Khan v Canelo May 7th!

magwitch
Middleweight
Posts: 4753
Joined: 30 Jun 2014, 20:04

Re: Khan v Canelo May 7th!

Post by magwitch »

Well, that's Donald Trump's newspaper spattered in coffee in the morning....
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23147
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Khan v Canelo May 7th!

Post by mickey1975 »

danamba7 wrote:
mickey1975 wrote:I can see Brook-Bizier been even more sluggish at the box office now. I'm just intrigued to see who Kell calls out afterwards. Thurmam, Porter? Neither of which will be in England.
Would Bradley travel to the UK again? I think he'd go for Garcia in the US.
Bradley will be on very good money for fighting Pac for the third time. I doubt Camp Eddie can make him an offer that he'll even think about.
ShadrachSimmo
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4738
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 05:42

Re: Khan v Canelo May 7th!

Post by ShadrachSimmo »

magwitch wrote:Well, that's Donald Trump's newspaper spattered in coffee in the morning....
:lol: :lol:
Cyclops
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5744
Joined: 13 Jun 2009, 04:14

Re: Khan v Canelo May 7th!

Post by Cyclops »

keirw wrote:
jimcook wrote:even if khan could remain onhis feet for 12 rounds against canelo, there is no way he would ever get a decision ...even if he deserved it. his management are making an inspired cash out play by throwing him to the wolves in this one. he has no chance in this fight , but they figure that they can get two big paydays rather than the one. i suppose it makes financial sense.
i feel sorry for brook though,was looking forward to seeing him splatter khan.
With all due respect, fcuk brook, maybe if he had faced one or two more top opponents in his career he wouldn't have to bang on about Khan constantly.
For such an obviously talented fighter Brook's opposition has been shockingly poor. Even when he was down to fight Brandon Rios and Diego Chavez both of these fights seemed underwhelming, stalling his career. But, Porter aside, they would have been the best names on his resume by quite some way. He didn't even fight them!

Khan has upped the stakes so high now (he mentioned fighting Canelo last year I think so this is not that much of a surprise to me) that Brook has to fight Bradley, Garcia, or the winner of Porter/Thurman in his next fight otherwise he is king of the "who needs him?" club and looks completely mismanaged. He is known by the more casual boxing fanbase but isn't anywhere near as big as he should be and I doubt big enough to pay to bring any of those names over here, so he'll have to take the short end and fight them in the states.
Deadendgeneration
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1906
Joined: 21 Feb 2009, 19:01

Re: Khan v Canelo May 7th!

Post by Deadendgeneration »

I don't get the assumption that Khan v Brook could do Wembley. Doesn't seem anywhere near that big to me. Especially down south.
danconnollyeire
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 3576
Joined: 24 May 2012, 10:31

Re: Khan v Canelo May 7th!

Post by danconnollyeire »

MW? What Da?
Rob3_142
Super Welterweight
Posts: 2791
Joined: 26 Jun 2015, 06:03

Re: Khan v Canelo May 7th!

Post by Rob3_142 »

Deadendgeneration wrote:I don't get the assumption that Khan v Brook could do Wembley. Doesn't seem anywhere near that big to me. Especially down south.
Some think it would of been bigger than Froch - Groves II
MarkMcBurney
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1670
Joined: 18 Nov 2012, 07:47

Re: Khan v Canelo May 7th!

Post by MarkMcBurney »

Rob3_142 wrote:
Deadendgeneration wrote:I don't get the assumption that Khan v Brook could do Wembley. Doesn't seem anywhere near that big to me. Especially down south.
Some think it would of been bigger than Froch - Groves II
Not for me (I live on south coast)
Terry Dooley
Welterweight
Posts: 1664
Joined: 25 Nov 2015, 09:07

Re: Khan v Canelo May 7th!

Post by Terry Dooley »

Rob3_142 wrote:
ste1983 wrote:Massive respect to Khan he wants to fight the best and does!

In the meantime Kel Brooke fights Brizier in March :OhYes:
Brook does fight Bizier in March, but that's because he has a mandatory World title defence. The idea was to get it out of the way March, to open up a super fight in the summer. I'm sorry but how can you be criticised for being world champion and defending against world level opponents? Neither Brook or Hearn are in control of the mandatory opponents, and it's the responsibility of being world champion. Okay his other fights outside of mandatory challenges are in their control, but it's not like time is against Brook, those fights will come. Kahn was supposed to be that move to bigger fights.

I'm also not that convinced he's getting more money with the Alvarez fight than he would have got for the Brook fight. Considering he was being offered the lions share of the split from the Brook fight, I doubt he's being offered anything over 40% for Alvarez. Also 80'000 sell out, and inevitable PPV (Britain does a remarkable sales in PPV against US).

I look forward to the fight non-the-less, and will be interesting to see how Kahn gets on carrying the extra weight.
Of course he will get more. The U.S. charges more for PPVS, you have site fees etc. People kept going on about Froch-Groves II, 80,000 and all that last night. Froch came out with around £8,000,000. He is arguably one of the biggest names in Britain, but chased Chavez in Vegas next, do you think that was purely based on his dream of fighting there?

If Britain is a huge draw can you explain why Floyd “MONEY” Mayweather has never come over here to milk that cash cow? Floyd earned around $25,000,000 for Marquez, a fight that was seen as competitive as Babe Ruth Vs a glass piñata and didn’t take place in front of 80,000 at Wembley.
Happy Slapper
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 499
Joined: 20 Jul 2008, 16:22

Re: Khan v Canelo May 7th!

Post by Happy Slapper »

Khan has played an absolute blinder here. Brook has been royally shafted and Eddie must be gutted.
Deadendgeneration
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1906
Joined: 21 Feb 2009, 19:01

Re: Khan v Canelo May 7th!

Post by Deadendgeneration »

Rob3_142 wrote:
Deadendgeneration wrote:I don't get the assumption that Khan v Brook could do Wembley. Doesn't seem anywhere near that big to me. Especially down south.
Some think it would of been bigger than Froch - Groves II
Yeah, I just don't see it. Froch/Groves 2 was so big because of the conclusion of the first fight which was in front of what, 1/4 of the spectators?
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Khan v Canelo May 7th!

Post by palooka »

Amir has got some bottle, Brook is a big welter but I very much doubt he'd face any of the light middleweight champs. If Khan puts on a good show the Brook bout is still there but Kell needs to up his opposition.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Khan v Canelo May 7th!

Post by Horse »

palooka wrote:Amir has got some bottle, Brook is a big welter but I very much doubt he'd face any of the light middleweight champs. If Khan puts on a good show the Brook bout is still there but Kell needs to up his opposition.
The Brook fight is still there even if he gets annihilated.

The fight would make less money, but he'd still be a very good opponent for Brook and he could still probably demand the lion's share.
Stuarty
Middleweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: Khan v Canelo May 7th!

Post by Stuarty »

Horse wrote:
palooka wrote:Amir has got some bottle, Brook is a big welter but I very much doubt he'd face any of the light middleweight champs. If Khan puts on a good show the Brook bout is still there but Kell needs to up his opposition.
The Brook fight is still there even if he gets annihilated.

The fight would make less money, but he'd still be a very good opponent for Brook and he could still probably demand the lion's share.
Do you think he'll even attempt to get back to 147 after this fight? Maybe he'll look/feel more comfortable and stay at 154? I personally think he's ready for chucking it after Canelo but who knows....

Suppose Brook is a big Welter so could step up no probs but there are so many good fights at 147 for him. I'm a fan of Brook but he's a frustrating character.
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Khan v Canelo May 7th!

Post by palooka »

In one swoop he's proved he isn't afraid of boxing Brook. Best of luck to Khan, I can't see him winning but if he and his team have had this in mind for a while I can see him giving it a right go.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Khan v Canelo May 7th!

Post by Horse »

Stuarty30 wrote:Do you think he'll even attempt to get back to 147 after this fight? Maybe he'll look/feel more comfortable and stay at 154? I personally think he's ready for chucking it after Canelo but who knows....
I reckon he'll keep fighting and move down if there's a big fight for him.
keirw
Middleweight
Posts: 2681
Joined: 03 Nov 2013, 10:55

Re: Khan v Canelo May 7th!

Post by keirw »

Metal Fingers wrote:


If Britain is a huge draw can you explain why Floyd “MONEY” Mayweather has never come over here to milk that cash cow? Floyd earned around $25,000,000 for Marquez, a fight that was seen as competitive as Babe Ruth Vs a glass piñata and didn’t take place in front of 80,000 at Wembley.
You are right, but I'm not sure Babe Ruth references belong on the British and Irish board.
Terry Dooley
Welterweight
Posts: 1664
Joined: 25 Nov 2015, 09:07

Re: Khan v Canelo May 7th!

Post by Terry Dooley »

keirw wrote:
Metal Fingers wrote:


If Britain is a huge draw can you explain why Floyd “MONEY” Mayweather has never come over here to milk that cash cow? Floyd earned around $25,000,000 for Marquez, a fight that was seen as competitive as Babe Ruth Vs a glass piñata and didn’t take place in front of 80,000 at Wembley.
You are right, but I'm not sure Babe Ruth references belong on the British and Irish board.
Of course. I should have used a legendary British baseball player. I apologise profusely and am self-flagellating myself as we speak, I just won't say where.
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Khan v Canelo May 7th!

Post by palooka »

Don't you know any famous English rounders players?
Terry Dooley
Welterweight
Posts: 1664
Joined: 25 Nov 2015, 09:07

Re: Khan v Canelo May 7th!

Post by Terry Dooley »

palooka wrote:Don't you know any famous English rounders players?
Not since the restraining order kicked in.
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Khan v Canelo May 7th!

Post by palooka »

Metal Fingers wrote:
palooka wrote:Don't you know any famous English rounders players?
Not since the restraining order kicked in.
Amateur :OhYes:
stevedoc
Super Middleweight
Posts: 3550
Joined: 24 May 2013, 07:40

Re: Khan v Canelo May 7th!

Post by stevedoc »

magwitch wrote:Well, that's Donald Trump's newspaper spattered in coffee in the morning....
Can you imagine if khan did a naz and started praising Allah before the fight,he'd get strung up after the fight now
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Khan v Canelo May 7th!

Post by palooka »

stevedoc wrote:
magwitch wrote:Well, that's Donald Trump's newspaper spattered in coffee in the morning....
Can you imagine if khan did a naz and started praising Allah before the fight,he'd get strung up after the fight now
I'd laugh if he came into the ring on a flying carpet.
Stuarty
Middleweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: Khan v Canelo May 7th!

Post by Stuarty »

palooka wrote:
stevedoc wrote:
magwitch wrote:Well, that's Donald Trump's newspaper spattered in coffee in the morning....
Can you imagine if khan did a naz and started praising Allah before the fight,he'd get strung up after the fight now
I'd laugh if he came into the ring on a flying carpet.
Fury coming in on a flying carpet would be the bollux! He'd need a rugby team to carry him in mind!
davie
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6763
Joined: 21 Aug 2010, 00:45

Re: Khan v Canelo May 7th!

Post by davie »

handsofstone wrote:Khan getting badgered on Sky Sports News now about the Brook fight,leave it Sky,who gives a fvck,Khan is fighting Canelo Alvarez baby :bag:
They must be spewing nearly as much as Camp Eddie.
They'll have been desperate for the Brook vs Khan Wembley fight.

Is there any mechanism where Fwank can host a PPV without Camp eddie and Sky to really put one over on them
Post Reply