Why are we falling for the Canelo fraud?
-
ImranSarwar
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 917
- Joined: 26 Sep 2014, 22:53
Re: Why are we falling for the Canelo fraud?
("help"/double printed!)
Last edited by ImranSarwar on 04 Feb 2016, 18:39, edited 1 time in total.
-
ImranSarwar
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 917
- Joined: 26 Sep 2014, 22:53
Re: Why are we falling for the Canelo fraud?
Heavyweight different perspective: Fury, Wilder, Joshua Anthony, Wladimir Klitschko & WIDE OPEN. We need a better print media focus on the heavyweight division.
[If we can CUT OFF after WBC WBA IBF WBO gonna help the overall CAUSE "A LOT"!]
[I propose first & second echelon!]['2e' FIVE USA States value.........]
[If we can CUT OFF after WBC WBA IBF WBO gonna help the overall CAUSE "A LOT"!]
[I propose first & second echelon!]['2e' FIVE USA States value.........]
Re: Why are we falling for the Canelo fraud?
For Canelo to look good he has to have a guy come straight at him, or go straight back it seems. Both Floyd and Lara made him look absolutely clueless at times. Even with Lara Canelo was only able to land shots to the head about 5 or 6 times the entire fight. Lara did run, but landed more punches and the only significant ones, even if Canelo was not hurt. Canelo's body shots were over counted also, with a lot of them being blocked. Lara should have won that fight regardless if he ran or not. No way will Canelo give him a rematch.
Both Anguelo and Kirkand cut massive amounts of weight to fight Canelo, and it showed. Both had 40+lb weight cuts, and style-wise were perfect for Canelo. Trout may have beaten Canelo too if not for the open scoring, which made him fight differently. Still was very close. Cotto fight was good, and I had Canelo winning by 2 rounds if I remember right, but Cotto is past his best too.
Bring on Khan. Khan knows he wouldn't get this payday if he loses to a welter, and is a win-win situation for him. What if Canelo loses? I will laugh my freaking arse off! This fight does nothing for him, other than make him some money. It actually damages his already eroding reputation with the catchweight bs.
Both Anguelo and Kirkand cut massive amounts of weight to fight Canelo, and it showed. Both had 40+lb weight cuts, and style-wise were perfect for Canelo. Trout may have beaten Canelo too if not for the open scoring, which made him fight differently. Still was very close. Cotto fight was good, and I had Canelo winning by 2 rounds if I remember right, but Cotto is past his best too.
Bring on Khan. Khan knows he wouldn't get this payday if he loses to a welter, and is a win-win situation for him. What if Canelo loses? I will laugh my freaking arse off! This fight does nothing for him, other than make him some money. It actually damages his already eroding reputation with the catchweight bs.
-
ImranSarwar
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 917
- Joined: 26 Sep 2014, 22:53
Re: Why are we falling for the Canelo fraud?
marking what you have to say here. ALL VERY Intelligent! Only about the "Catchweight" I see a divide in the thinking on that topic. It don't bother me, generally the "Catchweight". 160 is m limits. We need only be under m. But, too I see the plot of it when you force someone heavier down lbs. But/it's inside issue and those who say that the WBC WBA IBF /WBO aught become "involved"...I miss the reasoning and don't see any ISSUE that the FIRST &MAJOR FOUR can even step in about.Badhusker wrote:For Canelo to look good he has to have a guy come straight at him, or go straight back it seems. Both Floyd and Lara made him look absolutely clueless at times. Even with Lara Canelo was only able to land shots to the head about 5 or 6 times the entire fight. Lara did run, but landed more punches and the only significant ones, even if Canelo was not hurt. Canelo's body shots were over counted also, with a lot of them being blocked. Lara should have won that fight regardless if he ran or not. No way will Canelo give him a rematch.
Both Anguelo and Kirkand cut massive amounts of weight to fight Canelo, and it showed. Both had 40+lb weight cuts, and style-wise were perfect for Canelo. Trout may have beaten Canelo too if not for the open scoring, which made him fight differently. Still was very close. Cotto fight was good, and I had Canelo winning by 2 rounds if I remember right, but Cotto is past his best too.
Bring on Khan. Khan knows he wouldn't get this payday if he loses to a welter, and is a win-win situation for him. What if Canelo loses? I will laugh my freaking arse off! This fight does nothing for him, other than make him some money. It actually damages his already eroding reputation with the catchweight bs.
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: Why are we falling for the Canelo fraud?
I recommend you check out a Nicaraguan flyweight by the name of Roman Gonzalez, JohnImranSarwar wrote:No doubt what so ever..Canelo Top-5 in the world right now. In no particular order: Ward, Krusher, Manny, Gennady Golovikin and Canelo Alverez.
He's "great". I really think you'll like him.