Eddie Hearn low profile ?

Floyd the snake
Super Welterweight
Posts: 359
Joined: 04 Oct 2014, 13:52

Eddie Hearn low profile ?

Post by Floyd the snake »

Eddie seems to be keeping a very low profile 3 weeks in to the new year and no sign of him , no I film interviews yet which is not like him at all . I wonder if he's avoiding they sky PPV issues which were brought up at the back end of last year from Warren's /Fury / Hennesey ? I hope when he does appear Kugan doesn't avoid PPV issues and asks the relevant questions , but I've got a feeling he will be under orders not to dig too far!
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23152
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Eddie Hearn low profile ?

Post by mickey1975 »

He said he'd be announcing AJ's next bout around now.
ashedward
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 420
Joined: 19 Apr 2009, 16:17

Re: Eddie Hearn low profile ?

Post by ashedward »

I think you're over thinking it,Kugan was on holiday last week and his first show of the year is not until next week.His last IFL video was pretty clear that he knows that allegedly can do ppv`s on the Sky box office platform so he used the word Sky Sports box office allot.He will come back as cocky as ever when it`s time to sell the Quigg-Frampton ppv.I also think people give him a bit of a hard time over his comments over the last year when he said you can`t do ppvs without me,because at the time there was no rival platform in place and set up but now there is it will be interesting as allegedly subscriber to see how it all works out.
southace
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 49
Joined: 14 May 2006, 13:45

Re: Eddie Hearn low profile ?

Post by southace »

he's on holiday in the Carribbean.
Bodyshot3
Middleweight
Posts: 9791
Joined: 31 Dec 2013, 15:19

Re: Eddie Hearn low profile ?

Post by Bodyshot3 »

he's on holiday in the Carribbean.
:lol:
keirw
Middleweight
Posts: 2681
Joined: 03 Nov 2013, 10:55

Re: Eddie Hearn low profile ?

Post by keirw »

ashedward wrote:I think you're over thinking it,Kugan was on holiday last week and his first show of the year is not until next week.His last IFL video was pretty clear that he knows that allegedly can do ppv`s on the Sky box office platform so he used the word Sky Sports box office allot.He will come back as cocky as ever when it`s time to sell the Quigg-Frampton ppv.I also think people give him a bit of a hard time over his comments over the last year when he said you can`t do ppvs without me,because at the time there was no rival platform in place and set up but now there is it will be interesting as allegedly subscriber to see how it all works out.
Indeed, Frank claiming Eddie is blatantly lying is rather disingenuous. Because at the time of making the statements they were 100% accurate.

If George manages to set up a BNation PPV platform this year it still doesn't make Eddie a liar (not in this instance, at least) because it still wouldn't be classed as "sky sports PPV"
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: Eddie Hearn low profile ?

Post by whiskey »

I don't think Eddie has ever been anything other than transparent when discussing sky PPV.

If it involves a UK fighter then he's involved. In the case of Floyd vs Pac, he wasn't involved on the basis of that exclusive signed arrangement.

At least that's how I understood it.
Bodyshot3
Middleweight
Posts: 9791
Joined: 31 Dec 2013, 15:19

Re: Eddie Hearn low profile ?

Post by Bodyshot3 »

Probably in hiding after a bad reaction to his last botox session?
More than possible :TU:

But I am going with the Carribbean option....Eddie lounging around the infinity pool, giving that tan some love, and making doubly sure someone a bit less rich and famous feels slightly shite/insecure about themselves.

"Not being funny fella, but does that wristband give you access to this VIP pool area?"
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32978
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Eddie Hearn low profile ?

Post by Boxerbeetle »

G0mez wrote:I don't think Eddie has ever been anything other than transparent when discussing sky PPV.

If it involves a UK fighter then he's involved. In the case of Floyd vs Pac, he wasn't involved on the basis of that exclusive signed arrangement.

At least that's how I understood it.
Yes, but that arrangement only covers Sky Sports PPVs. The challenge is that Sky also have a PPV facility for events which don't fall under the Sky Sports banner & which would therefore not be covered under Matchroom's exclusivity deal - that's what B0xnati0n want to leverage. To be fair to Camp Eddie, he probably never realised that this was the case.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Eddie Hearn low profile ?

Post by Counter-puncher »

Bodyshot3 wrote:
But I am going with the Carribbean option....Eddie lounging around the infinity pool, giving that tan some love, and making doubly sure someone a bit less rich and famous feels slightly shite/insecure about themselves.

"Not being funny fella, but does that wristband give you access to this VIP pool area?"
Hahahaha :TU:
bripez
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4877
Joined: 11 Feb 2010, 18:07

Re: Eddie Hearn low profile ?

Post by bripez »

Counter-puncher wrote:
Bodyshot3 wrote:
But I am going with the Carribbean option....Eddie lounging around the infinity pool, giving that tan some love, and making doubly sure someone a bit less rich and famous feels slightly shite/insecure about themselves.

"Not being funny fella, but does that wristband give you access to this VIP pool area?"
Hahahaha :TU:
It was a good one that.

He is a smarmy little Lord fontleroy daddies boy.

Having been brought up with his multi millionaire dad going to the best schools etc. he has spent some time with some boxers and now likes to give the impression that he could be a bit if a hard knock and comes out with his mockney bollocks.

I am not a fan of that celebrity boxing shite but I would pay PPV money to watch this prick in a fight with them other 2 smarmy pricks (sons of another promoter)
Andrew
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6108
Joined: 17 Jul 2012, 09:31

Re: Eddie Hearn low profile ?

Post by Andrew »

First show of the year in 10 days so we'll hear from him next week.
Ally-M1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 483
Joined: 14 Mar 2007, 13:30

Re: Eddie Hearn low profile ?

Post by Ally-M1 »

Bodyshot3 wrote:
Probably in hiding after a bad reaction to his last botox session?
More than possible :TU:

But I am going with the Carribbean option....Eddie lounging around the infinity pool, giving that tan some love, and making doubly sure someone a bit less rich and famous feels slightly shite/insecure about themselves.

"Not being funny fella, but does that wristband give you access to this VIP pool area?"
This is exactly what's he doing. Nailed on!
broomy7s
Cruiserweight
Posts: 971
Joined: 19 May 2011, 07:53

Re: Eddie Hearn low profile ?

Post by broomy7s »

No sky sports shows in feb. Seems the sky sports deal for 20 fights a year includes the ppv. Thought when the deal was announced sky sports viewers would be getting 20 fights per year/season.
simonwalsh
Middleweight
Posts: 146
Joined: 05 May 2014, 08:40

Re: Eddie Hearn low profile ?

Post by simonwalsh »

broomy7s wrote:No sky sports shows in feb. Seems the sky sports deal for 20 fights a year includes the ppv. Thought when the deal was announced sky sports viewers would be getting 20 fights per year/season.
Don't know the details of course, but is there a deal in place for more than 20 if it's required? Just thinking of a) potential rematches and b) the bar seems to be lowering for what's a headline fight.
rd350lc
Super Welterweight
Posts: 4951
Joined: 22 Nov 2014, 11:49

Re: Eddie Hearn low profile ?

Post by rd350lc »

Anybody else think the Quigg / Frampton undercard looks a bit sparse ? would have thought it being such a big fight it would warrant something decent backing it up .
ashedward
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 420
Joined: 19 Apr 2009, 16:17

Re: Eddie Hearn low profile ?

Post by ashedward »

rd350lc wrote:Anybody else think the Quigg / Frampton undercard looks a bit sparse ? would have thought it being such a big fight it would warrant something decent backing it up .
It`s disappointing for sure, but not surprising to me,the main event fighters will be on shitloads so they didn`t want to spread the budget and they have already got the ticket money and have decided a good undercard will add nothing to the ppv,it would backfire badly if someone gets a cut early which stops the fight.
MarkMcBurney
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1670
Joined: 18 Nov 2012, 07:47

Re: Eddie Hearn low profile ?

Post by MarkMcBurney »

rd350lc wrote:Anybody else think the Quigg / Frampton undercard looks a bit sparse ? would have thought it being such a big fight it would warrant something decent backing it up .
Yep, actually quite glad I didn't get tickets now as the view would be shite anyway so would rather buy the PPV and watch it on telly to get a decent view of the action, given there's not much worth watching on the undercard.
simonwalsh
Middleweight
Posts: 146
Joined: 05 May 2014, 08:40

Re: Eddie Hearn low profile ?

Post by simonwalsh »

Undercard is taking a little bit of shape. There's probably at least 3-4 fights to be added to the below...

Charlie Edwards v Luke Wilton
Isaac Lowe v Marco McCullogh
Luke Campbell v TBA
Ryan Burnett v TBA

I'd say probably two "names" to be added and two prospects.
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23152
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Eddie Hearn low profile ?

Post by mickey1975 »

simonwalsh wrote:Undercard is taking a little bit of shape. There's probably at least 3-4 fights to be added to the below...

Charlie Edwards v Luke Wilton
Isaac Lowe v Marco McCullogh
Luke Campbell v TBA
Ryan Burnett v TBA

I'd say probably two "names" to be added and two prospects.
Campbell is on the Sheffield show now.
simonwalsh
Middleweight
Posts: 146
Joined: 05 May 2014, 08:40

Re: Eddie Hearn low profile ?

Post by simonwalsh »

mickey1975 wrote:
simonwalsh wrote:Undercard is taking a little bit of shape. There's probably at least 3-4 fights to be added to the below...

Charlie Edwards v Luke Wilton
Isaac Lowe v Marco McCullogh
Luke Campbell v TBA
Ryan Burnett v TBA

I'd say probably two "names" to be added and two prospects.
Campbell is on the Sheffield show now.
Ah. Didn't know that. Cheers.

Scott Fitzgerald and Josh Taylor added to the bill. Not exactly got anyone gushing, but it's better than nothing.
Andrew
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6108
Joined: 17 Jul 2012, 09:31

Re: Eddie Hearn low profile ?

Post by Andrew »

Have to admit I'm looking forward to him attempting to justify the Brook Bizier fight.
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23152
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Eddie Hearn low profile ?

Post by mickey1975 »

Naandrew wrote:Have to admit I'm looking forward to him attempting to justify the Brook Bizier fight.
Easy. Mandatory.
Manchester Massive
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 371
Joined: 29 May 2008, 18:34

Re: Eddie Hearn low profile ?

Post by Manchester Massive »

Think Burton might be fighting Shinkwin for vacant British light heavy title on this show
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Eddie Hearn low profile ?

Post by expe »

Manchester Massive wrote:Think Burton might be fighting Shinkwin for vacant British light heavy title on this show
Shinkwin's with Warren, almost certain to go to purse bids.
Post Reply