Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread

Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22331
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread

Post by Horse »

palooka wrote: :maybe:
Please stop.
Rexob
Middleweight
Posts: 6025
Joined: 20 Mar 2014, 15:17

Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread

Post by Rexob »

:maybe:
Monte Fisto
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2978
Joined: 23 Jan 2011, 15:36

Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread

Post by Monte Fisto »

After 8 rounds i had it 6-2 for Frampton. Even the rounds where Quigg perked up Frampton matched or at least kept them close. Frampton by 4 rounds for me.
i thought there was a decent sized gap in the level of their skills. I thought the commentary was mildly bad and in favour of Quigg. Every highlight they seemed to show involved Quiqqs shots to the point where they repeated the same shot 2 or 3 times then showed Frampton landing a single jab :roll:

i enjoyed the fight even the cagey start, although i did feel that it was going to catch fire much quicker. Honestly thought Quigg was going to put it on him early.
Monte Fisto
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2978
Joined: 23 Jan 2011, 15:36

Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread

Post by Monte Fisto »

mimmy123 wrote:didnt see first 4 round too busy shagging the wife.

What a top executive decision you made there mimmy. If only you made it through 2 more rounds :OhYes:
Kingfield
Super Welterweight
Posts: 191
Joined: 24 Jul 2014, 16:30

Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread

Post by Kingfield »

Horse wrote:
tobyh5 wrote:You talk the big bollx, but who are you?
Why does anyone care?

Do you read Hello magazine and love to check out the latest celebrity gossip?

Do you desperately want to know all of the 'juicy' details of all of the other BoxRecers lives?
The more posts of yours i read the more convinced i am that you are autistic. Making monthly lists (repetetive behaviour), constant battles and arguments on here (social interaction difficulty) and you struggle to explain your posts when directly asked which shows that communicating is something you find challenging too.

I think people should back off from having a go back at you and they would if they understood your condition a bit better.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22331
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread

Post by Horse »

Kingfield wrote:The more posts of yours i read the more convinced i am that you are autistic. Making monthly lists (repetetive behaviour), constant battles and arguments on here (social interaction difficulty) and you struggle to explain your posts when directly asked which shows that communicating is something you find challenging too.

I think people should back off from having a go back at you and they would if they understood your condition a bit better.
Stop trying to be clever buddy, because you cannot pull it off at all.

I thought you were an idiot from the first time I interacted with you (and so did everyone else).

http://boxrec.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f ... &p=4198225
Kingfield
Super Welterweight
Posts: 191
Joined: 24 Jul 2014, 16:30

Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread

Post by Kingfield »

Horse wrote:
Kingfield wrote:The more posts of yours i read the more convinced i am that you are autistic. Making monthly lists (repetetive behaviour), constant battles and arguments on here (social interaction difficulty) and you struggle to explain your posts when directly asked which shows that communicating is something you find challenging too.

I think people should back off from having a go back at you and they would if they understood your condition a bit better.
Stop trying to be clever buddy, because you cannot pull it off at all.

I thought you were an idiot from the first time I interacted with you (and so did everyone else).

http://boxrec.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f ... &p=4198225
You do realise you've just further proven my point by posting that, don't you?

Your default position is to offend people. That is not normal behaviour and something you should seek help with.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22331
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread

Post by Horse »

Kingfield wrote:You do realise you've just further proven my point by posting that, don't you?

Your default position is to offend people. That is not normal behaviour and something you should seek help with.
:TU:
Rexob
Middleweight
Posts: 6025
Joined: 20 Mar 2014, 15:17

Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread

Post by Rexob »

:maybe:
Kingfield
Super Welterweight
Posts: 191
Joined: 24 Jul 2014, 16:30

Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread

Post by Kingfield »

Rexob wrote::maybe:
:OhYes:
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22331
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread

Post by Horse »

Rexob wrote: :maybe:
:-?
Rexob
Middleweight
Posts: 6025
Joined: 20 Mar 2014, 15:17

Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread

Post by Rexob »

:lol:
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 16774
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread

Post by keithmoonhangover »

Horse wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:Have you ever boxed with a broken jaw Horse? Thought not. Keyboard warriors don't break their jaw.
He was better after he broke his jaw apparently, so it's not a very good excuse for him being rubbish.

You're a true warrior I suppose? You come across as an insecure prat.
I might be a prat, but I'm not an insecure one. I'm very comfortable with who I am.

I have done a fair bit of sparring and had the odd gym war. I know what it's like to be hit hard, have my nose broken, damaged my knuckles etc, so yes, I would say I'm more qualified to talk about it than someone who has never put on a pair of glove.

You say that Quigg put in a none performance, but scored the fight a draw. Were you watching the same fight as everyone else? A draw? A DRAW!?!?!

You criticize Quigg for fighting better with a broken jaw!?!?! WTF? He gritted his teeth, manned up and did his best. He didn't perform in the first 7 rounds because of Frampton's feinting, moving, defence and punching. As Frampton slowed, Quigg was able to land more. Frampton fought pretty much the right fight. He was in there to win and that's what he did.

Another crazy thing you wrote was.... "Frampton came out of that looking worse than Quigg to me." Absolute madness.

Fighter A: Dictated the fight, won clearly, broke his opponents jaw.

Fighter B: Came out looking better.

Only on planet Horse. :maybe:
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22331
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread

Post by Horse »

keithmoonhangover wrote:I might be a prat, but I'm not an insecure one. I'm very comfortable with who I am.

I have done a fair bit of sparring and had the odd gym war. I know what it's like to be hit hard, have my nose broken, damaged my knuckles etc, so yes, I would say I'm more qualified to talk about it than someone who has never put on a pair of glove.
Congratulations, tough guy.
keithmoonhangover wrote:You say that Quigg put in a none performance, but scored the fight a draw. Were you watching the same fight as everyone else? A draw? A DRAW!?!?!

You criticize Quigg for fighting better with a broken jaw!?!?! WTF? He gritted his teeth, manned up and did his best. He didn't perform in the first 7 rounds because of Frampton's feinting, moving, defence and punching. As Frampton slowed, Quigg was able to land more. Frampton fought pretty much the right fight. He was in there to win and that's what he did.
I didn't criticize him for fighting better with a broken jaw.

I said it wasn't a good excuse for his terrible performance in the early rounds, before he broke his jaw.
keithmoonhangover wrote:Another crazy thing you wrote was.... "Frampton came out of that looking worse than Quigg to me." Absolute madness.

Fighter A: Dictated the fight, won clearly, broke his opponents jaw.

Fighter B: Came out looking better.

Only on planet Horse. :maybe:
When they traded punches Quigg came off better.

Frampton looked weaker and relied on nicking the close rounds when Quigg was being too negative.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 16774
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread

Post by keithmoonhangover »

Horse wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:I might be a prat, but I'm not an insecure one. I'm very comfortable with who I am.

I have done a fair bit of sparring and had the odd gym war. I know what it's like to be hit hard, have my nose broken, damaged my knuckles etc, so yes, I would say I'm more qualified to talk about it than someone who has never put on a pair of glove.
Congratulations, tough guy.
keithmoonhangover wrote:You say that Quigg put in a none performance, but scored the fight a draw. Were you watching the same fight as everyone else? A draw? A DRAW!?!?!

You criticize Quigg for fighting better with a broken jaw!?!?! WTF? He gritted his teeth, manned up and did his best. He didn't perform in the first 7 rounds because of Frampton's feinting, moving, defence and punching. As Frampton slowed, Quigg was able to land more. Frampton fought pretty much the right fight. He was in there to win and that's what he did.
I didn't criticize him for fighting better with a broken jaw.

I said it wasn't a good excuse for his terrible performance in the early rounds, before he broke his jaw.
keithmoonhangover wrote:Another crazy thing you wrote was.... "Frampton came out of that looking worse than Quigg to me." Absolute madness.

Fighter A: Dictated the fight, won clearly, broke his opponents jaw.

Fighter B: Came out looking better.

Only on planet Horse. :maybe:
When they traded punches Quigg came off better.

Frampton looked weaker and relied on nicking the close rounds when Quigg was being too negative.
1. I'm not a tough guy.

2 & 3. Quigg's performance was a direct result of what his opponent was doing. Who is weaker and stronger has nothing to do with who wins a boxing match. Frampton didn't rely on Quigg for anything. He dictated the pace. His movement was excellent, getting in and out of range and landing enough punches to win rounds. Frampton found a way to win. That's what winning boxing contests is about. Finding a way to win.
tobyh5
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2880
Joined: 09 Jan 2008, 07:07

Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread

Post by tobyh5 »

I did not think there could be anything duller than a Gavin McDonnell fight, turned out I was wrong and found something even more boring - him being interviews.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X4qj0XRL2p8

Feck me this boy is a one man remedy to insomnia
magnus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1164
Joined: 13 Dec 2004, 08:59

Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread

Post by magnus »

When Carl Froch tallied his card at the end of the fight, he scored it a draw, according to his write-up on Sky Sports website earlier.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread

Post by crusader »

Did anyone on the Sky team have Frampton winning?
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23015
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread

Post by handsofstone »

Well well well what a night crazy atmosphere i just wish i stayed a bit more sober because i ended up blootered

Frampton/Quigg fight was awful ,i watched again and it didnt get any better,so many rounds where nothing happened and looked like a sparring session,i had Carl winning 117-113,credit to Scott for fighting with a broken jaw for 8 or so rounds

I was impressed with Lowe,he's a good young fighter who'll get better as he progresses,i thought McCullough's corner were a bit sharp with the towel at 1st but having seen the replay it was maybe the right call

Burton/Shinkwin was fight of the night for me,Miles had his moments but just couldnt handle Hosea's power,i thought the ref was a tad prememture though,i doubt Shinkwin wouldve took a knee but he should have if giving the chance
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23015
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread

Post by handsofstone »

Thanks to Beetle and Counter for the shout out last night ,i had a ball,glad to be home :salut:

Ive gotta say Saturday nights on Boxrec are effing hilarious when theres a RBR thread going(usually twice as funny when its a Camp Ed show,3 times as funny if its PPV) Im just having a read through the "bants" :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32679
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread

Post by Boxerbeetle »

handsofstone wrote:Thanks to Beetle and Counter for the shout out last night ,i had a ball,glad to be home :salut:

Ive gotta say Saturday nights on Boxrec are effing hilarious when theres a RBR thread going(usually twice as funny when its a Camp Ed show,3 times as funny if its PPV) Im just having a read through the "bants" :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
:TU:
Nightmare Roy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16415
Joined: 18 May 2003, 17:29

Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread

Post by Nightmare Roy »

crusader wrote:Did anyone on the Sky team have Frampton winning?
I'm interested in this question as well, BBC radio had it a shut out for Frampton.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22331
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread

Post by Horse »

Nightmare Roy wrote:I'm interested in this question as well, BBC radio had it a shut out for Frampton.
Fire them all.
SNG
Super Middleweight
Posts: 4703
Joined: 22 May 2013, 21:02

Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread

Post by SNG »

Nightmare Roy wrote:
crusader wrote:Did anyone on the Sky team have Frampton winning?
I'm interested in this question as well, BBC radio had it a shut out for Frampton.
Really? I'm not sure how they gave him all the round from 8-11.
Nightmare Roy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16415
Joined: 18 May 2003, 17:29

Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread

Post by Nightmare Roy »

Horse wrote:
Nightmare Roy wrote:I'm interested in this question as well, BBC radio had it a shut out for Frampton.
Fire them all.
Well I can't comment until I have seen the fight, but 99% of people seem to think Frampton breezed it.
Post Reply