Should Pacquiao have stayed at 140lb/Jnr. Welterweight?

Post Reply
Ricky_
Middleweight
Posts: 8896
Joined: 16 Oct 2013, 08:03

Should Pacquiao have stayed at 140lb/Jnr. Welterweight?

Post by Ricky_ »

Pacquiao's sensational 6-minute demolishing of Ricky Hatton:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jzhlxMF02bM


This was Pacquiao's one and only fight in the 140lb/10-stone division, yet I believe this to be Pacquiao at his physical peak.

Do you think he would have been served, from a longevity stand-point, to dominate the 140lb division instead of gaining more muscle mass to compete at Welter? Did the temptation of facing the much bigger Cotto, Margarito and Mosley serve to diminish Pacquiao's physical prime?
tiny_acres
Middleweight
Posts: 9463
Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43

Re: Should Pacquiao have stayed at 140lb/Jnr. Welterweight?

Post by tiny_acres »

Physically yes 140 was a great weight for him.
But financially he tore it up at 147.I do not blame him for going for the money bouts.
Undefeated49-0
Welterweight
Posts: 1192
Joined: 13 Nov 2015, 14:36

Re: Should Pacquiao have stayed at 140lb/Jnr. Welterweight?

Post by Undefeated49-0 »

No, Pacquiao proved his greatness by moving up and beating bigger opponents. If he stayed at 140 then all we would've heard is talk of how he never challenged himself with the bigger guys. Nothing he did diminished him, if anything it made him stronger.
koolkc107
Middleweight
Posts: 2032
Joined: 31 Oct 2013, 10:54

Re: Should Pacquiao have stayed at 140lb/Jnr. Welterweight?

Post by koolkc107 »

He would have never been able to.

He's been rehydrating to welter since his days as a super featherweight.

I bet he won't ever try to make 140 now, even tho there are some big fight there for him.

'Cause he can't.

He is short. Not small.
Ricky_
Middleweight
Posts: 8896
Joined: 16 Oct 2013, 08:03

Re: Should Pacquiao have stayed at 140lb/Jnr. Welterweight?

Post by Ricky_ »

koolkc107 wrote:He would have never been able to.
:lol:

Did you post as Brut account 1 then contradict yourself from Brut account 2 to make it more believable?
koolkc107
Middleweight
Posts: 2032
Joined: 31 Oct 2013, 10:54

Re: Should Pacquiao have stayed at 140lb/Jnr. Welterweight?

Post by koolkc107 »

Ricky_ wrote:
koolkc107 wrote:He would have never been able to.
:lol:

Did you post as Brut account 1 then contradict yourself from Brut account 2 to make it more believable?
You going to MAN-UP and put your money where your mouth is?

Or should I say your parent's money...

$200.

If I post under more than one screenname here, I send $200 per name to BoxRec.

If not, you donate $200 to this site.

That goes for everyone who wants to try their luck.
BAD INTENTIONS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1885
Joined: 22 Oct 2005, 17:45

Re: Should Pacquiao have stayed at 140lb/Jnr. Welterweight?

Post by BAD INTENTIONS »

Let's see ... how do you improve on a legendary career?
sucracristo
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1828
Joined: 24 Dec 2011, 23:47

Re: Should Pacquiao have stayed at 140lb/Jnr. Welterweight?

Post by sucracristo »

koolkc107 wrote:
Ricky_ wrote:
koolkc107 wrote:He would have never been able to.
:lol:

Did you post as Brut account 1 then contradict yourself from Brut account 2 to make it more believable?
You going to MAN-UP and put your money where your mouth is?

Or should I say your parent's money...

$200.

If I post under more than one screenname here, I send $200 per name to BoxRec.

If not, you donate $200 to this site.

That goes for everyone who wants to try their luck.
how would one go about proving to everyone here that they don't have multiple usernames?
is that what you are offering to do?
Monte Fisto
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2978
Joined: 23 Jan 2011, 15:36

Re: Should Pacquiao have stayed at 140lb/Jnr. Welterweight?

Post by Monte Fisto »

this is the mark of the man, he chased exciting fights at whatever weight he needed to. Pacman is a legend, no denying.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22334
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Should Pacquiao have stayed at 140lb/Jnr. Welterweight?

Post by Horse »

Why is everyone so obsessed with Brut?
IKSRTFO
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4759
Joined: 09 Dec 2007, 17:14

Re: Should Pacquiao have stayed at 140lb/Jnr. Welterweight?

Post by IKSRTFO »

koolkc107 wrote:He would have never been able to.

He's been rehydrating to welter since his days as a super featherweight.

I bet he won't ever try to make 140 now, even tho there are some big fight there for him.

'Cause he can't.

He is short. Not small.
:lol:

Like he made 143 with no problem for Chris Algeri and Marquez? He's only weight above 147 at a weigh in twice...and came in lower after that.
Bobbyptsd
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1858
Joined: 24 Apr 2011, 00:58

Re: Should Pacquiao have stayed at 140lb/Jnr. Welterweight?

Post by Bobbyptsd »

tiny_acres wrote:Physically yes 140 was a great weight for him.
But financially he tore it up at 147.I do not blame him for going for the money bouts.
I would go along these lines. I think he could have continued to dominate at 140 (and by that I mean not take the losses he has, great as he has been), but he made an awful lot more money by going up.

Then again when I think about it, it's not like those few extra pounds would have made much difference either way, so he would have had to stay at 140/avoid fighting JMM again for my scenario to work out.
koolkc107
Middleweight
Posts: 2032
Joined: 31 Oct 2013, 10:54

Re: Should Pacquiao have stayed at 140lb/Jnr. Welterweight?

Post by koolkc107 »

sucracristo wrote:
koolkc107 wrote:
Ricky_ wrote:
:lol:

Did you post as Brut account 1 then contradict yourself from Brut account 2 to make it more believable?
You going to MAN-UP and put your money where your mouth is?

Or should I say your parent's money...

$200.

If I post under more than one screenname here, I send $200 per name to BoxRec.

If not, you donate $200 to this site.

That goes for everyone who wants to try their luck.
how would one go about proving to everyone here that they don't have multiple usernames?
is that what you are offering to do?
Whatever proof the accuser finds sufficient will be given after the admin has their $200

That can include IP addresses, a conference call with all the usernames, whatever is ample proof to any rational person.

I am certain the admins would have some good ideas about what would constitute proof.
Bobbyptsd
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1858
Joined: 24 Apr 2011, 00:58

Re: Should Pacquiao have stayed at 140lb/Jnr. Welterweight?

Post by Bobbyptsd »

Brut is everywhere. I turned on my tv today, and I saw Charlie Sheen, but deep down, I knew it was Brut.
sucracristo
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1828
Joined: 24 Dec 2011, 23:47

Re: Should Pacquiao have stayed at 140lb/Jnr. Welterweight?

Post by sucracristo »

Bobbyptsd wrote:Brut is everywhere. I turned on my tv today, and I saw Charlie Sheen, but deep down, I knew it was Brut.
winning
Post Reply