But isn't the no power or pop due to someone struggling at the weight?Deno1986 wrote:Gallagher is full of the smelly stuff.
Despite what he said himself, I think Frampton is done at the weight - no power, pop and very questionable stamina. The problem if he does move up to featherweight is his size - he is tiny even up against some of the super bantams. He will be dwarfed by some of the top boys at featherweight.
Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread
Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 16774
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread
No sir, you did. You said "You are clueless." That is you starting the rudeness, not me. How did you score the fight Mr Horse?Horse wrote:You started the rudeness.keithmoonhangover wrote:You called me out. You engaged me. What do expect me to do? Say thanks for the insult Horse? Get a grip man.
You lack class.
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 16774
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread
I've got a lot of respect for Farhood and he is 100% right.Mighty Moose wrote:I had it 117-112 Frampton and while I have sympathy for the view that he did little in the first 4 rounds, I can't give a round to a guy throwing nothing in return. At least CF tried to force the fight, SQ reminded me of the trial horse coming in to give 4 rounds and go home unmarked to fight again next week, hugely disappointing approach, he proved what might have been possible 8 thru 11.
A couple of observations via Steve Farhood on Showtime:
"Quigg either had the worst fightplan in history or he froze for 7 rounds."
"Any debate over who won the fight was settled when Frampton won the 12th."
"No idea how you score that fight to Quigg"
Wants to see Santa Cruz vs Frampton down the line.
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13363
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread
Really gutted for Quigg, had he started putting the pressure on and trusted his chin 2 or 3 rounds earlier then maybe just maybe he could have done it.
-
Boxerbeetle
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 32680
- Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59
Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread
This exchange reminds me of the build up to Eubank-Benn I.Horse wrote:You started the rudeness.keithmoonhangover wrote:You called me out. You engaged me. What do expect me to do? Say thanks for the insult Horse? Get a grip man.
You lack class.
Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread
I know it's a cliche but Quigg will regret this fight, he'll always question whether or not he could have got the win if he started earlier.jameswilson wrote:Really gutted for Quigg, had he started putting the pressure on and trusted his chin 2 or 3 rounds earlier then maybe just maybe he could have done it.
Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread
I cant see a rematch here. Frampton probably knows he'd lose it - Quigg wouldn't fornicate up the same way again and would stick his foot on the gas much earlier. The McGuigans also wouldn't risk losing the bragging rights.
Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread
Try getting glassesHorse wrote:Try reading it again.stevedoc wrote:That's how I read it
Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread
keithmoonhangover wrote:No sir, you did. You said "You are clueless." That is you starting the rudeness, not me. How did you score the fight Mr Horse?
That is rude and disrespectful to those who disagree with you.keithmoonhangover wrote:116-112 by anyone who knows how to score a boxing contest.
I scored it 115-115 Even.
Frampton and Quigg were both rubbish in the first half of the fight. Frampton did not deserve to gain a large lead, he hardly did anything.
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 16774
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread
He's a nutter mate. I came on here to talk about the fight. I hardly ever post now..... I wonder why? Hmmmm.Boxerbeetle wrote:This exchange reminds me of the build up to Eubank-Benn I.Horse wrote:You started the rudeness.keithmoonhangover wrote:You called me out. You engaged me. What do expect me to do? Say thanks for the insult Horse? Get a grip man.
You lack class.
-
TheLeprechaun
- Middleweight
- Posts: 5148
- Joined: 27 Jun 2013, 20:42
Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread
SNG wrote:I know it's a cliche but Quigg will regret this fight, he'll always question whether or not he could have got the win if he started earlier.jameswilson wrote:Really gutted for Quigg, had he started putting the pressure on and trusted his chin 2 or 3 rounds earlier then maybe just maybe he could have done it.
Agreed. I thought Quigg really could have won this fight.
He simply came in giving Frampton too much respect.
Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread
Try reading it again.stevedoc wrote:Try getting glasses
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 16774
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread
You scoring it even proves my point. Stick me on ignore and say hello to your mum for me.Horse wrote:keithmoonhangover wrote:No sir, you did. You said "You are clueless." That is you starting the rudeness, not me. How did you score the fight Mr Horse?That is rude and disrespectful to those who disagree with you.keithmoonhangover wrote:116-112 by anyone who knows how to score a boxing contest.
I scored it 115-115 Even.
Frampton and Quigg were both rubbish in the first half of the fight. Frampton did not deserve to gain a large lead, he hardly did anything.
Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread
That's what I said - I think he's done at the weight. When I say he'll be tiny when he moves up I'm referring to his height, He's barely 5'5.Taansend wrote:But isn't the no power or pop due to someone struggling at the weight?Deno1986 wrote:Gallagher is full of the smelly stuff.
Despite what he said himself, I think Frampton is done at the weight - no power, pop and very questionable stamina. The problem if he does move up to featherweight is his size - he is tiny even up against some of the super bantams. He will be dwarfed by some of the top boys at featherweight.
Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread
What is wrong with this horse...keithmoonhangover wrote:Justice is served. No way in the world Quigg won that fight. 116-112 by anyone who knows how to score a boxing contest.
-
TheLeprechaun
- Middleweight
- Posts: 5148
- Joined: 27 Jun 2013, 20:42
Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread
afcmarshall wrote:quiggs face when Gallagher finally told him he was losing why did he not get into his ear earlier.
You could tell Quigg was shocked and it became an entirely different fight because he started putting himself in harms way to land his own shots. From that point on, he won more rounds.
Really have to question Gallagher. He should have told Quigg that earlier. Quigg was surprised mostly because Gallagher had been telling him he was boxing well before that.
Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread
Gallagher needed to be told that sky had quigg winning nothing early to know he was behind? That right there makes his Ring magazine award a joke and gives all his critics fuel for years. Inept plan but worse to not be able to read what was obviously happening is embarrassing.
Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread
Try reading it again.stevedoc wrote:What is wrong with this horse...
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13363
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread
Is Glenn McCrory ok??
-
Boxerbeetle
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 32680
- Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59
Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread
Shall we all tweet Quigg simultaneously en masse & tell him to leave Gallagher asap? Surely he can't ignore all of us! 
-
Nightmare Roy
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 16418
- Joined: 18 May 2003, 17:29
Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread
He deserves a bit of humble pie, he's so self assured and arrogantBoxerbeetle wrote:Effing hell, hope Gallagher watches this reaction tomorrow morning. When even Amir Khan can pick huge holes in your tactics, it's time to rethink your career.
-
Boxerbeetle
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 32680
- Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59
Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread
Hmmm, he does seem a bit tired and emotional?jameswilson wrote:Is Glenn McCrory ok??
Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread
What other fights could make either the money a rematch would? We could get a trilogy out of this, I hope they do it now.
Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread
Of course, the counter argument to this is that by forcing things earlier Quigg would open himself up to counters & not have the strength or energy later on to close the show.Loftgroov wrote:I cant see a rematch here. Frampton probably knows he'd lose it - Quigg wouldn't eff up the same way again and would stick his foot on the gas much earlier. The McGuigans also wouldn't risk losing the bragging rights.
Quigg started very slow & came on later but that doesn't automatically equate to him winning if he starts fast in a rematch.
Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread
I suspect he might have nipped off for a fly half whilst watching the fight.jameswilson wrote:Is Glenn McCrory ok??