Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread

keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 16774
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread

Post by keithmoonhangover »

Justice is served. No way in the world Quigg won that fight. 116-112 by anyone who knows how to score a boxing contest.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread

Post by Counter-puncher »

Lulz. Woodhall just saying it was quigg himself not his trainer who realised he had to step on the gas
ThereByTheGrace
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4016
Joined: 04 Sep 2010, 05:22

Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread

Post by ThereByTheGrace »

What a result up yours Hearn Gallagher you twats!
Taansend
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11653
Joined: 10 Jul 2004, 17:38

Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread

Post by Taansend »

smoothmoves wrote:117-11frampton
Mate, I had Frampton winning but not by 106 rounds :lol:
Nightmare Roy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16417
Joined: 18 May 2003, 17:29

Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread

Post by Nightmare Roy »

LancashireLoyal wrote:these pair of tvvats better fight rigo now
They won't
Like a Boss
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 5863
Joined: 01 May 2012, 03:21

Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread

Post by Like a Boss »

Glad to hear Frampton won. Look forward to seeing the replay.
Nightmare Roy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16417
Joined: 18 May 2003, 17:29

Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread

Post by Nightmare Roy »

ThereByTheGrace wrote:What a result up yours Hearn Gallagher you twats!
:TU:
reggaereggae
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4723
Joined: 21 Dec 2009, 17:01

Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread

Post by reggaereggae »

Another awful PPV fight...... Just dreadful...... No passion, little skill. And this is a unification fight?
tigermoth87
Welterweight
Posts: 1793
Joined: 21 Feb 2016, 11:23

Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread

Post by tigermoth87 »

fornicate knows why Quigg didn't start off strong. He threw it away by not doing anything for 6 rounds. Even if he started fighting just 2 rounds earlier he'd have pinched it.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22331
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread

Post by Horse »

keithmoonhangover wrote:Justice is served. No way in the world Quigg won that fight. 116-112 by anyone who knows how to score a boxing contest.
You are clueless.
Rexob
Middleweight
Posts: 6025
Joined: 20 Mar 2014, 15:17

Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread

Post by Rexob »

Like a Boss wrote:Glad to hear Frampton won. Look forward to seeing the replay.

Wouldn't bother for watching the first 9 rounds.
stevedoc
Super Middleweight
Posts: 3550
Joined: 24 May 2013, 07:40

Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread

Post by stevedoc »

Like a Boss wrote:Glad to hear Frampton won. Look forward to seeing the replay.
I wouldn't bother,both were crap
Loftgroov
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3712
Joined: 10 Oct 2003, 10:48

Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread

Post by Loftgroov »

Quigg looks so fresh.... just gutted he did naff all for the first half. So unnecessary.
uk_boxer
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 43
Joined: 13 Apr 2006, 17:57

Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread

Post by uk_boxer »

Frampton won without hitting his opponent?
stevedoc
Super Middleweight
Posts: 3550
Joined: 24 May 2013, 07:40

Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread

Post by stevedoc »

Horse wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:Justice is served. No way in the world Quigg won that fight. 116-112 by anyone who knows how to score a boxing contest.
You are clueless.
No he's not that's what I had
Kilburn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6573
Joined: 25 Jul 2002, 07:27

Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread

Post by Kilburn »

Really wanted Quigg to win but no problem with the decision.
Frampton not quite as good as his reputation suggested.
Rexob
Middleweight
Posts: 6025
Joined: 20 Mar 2014, 15:17

Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread

Post by Rexob »

Yeah, Quigg give it away shame.
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32680
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread

Post by Boxerbeetle »

Wonder who's booing Gallagher the loudest - the Irish or the Mancs?
smoothmoves
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 287
Joined: 05 Jun 2010, 14:48

Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread

Post by smoothmoves »

Taansend wrote:
smoothmoves wrote:117-11frampton
Mate, I had Frampton winning but not by 106 rounds :lol:

Oh dear! One too many whiskies perhaps! :OhYes:

117-113
Last edited by smoothmoves on 27 Feb 2016, 20:02, edited 1 time in total.
tigermoth87
Welterweight
Posts: 1793
Joined: 21 Feb 2016, 11:23

Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread

Post by tigermoth87 »

uk_boxer wrote:Frampton won without hitting his opponent?
It's more Quigg lost than Frampton won.

Quigg did nothing at all for the first 6. Frampton did nothing either but did at least throw a few jabs and punches to nick the rounds. It's not like Frampton won them by outboxing Quigg, he won because Quigg didn't throw a punch.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22331
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread

Post by Horse »

Counter-puncher wrote:Lulz. Woodhall just saying it was quigg himself not his trainer who realised he had to step on the gas
Was Gallagher going to be happy just to see Quigg hear the final bell?

What was his plan exactly?
Loftgroov
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3712
Joined: 10 Oct 2003, 10:48

Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread

Post by Loftgroov »

I think Ring Magazine might be phoning up and asking for their award back.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 16774
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread

Post by keithmoonhangover »

Quigg threw about 3 punches in the first four rounds. Yes, you made him miss, but how the hell did were you level after 4. Don't be daft man. :brick:
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread

Post by crusader »

tigermoth87 wrote:
uk_boxer wrote:Frampton won without hitting his opponent?
It's more Quigg lost than Frampton won.

Quigg did nothing at all for the first 6. Frampton did nothing either but did at least throw a few jabs and punches to nick the rounds.
Yep....you just have to do more than your opponent to win a round, even if it's not a lot.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22331
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread

Post by Horse »

stevedoc wrote:No he's not that's what I had
Read his post.
Post Reply