PTBF 2015 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD - FINAL

The_Truth
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 67
Joined: 02 Sep 2009, 15:14

Re: PTBF 2015 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD - UPDATED: NOV 22

Post by The_Truth »

Hi my points for this week was zero, looks like it might be the dash in my name instead of underscore:

The-Truth, Alvarez, Decision, Wide X2

Could it be amended please? Thanks
JCS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6243
Joined: 17 Dec 2004, 13:27

Re: PTBF 2015 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD - UPDATED: NOV 22

Post by JCS »

You guys and the name sh1t...
The_Truth
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 67
Joined: 02 Sep 2009, 15:14

Re: PTBF 2015 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD - UPDATED: NOV 22

Post by The_Truth »

Will I be getting my points? Cheers
Ally-M1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 483
Joined: 14 Mar 2007, 13:30

Re: PTBF 2015 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD - UPDATED: NOV 22

Post by Ally-M1 »

December 18: Denis Shafikov vs Rances Barthelmey

IBF World Lightweight Title.

Worth adding in? Boxrec no. 3 vs. no. 6?

I know Claude mentioned it before but thought it worth mentioning again in case.
CrazyHorse
Cruiserweight
Posts: 509
Joined: 19 Apr 2011, 14:46

Re: PTBF 2015 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD - UPDATED: NOV 28

Post by CrazyHorse »

I edited my pick about 15 minutes before they got in ring. Is that too late?
joe strong
Cruiserweight
Posts: 411
Joined: 15 Aug 2010, 12:21

Re: PTBF 2015 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD - FINAL

Post by joe strong »

didn't realize I had 2 x2 picks left... top 25 again...
Ally-M1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 483
Joined: 14 Mar 2007, 13:30

Re: PTBF 2015 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD - FINAL

Post by Ally-M1 »

A tough second. Leaving 2X's out there; absolutely criminal on my part. I still await a 1st place...

Congratulations to The_Truth.

JCS; a huge thanks to you for yet another truly fantastic competition.
JCS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6243
Joined: 17 Dec 2004, 13:27

Re: PTBF 2015 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD - FINAL

Post by JCS »

Updated again. Was testing a last-minute change and dropped the Fury/Klitschko picks.
Tanzio
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 12264
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 09:17

Re: PTBF 2015 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD - FINAL

Post by Tanzio »

Damn, and I was just getting on a roll :lol: congrats to The Truth, Ally and the top ten. :bow:

Thank goodness it is over :doh:

Most importantly, thank you JCS! I sincerely appreciate your efforts.
ikorolev
Middleweight
Posts: 4895
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 19:08

Re: PTBF 2015 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD - FINAL

Post by ikorolev »

No Lee vs Saunders PTBF ?
JCS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6243
Joined: 17 Dec 2004, 13:27

Re: PTBF 2015 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD - FINAL

Post by JCS »

Nah... season over.

Any interest in a 12th season? Any ideas for changes?
Ally-M1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 483
Joined: 14 Mar 2007, 13:30

Re: PTBF 2015 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD - FINAL

Post by Ally-M1 »

JCS wrote:Nah... season over.

Any interest in a 12th season? Any ideas for changes?
I, and I'm sure many are with me on this, feel there is huge appetite for another season. Simply no better or challenging Prediction League out there anywhere.

As for changes, some may disagree here but I think it's good as it is. It's a great competition; if you wanted to make tweaks then I'm sure it would work. Nothing too drastic though!

That's my 2 pence.
Tanzio
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 12264
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 09:17

Re: PTBF 2015 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD - FINAL

Post by Tanzio »

Ally-M1 wrote:
JCS wrote:Nah... season over.

Any interest in a 12th season? Any ideas for changes?
I, and I'm sure many are with me on this, feel there is huge appetite for another season. Simply no better or challenging Prediction League out there anywhere.

As for changes, some may disagree here but I think it's good as it is. It's a great competition; if you wanted to make tweaks then I'm sure it would work. Nothing too drastic though!

That's my 2 pence.
Tanzio,AGREES,WHOLEHEARTEDLY,3X
claudevsq
Editor
Editor
Posts: 3332
Joined: 19 Jun 2007, 14:35

Re: PTBF 2015 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD - FINAL

Post by claudevsq »

:TU: Yeah, me 2. Thanks to your system for all the work, JCS! :D
hbg
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 278
Joined: 11 Feb 2012, 18:55

Re: PTBF 2015 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD - FINAL

Post by hbg »

I'd love another season as well. I have to stop my downward spiral... ;)
JCS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6243
Joined: 17 Dec 2004, 13:27

Re: PTBF 2015 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD - FINAL

Post by JCS »

Thanks fellas.

I certainly don't mind another season, but it seems with each new season... I need more and more help maintaining the fight schedule. Either the size of my brain is decreasing or the amount of everything else piles up with time.. but it's tough to keep track of new fights, postponements, cancels, etc.

I know some of you (especially claude) try to help out, but I gotta think of a better way to do this in 2016.

I'm always open to a tweak here or a tweak there.. aka minor changes.
The_Truth
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 67
Joined: 02 Sep 2009, 15:14

Re: PTBF 2015 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD - FINAL

Post by The_Truth »

Cheers JCS, definitely up for another season
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46317
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: PTBF 2015 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD - FINAL

Post by gilgamesh »

I returned toward the end of the season, and I really had a mediocre run of it, but as a former Silver Cup runner. I want to be among the top of the rankings next year.

I shall return. PTBF 2016, I want the Gold :box:
claudevsq
Editor
Editor
Posts: 3332
Joined: 19 Jun 2007, 14:35

Re: PTBF 2015 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD - FINAL

Post by claudevsq »

The Revival wrote:I returned toward the end of the season, and I really had a mediocre run of it, but as a former Silver Cup runner. I want to be among the top of the rankings next year.

I shall return. PTBF 2016, I want the Gold :box:
There's no Silver Cup beneath your name. If you want it to be displayed next season, simply tell JCS under which name(s) you have played the former seasons. :TU:
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46317
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: PTBF 2015 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD - FINAL

Post by gilgamesh »

claudevsq wrote:
The Revival wrote:I returned toward the end of the season, and I really had a mediocre run of it, but as a former Silver Cup runner. I want to be among the top of the rankings next year.

I shall return. PTBF 2016, I want the Gold :box:
There's no Silver Cup beneath your name. If you want it to be displayed next season, simply tell JCS under which name(s) you have played the former seasons. :TU:
He knows who I am.
claudevsq
Editor
Editor
Posts: 3332
Joined: 19 Jun 2007, 14:35

Re: PTBF 2015 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD - FINAL

Post by claudevsq »

Lord Jesus knows all of his sheeps... still, that didn't earn me no damn silver trophy yet... :lol:
pete thebet
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 173
Joined: 19 Jan 2008, 06:51

Re: PTBF 2015 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD - FINAL

Post by pete thebet »

hi JCS, great comp, looking forward to the next one
my suggestion would be to incorporate the DFtP metric into the points calculation, by way of a multiplier
i.e. to give an increased points award the more difficult the fight is to predict (based on entrants selections)
cheers, pete
JCS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6243
Joined: 17 Dec 2004, 13:27

Re: PTBF 2015 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD - FINAL

Post by JCS »

pete thebet wrote:hi JCS, great comp, looking forward to the next one
my suggestion would be to incorporate the DFtP metric into the points calculation, by way of a multiplier
i.e. to give an increased points award the more difficult the fight is to predict (based on entrants selections)
cheers, pete
I've thought about that, but that's a major change.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: PTBF 2015 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD - FINAL

Post by crusader »

If people don't lose points (with the size of drop depending on the difficulty) for incorrect picks I don't think they should get extra points for correctly predicting 'difficult fights'.

Let's say we have:

-10 fights
-4 difficult
-4 easy
-2 medium

One person correctly predicts 6 (4 difficult and 2 medium) and another person also correctly predicts 6 (4 easy and 2 medium). Were the first person's predictions really superior when, unlike most participants, they failed to get the easy fights? Why shouldn't those misses offset their correct predictions of the difficult bouts?
Post Reply