Why is the Fury Vs Klitschko rematch taking so long to arrange??

JC
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4579
Joined: 07 Jan 2004, 13:04

Re: Why is the Fury Vs Klitschko rematch taking so long to arrange??

Post by JC »

Someone suggested Wlad's team might be delaying it to let Tyson put on plenty of weight in the meantime.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17105
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Why is the Fury Vs Klitschko rematch taking so long to arrange??

Post by keithmoonhangover »

J-C wrote:Someone suggested Wlad's team might be delaying it to let Tyson put on plenty of weight in the meantime.
If I had to guess, I would say it's got a lot to do with Wlad's mental state. Recovering from the loss, wife and kid, retirement rumors,
jamiem26
Super Welterweight
Posts: 169
Joined: 17 Nov 2014, 19:38

Re: Why is the Fury Vs Klitschko rematch taking so long to arrange??

Post by jamiem26 »

Rumours of Bolton's ground early July - 29k capacity so 35-40K with seats on the pitch...seems about right with a decent card.

Hopefully we get news soon, geting impatient.
Sklar
Middleweight
Posts: 5680
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 09:06

Re: Why is the Fury Vs Klitschko rematch taking so long to arrange??

Post by Sklar »

jamiem26 wrote:Rumours of Bolton's ground early July - 29k capacity so 35-40K with seats on the pitch...seems about right with a decent card.

Hopefully we get news soon, geting impatient.
Doesn't work like that any more I don't think. 29k capacity means 29k capacity bust, I'm 90% sure ylu're not allowed to oversell. Could be wrong though.
Rob3_142
Super Welterweight
Posts: 2791
Joined: 26 Jun 2015, 06:03

Re: Why is the Fury Vs Klitschko rematch taking so long to arrange??

Post by Rob3_142 »

keithmoonhangover wrote:
J-C wrote:Someone suggested Wlad's team might be delaying it to let Tyson put on plenty of weight in the meantime.
If I had to guess, I would say it's got a lot to do with Wlad's mental state. Recovering from the loss, wife and kid, retirement rumors,
I think everyone is getting a little desperate to fill the gap with some dramatic conspiracy theory. I think it's fair to say that their respective teams are just taking their time to agree terms, and find a suitable venue.

You could argue that the last fight was easier to make because Klitchko as the champion was calling the shots as he was the big name and Fury was a relatively unknown. Now Fury is top dog, and Klitchko is the challanger, although not an unknown, meaning it's hard to iron out certain details etc.
BitPlayer
Welterweight
Posts: 3527
Joined: 29 Feb 2016, 05:14

Re: Why is the Fury Vs Klitschko rematch taking so long to arrange??

Post by BitPlayer »

I heard BJS wants a to be on a comainevent, I don't know if this is being considered at all though.
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45238
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Why is the Fury Vs Klitschko rematch taking so long to arrange??

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

Sklar wrote:
jamiem26 wrote:Rumours of Bolton's ground early July - 29k capacity so 35-40K with seats on the pitch...seems about right with a decent card.

Hopefully we get news soon, geting impatient.
Doesn't work like that any more I don't think. 29k capacity means 29k capacity bust, I'm 90% sure ylu're not allowed to oversell. Could be wrong though.
You sure - you'd have to have seating on the pitch otherwise no ringside seats.
Sklar
Middleweight
Posts: 5680
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 09:06

Re: Why is the Fury Vs Klitschko rematch taking so long to arrange??

Post by Sklar »

jamesmcdonnell wrote:
Sklar wrote:
jamiem26 wrote:Rumours of Bolton's ground early July - 29k capacity so 35-40K with seats on the pitch...seems about right with a decent card.

Hopefully we get news soon, geting impatient.
Doesn't work like that any more I don't think. 29k capacity means 29k capacity bust, I'm 90% sure ylu're not allowed to oversell. Could be wrong though.
You sure - you'd have to have seating on the pitch otherwise no ringside seats.
You reduce seating in the stands one for one with the seats on the pitch. I'd not put my life on this but it's how I understand it works now for safety reasons.
the_doctor
Welterweight
Posts: 398
Joined: 01 Feb 2015, 09:08

Re: Why is the Fury Vs Klitschko rematch taking so long to arrange??

Post by the_doctor »

Sklar wrote:
jamesmcdonnell wrote:
Sklar wrote:
Doesn't work like that any more I don't think. 29k capacity means 29k capacity bust, I'm 90% sure ylu're not allowed to oversell. Could be wrong though.
You sure - you'd have to have seating on the pitch otherwise no ringside seats.
You reduce seating in the stands one for one with the seats on the pitch. I'd not put my life on this but it's how I understand it works now for safety reasons.
I think you're probably right. There are all sorts of regulations, right down to the number of toilets so I wouldn't be surprised if they can't just add an extra 5-10k to the capacity.
soulboy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 122
Joined: 06 Aug 2010, 13:20

Re: Why is the Fury Vs Klitschko rematch taking so long to arrange??

Post by soulboy »

who cares , it was the biggest borefest ive ever seen and if they gave me ringside seats for free with beer all night id refuse the ticket , worst world title fight id ever seen
Sklar
Middleweight
Posts: 5680
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 09:06

Re: Why is the Fury Vs Klitschko rematch taking so long to arrange??

Post by Sklar »

the_doctor wrote:
Sklar wrote:
jamesmcdonnell wrote:
You sure - you'd have to have seating on the pitch otherwise no ringside seats.
You reduce seating in the stands one for one with the seats on the pitch. I'd not put my life on this but it's how I understand it works now for safety reasons.
I think you're probably right. There are all sorts of regulations, right down to the number of toilets so I wouldn't be surprised if they can't just add an extra 5-10k to the capacity.
Yes, I don't want to state categorically that I'm correct because someone will find an exception but for a number of reasons, the days of filling stadiums in the Live Aid style of the eighties is no more. Wembley can seat 90,000, but it reduces that to 75,000 maximum for concerts to allow 15,000 to be stood i.e. still a total of 90,000.
Rob3_142
Super Welterweight
Posts: 2791
Joined: 26 Jun 2015, 06:03

Re: Why is the Fury Vs Klitschko rematch taking so long to arrange??

Post by Rob3_142 »

soulboy wrote:who cares , it was the biggest borefest ive ever seen and if they gave me ringside seats for free with beer all night id refuse the ticket , worst world title fight id ever seen
You'd refuse a full night of free beer and boxing? Suit yourself. Begsy having your ticket!
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45238
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Why is the Fury Vs Klitschko rematch taking so long to arrange??

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

Sklar wrote:
the_doctor wrote:
Sklar wrote:
You reduce seating in the stands one for one with the seats on the pitch. I'd not put my life on this but it's how I understand it works now for safety reasons.
I think you're probably right. There are all sorts of regulations, right down to the number of toilets so I wouldn't be surprised if they can't just add an extra 5-10k to the capacity.
Yes, I don't want to state categorically that I'm correct because someone will find an exception but for a number of reasons, the days of filling stadiums in the Live Aid style of the eighties is no more. Wembley can seat 90,000, but it reduces that to 75,000 maximum for concerts to allow 15,000 to be stood i.e. still a total of 90,000.
You're probably right, the health and safety brigade are in full force these days.
banjo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 26471
Joined: 20 Nov 2007, 03:17

Re: Why is the Fury Vs Klitschko rematch taking so long to arrange??

Post by banjo »

Sklar wrote:
the_doctor wrote:
Sklar wrote:
You reduce seating in the stands one for one with the seats on the pitch. I'd not put my life on this but it's how I understand it works now for safety reasons.
I think you're probably right. There are all sorts of regulations, right down to the number of toilets so I wouldn't be surprised if they can't just add an extra 5-10k to the capacity.
Yes, I don't want to state categorically that I'm correct because someone will find an exception but for a number of reasons, the days of filling stadiums in the Live Aid style of the eighties is no more. Wembley can seat 90,000, but it reduces that to 75,000 maximum for concerts to allow 15,000 to be stood i.e. still a total of 90,000.
Remember though for concerts one side of the stadium is backstage so you can't seat people there anyway.
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45238
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Why is the Fury Vs Klitschko rematch taking so long to arrange??

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

banjo wrote:
Sklar wrote:
the_doctor wrote: I think you're probably right. There are all sorts of regulations, right down to the number of toilets so I wouldn't be surprised if they can't just add an extra 5-10k to the capacity.
Yes, I don't want to state categorically that I'm correct because someone will find an exception but for a number of reasons, the days of filling stadiums in the Live Aid style of the eighties is no more. Wembley can seat 90,000, but it reduces that to 75,000 maximum for concerts to allow 15,000 to be stood i.e. still a total of 90,000.
Remember though for concerts one side of the stadium is backstage so you can't seat people there anyway.
Good point Senor.
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Why is the Fury Vs Klitschko rematch taking so long to arrange??

Post by expe »

Sklar wrote:
the_doctor wrote:
Sklar wrote:
You reduce seating in the stands one for one with the seats on the pitch. I'd not put my life on this but it's how I understand it works now for safety reasons.
I think you're probably right. There are all sorts of regulations, right down to the number of toilets so I wouldn't be surprised if they can't just add an extra 5-10k to the capacity.
Yes, I don't want to state categorically that I'm correct because someone will find an exception but for a number of reasons, the days of filling stadiums in the Live Aid style of the eighties is no more. Wembley can seat 90,000, but it reduces that to 75,000 maximum for concerts to allow 15,000 to be stood i.e. still a total of 90,000.
Rod Stewart had 20k in at Blackpool a couple of years ago and that's barely safe for the usual capacity of 16-17k. Hatton went over the capacity when he fought outdoors too.
Sklar
Middleweight
Posts: 5680
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 09:06

Re: Why is the Fury Vs Klitschko rematch taking so long to arrange??

Post by Sklar »

There you go. There are always exceptions. All the large venues I've done stuff for work the way I said but anecdotally there are exceptions legit and otherwise.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17105
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Why is the Fury Vs Klitschko rematch taking so long to arrange??

Post by keithmoonhangover »

jamesmcdonnell wrote:
banjo wrote:
Sklar wrote:
Yes, I don't want to state categorically that I'm correct because someone will find an exception but for a number of reasons, the days of filling stadiums in the Live Aid style of the eighties is no more. Wembley can seat 90,000, but it reduces that to 75,000 maximum for concerts to allow 15,000 to be stood i.e. still a total of 90,000.
Remember though for concerts one side of the stadium is backstage so you can't seat people there anyway.
Good point Senor.
Sklar is incorrect on this one. A lot of modern stadiums are designed with much more stringent safety features in mind. They build safety to a much higher standard than is needed.

An example is when Rhianna played a gig at the Stadium of Light. There were 57,000 people there and the standard seated capacity is 49,000.

The same happened when Coldplay played the Reebock Stadium.
Stuarty
Middleweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: Why is the Fury Vs Klitschko rematch taking so long to arrange??

Post by Stuarty »

expe wrote:
Sklar wrote:
the_doctor wrote: I think you're probably right. There are all sorts of regulations, right down to the number of toilets so I wouldn't be surprised if they can't just add an extra 5-10k to the capacity.
Yes, I don't want to state categorically that I'm correct because someone will find an exception but for a number of reasons, the days of filling stadiums in the Live Aid style of the eighties is no more. Wembley can seat 90,000, but it reduces that to 75,000 maximum for concerts to allow 15,000 to be stood i.e. still a total of 90,000.
Rod Stewart had 20k in at Blackpool a couple of years ago and that's barely safe for the usual capacity of 16-17k. Hatton went over the capacity when he fought outdoors too.
Rod Stewart's a fake Scottish dick splash. His wife must be whoring it about. How the hell does he even manage to get it up never mind fire out weans!? I'd rather squat on a cactus than go and see him!
Stuarty
Middleweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: Why is the Fury Vs Klitschko rematch taking so long to arrange??

Post by Stuarty »

keithmoonhangover wrote:
jamesmcdonnell wrote:
banjo wrote:
Remember though for concerts one side of the stadium is backstage so you can't seat people there anyway.
Good point Senor.
Sklar is incorrect on this one. A lot of modern stadiums are designed with much more stringent safety features in mind. They build safety to a much higher standard than is needed.

An example is when Rhianna played a gig at the Stadium of Light. There were 57,000 people there and the standard seated capacity is 49,000.

The same happened when Coldplay played the Reebock Stadium.
Was Rihanna any good? Did you throw your boxers at her?
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45238
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Why is the Fury Vs Klitschko rematch taking so long to arrange??

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

Stuarty30 wrote:
expe wrote:
Sklar wrote:
Yes, I don't want to state categorically that I'm correct because someone will find an exception but for a number of reasons, the days of filling stadiums in the Live Aid style of the eighties is no more. Wembley can seat 90,000, but it reduces that to 75,000 maximum for concerts to allow 15,000 to be stood i.e. still a total of 90,000.
Rod Stewart had 20k in at Blackpool a couple of years ago and that's barely safe for the usual capacity of 16-17k. Hatton went over the capacity when he fought outdoors too.
Rod Stewart's a fake Scottish dick splash. His wife must be whoring it about. How the hell does he even manage to get it up never mind fire out weans!? I'd rather squat on a cactus than go and see him!
He also can't sing for shite any more. He was cool and had a great voice when he was young, but he's turned into a tedious old wankspanner.
Stuarty
Middleweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: Why is the Fury Vs Klitschko rematch taking so long to arrange??

Post by Stuarty »

jamesmcdonnell wrote:
Stuarty30 wrote:
expe wrote: Rod Stewart had 20k in at Blackpool a couple of years ago and that's barely safe for the usual capacity of 16-17k. Hatton went over the capacity when he fought outdoors too.
Rod Stewart's a fake Scottish dick splash. His wife must be whoring it about. How the hell does he even manage to get it up never mind fire out weans!? I'd rather squat on a cactus than go and see him!
He also can't sing for shite any more. He was cool and had a great voice when he was young, but he's turned into a tedious old wankspanner.
Probably spends thousands a year on botox and his coupon is still wrinklier than an elephants ball sack!
the_doctor
Welterweight
Posts: 398
Joined: 01 Feb 2015, 09:08

Re: Why is the Fury Vs Klitschko rematch taking so long to arrange??

Post by the_doctor »

jamesmcdonnell wrote:
Stuarty30 wrote:
expe wrote: Rod Stewart had 20k in at Blackpool a couple of years ago and that's barely safe for the usual capacity of 16-17k. Hatton went over the capacity when he fought outdoors too.
Rod Stewart's a fake Scottish dick splash. His wife must be whoring it about. How the hell does he even manage to get it up never mind fire out weans!? I'd rather squat on a cactus than go and see him!
He also can't sing for shite any more. He was cool and had a great voice when he was young, but he's turned into a tedious old wankspanner.
A wankspanner sounds like a great invention

"Tighten bolts and reward yourself with just one handy tool - the WankSpanner™ from JML"
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45238
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Why is the Fury Vs Klitschko rematch taking so long to arrange??

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

the_doctor wrote:
jamesmcdonnell wrote:
Stuarty30 wrote:
Rod Stewart's a fake Scottish dick splash. His wife must be whoring it about. How the hell does he even manage to get it up never mind fire out weans!? I'd rather squat on a cactus than go and see him!
He also can't sing for shite any more. He was cool and had a great voice when he was young, but he's turned into a tedious old wankspanner.
A wankspanner sounds like a great invention

"Tighten bolts and reward yourself with just one handy tool - the WankSpanner™ from JML"
There was a great one about Trump the other day, someone called him a "hoofwanking cnutbungler" on a twitter. Most apt.
Post Reply