Rank these boxers

DrunkenBoxer · Post by **DrunkenBoxer** » 03 Apr 2016, 23:29

Shawn Porter
Danny Garcia
Keith Thurman
Kell Brook
Adrien Broner

SFW · Post by **SFW** » 03 Apr 2016, 23:40

DrunkenBoxer wrote:Shawn Porter
Danny Garcia
Keith Thurman
Kell Brook
Danny Garcia
Adrien Broner

Thurman
Brook
Porter
Broner
Garcia

NateJR · Post by **NateJR** » 03 Apr 2016, 23:44

Brook
Thurman
Garcia
Porter
Broner

tigermoth87 · Post by **tigermoth87** » 04 Apr 2016, 00:10

Brook
Thurman
Garcia
Porter
Broner

davie · Post by **davie** » 04 Apr 2016, 00:59

NateJR wrote:Brook
Thurman
Garcia
Porter
Broner

This for me.

I can't call the Thurman vs Brook fight but this has to be the order.

Brook beat Porter and Porter beat Broner so that sorts out half the pile.
Garcia is a funny one, we'll have to wait till he fights one of those names until we really rank him in WW

ikorolev · Post by **ikorolev** » 04 Apr 2016, 01:42

1-2 Brook/Thurman hard to call
3 Porter
4 Garcia
5 Broner

Larrylefthook · Post by **Larrylefthook** » 04 Apr 2016, 07:58

Kell Brook
Keith Thurman
Shawn Porter
Danny Garcia
Adrien Broner

Gambler · Post by **Gambler** » 04 Apr 2016, 15:38

Thurman
Brook
Porter
Danny Garcia
Adrien Broner

gilgamesh · Post by **gilgamesh** » 04 Apr 2016, 15:58

For now

1. Kell Brook
2. Keith Thurman
3. Danny Garcia
4. Shawn Porter

5. Adrien Broner

Though I'd say if Thurman beats Porter he can possibly become #1.

Tarkus · Post by **Tarkus** » 04 Apr 2016, 16:01

Kell Brook
Keith Thurman
Danny Garcia
Shawn Porter
Adrien Broner

crusader · Post by **crusader** » 04 Apr 2016, 16:10

NateJR wrote:Brook
Thurman
Garcia
Porter
Broner

tigermoth87 wrote:Brook
Thurman
Garcia
Porter
Broner

Tarkus wrote:Kell Brook
Keith Thurman
Danny Garcia
Shawn Porter
Adrien Broner

I agree

SaadOffTheDeck · Post by **SaadOffTheDeck** » 04 Apr 2016, 16:23

Resume wise Garcia is the easy #1.

Brook
Porter
Thurman
Broner

Boxerbeetle · Post by **Boxerbeetle** » 04 Apr 2016, 16:37

Thurman
Brook
Garcia
Porter
Broner

Lennox · Post by **Lennox** » 04 Apr 2016, 17:06

If you go by whats happened.

Brook or Garcia are the 1 and 2, probably Brook 1.

Porter and Thurman are close 3 and 4s.

Big gap to Broner.

Larrylefthook · Post by **Larrylefthook** » 04 Apr 2016, 18:35

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Resume wise Garcia is the easy #1.

Brook
Porter
Thurman
Broner

What resume he's only had 2 fights at WW and it took him 9 rounds to be a shot to fcuk Paulie who hadn't fought for over a year when he got destroyed in 4 by Porter.

SaadOffTheDeck · Post by **SaadOffTheDeck** » 04 Apr 2016, 19:31

Larrylefthook wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Resume wise Garcia is the easy #1.

Brook
Porter
Thurman
Broner
What resume he's only had 2 fights at WW and it took him 9 rounds to be a shot to fcuk Paulie who hadn't fought for over a year when he got destroyed in 4 by Porter.

Forgive me, I do not have your infrared goggles that came up with strictly Welterweight fights in the question.

Larrylefthook · Post by **Larrylefthook** » 04 Apr 2016, 19:44

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
Larrylefthook wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Resume wise Garcia is the easy #1.

Brook
Porter
Thurman
Broner
What resume he's only had 2 fights at WW and it took him 9 rounds to be a shot to fcuk Paulie who hadn't fought for over a year when he got destroyed in 4 by Porter.
Forgive me, I do not have your infrared goggles that came up with strictly Welterweight fights in the question.

Haha yeh my bad, wouldn't have Danny as clear #1 I think they're fairly close except Broner being clearly bottom of the pack.

SaadOffTheDeck · Post by **SaadOffTheDeck** » 04 Apr 2016, 20:25

Larrylefthook wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
Larrylefthook wrote: What resume he's only had 2 fights at WW and it took him 9 rounds to be a shot to fcuk Paulie who hadn't fought for over a year when he got destroyed in 4 by Porter.
Forgive me, I do not have your infrared goggles that came up with strictly Welterweight fights in the question.
Haha yeh my bad, wouldn't have Danny as clear #1 I think they're fairly close except Broner being clearly bottom of the pack.

Really? Matthysse, Peterson, Khan, Paulie, Guerrero, Morales, Judah...

I don't think any of the rest of these come close to that.

Larrylefthook · Post by **Larrylefthook** » 04 Apr 2016, 21:14

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
Larrylefthook wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
Forgive me, I do not have your infrared goggles that came up with strictly Welterweight fights in the question.
Haha yeh my bad, wouldn't have Danny as clear #1 I think they're fairly close except Broner being clearly bottom of the pack.
Really? Matthysse, Peterson, Khan, Paulie, Guerrero, Morales, Judah...

I don't think any of the rest of these come close to that.

I wasn't impressed with the performance in most of those fights. If he was elite he would of walked through Paulie, wouldn't have got out boxed by Peterson in the last 5 rounds and wouldn't have struggled against Herrera.

SaadOffTheDeck · Post by **SaadOffTheDeck** » 04 Apr 2016, 22:14

He's just faced higher caliber. I thought Brook/porter was unimpressive on both sides. Thurman probably has the eye test imo, resume wise, impressed or not, Garcia has this in a landslide.

jezzamundo · Post by **jezzamundo** » 04 Apr 2016, 22:34

Resume:
Garcia
Brook
Porter
Thurman
Broner

Current welterweight rank:
Brook
Thurman
Porter
Garcia
Broner

Trying to rate them pound-for-pound is trickier, because Garcia and Broner have come up divisions, which is something I like to give fighters credit for when doing these sort of rankings.

ImranSarwar · Post by **ImranSarwar** » 04 Apr 2016, 23:12

SFW wrote:
DrunkenBoxer wrote:Shawn Porter
Danny Garcia
Keith Thurman
Kell Brook
Danny Garcia
Adrien Broner
Thurman
Brook
Porter
Broner
Garcia

Thurman, Brook, Porter in same make-up. Broner already lost to one of them, didn't he? Garcia...yeah. Idk. I didn't personally like him what-ever [he never done nothing to ME, though..his "team" pretty (vulgar talking, noticed!)]
How CAN you rate these guys. It's like picking straws isn't it??
I like a "sure bet"..pick 1-2-3: RON LYLE, KEN NORTON, ERNIE SHAVERS.
I'll tell YOU if you are a knowledgeable boxing fan for that era.

PredatorHayds · Post by **PredatorHayds** » 06 Apr 2016, 07:10

Boxerbeetle wrote:Thurman
Brook
Garcia
Porter
Broner

I agree with this.

Monte Fisto · Post by **Monte Fisto** » 06 Apr 2016, 17:28

DrunkenBoxer wrote:Shawn Porter
Danny Garcia
Keith Thurman
Kell Brook
Adrien Broner

Thurman
Garcia
Brook
Porter
Broner

ImranSarwar · Post by **ImranSarwar** » 06 Apr 2016, 19:53

No takers 1-2-3 RON LYLE, KEN NORTON, ERNIE SHAVERS?

Rank these boxers

Rank these boxers

Re: Rank these boxers

Re: Rank these boxers

Re: Rank these boxers

Re: Rank these boxers

Re: Rank these boxers

Re: Rank these boxers

Re: Rank these boxers

Re: Rank these boxers

Re: Rank these boxers

Re: Rank these boxers

Re: Rank these boxers

Re: Rank these boxers

Re: Rank these boxers

Re: Rank these boxers

Re: Rank these boxers

Re: Rank these boxers

Re: Rank these boxers

Re: Rank these boxers

Re: Rank these boxers

Re: Rank these boxers

Re: Rank these boxers

Re: Rank these boxers

Re: Rank these boxers

Re: Rank these boxers