Haye-Briggs is on.

keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17105
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Haye-Briggs is on.

Post by keithmoonhangover »

It's listed on Boxrec, but then so was Hughie - Wilder.
Stuarty
Middleweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: Haye-Briggs is on.

Post by Stuarty »

It's a step up from his last opponent but then again the guy RJJ fought last night would've been a step up! Glitter Scrot Eddie said today that Briggs would be on the Burns/Di Rocco undercard.
Mimmy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Haye-Briggs is on.

Post by Mimmy »

I'd love it, I would really love it.

Id even love to buy a ticket even though ive promised myself never to buy another Haye fight ticket.
reggaereggae
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4723
Joined: 21 Dec 2009, 17:01

Re: Haye-Briggs is on.

Post by reggaereggae »

mimmy123 wrote:I'd love it, I would really love it.

Id even love to buy a ticket even though ive promised myself never to buy another Haye fight ticket.
What, you want to see Briggs get killed?
Mimmy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Haye-Briggs is on.

Post by Mimmy »

reggaereggae wrote:
mimmy123 wrote:I'd love it, I would really love it.

Id even love to buy a ticket even though ive promised myself never to buy another Haye fight ticket.
What, you want to see Briggs get killed?

not quite, the opposite

better rephrase that, no I want to see Briggs win. not by death though.
Offal
Welterweight
Posts: 274
Joined: 17 Mar 2016, 18:28

Re: Haye-Briggs is on.

Post by Offal »

mimmy123 wrote:I'd love it, I would really love it
:neutral:
Offal
Welterweight
Posts: 274
Joined: 17 Mar 2016, 18:28

Re: Haye-Briggs is on.

Post by Offal »

mimmy123 wrote:not quite, the opposite

better rephrase that, no I want to see Briggs win. not by death though.
Even worse than your last post on this thread, you're on a roll Mimms :TU:
leejonesjnr
Middleweight
Posts: 2667
Joined: 31 Dec 2013, 18:32

Re: Haye-Briggs is on.

Post by leejonesjnr »

For the vacant WBA regular?
Mimmy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Haye-Briggs is on.

Post by Mimmy »

Offal wrote:
mimmy123 wrote:not quite, the opposite

better rephrase that, no I want to see Briggs win. not by death though.
Even worse than your last post on this thread, you're on a roll Mimms :TU:
I never suggested death. It came out wrong. Thats why i said not quite, the opposite. I just dont like david haye, cost me money thats all, cant afford to waste my wages tbh.
Oiky
Super Welterweight
Posts: 7277
Joined: 16 Feb 2015, 09:22

Re: Haye-Briggs is on.

Post by Oiky »

briggs is comical and a down to earth man but haye is gonna beat him, don't like haye so would love to see briggs bust him but i doubt its gonna happen
fizzjambo
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1283
Joined: 22 Sep 2010, 10:36

Re: Haye-Briggs is on.

Post by fizzjambo »

Shocking fight, so small a step up from De Moro it's almost laughable. Briggs will get stood on his head and I hope he gets taken out early as his solid chin could see him take a lot of clean shots. His defence has always been poreous and he's never been quick but he looks like he is walking through treacle these days and his work rate is single figure punches per round.

It's smart by Haye as Briggs is a great talker, has built a decent social media following and had the media eating out of his hand over here this week. In reality though he's never been top level, hasn't had a decent win in almost a decade and is a 44 year old who took a hellish 12 round beating in his last fight worth a damn and had been banned as a drugs cheat. It's not even a contest
Offal
Welterweight
Posts: 274
Joined: 17 Mar 2016, 18:28

Re: Haye-Briggs is on.

Post by Offal »

fizzjambo wrote:In reality though he's never been top level, hasn't had a decent win in almost a decade and is a 44 year old who took a hellish 12 round beating in his last fight worth a damn and had been banned as a drugs cheat. It's not even a contest
Yes .. with any luck the BBBoC will veto it.
leejonesjnr
Middleweight
Posts: 2667
Joined: 31 Dec 2013, 18:32

Re: Haye-Briggs is on.

Post by leejonesjnr »

No official announcement or twitter/Facebook mention from either man as well as Haye recently dismissing the idea. Probably not really on.
chiggsy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1387
Joined: 12 Feb 2010, 03:09

Re: Haye-Briggs is on.

Post by chiggsy »

Offal wrote:
fizzjambo wrote:In reality though he's never been top level, hasn't had a decent win in almost a decade and is a 44 year old who took a hellish 12 round beating in his last fight worth a damn and had been banned as a drugs cheat. It's not even a contest
Yes .. with any luck the BBBoC will veto it.
Could they really veto a fight based on their concerns of a man who happens to be ranked higher than his opponent?

I'm not defending it,briggs should be saved from himself at 44 years old but like it or not he's the wba no 4.
mullenman
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1124
Joined: 23 Oct 2012, 11:10

Re: Haye-Briggs is on.

Post by mullenman »

If that fight happens the fight is massive

Haye is a marketing king
asdfjkl
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Haye-Briggs is on.

Post by asdfjkl »

I love it, at least one of them will be shutted up forever after that fight, I'm affraid it will be Briggs, but if he makes it through there he really makes a point and I'm really going to laugh.
fizzjambo
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1283
Joined: 22 Sep 2010, 10:36

Re: Haye-Briggs is on.

Post by fizzjambo »

chiggsy wrote:
Offal wrote:
fizzjambo wrote:In reality though he's never been top level, hasn't had a decent win in almost a decade and is a 44 year old who took a hellish 12 round beating in his last fight worth a damn and had been banned as a drugs cheat. It's not even a contest
Yes .. with any luck the BBBoC will veto it.
Could they really veto a fight based on their concerns of a man who happens to be ranked higher than his opponent?

I'm not defending it,briggs should be saved from himself at 44 years old but like it or not he's the wba no 4.
Cannae see it being vetoed to be honest, don't think their are grounds to (other than by punters!).

Briggs ranking with the WBA is brutal even for them though. Who'd he beat to get there?
fizzjambo
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1283
Joined: 22 Sep 2010, 10:36

Re: Haye-Briggs is on.

Post by fizzjambo »

asdfjkl wrote:I love it, at least one of them will be shutted up forever after that fight, I'm affraid it will be Briggs, but if he makes it through there he really makes a point and I'm really going to laugh.
Have you watched Vitali v Briggs? The man could have got seriously hurt for life.
No matter whether I like a boxer or not I don't want to see anyone "shutted up forever" like that.
Looking On
Super Middleweight
Posts: 927
Joined: 12 Oct 2012, 13:50

Re: Haye-Briggs is on.

Post by Looking On »

If BBBofC dont veto it then it just proves that its all about the money with them.
Because they vetoed far less previously.

I specifically remember them declining to allow Frans Botha boxing Fury even though at the time he would have been Furys biggest test... which was due to his age they said.

Im sure Tijuana who posts on here is younger than Briggs too.
fizzjambo
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1283
Joined: 22 Sep 2010, 10:36

Re: Haye-Briggs is on.

Post by fizzjambo »

Looking On wrote:If BBBofC dont veto it then it just proves that its all about the money with them.
Because they vetoed far less previously.

I specifically remember them declining to allow Frans Botha boxing Fury even though at the time he would have been Furys biggest test... which was due to his age they said.

Im sure Tijuana who posts on here is younger than Briggs too.
It's not a fight I want to happen but I'm not sure about it getting vetoed. Skelton has boxed at a good years older and had been stopped more recently.

I'd like to see the media tearing this up for the arse paper it is but I'm not holding my breath
Rexob
Middleweight
Posts: 6025
Joined: 20 Mar 2014, 15:17

Re: Haye-Briggs is on.

Post by Rexob »

Looking forward to this.
Offal
Welterweight
Posts: 274
Joined: 17 Mar 2016, 18:28

Re: Haye-Briggs is on.

Post by Offal »

fizzjambo wrote:Who'd he beat to get there?
Zoltan Petranyi former UBO European Champion?
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: Haye-Briggs is on.

Post by whiskey »

I wonder if Ian John Lewis will be the ref ?

:o
asdfjkl
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Haye-Briggs is on.

Post by asdfjkl »

fizzjambo wrote:
asdfjkl wrote:I love it, at least one of them will be shutted up forever after that fight, I'm affraid it will be Briggs, but if he makes it through there he really makes a point and I'm really going to laugh.
Have you watched Vitali v Briggs? The man could have got seriously hurt for life.
No matter whether I like a boxer or not I don't want to see anyone "shutted up forever" like that.
Uea, but let's get real, Haye isn't a Klitschko and Briggs probably doesn't get injured after two rounds.
fizzjambo
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1283
Joined: 22 Sep 2010, 10:36

Re: Haye-Briggs is on.

Post by fizzjambo »

asdfjkl wrote:
fizzjambo wrote:
asdfjkl wrote:I love it, at least one of them will be shutted up forever after that fight, I'm affraid it will be Briggs, but if he makes it through there he really makes a point and I'm really going to laugh.
Have you watched Vitali v Briggs? The man could have got seriously hurt for life.
No matter whether I like a boxer or not I don't want to see anyone "shutted up forever" like that.
Uea, but let's get real, Haye isn't a Klitschko and Briggs probably doesn't get injured after two rounds.
How much of a difference do you think Briggs' injury made against Vitali? Did it stop him moving his head? Did it make his feet as slow as they were? Would he have won the fight otherwise?
Briggs looked that bad against Klitschko as he was even then an old man, well past his best and was painfully slow. Nowt's improved there. Most thought he was pretty much done at the top level when he stopped Lyakhovich with a couple of seconds left to win his second world title - ten years ago.
Haye isn't a Klitschko and when Briggs was 27/28 and Haye was 30 they would have made a good match - it doesn't work like that though.
This, if it happens, will be a painful watch. I have no preference for either man but Briggs shouldn't be anywhere near a 'live' heavyweight who can punch for his own health these days
Post Reply