Linares vs Zlaticanin WBC/RING magazine lightweight title

davor1
Super Middleweight
Posts: 84
Joined: 15 Apr 2013, 05:14

Linares vs Zlaticanin WBC/RING magazine lightweight title

Post by davor1 »

WBC ordered Jorge Linares to start negotiations with mandatory challenger Dejan Zlaticanin.
Re-up Gang
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 106
Joined: 23 Oct 2008, 06:32

Re: Linares vs Zlaticanin WBC/RING magazine lightweight title

Post by Re-up Gang »

good fight. zlaticanin by ko or liners pts
forestbox
Welterweight
Posts: 210
Joined: 02 Nov 2015, 11:46

Re: Linares vs Zlaticanin WBC/RING magazine lightweight title

Post by forestbox »

good fight linares needs to watch that zlaticanin left hook was lethal v burns
PredatorHayds
Welterweight
Posts: 4888
Joined: 08 Jul 2015, 08:23

Re: Linares vs Zlaticanin WBC/RING magazine lightweight title

Post by PredatorHayds »

Great fight. Proper 50/50. I'm siding with Linares.
Just think he can catch him coming in. I can see Linares getting hurt as usual but still holding on to win a close decision.
Jpreisser
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 483
Joined: 24 Jun 2010, 14:53

Re: Linares vs Zlaticanin WBC/RING magazine lightweight title

Post by Jpreisser »

I like this fight. Linares should outbox him for the most part, but Zlaticanin will be dangerous throughout.
Taansend
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11890
Joined: 10 Jul 2004, 17:38

Re: Linares vs Zlaticanin WBC/RING magazine lightweight title

Post by Taansend »

Why isn't Zlaticanin ranked in the Boxrec European rankings?

Or is he & I missed him :oops:
keirw
Middleweight
Posts: 2681
Joined: 03 Nov 2013, 10:55

Re: Linares vs Zlaticanin WBC/RING magazine lightweight title

Post by keirw »

Good fight, Zlaticanin is a dangerous puncher and Linares is a very clever boxer.
I feel Zlaticanin needs to catch him early because it takes Linares a few rounds to get into a fight usually, but once he is in his rhythm he is very difficult to beat.
Boxing Prospect
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6592
Joined: 25 Jun 2012, 14:35

Re: Linares vs Zlaticanin WBC/RING magazine lightweight title

Post by Boxing Prospect »

Linares can be a slow starter but interestingly he has NEVER completed a 12 rounder. The closest he came was against DeMarco, where he was stopped in round 11. That's the only time he has EVER been beyond 10 rounds.
Datsue
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Linares vs Zlaticanin WBC/RING magazine lightweight title

Post by Datsue »

Brilliant fight on paper. Zlati via KO or Linares on points seem the sane bets.
davor1
Super Middleweight
Posts: 84
Joined: 15 Apr 2013, 05:14

Re: Linares vs Zlaticanin WBC/RING magazine lightweight title

Post by davor1 »

Taansend wrote:Why isn't Zlaticanin ranked in the Boxrec European rankings?

Or is he & I missed him :oops:
I dont know why. And I was try to find him in European rankings
jujigatame
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7473
Joined: 30 Oct 2004, 21:08

Re: Linares vs Zlaticanin WBC/RING magazine lightweight title

Post by jujigatame »

Good fight although rating Zlaticanin #2 based on that one win over Burns is somewhat dubious.
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Linares vs Zlaticanin WBC/RING magazine lightweight title

Post by expe »

How the fornicate is this for the Ring title?
Taansend
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11890
Joined: 10 Jul 2004, 17:38

Re: Linares vs Zlaticanin WBC/RING magazine lightweight title

Post by Taansend »

jujigatame wrote:Good fight although rating Zlaticanin #2 based on that one win over Burns is somewhat dubious.
Isn't his ranking also based on his win over the undefeated Ivan Redkach?
jujigatame
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7473
Joined: 30 Oct 2004, 21:08

Re: Linares vs Zlaticanin WBC/RING magazine lightweight title

Post by jujigatame »

expe wrote:How the eff is this for the Ring title?
Because as I said they somehow have Zlaticanin #2 at 135, ahead of Flanagan and Shafikov.

They also have Sharif Bogere at #4 which I can only assume is because of his unconvincing win over Beltran 4 and a half years ago.
jujigatame
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7473
Joined: 30 Oct 2004, 21:08

Re: Linares vs Zlaticanin WBC/RING magazine lightweight title

Post by jujigatame »

Taansend wrote:
jujigatame wrote:Good fight although rating Zlaticanin #2 based on that one win over Burns is somewhat dubious.
Isn't his ranking also based on his win over the undefeated Ivan Redkach?
I guess so, but Redkach hadn't actually fought anyone decent yet. He was undefeated but untested.
Andrew
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6108
Joined: 17 Jul 2012, 09:31

Re: Linares vs Zlaticanin WBC/RING magazine lightweight title

Post by Andrew »

jujigatame wrote:
Taansend wrote:
jujigatame wrote:Good fight although rating Zlaticanin #2 based on that one win over Burns is somewhat dubious.
Isn't his ranking also based on his win over the undefeated Ivan Redkach?
I guess so, but Redkach hadn't actually fought anyone decent yet. He was undefeated but untested.
True though Zlaticanin destroyed him. Even though Burns seemed fairly shot v Zlaticanin he did do well against Figueroa. Dejan deserves credit for that win Scotland's a tough place to fight as the away fighter.

Can't see how he is 2nd but looking at who's at the weight I'd say he's around top 10 got a solid look about him and he would give all the others a tough fight.
jujigatame
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7473
Joined: 30 Oct 2004, 21:08

Re: Linares vs Zlaticanin WBC/RING magazine lightweight title

Post by jujigatame »

Oh he's legit for sure, just not sure #2 is warranted for him right now. Maybe somewhere in the middle of the top 10 would be more appropriate.
Batley18
Super Middleweight
Posts: 567
Joined: 18 Sep 2012, 06:29

Re: Linares vs Zlaticanin WBC/RING magazine lightweight title

Post by Batley18 »

Interesting to see if he can step it up. Certainly looks to have some telnet, but Linares is a battling champ. I am going for a successful UD defence
Bobbyptsd
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1858
Joined: 24 Apr 2011, 00:58

Re: Linares vs Zlaticanin WBC/RING magazine lightweight title

Post by Bobbyptsd »

expe wrote:How the eff is this for the Ring title?
Who promotes Linares?
Taansend
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11890
Joined: 10 Jul 2004, 17:38

Re: Linares vs Zlaticanin WBC/RING magazine lightweight title

Post by Taansend »

jujigatame wrote:
Taansend wrote:
jujigatame wrote:Good fight although rating Zlaticanin #2 based on that one win over Burns is somewhat dubious.
Isn't his ranking also based on his win over the undefeated Ivan Redkach?
I guess so, but Redkach hadn't actually fought anyone decent yet. He was undefeated but untested.
So his ranking is based on beating an ex World Champion & an undefeated fighter who had beaten a couple of ranked fighters.

Not what I would call dubious, especially when you consider that there are four (plus) titles.
Datsue
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Linares vs Zlaticanin WBC/RING magazine lightweight title

Post by Datsue »

Bobbyptsd wrote:
expe wrote:How the eff is this for the Ring title?
Who promotes Linares?

:TU: :OhYes:
jujigatame
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7473
Joined: 30 Oct 2004, 21:08

Re: Linares vs Zlaticanin WBC/RING magazine lightweight title

Post by jujigatame »

Taansend wrote:
So his ranking is based on beating an ex World Champion & an undefeated fighter who had beaten a couple of ranked fighters.

Not what I would call dubious, especially when you consider that there are four (plus) titles.
The win over Burns was a close win. And this was after Crawford dismantled him and he got a gift draw against Beltran.

Redkach did not beat anyone "ranked". At least not ranked by anyone meaningful. His record was 100% nobodies.

Zlaticanin is good. I just don't think he's the #2 guy in the division.
Taansend
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11890
Joined: 10 Jul 2004, 17:38

Re: Linares vs Zlaticanin WBC/RING magazine lightweight title

Post by Taansend »

jujigatame wrote:
Taansend wrote:
So his ranking is based on beating an ex World Champion & an undefeated fighter who had beaten a couple of ranked fighters.

Not what I would call dubious, especially when you consider that there are four (plus) titles.
The win over Burns was a close win. And this was after Crawford dismantled him and he got a gift draw against Beltran.

Redkach did not beat anyone "ranked". At least not ranked by anyone meaningful. His record was 100% nobodies.

Zlaticanin is good. I just don't think he's the #2 guy in the division.
Nor do most people but that's not how the ranking system works. He beat a recently dethroned champion & then beat an undefeated prospect. That's why he's ranked so highly. That's how it works.

It's not based on what you or I think. It would be nice if it was but it's not.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Linares vs Zlaticanin WBC/RING magazine lightweight title

Post by crusader »

The lightweight division doesn't have standout fighters at the moment in my opinion. I don't have much of an issue with Linares being at #1 or Zlaticanin being at #2, and The Ring typically awards their title to the winners of these types of bouts.

That said, I thought that Zlaticanin was ranked something like 7th (I would've had him higher) even after stopping Redkach, and if that's true I'm not sure how he climbed so many spots without another win; were there that many fighters above him who lost or moved divisions?
Last edited by crusader on 26 Nov 2015, 20:17, edited 2 times in total.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46550
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Linares vs Zlaticanin WBC/RING magazine lightweight title

Post by gilgamesh »

Zlaticanin is gonna kick Linares' ass
Post Reply