Ever heard of an extra round being fought after a draw was declared?

Post Reply
King Carlos
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1123
Joined: 11 May 2010, 19:10

Ever heard of an extra round being fought after a draw was declared?

Post by King Carlos »

I was running through Sanderline Williams' record and noticed he dropped a Split Decision to Ronnie Essett for the vacant NABF title back in '88. After a draw was declared after 12, they fought a 13th round to determine the winner.

Did some trawling online and apparently this was a thing among the smaller belts (NABF, USBA) at the time. This is the only example I can find of it actually being utilized, though. Anyone have any info on this or any other examples?
scartissue
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1893
Joined: 31 Mar 2002, 20:00

Re: Ever heard of an extra round being fought after a draw was declared?

Post by scartissue »

I know it's been done sporadically over the years, but the only one I can think of at the moment was Bruce Curry against Rafael Rodriguez. An 11th round was ordered due to them being a part of a television tournament.
King Carlos
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1123
Joined: 11 May 2010, 19:10

Re: Ever heard of an extra round being fought after a draw was declared?

Post by King Carlos »

Found another example. Doug DeWitt MD13 Tony Thornton for the USBA title in '87.
BoxBuzz
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 29847
Joined: 07 Jun 2005, 16:37

Re: Ever heard of an extra round being fought after a draw was declared?

Post by BoxBuzz »

Who thinks this is a good idea? I sorta like it, think of all the draws that could have been resolved by this simple method.

It also feels very risky....another reason I like it.


Of course neither fighter should be forced into that extra round, and a "no mas" signal means the other guy is the winner.
yancey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2827
Joined: 16 Dec 2007, 18:26

Re: Ever heard of an extra round being fought after a draw was declared?

Post by yancey »

Agree, it is an interesting idea. A sudden death playoff, if you will.

I'd like to see it get some trial usage. The extra length of time between the end of regulation and the announcement of a draw would also give the fighters a bit longer rest for the decider round.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Ever heard of an extra round being fought after a draw was declared?

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

Yes, I remember the brief trial.
evrenb
Super Middleweight
Posts: 3410
Joined: 16 Feb 2013, 09:47

Re: Ever heard of an extra round being fought after a draw was declared?

Post by evrenb »

BoxBuzz wrote:Who thinks this is a good idea? I sorta like it, think of all the draws that could have been resolved by this simple method.

It also feels very risky....another reason I like it.


Of course neither fighter should be forced into that extra round, and a "no mas" signal means the other guy is the winner.
There was another fight in the early 1990's but I cant remember right now - thought it was Prince Charles Williams but I got confused with his first fight with Merqui Sosa where both fighters were deemed unfit to continue after seven treacherous rounds. I twas around that time though...
Boxing Prospect
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6592
Joined: 25 Jun 2012, 14:35

Re: Ever heard of an extra round being fought after a draw was declared?

Post by Boxing Prospect »

Think Boxeo used it last year...maybe the year before
Post Reply