I was running through Sanderline Williams' record and noticed he dropped a Split Decision to Ronnie Essett for the vacant NABF title back in '88. After a draw was declared after 12, they fought a 13th round to determine the winner.
Did some trawling online and apparently this was a thing among the smaller belts (NABF, USBA) at the time. This is the only example I can find of it actually being utilized, though. Anyone have any info on this or any other examples?
Ever heard of an extra round being fought after a draw was declared?
-
King Carlos
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1123
- Joined: 11 May 2010, 19:10
-
scartissue
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1893
- Joined: 31 Mar 2002, 20:00
Re: Ever heard of an extra round being fought after a draw was declared?
I know it's been done sporadically over the years, but the only one I can think of at the moment was Bruce Curry against Rafael Rodriguez. An 11th round was ordered due to them being a part of a television tournament.
-
King Carlos
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1123
- Joined: 11 May 2010, 19:10
Re: Ever heard of an extra round being fought after a draw was declared?
Found another example. Doug DeWitt MD13 Tony Thornton for the USBA title in '87.
Re: Ever heard of an extra round being fought after a draw was declared?
Who thinks this is a good idea? I sorta like it, think of all the draws that could have been resolved by this simple method.
It also feels very risky....another reason I like it.
Of course neither fighter should be forced into that extra round, and a "no mas" signal means the other guy is the winner.
It also feels very risky....another reason I like it.
Of course neither fighter should be forced into that extra round, and a "no mas" signal means the other guy is the winner.
Re: Ever heard of an extra round being fought after a draw was declared?
Agree, it is an interesting idea. A sudden death playoff, if you will.
I'd like to see it get some trial usage. The extra length of time between the end of regulation and the announcement of a draw would also give the fighters a bit longer rest for the decider round.
I'd like to see it get some trial usage. The extra length of time between the end of regulation and the announcement of a draw would also give the fighters a bit longer rest for the decider round.
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: Ever heard of an extra round being fought after a draw was declared?
Yes, I remember the brief trial.
Re: Ever heard of an extra round being fought after a draw was declared?
There was another fight in the early 1990's but I cant remember right now - thought it was Prince Charles Williams but I got confused with his first fight with Merqui Sosa where both fighters were deemed unfit to continue after seven treacherous rounds. I twas around that time though...BoxBuzz wrote:Who thinks this is a good idea? I sorta like it, think of all the draws that could have been resolved by this simple method.
It also feels very risky....another reason I like it.
Of course neither fighter should be forced into that extra round, and a "no mas" signal means the other guy is the winner.
-
Boxing Prospect
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 6592
- Joined: 25 Jun 2012, 14:35
Re: Ever heard of an extra round being fought after a draw was declared?
Think Boxeo used it last year...maybe the year before