You are more than making this personal. Which is sad and pathetic, by the way. Then again, what would I expect from an Englishman? Nothing less than rudeness and spite.

YOUR POINT was that Hughie was too small to fight Joshua. YOUR POINT was that Hughie was too immature to fight Joshua. YOUR POINT was that Joshua is such a powerhouse that Hughie has no chance in hell to win and would get blown away inside of three rounds.
All I pointed out is that BOXING, THE SWEET SCIENCE is not about power alone, size alone or even experience alone. Hughie is virtually the same size as Joshua. He's just as fast, if not faster. His style is all defense than offense. He's fast, he's experienced in the gym as Tyson's chief sparring partner and has put in hundreds and hundreds of rounds with a good mix of guys (Chambers, Cunningham, Johnson, etc).
Yes, I do believe Hughie can beat the man. But it's NOT because of my fascination with gyspies or bareknuckle boxing. It's because your man Joshua fights in a straight line, and has a limited arsenal of punches. He's wide open for counters, and the Dillian Whyte fight shown more errors and flaws in the man's style and constitution than it did success. Hughie has been taught, instructed and bred to be all about elusiveness and timing. I think a Joshua would have a hard time hitting the intended target.
Joshua is a repeat of David Price all over again. And that is just my feeling on the matter. We can agree to disagree all you want, but don't make it personal and say such contrived nonsense as to say I wish Gorman was my father and the like. That is petty, that is beneath common decency. Just because you are a man who wants to focus on paper (records) rather than what records don't show, and have to real vision to see outside the box, doesn't give you the right to insult me in such a manner.