Klitschko-Fury weigh in
Klitschko-Fury weigh in
Not open to the public but live on Sky now. Fury looks in great shape, the best he's been in I'd say, wonder what weight he'll come in at.
Fury refused a handshake and looks a little wound up.
Fury refused a handshake and looks a little wound up.
Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in
Fury 17 stone 8 lbs, 112kg, 247 lbs.
Wlad 17 stone 7 lbs 111.5kg, 246 lbs.
Wlad 17 stone 7 lbs 111.5kg, 246 lbs.
Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in
Wow! That's super light for Tyson. Was expecting at least 18st
-
freddydoesdallas
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 9436
- Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 13:48
Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in
Surprising that he's come in so low. Why give away the weight advantage so much, especially as it could weaken his whiskers a bit
Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in
Couldn't see whether one or both were wearing shoes but Wlad actually looked a cm or so taller in the head to head.
Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in
Interesting the point Froch made about Fury possibly coming in lighter so he could look to box and move. Not sure that'll work. Also there looked to be no height difference at all.
Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in
he must be looking for speed , a good weight for fury i thinkfreddydoesdallas wrote:Surprising that he's come in so low. Why give away the weight advantage so much, especially as it could weaken his whiskers a bit
Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in
I think he's come in lighter because he's trained properly for the fight and hasn't cut corners, rather than as part of any gameplan.SteveDow wrote:Interesting the point Froch made about Fury possibly coming in lighter so he could look to box and move. Not sure that'll work. Also there looked to be no height difference at all.
-
bigjack
- Heavyweight

Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in
stevedoc wrote:he must be looking for speed , a good weight for fury i thinkfreddydoesdallas wrote:Surprising that he's come in so low. Why give away the weight advantage so much, especially as it could weaken his whiskers a bit
I think that's a cracking weight for Tyson,he's obviously trained very hard for this and i'm so looking forward to it now
Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in
According to Boxrec, Fury is 6ft9 and Wlad 6ft6. No way is there a 3 inch difference. Fury must be 6ft7 tops.SteveDow wrote:Interesting the point Froch made about Fury possibly coming in lighter so he could look to box and move. Not sure that'll work. Also there looked to be no height difference at all.
Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in
Tyson slouches, Wlad stands his full height, I wouldn't be surprised if there is 3 inches between them, there's been a bigger difference in photos before than there was at the weigh in today.danamba7 wrote:According to Boxrec, Fury is 6ft9 and Wlad 6ft6. No way is there a 3 inch difference. Fury must be 6ft7 tops.SteveDow wrote:Interesting the point Froch made about Fury possibly coming in lighter so he could look to box and move. Not sure that'll work. Also there looked to be no height difference at all.
Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in
expe wrote:Tyson slouches, Wlad stands his full height, I wouldn't be surprised if there is 3 inches between them, there's been a bigger difference in photos before than there was at the weigh in today.danamba7 wrote:According to Boxrec, Fury is 6ft9 and Wlad 6ft6. No way is there a 3 inch difference. Fury must be 6ft7 tops.SteveDow wrote:Interesting the point Froch made about Fury possibly coming in lighter so he could look to box and move. Not sure that'll work. Also there looked to be no height difference at all.

Both seem to be standing tall in this image. Seems to be a pretty straight photo as apposed to at an angle too.
-
Tuan_Jim
- Heavyweight

Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in
How does having excess fat around the midriff enforce the jawbone?freddydoesdallas wrote:Surprising that he's come in so low. Why give away the weight advantage so much, especially as it could weaken his whiskers a bit
-
Tuan_Jim
- Heavyweight

Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in
Klitschko might be wearing Hollywood-style lifts on his heels in order to try and diminish the size difference. If he is, he must be the first 6'6'' man in history to wear such an accoutrement.
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 17116
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in
No. Wlad looks in great shape. Fury looks in decent shape. Great shape is not having love handles and Fury still has them.johnswan1 wrote:Fury looks in great shape
-
bigjack
- Heavyweight

Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in
Tuan_Jim wrote:How does having excess fat around the midriff enforce the jawbone?freddydoesdallas wrote:Surprising that he's come in so low. Why give away the weight advantage so much, especially as it could weaken his whiskers a bit
that's what i was thinking,being lighter is more likely to help him avoid getting clipped in the first place,can't see how it would effect the chin department.
-
freddydoesdallas
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 9436
- Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 13:48
Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in
Maybe because he's at a weight that he's not really accustomed to.Tuan_Jim wrote:How does having excess fat around the midriff enforce the jawbone?freddydoesdallas wrote:Surprising that he's come in so low. Why give away the weight advantage so much, especially as it could weaken his whiskers a bit
-
bigjack
- Heavyweight

Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in
keithmoonhangover wrote:No. Wlad looks in great shape. Fury looks in decent shape. Great shape is not having love handles and Fury still has them.johnswan1 wrote:Fury looks in great shape
most of the 80s heavies were flabby and they were more than capable of doing 12 or 15 rounds,i wouldn't read too much into that .
-
reggaereggae
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4723
- Joined: 21 Dec 2009, 17:01
Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in
I don't agree - Klitschko seems to be standing fully erect (boom boom) but Fury can definitely get another two inches if he had the same stance.danamba7 wrote:expe wrote:Tyson slouches, Wlad stands his full height, I wouldn't be surprised if there is 3 inches between them, there's been a bigger difference in photos before than there was at the weigh in today.danamba7 wrote:
According to Boxrec, Fury is 6ft9 and Wlad 6ft6. No way is there a 3 inch difference. Fury must be 6ft7 tops.
Both seem to be standing tall in this image. Seems to be a pretty straight photo as apposed to at an angle too.
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 17116
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in
In their prime, how many of the all time greats had love handles?bigjack wrote:keithmoonhangover wrote:No. Wlad looks in great shape. Fury looks in decent shape. Great shape is not having love handles and Fury still has them.johnswan1 wrote:Fury looks in great shape
most of the 80s heavies were flabby and they were more than capable of doing 12 or 15 rounds,i wouldn't read too much into that .
Johnson? Dempsey? Louis? Marciano? Ali? Not a love handle in sight. Hmmm.
-
Aaronide_ger
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 595
- Joined: 13 Sep 2014, 10:01
Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in
I give Fury a 30%-35% chance to upset Wladimir... I hope it happens we need a change in the heavyweight division. Fury is the man to do it!
-
Tuan_Jim
- Heavyweight

Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in
I see what you mean, but I think punch resistance can only be impaired by a lighter weight if a fighter is weight drained, which he can hardly be at nearly 18 stone. And as bigjack said, he's more likely to be nimble and keep the chin out of harm's way at a more mobile weight.freddydoesdallas wrote:Maybe because he's at a weight that he's not really accustomed to.Tuan_Jim wrote:How does having excess fat around the midriff enforce the jawbone?freddydoesdallas wrote:Surprising that he's come in so low. Why give away the weight advantage so much, especially as it could weaken his whiskers a bit
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 17116
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in
That's because you're full sh1t.Tuan_Jim wrote:WAR FURY RUMBLING IN MY BOWELS