Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 16774
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread
Justice is served. No way in the world Quigg won that fight. 116-112 by anyone who knows how to score a boxing contest.
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread
Lulz. Woodhall just saying it was quigg himself not his trainer who realised he had to step on the gas
-
ThereByTheGrace
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 4016
- Joined: 04 Sep 2010, 05:22
Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread
What a result up yours Hearn Gallagher you twats!
Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread
Mate, I had Frampton winning but not by 106 roundssmoothmoves wrote:117-11frampton
-
Nightmare Roy
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 16418
- Joined: 18 May 2003, 17:29
Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread
They won'tLancashireLoyal wrote:these pair of tvvats better fight rigo now
-
Like a Boss
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 5863
- Joined: 01 May 2012, 03:21
Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread
Glad to hear Frampton won. Look forward to seeing the replay.
-
Nightmare Roy
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 16418
- Joined: 18 May 2003, 17:29
Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread
ThereByTheGrace wrote:What a result up yours Hearn Gallagher you twats!
-
reggaereggae
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4723
- Joined: 21 Dec 2009, 17:01
Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread
Another awful PPV fight...... Just dreadful...... No passion, little skill. And this is a unification fight?
-
tigermoth87
- Welterweight
- Posts: 1793
- Joined: 21 Feb 2016, 11:23
Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread
fornicate knows why Quigg didn't start off strong. He threw it away by not doing anything for 6 rounds. Even if he started fighting just 2 rounds earlier he'd have pinched it.
Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread
You are clueless.keithmoonhangover wrote:Justice is served. No way in the world Quigg won that fight. 116-112 by anyone who knows how to score a boxing contest.
Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread
Like a Boss wrote:Glad to hear Frampton won. Look forward to seeing the replay.
Wouldn't bother for watching the first 9 rounds.
Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread
I wouldn't bother,both were crapLike a Boss wrote:Glad to hear Frampton won. Look forward to seeing the replay.
Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread
Quigg looks so fresh.... just gutted he did naff all for the first half. So unnecessary.
Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread
Frampton won without hitting his opponent?
Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread
No he's not that's what I hadHorse wrote:You are clueless.keithmoonhangover wrote:Justice is served. No way in the world Quigg won that fight. 116-112 by anyone who knows how to score a boxing contest.
Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread
Really wanted Quigg to win but no problem with the decision.
Frampton not quite as good as his reputation suggested.
Frampton not quite as good as his reputation suggested.
Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread
Yeah, Quigg give it away shame.
-
Boxerbeetle
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 32680
- Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59
Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread
Wonder who's booing Gallagher the loudest - the Irish or the Mancs?
-
smoothmoves
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 287
- Joined: 05 Jun 2010, 14:48
Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread
Taansend wrote:Mate, I had Frampton winning but not by 106 roundssmoothmoves wrote:117-11frampton
Oh dear! One too many whiskies perhaps!
117-113
Last edited by smoothmoves on 27 Feb 2016, 20:02, edited 1 time in total.
-
tigermoth87
- Welterweight
- Posts: 1793
- Joined: 21 Feb 2016, 11:23
Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread
It's more Quigg lost than Frampton won.uk_boxer wrote:Frampton won without hitting his opponent?
Quigg did nothing at all for the first 6. Frampton did nothing either but did at least throw a few jabs and punches to nick the rounds. It's not like Frampton won them by outboxing Quigg, he won because Quigg didn't throw a punch.
Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread
Was Gallagher going to be happy just to see Quigg hear the final bell?Counter-puncher wrote:Lulz. Woodhall just saying it was quigg himself not his trainer who realised he had to step on the gas
What was his plan exactly?
Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread
I think Ring Magazine might be phoning up and asking for their award back.
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 16774
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread
Quigg threw about 3 punches in the first four rounds. Yes, you made him miss, but how the hell did were you level after 4. Don't be daft man. 
Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread
Yep....you just have to do more than your opponent to win a round, even if it's not a lot.tigermoth87 wrote:It's more Quigg lost than Frampton won.uk_boxer wrote:Frampton won without hitting his opponent?
Quigg did nothing at all for the first 6. Frampton did nothing either but did at least throw a few jabs and punches to nick the rounds.
Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread
Read his post.stevedoc wrote:No he's not that's what I had