IKSRTFO
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4759
Joined: 09 Dec 2007, 17:14

Re: Fighters that are/were low risk - high reward?

Post by IKSRTFO »

Vic Darchinyan: Up until now, he was the come up for the up and comers
Jorge Arce: Same with Darchinyan
Berto: The come up to a Floyd fight for anyone including himself
Malignaggi - Question is how good you can do against him
Chavez above 168 - His greatest asset (weight advantage) is minimized.
Mayorga - People thought he was so dangerous simply based off his Forrest victories. Truth his, he never even remotely hurt any top opponent.
Tony1244
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 24714
Joined: 03 Jun 2010, 21:31

Re: Fighters that are/were low risk - high reward?

Post by Tony1244 »

Fighting Roberto Duran in the last few years of his career. Duran still had his name which was just about all.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46556
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Fighters that are/were low risk - high reward?

Post by gilgamesh »

Adrien Broner

Ricardo Mayorga definitely milked his two wins over Forrest for all they were worth, and so did potential opponents of his

I can't figure Antonio Tarver or Steve Cunningham would be all that likely to beat any Top 10 or Top 5 guys at Heavyweight, but they're known enough that it'd probably be a decent payday.
PredatorHayds
Welterweight
Posts: 4888
Joined: 08 Jul 2015, 08:23

Re: Fighters that are/were low risk - high reward?

Post by PredatorHayds »

I'd say Provodnikov is low risk high reward now since he stopped moving his head and walking in straight lines. Target practise.

Shannon Briggs is one that springs to mind. Good cash cow for Wilder.

Fighting Anthony Mundine in Australia is a fight that makes money against limited opposition.
digzee
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1582
Joined: 11 Nov 2008, 13:49

Re: Fighters that are/were low risk - high reward?

Post by digzee »

Amir Khan for Brook, massive money and there's no chance Khan wont get knocked clean out.
IKSRTFO
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4759
Joined: 09 Dec 2007, 17:14

Re: Fighters that are/were low risk - high reward?

Post by IKSRTFO »

digzee wrote:Amir Khan for Brook, massive money and there's no chance Khan wont get knocked clean out.

Khan is an extremely tough fight if you are a boxer with no accuracy or power like Alexander.
digzee
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1582
Joined: 11 Nov 2008, 13:49

Re: Fighters that are/were low risk - high reward?

Post by digzee »

IKSRTFO wrote:
digzee wrote:Amir Khan for Brook, massive money and there's no chance Khan wont get knocked clean out.

Khan is an extremely tough fight if you are a boxer with no accuracy or power like Alexander.
Which is why I only mentioned Brook. The money in that fight is huge and Kell has great timing and very good punching power, which is why Khan hasn't faced him or any other big hitter in the division, he knows Kell will knock him out.
Chepppaaa
Super Middleweight
Posts: 2626
Joined: 01 Jun 2013, 19:32

Re: Fighters that are/were low risk - high reward?

Post by Chepppaaa »

de la hoya for X
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Fighters that are/were low risk - high reward?

Post by Counter-puncher »

Alvarez and de la Hoya for Floyd.
salaambrown
Middleweight
Posts: 56
Joined: 12 Jun 2014, 11:19

Re: Fighters that are/were low risk - high reward?

Post by salaambrown »

Counter-puncher wrote:Alvarez and de la Hoya for Floyd.
Disagree with the De la Hoya fight, it was a SD! Pretty risky imo!
Perseus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3200
Joined: 26 Jul 2007, 03:58

Re: Fighters that are/were low risk - high reward?

Post by Perseus »

Arturo Gatti
caldo2025
Super Welterweight
Posts: 4417
Joined: 16 Dec 2014, 07:37

Re: Fighters that are/were low risk - high reward?

Post by caldo2025 »

Gabriel Rosado is definitely someone that I would put in this category. He has a pretty nice following for a guy with so many losses. His fights are usually entertaining and you can bet on some blood as he probably bleeds rubbing his eyes in the morning. But he's like Special Delivery Jones back in the WWF days. He always gave the other star wrestlers a good match but would always get pinned in the end.
Post Reply