CharlesListon wrote:We've paid 17 quid for this.
Klitschko v Fury RBR
Re: Klitschko v Fury RBR
Re: Klitschko v Fury RBR
What's he called? Sounds like 'Cat Lick' on the commentary!
Re: Klitschko v Fury RBR
I'm going to be listening on the radio but for you TV men the main event will make it worth it for you, I reckon.CharlesListon wrote:We've paid 17 quid for this.
-
handsofstone
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 22991
- Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28
Re: Klitschko v Fury RBR
Tlatlik not wanting the KO?
-
ScottDetonator
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 1073
- Joined: 15 Mar 2011, 04:33
Re: Klitschko v Fury RBR
This it after this fight? Finally, Fury and Klitschko in the same ring.
Let's get it on!
Let's get it on!
-
Boxerbeetle
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 32661
- Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59
Re: Klitschko v Fury RBR
I'm buzzing for the main event, although this undercard is doing its best to dampen my enthusiasm.
Re: Klitschko v Fury RBR
Rahimi is one tough dude.
-
Controversial
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9152
- Joined: 13 Jul 2002, 18:29
Re: Klitschko v Fury RBR
I don't have Sky Sports, can I still pay for the fight or do you have to be a Sky Sports subscriber as well?
Re: Klitschko v Fury RBR
Cracking fight this. Dont get me wrong, its a howler of an undercard, but this is a pleasant surprise.
-
ThereByTheGrace
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 4016
- Joined: 04 Sep 2010, 05:22
Re: Klitschko v Fury RBR
I wonder how long wlad will take to get to the ring? Fury would be Best doing his warm up in the ring cause it'll take at least 10 mins
Re: Klitschko v Fury RBR
Looks like Rahimi has shot his bolt, sadly.
Re: Klitschko v Fury RBR
Yes I think you need to already subscibe.Controversial wrote:I don't have Sky Sports, can I still pay for the fight or do you have to be a Sky Sports subscriber as well?
-
Boxerbeetle
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 32661
- Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59
Re: Klitschko v Fury RBR
You never used to have to.Neil Gee wrote:Yes I think you need to already subscibe.Controversial wrote:I don't have Sky Sports, can I still pay for the fight or do you have to be a Sky Sports subscriber as well?
Re: Klitschko v Fury RBR
Come on Tyson .
-
CharlesListon
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 888
- Joined: 24 May 2010, 16:17
Re: Klitschko v Fury RBR
You don't have to have skysports to buy the ppvBoxerbeetle wrote:You never used to have to.Neil Gee wrote:Yes I think you need to already subscibe.Controversial wrote:I don't have Sky Sports, can I still pay for the fight or do you have to be a Sky Sports subscriber as well?
Re: Klitschko v Fury RBR
Fvcking hell. What are Smith & McCrory rambling about the low blow for...the huge right after the ref called break completely fvcked the boy up. Dicks.
-
Controversial
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9152
- Joined: 13 Jul 2002, 18:29
Re: Klitschko v Fury RBR
Correct just booked it and now watching, thanksCharlesListon wrote:
You don't have to have skysports to buy the ppv
Re: Klitschko v Fury RBR
This is one tough night for Tlatlik. He's proving his mettle.
Re: Klitschko v Fury RBR
You'd think that they would put at least one decent undercard fight on ,the purse for wlad and fury must be 5million another 150k would of got a couple of decent fights
Re: Klitschko v Fury RBR
x2Baboon wrote:Cracking fight this. Dont get me wrong, its a howler of an undercard, but this is a pleasant surprise.
Shocking undercard, but c'mon Rahimi !
-
CharlesListon
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 888
- Joined: 24 May 2010, 16:17
Re: Klitschko v Fury RBR
Exactly. It's been pants. What makes it worse is the commentary team pretending how great these bouts are. Like they think we're thick.stevedoc wrote:You'd think that they would put at least one decent undercard fight on ,the purse for wlad and fury must be 5million another 150k would of got a couple of decent fights
-
manchester-mexican
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 247
- Joined: 15 Jul 2007, 11:18
Re: Klitschko v Fury RBR
we are paid 17 quid for itCharlesListon wrote:Exactly. It's been pants. What makes it worse is the commentary team pretending how great these bouts are. Like they think we're thick.stevedoc wrote:You'd think that they would put at least one decent undercard fight on ,the purse for wlad and fury must be 5million another 150k would of got a couple of decent fights
-
handsofstone
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 22991
- Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28
Re: Klitschko v Fury RBR
Thought the ref couldve gave Rahimi another standing count but still a decent fight
Re: Klitschko v Fury RBR
Stuck in Spain with no chance of seeing the fight. Any streams?
Re: Klitschko v Fury RBR
Definitely. You can't moan about that as an undercard fight on any card.handsofstone wrote:Thought the ref couldve gave Rahimi another standing count but still a decent fight