Corrections
-
ILoveHowardFoster
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 42
- Joined: 10 Jul 2015, 10:34
Corrections
Guys, I hate doing this, but after reading the Daws v Nieto thread, can I point out two things...
1. A Doctor cannot stop a fight. He can only ADVISE the referee to do so. If the ref doesn't want to listen to the doctor, he doesn't have to
2. There is no such thing as a 9-9 round for a point deduction. Someone HAS TO have 10 points. Therefore, it would be a 10-10 round. For example....a boxer is winning a round easily, which would usually be scored10-9 in his favour. He then has a point deducted..... That would be scored as a 10-10 round, not 9-9.
1. A Doctor cannot stop a fight. He can only ADVISE the referee to do so. If the ref doesn't want to listen to the doctor, he doesn't have to
2. There is no such thing as a 9-9 round for a point deduction. Someone HAS TO have 10 points. Therefore, it would be a 10-10 round. For example....a boxer is winning a round easily, which would usually be scored10-9 in his favour. He then has a point deducted..... That would be scored as a 10-10 round, not 9-9.
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 16944
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Corrections
Sorry, but number two is a load of horseshit. Loads of fights have had 9-9 rounds. The 12th round of Amir Khan vs Lamont Peterson springs to mind straight away.ILoveHowardFoster wrote:Guys, I hate doing this, but after reading the Daws v Nieto thread, can I point out two things...
1. A Doctor cannot stop a fight. He can only ADVISE the referee to do so. If the ref doesn't want to listen to the doctor, he doesn't have to
2. There is no such thing as a 9-9 round for a point deduction. Someone HAS TO have 10 points. Therefore, it would be a 10-10 round. For example....a boxer is winning a round easily, which would usually be scored10-9 in his favour. He then has a point deducted..... That would be scored as a 10-10 round, not 9-9.
Re: Corrections
Don't get why anyone cares if it's 9-9 or 10-10. Makes no meaningful difference either way.
-
Terminator666
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1663
- Joined: 06 Nov 2007, 10:18
Re: Corrections
Also- would or has a ref ever gone against a doctors advice regarding stopping the fight?
Re: Corrections
The ref's kicked the towel out before now.
Foreman/Cotto seems to be an obvious one.
Foreman/Cotto seems to be an obvious one.
Re: Corrections
Briggs/Vitali? That seemed to go on forever, most people thought it should have been stopped a few rounds before the end.
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 23027
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: Corrections
Mickey Vann.orbtastic wrote:The ref's kicked the towel out before now.
Foreman/Cotto seems to be an obvious one.
-
ILoveHowardFoster
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 42
- Joined: 10 Jul 2015, 10:34
Re: Corrections
keithmoonhangover wrote:Sorry, but number two is a load of horseshit. Loads of fights have had 9-9 rounds. The 12th round of Amir Khan vs Lamont Peterson springs to mind straight away.ILoveHowardFoster wrote:Guys, I hate doing this, but after reading the Daws v Nieto thread, can I point out two things...
1. A Doctor cannot stop a fight. He can only ADVISE the referee to do so. If the ref doesn't want to listen to the doctor, he doesn't have to
2. There is no such thing as a 9-9 round for a point deduction. Someone HAS TO have 10 points. Therefore, it would be a 10-10 round. For example....a boxer is winning a round easily, which would usually be scored10-9 in his favour. He then has a point deducted..... That would be scored as a 10-10 round, not 9-9.
I don't care what Khan/Peterson was scored as, you CANNOT officially have a 9-9 round!!
-
ILoveHowardFoster
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 42
- Joined: 10 Jul 2015, 10:34
Re: Corrections
Micky Vann did it with Michael Katsidis v someone over here as well. Can't remember the British guy he foughtorbtastic wrote:The ref's kicked the towel out before now.
Foreman/Cotto seems to be an obvious one.
-
tiny_acres
- Middleweight
- Posts: 9497
- Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43
Re: Corrections
The round is scored as it normally would be. 10-9 the point deduction is taken at the end of the fight.ILoveHowardFoster wrote:keithmoonhangover wrote:Sorry, but number two is a load of horseshit. Loads of fights have had 9-9 rounds. The 12th round of Amir Khan vs Lamont Peterson springs to mind straight away.ILoveHowardFoster wrote:Guys, I hate doing this, but after reading the Daws v Nieto thread, can I point out two things...
1. A Doctor cannot stop a fight. He can only ADVISE the referee to do so. If the ref doesn't want to listen to the doctor, he doesn't have to
2. There is no such thing as a 9-9 round for a point deduction. Someone HAS TO have 10 points. Therefore, it would be a 10-10 round. For example....a boxer is winning a round easily, which would usually be scored10-9 in his favour. He then has a point deducted..... That would be scored as a 10-10 round, not 9-9.
I don't care what Khan/Peterson was scored as, you CANNOT officially have a 9-9 round!!
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 16944
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Corrections
I think your definition of the word cannot is slightly different to the one in the Oxford English Dictionary.ILoveHowardFoster wrote:keithmoonhangover wrote:Sorry, but number two is a load of horseshit. Loads of fights have had 9-9 rounds. The 12th round of Amir Khan vs Lamont Peterson springs to mind straight away.ILoveHowardFoster wrote:Guys, I hate doing this, but after reading the Daws v Nieto thread, can I point out two things...
1. A Doctor cannot stop a fight. He can only ADVISE the referee to do so. If the ref doesn't want to listen to the doctor, he doesn't have to
2. There is no such thing as a 9-9 round for a point deduction. Someone HAS TO have 10 points. Therefore, it would be a 10-10 round. For example....a boxer is winning a round easily, which would usually be scored10-9 in his favour. He then has a point deducted..... That would be scored as a 10-10 round, not 9-9.
I don't care what Khan/Peterson was scored as, you CANNOT officially have a 9-9 round!!

Apology accepted.
-
ILoveHowardFoster
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 42
- Joined: 10 Jul 2015, 10:34
Re: Corrections
Ten-point Must System
Judges use the 10-Point Must System in professional bouts. This system assigns ten points to the winner of each round. The loser receives nine points for a close round, eight points if he was knocked down or dominated, and seven points if he was knocked down twice. If a round is even and neither boxer was knocked down, both boxers receive 10 points. If each boxer was knocked down once, the knockdowns are disregarded and the winner of the round receives 10 points, while the loser receives nine points.
So, as I stated earlier "somebody must have 10".......I'll give you a more conclusive example when I get home from work!
Apology accepted!
Judges use the 10-Point Must System in professional bouts. This system assigns ten points to the winner of each round. The loser receives nine points for a close round, eight points if he was knocked down or dominated, and seven points if he was knocked down twice. If a round is even and neither boxer was knocked down, both boxers receive 10 points. If each boxer was knocked down once, the knockdowns are disregarded and the winner of the round receives 10 points, while the loser receives nine points.
So, as I stated earlier "somebody must have 10".......I'll give you a more conclusive example when I get home from work!
Apology accepted!
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 16944
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Corrections
I've posted a picture of an official world championship scorecard, which clearly shows all three judges scored it 9-9. Accept you're wrong and let's move on.ILoveHowardFoster wrote:Ten-point Must System
Judges use the 10-Point Must System in professional bouts. This system assigns ten points to the winner of each round. The loser receives nine points for a close round, eight points if he was knocked down or dominated, and seven points if he was knocked down twice. If a round is even and neither boxer was knocked down, both boxers receive 10 points. If each boxer was knocked down once, the knockdowns are disregarded and the winner of the round receives 10 points, while the loser receives nine points.
So, as I stated earlier "somebody must have 10".......I'll give you a more conclusive example when I get home from work!
Apology accepted!
Re: Corrections
Must admit I thoughtit was scored a 10-9 and the point removed at the end as tiny acres said.that's how I do it anyway,prob wrong though...
Re: Corrections
Didn't Oli clarify this the other day on another thread?
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 16944
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Corrections
I don't know mate. It seems pretty clear on the scorecard I posted. There are dozens of other examples.orbtastic wrote:Didn't Oli clarify this the other day on another thread?
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 16944
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Corrections
The 10th round of Froch - Dirrell was also a 9-9.


Re: Corrections
there's also no mention of a ten point must system in EBU fights .the rules aren't universal
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 16944
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Corrections
I've seen 9-8 rounds in the states before.stevedoc wrote:there's also no mention of a ten point must system in EBU fights .the rules aren't universal
-
Boxerbeetle
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 32859
- Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59
Re: Corrections
Where does it talk about deductions?ILoveHowardFoster wrote:Ten-point Must System
Judges use the 10-Point Must System in professional bouts. This system assigns ten points to the winner of each round. The loser receives nine points for a close round, eight points if he was knocked down or dominated, and seven points if he was knocked down twice. If a round is even and neither boxer was knocked down, both boxers receive 10 points. If each boxer was knocked down once, the knockdowns are disregarded and the winner of the round receives 10 points, while the loser receives nine points.
So, as I stated earlier "somebody must have 10".......I'll give you a more conclusive example when I get home from work!
Apology accepted!
Re: Corrections
I guess scoring conventions may vary by area and organization, but I've always thought a round like that was generally to be scored 9-9, with the 10 point must meaning that the winner must receive 10 points barring a point deduction.
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 16944
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Corrections
Yep.crusader wrote:I've always thought a round like that was generally to be scored 9-9, with the 10 point must meaning that the winner must receive 10 points barring a point deduction.
Re: Corrections
To be equally pedantic, Mickey Vann did not disregard a doctors advice - the corner threw in the towel and Vann threw it out and let the fight carry on.
-
Boxing Prospect
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 6592
- Joined: 25 Jun 2012, 14:35
Re: Corrections
FWIW-The Cotto/Foreman referee was Arthur Mercante Jr