For those overseas that is about two and a half hours after the time of this post.
His press release, see below, states he has a 'MAJOR ANNOUNCEMENT' to make.

Interesting??

An update on the B sample perhaps?
Wow I didn't know anything was infalliblediddy wrote:Couldn't care less what he has to say.
VADA doesn't make mistakes.
Guilty.
tiny_acres wrote:Wow I didn't know anything was infalliblediddy wrote:Couldn't care less what he has to say.
VADA doesn't make mistakes.
Guilty.
Diddy, how do you know VADA doesn't mess up?diddy wrote:What's he gonna do? Admit it? It's a combat sport. Dudes cheat. Vada doesn't mess up. He's guilty. Next.
They are clearly assuming the B sample will provide the same result as the A sample and are therefore not prepared to spend the time and money on pursuing it.Perseus wrote:Regardless of what "investigation" they plan on doing, foregoing the B sample usually means the athlete is accepting the A sample as a valid result which allows the governing body to move forward with whatever penalties they are going to impose.
Whatever.Like a Boss wrote:They are clearly assuming the B sample will provide the same result as the A sample and therefore not prepared to spend the time and money on pursuing it.Perseus wrote:Regardless of what "investigation" they plan on doing, foregoing the B sample usually means the athlete is accepting the A sample as a valid result which allows the governing body to move forward with whatever penalties they are going to impose.
I haven't seen Browne's team point their finger directly at AVADA. What they appear to be suggesting is Browne was given something (contained in his food or drink) that produced the positive result.
It is interesting Browne was clean when he arrived in Grozny, and the negative result of the first test proves that's the case. Because why on earth would a heavyweight take clenbuterol within 2 weeks of a fight?
Lovely. So you're not going to use any logic. Just a brick walldiddy wrote:Guilty. Suspend him.
Next.
Whether Browne was tricked into eating or drinking something containing clenbuterol or not it will be next to impossible to prove. Particularly when it occurred in a foreign country where they don't speak English and have everything to gain by not being cooperative.Taansend wrote:Lovely. So you're not going to use any logic. Just a brick walldiddy wrote:Guilty. Suspend him.
Next.
I agree with you, VADA is the most trustworthy testing agency.diddy wrote:Guilty. Suspend him.
Next.
Browne isn't suggesting that VADA made a mistake, hence not requesting the B sample to be tested. Clearly he accepts that a banned substance was in his blood, but he denies taking it knowingly. Of course this will be very hard to prove.diddy wrote:Couldn't care less what he has to say.
VADA doesn't make mistakes.
Guilty.
The fact that he tested negative just five days earlier is significant, particularly because the banned substance he tested positive for is used for weight loss and not for short term performance enhancement.Perseus wrote:It just doesn't matter how many times an athlete in any sport has a negative drug test.
The one positive is the only test that needs a credible explanation.
Again, no one is suggesting that VADA messed up. Based on this assumption, we can agree with 100% certainty that Browne was clean just five days before the fight. Knowingly taking clenbuterol - to lose weight - so close to a fight makes no sense. Then consider the dodgy goings on in the fight - the long round, the short round and three lopsided scorecards - and it's certainly not inconceivable that someone spiked Browne's food in the leadup to the fight. Will be very hard to prove though.diddy wrote:What's he gonna do? Admit it? It's a combat sport. Dudes cheat. Vada doesn't mess up. He's guilty. Next.
You would make a terrible judge.diddy wrote:Guilty. Suspend him.
Next.
No, it implies that he agrees the positive test was accurate and he believes he was spiked. Why are people finding this so hard to understand?!Freedom2013 wrote:I agree with you, VADA is the most trustworthy testing agency.diddy wrote:Guilty. Suspend him.
Next.
To the doubters: that he decided to NOT have the B sample tested implies he is indeed guilty.
I think he's saying he was drugged, that requires no error from VADA.diddy wrote:What's he gonna do? Admit it? It's a combat sport. Dudes cheat. Vada doesn't mess up. He's guilty. Next.