Oh man did you just really bring up Broner? Broner? OMG. He is a bum.koolkc107 wrote:Let me show you how flawed certain logic is.
Joe Calzaghe had exactly two fights outside of Europe, the last 2.
In them, he faced guys that everyone agrees he should have fought much, much earlier.
As in, he should have left Britain and faced them at minimum 7 years before he actually did.
Yet, you don't see folks here calling Joe a coward.
The fights didn't happen when they should have, plain and simple.
Sometimes that happens.
Look how Euro champs and contenders have all found a way not to fight Rigondeaux.
Look how Broner was avoided at the lighter weights.
Upthread, I explained how it is quite likely Loeffler and lil g are actually avoiding Jacobs.
It makes sense. And is understandable. And in no way means Gennady is a coward.
It's a money game first, B...
Daniel Jacobs is ducking Gennady Golovkin.Jacobs is also overated!
Re: Daniel Jacobs is ducking Gennady Golovkin.Jacobs is also overated!
Re: Daniel Jacobs is ducking Gennady Golovkin.Jacobs is also overated!
Undefeated49-0 wrote:You're wasting your time with this Clown, he's just one of these dudes with a Euro Superiority Complex who hates Americans because he somehow think he/they are better over there than us (Americans) over here. I can't stand classless Bums link Lancenix, he's the kind of punk that would run if you encountered him on the street but would be the first to talk sh*t over the internet about someone being scared.koolkc107 wrote:Let me show you how flawed certain logic is.
Joe Calzaghe had exactly two fights outside of Europe, the last 2.
In them, he faced guys that everyone agrees he should have fought much, much earlier.
As in, he should have left Britain and faced them at minimum 7 years before he actually did.
Yet, you don't see folks here calling Joe a coward.
The fights didn't happen when they should have, plain and simple.
Sometimes that happens.
Look how Euro champs and contenders have all found a way not to fight Rigondeaux.
Look how Broner was avoided at the lighter weights.
Upthread, I explained how it is quite likely Loeffler and lil g are actually avoiding Jacobs.
It makes sense. And is understandable. And in no way means Gennady is a coward.
It's a money game first, B...
How long have Americans ruled boxing, Euro is just recently being starting to show a decent amount of good fighters, we've always had them, so don't go comparing your puny history to ours because I could list hundreds of American fighters that have dominated this sport for centuries Mr. A$$Clown Lancenix.
I just embarrassed you in your own haymon thread dude. STFU. SHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
-
Undefeated49-0
- Welterweight
- Posts: 1192
- Joined: 13 Nov 2015, 14:36
Re: Daniel Jacobs is ducking Gennady Golovkin.Jacobs is also overated!
Lancenix wrote:I just embarrassed you in your own haymon thread dude. STFU. SHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
You could never embarrass me you Clown but you have embarrassed yourself with your "I Hate Americans because I think I'm better because I'm Europen" rant.
Newsflash, none of the Americans here like you either turd, go flush yourself.
Re: Daniel Jacobs is ducking Gennady Golovkin.Jacobs is also overated!
At 130, he was untouchable, son.Lancenix wrote:Oh man did you just really bring up Broner? Broner? OMG. He is a bum.koolkc107 wrote:Let me show you how flawed certain logic is.
Joe Calzaghe had exactly two fights outside of Europe, the last 2.
In them, he faced guys that everyone agrees he should have fought much, much earlier.
As in, he should have left Britain and faced them at minimum 7 years before he actually did.
Yet, you don't see folks here calling Joe a coward.
The fights didn't happen when they should have, plain and simple.
Sometimes that happens.
Look how Euro champs and contenders have all found a way not to fight Rigondeaux.
Look how Broner was avoided at the lighter weights.
Upthread, I explained how it is quite likely Loeffler and lil g are actually avoiding Jacobs.
It makes sense. And is understandable. And in no way means Gennady is a coward.
It's a money game first, B...
Re: Daniel Jacobs is ducking Gennady Golovkin.Jacobs is also overated!
I already did. And really badly. A lot of people PM';d me all laughing at my smackdown of you.Undefeated49-0 wrote:Lancenix wrote:I just embarrassed you in your own haymon thread dude. STFU. SHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
You could never embarrass me you Clown but you have embarrassed yourself with your "I Hate Americans because I think I'm better because I'm Europen" rant.
Newsflash, none of the Americans here like you either turd, go flush yourself.
Re: Daniel Jacobs is ducking Gennady Golovkin.Jacobs is also overated!
He is a bum and fought like puss against Porter and Maidana. It was just sad that he had been built up into anything. "all About the Billions" I am so glad he still has a fan club in America. With you being the Pres. kinda sad actually. I want you to tell me what he did at 130 that waS SO IMPRESSIVE TO YOU. Please do tell.koolkc107 wrote:At 130, he was untouchable, son.Lancenix wrote:Oh man did you just really bring up Broner? Broner? OMG. He is a bum.koolkc107 wrote:Let me show you how flawed certain logic is.
Joe Calzaghe had exactly two fights outside of Europe, the last 2.
In them, he faced guys that everyone agrees he should have fought much, much earlier.
As in, he should have left Britain and faced them at minimum 7 years before he actually did.
Yet, you don't see folks here calling Joe a coward.
The fights didn't happen when they should have, plain and simple.
Sometimes that happens.
Look how Euro champs and contenders have all found a way not to fight Rigondeaux.
Look how Broner was avoided at the lighter weights.
Upthread, I explained how it is quite likely Loeffler and lil g are actually avoiding Jacobs.
It makes sense. And is understandable. And in no way means Gennady is a coward.
It's a money game first, B...
-
Undefeated49-0
- Welterweight
- Posts: 1192
- Joined: 13 Nov 2015, 14:36
Re: Daniel Jacobs is ducking Gennady Golovkin.Jacobs is also overated!
a lot of American Hating pieces of Euro-filth like you, I'm not surprised.Lancenix wrote:I already did. And really badly. A lot of people PM';d me all laughing at my smackdown of you.
Re: Daniel Jacobs is ducking Gennady Golovkin.Jacobs is also overated!
Euro-filth kind of harsh no??Undefeated49-0 wrote:a lot of American Hating pieces of Euro-filth like you, I'm not surprised.Lancenix wrote:I already did. And really badly. A lot of people PM';d me all laughing at my smackdown of you.
Re: Daniel Jacobs is ducking Gennady Golovkin.Jacobs is also overated!
He lost to PDL and Quintero at 130 lbs. :roflkoolkc107 wrote:At 130, he was untouchable, son.Lancenix wrote:Oh man did you just really bring up Broner? Broner? OMG. He is a bum.koolkc107 wrote:Let me show you how flawed certain logic is.
Joe Calzaghe had exactly two fights outside of Europe, the last 2.
In them, he faced guys that everyone agrees he should have fought much, much earlier.
As in, he should have left Britain and faced them at minimum 7 years before he actually did.
Yet, you don't see folks here calling Joe a coward.
The fights didn't happen when they should have, plain and simple.
Sometimes that happens.
Look how Euro champs and contenders have all found a way not to fight Rigondeaux.
Look how Broner was avoided at the lighter weights.
Upthread, I explained how it is quite likely Loeffler and lil g are actually avoiding Jacobs.
It makes sense. And is understandable. And in no way means Gennady is a coward.
It's a money game first, B...
Watch those fights. He did not beat either fighter.
Re: Daniel Jacobs is ducking Gennady Golovkin.Jacobs is also overated!
Clear victories for Broner, just not his usual blowouts.Mexi-Box wrote:He lost to PDL and Quintero at 130 lbs. :roflkoolkc107 wrote:At 130, he was untouchable, son.Lancenix wrote:
Oh man did you just really bring up Broner? Broner? OMG. He is a bum.
Watch those fights. He did not beat either fighter.
But you are entitled to think whatever you like.
Re: Daniel Jacobs is ducking Gennady Golovkin.Jacobs is also overated!
KO-1'd your post. Log off, troll.koolkc107 wrote:Clear victories for Broner, just not his usual blowouts.Mexi-Box wrote:He lost to PDL and Quintero at 130 lbs. :roflkoolkc107 wrote:
At 130, he was untouchable, son.
Watch those fights. He did not beat either fighter.
But you are entitled to think whatever you like.
Re: Daniel Jacobs is ducking Gennady Golovkin.Jacobs is also overated!
PDL showed a blueprint for defeating Broner, and the Aztec should have been awarded the decision.koolkc107 wrote:Clear victories for Broner, just not his usual blowouts.Mexi-Box wrote:He lost to PDL and Quintero at 130 lbs. :roflkoolkc107 wrote:
At 130, he was untouchable, son.
Watch those fights. He did not beat either fighter.
But you are entitled to think whatever you like.
Re: Daniel Jacobs is ducking Gennady Golovkin.Jacobs is also overated!
Holmes, frankly I don't give a fugg about you or your bullshyt opinion.Mexi-Box wrote:KO-1'd your post. Log off, troll.koolkc107 wrote:Clear victories for Broner, just not his usual blowouts.Mexi-Box wrote:
He lost to PDL and Quintero at 130 lbs. :rofl
Watch those fights. He did not beat either fighter.
But you are entitled to think whatever you like.
Broner won those fights.
Clearly.
And just cuz you might not like a fighter's act outside the ring
doesn't mean it is OK to discount what they do inside it.
Re: Daniel Jacobs is ducking Gennady Golovkin.Jacobs is also overated!
Y'all kill me with the way some fights are viewed.Tanzio wrote:PDL showed a blueprint for defeating Broner, and the Aztec should have been awarded the decision.koolkc107 wrote:Clear victories for Broner, just not his usual blowouts.Mexi-Box wrote:
He lost to PDL and Quintero at 130 lbs. :rofl
Watch those fights. He did not beat either fighter.
But you are entitled to think whatever you like.
Broner landed the cleaner, harder shots in both these fights.
It's why he won.
Y'all are free to see it the way you like.
But they both are W's for Broner...as they should be.
Re: Daniel Jacobs is ducking Gennady Golovkin.Jacobs is also overated!
It was close but PDL deserved it and it showed the way to beat him.koolkc107 wrote:Y'all kill me with the way some fights are viewed.Tanzio wrote:PDL showed a blueprint for defeating Broner, and the Aztec should have been awarded the decision.koolkc107 wrote:
Clear victories for Broner, just not his usual blowouts.
But you are entitled to think whatever you like.
Broner landed the cleaner, harder shots in both these fights.
It's why he won.
Y'all are free to see it the way you like.
But they both are W's for Broner...as they should be.
Yes, Broner has the W, just as Sturm does over Chudinov, and Chaves has the draw with Ramming Speed, and Ramming Speed has the W over Pac, etc., etc.
Your opinion is just as worthless as ours.