Daniel Jacobs is ducking Gennady Golovkin.Jacobs is also overated!

Lancenix
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1656
Joined: 14 Apr 2013, 01:27

Re: Daniel Jacobs is ducking Gennady Golovkin.Jacobs is also overated!

Post by Lancenix »

koolkc107 wrote:Let me show you how flawed certain logic is.

Joe Calzaghe had exactly two fights outside of Europe, the last 2.

In them, he faced guys that everyone agrees he should have fought much, much earlier.

As in, he should have left Britain and faced them at minimum 7 years before he actually did.

Yet, you don't see folks here calling Joe a coward.

The fights didn't happen when they should have, plain and simple.

Sometimes that happens.

Look how Euro champs and contenders have all found a way not to fight Rigondeaux.
Look how Broner was avoided at the lighter weights.

Upthread, I explained how it is quite likely Loeffler and lil g are actually avoiding Jacobs.

It makes sense. And is understandable. And in no way means Gennady is a coward.

It's a money game first, B...
Oh man did you just really bring up Broner? Broner? OMG. He is a bum.
Lancenix
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1656
Joined: 14 Apr 2013, 01:27

Re: Daniel Jacobs is ducking Gennady Golovkin.Jacobs is also overated!

Post by Lancenix »

Undefeated49-0 wrote:
koolkc107 wrote:Let me show you how flawed certain logic is.

Joe Calzaghe had exactly two fights outside of Europe, the last 2.

In them, he faced guys that everyone agrees he should have fought much, much earlier.

As in, he should have left Britain and faced them at minimum 7 years before he actually did.

Yet, you don't see folks here calling Joe a coward.

The fights didn't happen when they should have, plain and simple.

Sometimes that happens.

Look how Euro champs and contenders have all found a way not to fight Rigondeaux.
Look how Broner was avoided at the lighter weights.

Upthread, I explained how it is quite likely Loeffler and lil g are actually avoiding Jacobs.

It makes sense. And is understandable. And in no way means Gennady is a coward.

It's a money game first, B...
You're wasting your time with this Clown, he's just one of these dudes with a Euro Superiority Complex who hates Americans because he somehow think he/they are better over there than us (Americans) over here. I can't stand classless Bums link Lancenix, he's the kind of punk that would run if you encountered him on the street but would be the first to talk sh*t over the internet about someone being scared.

How long have Americans ruled boxing, Euro is just recently being starting to show a decent amount of good fighters, we've always had them, so don't go comparing your puny history to ours because I could list hundreds of American fighters that have dominated this sport for centuries Mr. A$$Clown Lancenix.

I just embarrassed you in your own haymon thread dude. STFU. SHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
Undefeated49-0
Welterweight
Posts: 1192
Joined: 13 Nov 2015, 14:36

Re: Daniel Jacobs is ducking Gennady Golovkin.Jacobs is also overated!

Post by Undefeated49-0 »

Lancenix wrote:I just embarrassed you in your own haymon thread dude. STFU. SHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

You could never embarrass me you Clown but you have embarrassed yourself with your "I Hate Americans because I think I'm better because I'm Europen" rant.

Newsflash, none of the Americans here like you either turd, go flush yourself.
koolkc107
Middleweight
Posts: 2032
Joined: 31 Oct 2013, 10:54

Re: Daniel Jacobs is ducking Gennady Golovkin.Jacobs is also overated!

Post by koolkc107 »

Lancenix wrote:
koolkc107 wrote:Let me show you how flawed certain logic is.

Joe Calzaghe had exactly two fights outside of Europe, the last 2.

In them, he faced guys that everyone agrees he should have fought much, much earlier.

As in, he should have left Britain and faced them at minimum 7 years before he actually did.

Yet, you don't see folks here calling Joe a coward.

The fights didn't happen when they should have, plain and simple.

Sometimes that happens.

Look how Euro champs and contenders have all found a way not to fight Rigondeaux.
Look how Broner was avoided at the lighter weights.

Upthread, I explained how it is quite likely Loeffler and lil g are actually avoiding Jacobs.

It makes sense. And is understandable. And in no way means Gennady is a coward.

It's a money game first, B...
Oh man did you just really bring up Broner? Broner? OMG. He is a bum.
At 130, he was untouchable, son.
Lancenix
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1656
Joined: 14 Apr 2013, 01:27

Re: Daniel Jacobs is ducking Gennady Golovkin.Jacobs is also overated!

Post by Lancenix »

Undefeated49-0 wrote:
Lancenix wrote:I just embarrassed you in your own haymon thread dude. STFU. SHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

You could never embarrass me you Clown but you have embarrassed yourself with your "I Hate Americans because I think I'm better because I'm Europen" rant.

Newsflash, none of the Americans here like you either turd, go flush yourself.
I already did. And really badly. A lot of people PM';d me all laughing at my smackdown of you.
Lancenix
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1656
Joined: 14 Apr 2013, 01:27

Re: Daniel Jacobs is ducking Gennady Golovkin.Jacobs is also overated!

Post by Lancenix »

koolkc107 wrote:
Lancenix wrote:
koolkc107 wrote:Let me show you how flawed certain logic is.

Joe Calzaghe had exactly two fights outside of Europe, the last 2.

In them, he faced guys that everyone agrees he should have fought much, much earlier.

As in, he should have left Britain and faced them at minimum 7 years before he actually did.

Yet, you don't see folks here calling Joe a coward.

The fights didn't happen when they should have, plain and simple.

Sometimes that happens.

Look how Euro champs and contenders have all found a way not to fight Rigondeaux.
Look how Broner was avoided at the lighter weights.

Upthread, I explained how it is quite likely Loeffler and lil g are actually avoiding Jacobs.

It makes sense. And is understandable. And in no way means Gennady is a coward.

It's a money game first, B...
Oh man did you just really bring up Broner? Broner? OMG. He is a bum.
At 130, he was untouchable, son.
He is a bum and fought like puss against Porter and Maidana. It was just sad that he had been built up into anything. "all About the Billions" I am so glad he still has a fan club in America. With you being the Pres. kinda sad actually. I want you to tell me what he did at 130 that waS SO IMPRESSIVE TO YOU. Please do tell.
Undefeated49-0
Welterweight
Posts: 1192
Joined: 13 Nov 2015, 14:36

Re: Daniel Jacobs is ducking Gennady Golovkin.Jacobs is also overated!

Post by Undefeated49-0 »

Lancenix wrote:I already did. And really badly. A lot of people PM';d me all laughing at my smackdown of you.
a lot of American Hating pieces of Euro-filth like you, I'm not surprised.
Lancenix
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1656
Joined: 14 Apr 2013, 01:27

Re: Daniel Jacobs is ducking Gennady Golovkin.Jacobs is also overated!

Post by Lancenix »

Undefeated49-0 wrote:
Lancenix wrote:I already did. And really badly. A lot of people PM';d me all laughing at my smackdown of you.
a lot of American Hating pieces of Euro-filth like you, I'm not surprised.
Euro-filth kind of harsh no??
Mexi-Box
Welterweight
Posts: 3963
Joined: 24 Jan 2016, 16:19

Re: Daniel Jacobs is ducking Gennady Golovkin.Jacobs is also overated!

Post by Mexi-Box »

koolkc107 wrote:
Lancenix wrote:
koolkc107 wrote:Let me show you how flawed certain logic is.

Joe Calzaghe had exactly two fights outside of Europe, the last 2.

In them, he faced guys that everyone agrees he should have fought much, much earlier.

As in, he should have left Britain and faced them at minimum 7 years before he actually did.

Yet, you don't see folks here calling Joe a coward.

The fights didn't happen when they should have, plain and simple.

Sometimes that happens.

Look how Euro champs and contenders have all found a way not to fight Rigondeaux.
Look how Broner was avoided at the lighter weights.

Upthread, I explained how it is quite likely Loeffler and lil g are actually avoiding Jacobs.

It makes sense. And is understandable. And in no way means Gennady is a coward.

It's a money game first, B...
Oh man did you just really bring up Broner? Broner? OMG. He is a bum.
At 130, he was untouchable, son.
He lost to PDL and Quintero at 130 lbs. :rofl

Watch those fights. He did not beat either fighter.
koolkc107
Middleweight
Posts: 2032
Joined: 31 Oct 2013, 10:54

Re: Daniel Jacobs is ducking Gennady Golovkin.Jacobs is also overated!

Post by koolkc107 »

Mexi-Box wrote:
koolkc107 wrote:
Lancenix wrote:
Oh man did you just really bring up Broner? Broner? OMG. He is a bum.
At 130, he was untouchable, son.
He lost to PDL and Quintero at 130 lbs. :rofl

Watch those fights. He did not beat either fighter.
Clear victories for Broner, just not his usual blowouts.

But you are entitled to think whatever you like.
Mexi-Box
Welterweight
Posts: 3963
Joined: 24 Jan 2016, 16:19

Re: Daniel Jacobs is ducking Gennady Golovkin.Jacobs is also overated!

Post by Mexi-Box »

koolkc107 wrote:
Mexi-Box wrote:
koolkc107 wrote:
At 130, he was untouchable, son.
He lost to PDL and Quintero at 130 lbs. :rofl

Watch those fights. He did not beat either fighter.
Clear victories for Broner, just not his usual blowouts.

But you are entitled to think whatever you like.
KO-1'd your post. Log off, troll.
:KO:
Tanzio
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 12264
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 09:17

Re: Daniel Jacobs is ducking Gennady Golovkin.Jacobs is also overated!

Post by Tanzio »

koolkc107 wrote:
Mexi-Box wrote:
koolkc107 wrote:
At 130, he was untouchable, son.
He lost to PDL and Quintero at 130 lbs. :rofl

Watch those fights. He did not beat either fighter.
Clear victories for Broner, just not his usual blowouts.

But you are entitled to think whatever you like.
PDL showed a blueprint for defeating Broner, and the Aztec should have been awarded the decision.
koolkc107
Middleweight
Posts: 2032
Joined: 31 Oct 2013, 10:54

Re: Daniel Jacobs is ducking Gennady Golovkin.Jacobs is also overated!

Post by koolkc107 »

Mexi-Box wrote:
koolkc107 wrote:
Mexi-Box wrote:
He lost to PDL and Quintero at 130 lbs. :rofl

Watch those fights. He did not beat either fighter.
Clear victories for Broner, just not his usual blowouts.

But you are entitled to think whatever you like.
KO-1'd your post. Log off, troll.
:KO:
Holmes, frankly I don't give a fugg about you or your bullshyt opinion.

Broner won those fights.

Clearly.

And just cuz you might not like a fighter's act outside the ring
doesn't mean it is OK to discount what they do inside it.
koolkc107
Middleweight
Posts: 2032
Joined: 31 Oct 2013, 10:54

Re: Daniel Jacobs is ducking Gennady Golovkin.Jacobs is also overated!

Post by koolkc107 »

Tanzio wrote:
koolkc107 wrote:
Mexi-Box wrote:
He lost to PDL and Quintero at 130 lbs. :rofl

Watch those fights. He did not beat either fighter.
Clear victories for Broner, just not his usual blowouts.

But you are entitled to think whatever you like.
PDL showed a blueprint for defeating Broner, and the Aztec should have been awarded the decision.
Y'all kill me with the way some fights are viewed.

Broner landed the cleaner, harder shots in both these fights.

It's why he won.

Y'all are free to see it the way you like.

But they both are W's for Broner...as they should be.
Tanzio
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 12264
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 09:17

Re: Daniel Jacobs is ducking Gennady Golovkin.Jacobs is also overated!

Post by Tanzio »

koolkc107 wrote:
Tanzio wrote:
koolkc107 wrote:
Clear victories for Broner, just not his usual blowouts.

But you are entitled to think whatever you like.
PDL showed a blueprint for defeating Broner, and the Aztec should have been awarded the decision.
Y'all kill me with the way some fights are viewed.

Broner landed the cleaner, harder shots in both these fights.

It's why he won.

Y'all are free to see it the way you like.

But they both are W's for Broner...as they should be.
It was close but PDL deserved it and it showed the way to beat him.

Yes, Broner has the W, just as Sturm does over Chudinov, and Chaves has the draw with Ramming Speed, and Ramming Speed has the W over Pac, etc., etc.

Your opinion is just as worthless as ours.
Post Reply