Purse bid for Fury-Glazkov IBF bout set for Dec. 11 - but fight unlikely to happen

Post Reply
Redback Rasta
Welterweight
Posts: 2907
Joined: 19 Jul 2015, 18:53

Purse bid for Fury-Glazkov IBF bout set for Dec. 11 - but fight unlikely to happen

Post by Redback Rasta »

http://espn.go.com/boxing/story/_/id...eads-purse-bid

Tyson Fury is not going to have long to savor his upset victory against Wladimir Klitschko.

In addition to claiming the lineal world title, Fury also claimed Klitschko's 3 major sanctioning organization belts, and ownership of those belts comes with mandatory defense obligations.

Fury was ordered by the IBF on Monday to next face Vyacheslav "Czar" Glazkov, and the camps were given 30 days to make a deal or a purse bid would be ordered. However, on Tuesday, Main Events promoter Kathy Duva, who represents Glazkov, informed the IBF that they were unwilling to participate in negotiations with Fury promoter Mick Hennessy and requested an immediate purse bid, which is allowable under IBF rules - although the fight is unlikely to happen.
jezzamundo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3127
Joined: 16 Jun 2004, 13:11

Re: Purse bid for Fury-Glazkov IBF bout set for Dec. 11 - but fight unlikely to happen

Post by jezzamundo »

I hope the fight happens, though I don't see Glazkov as having anything more than a punchers chance - he's been given too many gifts in close fights and it's time he was dealt a loss. Not sure Fury stops him, though.
lowlefthand
Super Welterweight
Posts: 151
Joined: 21 May 2015, 04:44

Re: Purse bid for Fury-Glazkov IBF bout set for Dec. 11 - but fight unlikely to happen

Post by lowlefthand »

I can see the belts splitting up now Klit has lost them.
The sanctioning bodies might actually enforce their mandatories.
They were loath to do it when Team Klit was king, because they paid them handsomely and called the shots.
I'm not saying Wlad ducked any, it's just the logistics of defending 4 mandatories every 9-12 months. Just not possible if the letter if the law of the organizations is followed.
I don't know if Tyson is that interested on holding on to the IBF belt when he has a big money rematch against Wlad.
I guess Duva could just be after some step aside money. Seems to be a lot of that going on.
More likely, they want to know if they can force it before the rematch, or if they are going to go the Wilder path.

Glazkov loses either way. Too short. No Power.
(I did however pick Wlad to beat Fury)
jujigatame
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7473
Joined: 30 Oct 2004, 21:08

Re: Purse bid for Fury-Glazkov IBF bout set for Dec. 11 - but fight unlikely to happen

Post by jujigatame »

Why is the fight unlikely to happen? I thought Glazkov had been sitting around doing dick-all for months because he was waiting to take advantage of his mandatory status.
SteveO
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1383
Joined: 31 Dec 2001, 20:00

Re: Purse bid for Fury-Glazkov IBF bout set for Dec. 11 - but fight unlikely to happen

Post by SteveO »

According to their rules, Fury does not have to fight the IBF mandatory challenger until November 2016. Newly crowned IBF champions have a year before they must defend their title.
I have posted a link - scroll down to Rule 5:

http://www.ibfusbaregistration.com/ibfu ... 7_2014.pdf
jockpunk
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 524
Joined: 28 Oct 2005, 16:20

Re: Purse bid for Fury-Glazkov IBF bout set for Dec. 11 - but fight unlikely to happen

Post by jockpunk »

jujigatame wrote:Why is the fight unlikely to happen? I thought Glazkov had been sitting around doing dick-all for months because he was waiting to take advantage of his mandatory status.
Glazkov was also supposed to fight wilder. Not sure if that will happen now that he has been named mandatory. If fury vacates would it be glazkov-martin for the vacant belt?
Ilya Muromets
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4243
Joined: 06 Nov 2009, 15:02

Re: Purse bid for Fury-Glazkov IBF bout set for Dec. 11 - but fight unlikely to happen

Post by Ilya Muromets »

December 11th? Like next week? Say what? The headline of this thread doesn't relate to the story, and the story appears to no longer exist anyway.
tiny_acres
Middleweight
Posts: 9463
Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43

Re: Purse bid for Fury-Glazkov IBF bout set for Dec. 11 - but fight unlikely to happen

Post by tiny_acres »

SteveO wrote:According to their rules, Fury does not have to fight the IBF mandatory challenger until November 2016. Newly crowned IBF champions have a year before they must defend their title.
I have posted a link - scroll down to Rule 5:

http://www.ibfusbaregistration.com/ibfu ... 7_2014.pdf
Do the alphabet groups actually follow their own rules?
SteveO
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1383
Joined: 31 Dec 2001, 20:00

Re: Purse bid for Fury-Glazkov IBF bout set for Dec. 11 - but fight unlikely to happen

Post by SteveO »

It doesn't matter now anyway.
Glazkov will have to wait for the winner of Fury-Klitschko II.
zorndeslammes
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 537
Joined: 01 Jul 2007, 00:21

Re: Purse bid for Fury-Glazkov IBF bout set for Dec. 11 - but fight unlikely to happen

Post by zorndeslammes »

Minor Events refused to negotiate anything with Fury to force him to drop. They want none of him. They'll push for a vacant title fight and I hope Glazkov finally gets handed the L he's deserved several times over now.
jujigatame
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7473
Joined: 30 Oct 2004, 21:08

Re: Purse bid for Fury-Glazkov IBF bout set for Dec. 11 - but fight unlikely to happen

Post by jujigatame »

Main Events has made some really shameful moves lately. First they push for the Kovalev/Stevenson purse bid and pull out of the fight when they don't win it. Now they maneuver Glazkov into an IBF mandatory (thanks to a whole lot of dodgy judging) and are demanding the fight to happen immediately because they know Fury can't or won't go for it and they can fight for the vacated title against a much easier opponent.
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Purse bid for Fury-Glazkov IBF bout set for Dec. 11 - but fight unlikely to happen

Post by expe »

jujigatame wrote:Main Events has made some really shameful moves lately. First they push for the Kovalev/Stevenson purse bid and pull out of the fight when they don't win it. Now they maneuver Glazkov into an IBF mandatory (thanks to a whole lot of dodgy judging) and are demanding the fight to happen immediately because they know Fury can't or won't go for it and they can fight for the vacated title against a much easier opponent.
Come back to bite them in the arse though, next available challenger for the vacant title is now Wladimir Klitschko.
pound per pound
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1603
Joined: 13 Jan 2005, 14:36

Re: Purse bid for Fury-Glazkov IBF bout set for Dec. 11 - but fight unlikely to happen

Post by pound per pound »

lowlefthand wrote:I can see the belts splitting up now Klit has lost them.
The sanctioning bodies might actually enforce their mandatories.
They were loath to do it when Team Klit was king, because they paid them handsomely and called the shots.
I'm not saying Wlad ducked any, it's just the logistics of defending 4 mandatories every 9-12 months. Just not possible if the letter if the law of the organizations is followed.
I don't know if Tyson is that interested on holding on to the IBF belt when he has a big money rematch against Wlad.
I guess Duva could just be after some step aside money. Seems to be a lot of that going on.
More likely, they want to know if they can force it before the rematch, or if they are going to go the Wilder path.

Glazkov loses either way. Too short. No Power.
(I did however pick Wlad to beat Fury)

It sucks to see all of Wlad's work become fragmented. Fury could stay busy if he wants to and keep them.

I think Fury vs Glazkov is a good match if it happens.
Badhusker
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4902
Joined: 19 Jun 2010, 23:57

Re: Purse bid for Fury-Glazkov IBF bout set for Dec. 11 - but fight unlikely to happen

Post by Badhusker »

So if I read right Flask of passed on a title shot with Wilder? I was looking forward to that fight.
Post Reply