Briggs - "Lets Go Haye"

asdfjkl
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Briggs - "Lets Go Haye"

Post by asdfjkl »

gazza8 wrote:hope Haye fights KT him the f O and end tbis pantomime that is Shannin Briggs
I hope Briggs fights KT him the f O and ends tbis pentomime that is David Haye
rhino222
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6618
Joined: 09 Sep 2005, 09:38

Re: Briggs - "Lets Go Haye"

Post by rhino222 »

briggs...although old, although slower than in his prime.....will pause a threat to most of the top ten. the reason being that the heavyweight division is relatively poor at the moment.

briggs can punch and the majority of the top ten have questionable whiskers. klitschko, fury, haye, wilder...etc etc

i think the public deserve one more look at briggs in anger, in a decent fight, against a top 10 opponent....to know if he can cause a massive upset.
Dixonian
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1051
Joined: 08 Aug 2011, 06:37

Re: Briggs - "Lets Go Haye"

Post by Dixonian »

rhino222 wrote:briggs...although old, although slower than in his prime.....will pause a threat to most of the top ten. the reason being that the heavyweight division is relatively poor at the moment.

briggs can punch and the majority of the top ten have questionable whiskers. klitschko, fury, haye, wilder...etc etc

i think the public deserve one more look at briggs in anger, in a decent fight, against a top 10 opponent....to know if he can cause a massive upset.
He hasn't fought anyone. And I mean no one. Until he has I don't know how you can make that statement. Let's see him fight someone inside the top 100 first.
rhino222
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6618
Joined: 09 Sep 2005, 09:38

Re: Briggs - "Lets Go Haye"

Post by rhino222 »

Dixonian wrote:
rhino222 wrote:briggs...although old, although slower than in his prime.....will pause a threat to most of the top ten. the reason being that the heavyweight division is relatively poor at the moment.

briggs can punch and the majority of the top ten have questionable whiskers. klitschko, fury, haye, wilder...etc etc

i think the public deserve one more look at briggs in anger, in a decent fight, against a top 10 opponent....to know if he can cause a massive upset.
He hasn't fought anyone. And I mean no one. Until he has I don't know how you can make that statement. Let's see him fight someone inside the top 100 first.
i refer to his career....has he still not fought anyone? the last thing you lose is your punch, or dont you believe in that old one?
Stuarty
Middleweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: Briggs - "Lets Go Haye"

Post by Stuarty »

rhino222 wrote:
Dixonian wrote:
rhino222 wrote:briggs...although old, although slower than in his prime.....will pause a threat to most of the top ten. the reason being that the heavyweight division is relatively poor at the moment.

briggs can punch and the majority of the top ten have questionable whiskers. klitschko, fury, haye, wilder...etc etc

i think the public deserve one more look at briggs in anger, in a decent fight, against a top 10 opponent....to know if he can cause a massive upset.
He hasn't fought anyone. And I mean no one. Until he has I don't know how you can make that statement. Let's see him fight someone inside the top 100 first.
i refer to his career....has he still not fought anyone? the last thing you lose is your punch, or dont you believe in that old one?
If he beat someone in an eliminator I wouldn't mind seeing him get a chance but the fact he's been chasing everyone and anyone relevant and trying to talk his way into a big fight rather than work his way in suggests he's just after a payday IMO. The tanking he took against Vitali was pretty horrible to watch and that wasn't yesterday.
asdfjkl
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Briggs - "Lets Go Haye"

Post by asdfjkl »

Dixonian wrote:
rhino222 wrote:briggs...although old, although slower than in his prime.....will pause a threat to most of the top ten. the reason being that the heavyweight division is relatively poor at the moment.

briggs can punch and the majority of the top ten have questionable whiskers. klitschko, fury, haye, wilder...etc etc

i think the public deserve one more look at briggs in anger, in a decent fight, against a top 10 opponent....to know if he can cause a massive upset.
He hasn't fought anyone. And I mean no one. Until he has I don't know how you can make that statement. Let's see him fight someone inside the top 100 first.
A few of hia opponends after Vitali were around rank 100 actually.
Dixonian
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1051
Joined: 08 Aug 2011, 06:37

Re: Briggs - "Lets Go Haye"

Post by Dixonian »

rhino222 wrote:
Dixonian wrote:
rhino222 wrote:briggs...although old, although slower than in his prime.....will pause a threat to most of the top ten. the reason being that the heavyweight division is relatively poor at the moment.

briggs can punch and the majority of the top ten have questionable whiskers. klitschko, fury, haye, wilder...etc etc

i think the public deserve one more look at briggs in anger, in a decent fight, against a top 10 opponent....to know if he can cause a massive upset.
He hasn't fought anyone. And I mean no one. Until he has I don't know how you can make that statement. Let's see him fight someone inside the top 100 first.
i refer to his career....has he still not fought anyone? the last thing you lose is your punch, or dont you believe in that old one?
Sorry you're right. He fought Vitali 6 years ago and Sultan Ibragimov two years before that. Lost both. This most definitely qualifies him to fight a world top-tenner.

Also, yes the last thing to go is your punch. Earnie Shavers is still alive right? C'mon Earnie you know what to do... roar the words "let's go champ!" a zillion times and you might earn yourself a world title eliminator.
Dixonian
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1051
Joined: 08 Aug 2011, 06:37

Re: Briggs - "Lets Go Haye"

Post by Dixonian »

asdfjkl wrote:
Dixonian wrote:
rhino222 wrote:briggs...although old, although slower than in his prime.....will pause a threat to most of the top ten. the reason being that the heavyweight division is relatively poor at the moment.

briggs can punch and the majority of the top ten have questionable whiskers. klitschko, fury, haye, wilder...etc etc

i think the public deserve one more look at briggs in anger, in a decent fight, against a top 10 opponent....to know if he can cause a massive upset.
He hasn't fought anyone. And I mean no one. Until he has I don't know how you can make that statement. Let's see him fight someone inside the top 100 first.
A few of hia opponends after Vitali were around rank 100 actually.
The only one I can think of is possibly Zumbano Love. Who took him the distance. And we know how bad he is.
Controversial
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9221
Joined: 13 Jul 2002, 18:29

Re: Briggs - "Lets Go Haye"

Post by Controversial »

Dixonian wrote:
rhino222 wrote: i refer to his career....has he still not fought anyone? the last thing you lose is your punch, or dont you believe in that old one?
Also, yes the last thing to go is your punch.
I even think that old saying is rubbish, plenty of big punchers carried on and struggled to knock people out, Joe Louis, Tyson and Herbie Hide are good examples of that. Briggs is a joke, he had little success in his prime so I can't see how he is any better aged 44. He's after a big pay cheque that's all, he should try expending all the energy in beating someone half decent first and then maybe the bigger fights will come.
Dixonian
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1051
Joined: 08 Aug 2011, 06:37

Re: Briggs - "Lets Go Haye"

Post by Dixonian »

Controversial wrote:
Dixonian wrote:
rhino222 wrote: i refer to his career....has he still not fought anyone? the last thing you lose is your punch, or dont you believe in that old one?
Also, yes the last thing to go is your punch.
I even think that old saying is rubbish, plenty of big punchers carried on and struggled to knock people out, Joe Louis, Tyson and Herbie Hide are good examples of that. Briggs is a joke, he had little success in his prime so I can't see how he is any better aged 44. He's after a big pay cheque that's all, he should try expending all the energy in beating someone half decent first and then maybe the bigger fights will come.
Precisely, is that too much to ask?

(Answer: Yes it is and that's why he's trying to get a title shot by shooting his mouth off instead.)
Controversial
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9221
Joined: 13 Jul 2002, 18:29

Re: Briggs - "Lets Go Haye"

Post by Controversial »

Dixonian wrote:
Controversial wrote:
Dixonian wrote:


Also, yes the last thing to go is your punch.
I even think that old saying is rubbish, plenty of big punchers carried on and struggled to knock people out, Joe Louis, Tyson and Herbie Hide are good examples of that. Briggs is a joke, he had little success in his prime so I can't see how he is any better aged 44. He's after a big pay cheque that's all, he should try expending all the energy in beating someone half decent first and then maybe the bigger fights will come.
Precisely, is that too much to ask?

(Answer: Yes it is and that's why he's trying to get a title shot by shooting his mouth off instead.)
Yes why risk getting spanked for little money when you can get spanked for big money !!
asdfjkl
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Briggs - "Lets Go Haye"

Post by asdfjkl »

Dixonian wrote:
Controversial wrote:
Dixonian wrote:


Also, yes the last thing to go is your punch.
I even think that old saying is rubbish, plenty of big punchers carried on and struggled to knock people out, Joe Louis, Tyson and Herbie Hide are good examples of that. Briggs is a joke, he had little success in his prime so I can't see how he is any better aged 44. He's after a big pay cheque that's all, he should try expending all the energy in beating someone half decent first and then maybe the bigger fights will come.
Precisely, is that too much to ask?

(Answer: Yes it is and that's why he's trying to get a title shot by shooting his mouth off instead.)
Well, let's get real, Briggs is higher ranked as David Haye for a reason
Controversial
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9221
Joined: 13 Jul 2002, 18:29

Re: Briggs - "Lets Go Haye"

Post by Controversial »

asdfjkl wrote:
Dixonian wrote:
Controversial wrote:
I even think that old saying is rubbish, plenty of big punchers carried on and struggled to knock people out, Joe Louis, Tyson and Herbie Hide are good examples of that. Briggs is a joke, he had little success in his prime so I can't see how he is any better aged 44. He's after a big pay cheque that's all, he should try expending all the energy in beating someone half decent first and then maybe the bigger fights will come.
Precisely, is that too much to ask?

(Answer: Yes it is and that's why he's trying to get a title shot by shooting his mouth off instead.)
Well, let's get real, Briggs is higher ranked as David Haye for a reason
Yes the reason is Haye had 3.5 years out the game. Rankings are a joke, jeez the IBF champ is someone most fans hadn't even heard of before he won the title. Who has Briggs beaten since losing to Klitschko in 2010? Its a pointless fight for Haye, he would smash Briggs in a round or two and get criticised for beating a 44 year old whose had 2 fights against nobodies in the last year. One of the guys Briggs beat last year was almost 49 !!!!
asdfjkl
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Briggs - "Lets Go Haye"

Post by asdfjkl »

Controversial wrote:
asdfjkl wrote:
Dixonian wrote:
Precisely, is that too much to ask?

(Answer: Yes it is and that's why he's trying to get a title shot by shooting his mouth off instead.)
Well, let's get real, Briggs is higher ranked as David Haye for a reason
Yes the reason is Haye had 3.5 years out the game. Rankings are a joke, jeez the IBF champ is someone most fans hadn't even heard of before he won the title. Who has Briggs beaten since losing to Klitschko in 2010? Its a pointless fight for Haye, he would smash Briggs in a round or two and get criticised for beating a 44 year old whose had 2 fights against nobodies in the last year. One of the guys Briggs beat last year was almost 49 !!!!
No offence, but Zoltan Petranyi and Raphael Zumbrano love are both ranked higher as Mark de Mori...
Controversial
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9221
Joined: 13 Jul 2002, 18:29

Re: Briggs - "Lets Go Haye"

Post by Controversial »

asdfjkl wrote:
Controversial wrote:
asdfjkl wrote: Well, let's get real, Briggs is higher ranked as David Haye for a reason
Yes the reason is Haye had 3.5 years out the game. Rankings are a joke, jeez the IBF champ is someone most fans hadn't even heard of before he won the title. Who has Briggs beaten since losing to Klitschko in 2010? Its a pointless fight for Haye, he would smash Briggs in a round or two and get criticised for beating a 44 year old whose had 2 fights against nobodies in the last year. One of the guys Briggs beat last year was almost 49 !!!!
No offence, but Zoltan Petranyi and Raphael Zumbrano love are both ranked higher as Mark de Mori...
Haye wasn't going to fight them though was he. AJ had already flattened Zambrano and Petranyi was coming off two knock out defeats and is aged 49. On paper de Mori was the far better opponent than them two clowns, their rankings are irrelevent. Also who can blame Haye for an easy fight after the injury and time out he's had. What makes you think Briggs is such a good fight for Haye?
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17105
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Briggs - "Lets Go Haye"

Post by keithmoonhangover »

Controversial wrote:who can blame Haye for an easy fight after the injury and time out he's had.
watsupdoc87
Super Welterweight
Posts: 2841
Joined: 25 Oct 2014, 14:16

Re: Briggs - "Lets Go Haye"

Post by watsupdoc87 »

keithmoonhangover wrote:
Controversial wrote:who can blame Haye for an easy fight after the injury and time out he's had.
most people :bag:
Controversial
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9221
Joined: 13 Jul 2002, 18:29

Re: Briggs - "Lets Go Haye"

Post by Controversial »

Haye is one of those fighters that people love or hate. Whatever he does some people will dig him out. If he fought Briggs it wouldn't be too long before Briggs was snoozing on the canvas. I personally can't see what Haye would prove doing that, he needs to fight someone higher up the rankings than Briggs, someone top 10 at least.
asdfjkl
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Briggs - "Lets Go Haye"

Post by asdfjkl »

Controversial wrote:
asdfjkl wrote:
Controversial wrote:
Yes the reason is Haye had 3.5 years out the game. Rankings are a joke, jeez the IBF champ is someone most fans hadn't even heard of before he won the title. Who has Briggs beaten since losing to Klitschko in 2010? Its a pointless fight for Haye, he would smash Briggs in a round or two and get criticised for beating a 44 year old whose had 2 fights against nobodies in the last year. One of the guys Briggs beat last year was almost 49 !!!!
No offence, but Zoltan Petranyi and Raphael Zumbrano love are both ranked higher as Mark de Mori...
Haye wasn't going to fight them though was he. AJ had already flattened Zambrano and Petranyi was coming off two knock out defeats and is aged 49. On paper de Mori was the far better opponent than them two clowns, their rankings are irrelevent. Also who can blame Haye for an easy fight after the injury and time out he's had. What makes you think Briggs is such a good fight for Haye?
Who says Briggs is that bad? Haye simply hasn't proven himself to be that good.
On paper Haye is an absolute nobody at this moment, yes partly because he hasn't been active for 3,5 years, but really, what has Haye proved more as Briggs has at this point?
Why would any top contender fight Haye and not Briggs?
They are really quite equal at this point, perhaps not in the ring, but they certainly are on paper.
I've already suggested Ortiz, a boxer that does have the skills and ranks, but can't bring in the money because his fans got no money, but Haye doesn't seem to want to fight him either. In other words, Haye can't fight top contenders, the subleague can't offer anything for Haye and neither the other way around and behind that you'll find Shannon Briggs.


David Haye once talked himself into a match, but he's basically a cruiserweight that wants to beat the heavyweights, but can't.

For me Haye seems to be just after cash and nothing else.

Any top 30 fighter can easely avoid David Haye because he's too low ranked, so Briggs really isn't such a bad option.
Somehow Haye seems to wish to avoid that option and wishes to become the new Briggs himself.
Dixonian
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1051
Joined: 08 Aug 2011, 06:37

Re: Briggs - "Lets Go Haye"

Post by Dixonian »

asdfjkl wrote:
Controversial wrote:
asdfjkl wrote: No offence, but Zoltan Petranyi and Raphael Zumbrano love are both ranked higher as Mark de Mori...
Haye wasn't going to fight them though was he. AJ had already flattened Zambrano and Petranyi was coming off two knock out defeats and is aged 49. On paper de Mori was the far better opponent than them two clowns, their rankings are irrelevent. Also who can blame Haye for an easy fight after the injury and time out he's had. What makes you think Briggs is such a good fight for Haye?
Who says Briggs is that bad? Haye simply hasn't proven himself to be that good.
On paper Haye is an absolute nobody at this moment, yes partly because he hasn't been active for 3,5 years, but really, what has Haye proved more as Briggs has at this point?
Why would any top contender fight Haye and not Briggs?
They are really quite equal at this point, perhaps not in the ring, but they certainly are on paper.
I've already suggested Ortiz, a boxer that does have the skills and ranks, but can't bring in the money because his fans got no money, but Haye doesn't seem to want to fight him either. In other words, Haye can't fight top contenders, the subleague can't offer anything for Haye and neither the other way around and behind that you'll find Shannon Briggs.


David Haye once talked himself into a match, but he's basically a cruiserweight that wants to beat the heavyweights, but can't.

For me Haye seems to be just after cash and nothing else.

Any top 30 fighter can easely avoid David Haye because he's too low ranked, so Briggs really isn't such a bad option.
Somehow Haye seems to wish to avoid that option and wishes to become the new Briggs himself.
Haye is more than capable of smashing his way up the rankings and he won't need old man Briggs to do it. He'll get tons of stick for beating him up anyway and won't move far up the rankings as a result (although rankings do work in mysterious ways).
Controversial
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9221
Joined: 13 Jul 2002, 18:29

Re: Briggs - "Lets Go Haye"

Post by Controversial »

asdfjkl wrote:
Who says Briggs is that bad? Haye simply hasn't proven himself to be that good.
On paper Haye is an absolute nobody at this moment, yes partly because he hasn't been active for 3,5 years, but really, what has Haye proved more as Briggs has at this point?
Why would any top contender fight Haye and not Briggs?
They are really quite equal at this point, perhaps not in the ring, but they certainly are on paper.
I've already suggested Ortiz, a boxer that does have the skills and ranks, but can't bring in the money because his fans got no money, but Haye doesn't seem to want to fight him either. In other words, Haye can't fight top contenders, the subleague can't offer anything for Haye and neither the other way around and behind that you'll find Shannon Briggs.

David Haye once talked himself into a match, but he's basically a cruiserweight that wants to beat the heavyweights, but can't.

For me Haye seems to be just after cash and nothing else.

Any top 30 fighter can easely avoid David Haye because he's too low ranked, so Briggs really isn't such a bad option.
Somehow Haye seems to wish to avoid that option and wishes to become the new Briggs himself.
Because Briggs hasn't beaten anyone decent in years. If anyone wants an easy fight and had to choose to fight Haye or Briggs I'd put money on Briggs being picked everytime. Haye's goal is a world title shot and the only way is to get up the rankings as quick as possible, beating a 44 year old Briggs isn't going to achieve that. Watch how slow Briggs was in his last fight, he's just a loudmouth meathead who is past his best and trying to get one last big pay day before retiring. Go through Briggs record, anyone he has beaten in the last 10 years Haye would beat even easier.
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45238
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Briggs - "Lets Go Haye"

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

Looking at the last clip I saw of briggs hitting the heavy bag, he appears to have absolutely zero gas in the tank, he looked exhausted after about 10 seconds.

He's just a roided up former name now looking to cash out.
Controversial
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9221
Joined: 13 Jul 2002, 18:29

Re: Briggs - "Lets Go Haye"

Post by Controversial »

jamesmcdonnell wrote:Looking at the last clip I saw of briggs hitting the heavy bag, he appears to have absolutely zero gas in the tank, he looked exhausted after about 10 seconds.

He's just a roided up former name now looking to cash out.
You beat me to it, yes I saw him on the bags the other day, shocking.
Cyclops
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5744
Joined: 13 Jun 2009, 04:14

Re: Briggs - "Lets Go Haye"

Post by Cyclops »

asdfjkl wrote:
gazza8 wrote:hope Haye fights KT him the f O and end tbis pantomime that is Shannin Briggs
I hope Briggs fights KT him the f O and ends tbis pentomime that is David Haye
I prefer British and Irish to Current Scene because the quality of debate is so much higher, don't you think?
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45238
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Briggs - "Lets Go Haye"

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

clopixolacuphase wrote:
asdfjkl wrote:
gazza8 wrote:hope Haye fights KT him the f O and end tbis pantomime that is Shannin Briggs
I hope Briggs fights KT him the f O and ends tbis pentomime that is David Haye
I prefer British and Irish to Current Scene because the quality of debate is so much higher, don't you think?
Especially the spelling.
Post Reply