Haye-Briggs is on.
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 17105
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Haye-Briggs is on.
It's listed on Boxrec, but then so was Hughie - Wilder.
Re: Haye-Briggs is on.
It's a step up from his last opponent but then again the guy RJJ fought last night would've been a step up! Glitter Scrot Eddie said today that Briggs would be on the Burns/Di Rocco undercard.
-
Mimmy
- Heavyweight

Re: Haye-Briggs is on.
I'd love it, I would really love it.
Id even love to buy a ticket even though ive promised myself never to buy another Haye fight ticket.
Id even love to buy a ticket even though ive promised myself never to buy another Haye fight ticket.
-
reggaereggae
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4723
- Joined: 21 Dec 2009, 17:01
Re: Haye-Briggs is on.
What, you want to see Briggs get killed?mimmy123 wrote:I'd love it, I would really love it.
Id even love to buy a ticket even though ive promised myself never to buy another Haye fight ticket.
-
Mimmy
- Heavyweight

Re: Haye-Briggs is on.
reggaereggae wrote:What, you want to see Briggs get killed?mimmy123 wrote:I'd love it, I would really love it.
Id even love to buy a ticket even though ive promised myself never to buy another Haye fight ticket.
not quite, the opposite
better rephrase that, no I want to see Briggs win. not by death though.
Re: Haye-Briggs is on.
mimmy123 wrote:I'd love it, I would really love it
Re: Haye-Briggs is on.
Even worse than your last post on this thread, you're on a roll Mimmsmimmy123 wrote:not quite, the opposite
better rephrase that, no I want to see Briggs win. not by death though.
-
leejonesjnr
- Middleweight
- Posts: 2667
- Joined: 31 Dec 2013, 18:32
Re: Haye-Briggs is on.
For the vacant WBA regular?
-
Mimmy
- Heavyweight

Re: Haye-Briggs is on.
I never suggested death. It came out wrong. Thats why i said not quite, the opposite. I just dont like david haye, cost me money thats all, cant afford to waste my wages tbh.Offal wrote:Even worse than your last post on this thread, you're on a roll Mimmsmimmy123 wrote:not quite, the opposite
better rephrase that, no I want to see Briggs win. not by death though.
Re: Haye-Briggs is on.
briggs is comical and a down to earth man but haye is gonna beat him, don't like haye so would love to see briggs bust him but i doubt its gonna happen
Re: Haye-Briggs is on.
Shocking fight, so small a step up from De Moro it's almost laughable. Briggs will get stood on his head and I hope he gets taken out early as his solid chin could see him take a lot of clean shots. His defence has always been poreous and he's never been quick but he looks like he is walking through treacle these days and his work rate is single figure punches per round.
It's smart by Haye as Briggs is a great talker, has built a decent social media following and had the media eating out of his hand over here this week. In reality though he's never been top level, hasn't had a decent win in almost a decade and is a 44 year old who took a hellish 12 round beating in his last fight worth a damn and had been banned as a drugs cheat. It's not even a contest
It's smart by Haye as Briggs is a great talker, has built a decent social media following and had the media eating out of his hand over here this week. In reality though he's never been top level, hasn't had a decent win in almost a decade and is a 44 year old who took a hellish 12 round beating in his last fight worth a damn and had been banned as a drugs cheat. It's not even a contest
Re: Haye-Briggs is on.
Yes .. with any luck the BBBoC will veto it.fizzjambo wrote:In reality though he's never been top level, hasn't had a decent win in almost a decade and is a 44 year old who took a hellish 12 round beating in his last fight worth a damn and had been banned as a drugs cheat. It's not even a contest
-
leejonesjnr
- Middleweight
- Posts: 2667
- Joined: 31 Dec 2013, 18:32
Re: Haye-Briggs is on.
No official announcement or twitter/Facebook mention from either man as well as Haye recently dismissing the idea. Probably not really on.
Re: Haye-Briggs is on.
Could they really veto a fight based on their concerns of a man who happens to be ranked higher than his opponent?Offal wrote:Yes .. with any luck the BBBoC will veto it.fizzjambo wrote:In reality though he's never been top level, hasn't had a decent win in almost a decade and is a 44 year old who took a hellish 12 round beating in his last fight worth a damn and had been banned as a drugs cheat. It's not even a contest
I'm not defending it,briggs should be saved from himself at 44 years old but like it or not he's the wba no 4.
Re: Haye-Briggs is on.
If that fight happens the fight is massive
Haye is a marketing king
Haye is a marketing king
-
asdfjkl
- Heavyweight

Re: Haye-Briggs is on.
I love it, at least one of them will be shutted up forever after that fight, I'm affraid it will be Briggs, but if he makes it through there he really makes a point and I'm really going to laugh.
Re: Haye-Briggs is on.
Cannae see it being vetoed to be honest, don't think their are grounds to (other than by punters!).chiggsy wrote:Could they really veto a fight based on their concerns of a man who happens to be ranked higher than his opponent?Offal wrote:Yes .. with any luck the BBBoC will veto it.fizzjambo wrote:In reality though he's never been top level, hasn't had a decent win in almost a decade and is a 44 year old who took a hellish 12 round beating in his last fight worth a damn and had been banned as a drugs cheat. It's not even a contest
I'm not defending it,briggs should be saved from himself at 44 years old but like it or not he's the wba no 4.
Briggs ranking with the WBA is brutal even for them though. Who'd he beat to get there?
Re: Haye-Briggs is on.
Have you watched Vitali v Briggs? The man could have got seriously hurt for life.asdfjkl wrote:I love it, at least one of them will be shutted up forever after that fight, I'm affraid it will be Briggs, but if he makes it through there he really makes a point and I'm really going to laugh.
No matter whether I like a boxer or not I don't want to see anyone "shutted up forever" like that.
-
Looking On
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 927
- Joined: 12 Oct 2012, 13:50
Re: Haye-Briggs is on.
If BBBofC dont veto it then it just proves that its all about the money with them.
Because they vetoed far less previously.
I specifically remember them declining to allow Frans Botha boxing Fury even though at the time he would have been Furys biggest test... which was due to his age they said.
Im sure Tijuana who posts on here is younger than Briggs too.
Because they vetoed far less previously.
I specifically remember them declining to allow Frans Botha boxing Fury even though at the time he would have been Furys biggest test... which was due to his age they said.
Im sure Tijuana who posts on here is younger than Briggs too.
Re: Haye-Briggs is on.
It's not a fight I want to happen but I'm not sure about it getting vetoed. Skelton has boxed at a good years older and had been stopped more recently.Looking On wrote:If BBBofC dont veto it then it just proves that its all about the money with them.
Because they vetoed far less previously.
I specifically remember them declining to allow Frans Botha boxing Fury even though at the time he would have been Furys biggest test... which was due to his age they said.
Im sure Tijuana who posts on here is younger than Briggs too.
I'd like to see the media tearing this up for the arse paper it is but I'm not holding my breath
Re: Haye-Briggs is on.
Looking forward to this.
Re: Haye-Briggs is on.
Zoltan Petranyi former UBO European Champion?fizzjambo wrote:Who'd he beat to get there?
Re: Haye-Briggs is on.
I wonder if Ian John Lewis will be the ref ?

-
asdfjkl
- Heavyweight

Re: Haye-Briggs is on.
Uea, but let's get real, Haye isn't a Klitschko and Briggs probably doesn't get injured after two rounds.fizzjambo wrote:Have you watched Vitali v Briggs? The man could have got seriously hurt for life.asdfjkl wrote:I love it, at least one of them will be shutted up forever after that fight, I'm affraid it will be Briggs, but if he makes it through there he really makes a point and I'm really going to laugh.
No matter whether I like a boxer or not I don't want to see anyone "shutted up forever" like that.
Re: Haye-Briggs is on.
How much of a difference do you think Briggs' injury made against Vitali? Did it stop him moving his head? Did it make his feet as slow as they were? Would he have won the fight otherwise?asdfjkl wrote:Uea, but let's get real, Haye isn't a Klitschko and Briggs probably doesn't get injured after two rounds.fizzjambo wrote:Have you watched Vitali v Briggs? The man could have got seriously hurt for life.asdfjkl wrote:I love it, at least one of them will be shutted up forever after that fight, I'm affraid it will be Briggs, but if he makes it through there he really makes a point and I'm really going to laugh.
No matter whether I like a boxer or not I don't want to see anyone "shutted up forever" like that.
Briggs looked that bad against Klitschko as he was even then an old man, well past his best and was painfully slow. Nowt's improved there. Most thought he was pretty much done at the top level when he stopped Lyakhovich with a couple of seconds left to win his second world title - ten years ago.
Haye isn't a Klitschko and when Briggs was 27/28 and Haye was 30 they would have made a good match - it doesn't work like that though.
This, if it happens, will be a painful watch. I have no preference for either man but Briggs shouldn't be anywhere near a 'live' heavyweight who can punch for his own health these days