Gallagher fighters in big fights

BigDoofus
Welterweight
Posts: 2182
Joined: 04 Apr 2016, 14:59

Gallagher fighters in big fights

Post by BigDoofus »

Tend to lose.
tobyh5
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2880
Joined: 09 Jan 2008, 07:07

Re: Gallagher fighters in big fights

Post by tobyh5 »

List them

Stephen Smith
Scott Quigg
Your turn
wesshaw1985
Super Middleweight
Posts: 7483
Joined: 21 Jul 2013, 17:57

Re: Gallagher fighters in big fights

Post by wesshaw1985 »

tobyh5 wrote:List them

Stephen Smith
Scott Quigg
Your turn
Stephen Smith
Scott Quigg
+
Paul Smith
Scott Cardle
BigDoofus
Welterweight
Posts: 2182
Joined: 04 Apr 2016, 14:59

Re: Gallagher fighters in big fights

Post by BigDoofus »

tobyh5 wrote:List them

Stephen Smith
Scott Quigg
Your turn


Add Paul Smith's last 3.
John Murray.

Unless his fighter is odds on favourite they seem to lose. Liam Smith wouldn't fight Andrade (his paper title is not highly regarded)
cocobongo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 358
Joined: 09 Jun 2010, 13:02

Re: Gallagher fighters in big fights

Post by cocobongo »

Macklin vs strum
DMA1987
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2927
Joined: 04 Jun 2011, 17:05

Re: Gallagher fighters in big fights

Post by DMA1987 »

Crolla?

Gallagher tends to be called a tactical genius is one fight and clueless in the next.
bripez
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4877
Joined: 11 Feb 2010, 18:07

Re: Gallagher fighters in big fights

Post by bripez »

#RecordsAreForDJs

I agree though - unless the odds are greatly stacked in their favour, his fighters lose
BigDoofus
Welterweight
Posts: 2182
Joined: 04 Apr 2016, 14:59

Re: Gallagher fighters in big fights

Post by BigDoofus »

DMA1987 wrote:Crolla?

Gallagher tends to be called a tactical genius is one fight and clueless in the next.
Crolla beat Perez who is rated no.41 in the world.
rd350lc
Super Welterweight
Posts: 4942
Joined: 22 Nov 2014, 11:49

Re: Gallagher fighters in big fights

Post by rd350lc »

was only thinking today that he has lost his mojo a bit .
rio
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1173
Joined: 22 Oct 2012, 16:48

Re: Gallagher fighters in big fights

Post by rio »

Off the top of my head here are the big fights against top fighters from the division hes been involved in:

Paul smith vs ward, Abraham x2, degale, groves
Record: 0-5

Quigg vs frampton
Record: 0-1

Stephen Smith vs selby, pedraza
Record: 0-2

Macklin vs sturm
Record: 0-1

John Murray vs Rios, mitchell
Record: 0-2

Crolla vs perez
Record: 1-0-1

That's a record of 1-11 with 1 draw when his fighters step up. Trainer of the year my a**e!
Sklar
Middleweight
Posts: 5680
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 09:06

Re: Gallagher fighters in big fights

Post by Sklar »

Wouldn't have mattered who they were trained by, they'd all still have lost but would they have got into the position to get those fights without Gallagher? I don't have a clue.
wesshaw1985
Super Middleweight
Posts: 7483
Joined: 21 Jul 2013, 17:57

Re: Gallagher fighters in big fights

Post by wesshaw1985 »

Sklar wrote:Wouldn't have mattered who they were trained by, they'd all still have lost but would they have got into the position to get those fights without Gallagher? I don't have a clue.
did Gallagher get them the fights or did Hearn?
Gallagher gets paid to train his fighters and devise a plan to beat their opponents.
P45 time for Tesco Joe I think...
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17116
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Gallagher fighters in big fights

Post by keithmoonhangover »

Amazing fact #76. 50% of all boxers in big fights lose. :OhYes:
bripez
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4877
Joined: 11 Feb 2010, 18:07

Re: Gallagher fighters in big fights

Post by bripez »

keithmoonhangover wrote:Amazing fact #76. 50% of all boxers in big fights lose. :OhYes:
Therefore Gallagher should have at least a 50% success rate?
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17116
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Gallagher fighters in big fights

Post by keithmoonhangover »

bripez wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:Amazing fact #76. 50% of all boxers in big fights lose. :OhYes:
Therefore Gallagher should have at least a 50% success rate?
That all depends which of the original 50% they are. :OhYes:
pimp
Super Middleweight
Posts: 288
Joined: 27 Nov 2012, 16:55

Re: Gallagher fighters in big fights

Post by pimp »

He's defiantly overrated as a trainer, he gets good results at British and European level, he's never had a fighter from scratch he's had fighter given to him and he's a arrogant pudendum as well
Sklar
Middleweight
Posts: 5680
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 09:06

Re: Gallagher fighters in big fights

Post by Sklar »

keithmoonhangover wrote:Amazing fact #76. 50% of all boxers in big fights lose. :OhYes:
Not true.
SNG
Super Middleweight
Posts: 4703
Joined: 22 May 2013, 21:02

Re: Gallagher fighters in big fights

Post by SNG »

bripez wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:Amazing fact #76. 50% of all boxers in big fights lose. :OhYes:
Therefore Gallagher should have at least a 50% success rate?
Why?
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23147
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Gallagher fighters in big fights

Post by mickey1975 »

pimp wrote:He's defiantly overrated as a trainer, he gets good results at British and European level, he's never had a fighter from scratch he's had fighter given to him and he's a arrogant pudendum as well
John Murray.
tobyh5
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2880
Joined: 09 Jan 2008, 07:07

Re: Gallagher fighters in big fights

Post by tobyh5 »

keithmoonhangover wrote:Amazing fact #76. 50% of all boxers in big fights lose. :OhYes:
I appreciate the attempt at humour but interesting fact #77 is that there is such a thing as a draw in a big fight. Shocker right.
Finn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5509
Joined: 07 May 2009, 15:56

Re: Gallagher fighters in big fights

Post by Finn »

The style of his fighters seems to be come forward in straight lines, sit on the other guys chest and trade shots with a peak a boo defence.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17116
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Gallagher fighters in big fights

Post by keithmoonhangover »

tobyh5 wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:Amazing fact #76. 50% of all boxers in big fights lose. :OhYes:
I appreciate the attempt at humour but interesting fact #77 is that there is such a thing as a draw in a big fight. Shocker right.
No one likes a smarty pants Toby. :roll:
davie
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6763
Joined: 21 Aug 2010, 00:45

Re: Gallagher fighters in big fights

Post by davie »

mickey1975 wrote:
pimp wrote:He's defiantly overrated as a trainer, he gets good results at British and European level, he's never had a fighter from scratch he's had fighter given to him and he's a arrogant pudendum as well
John Murray.
Ah, that classic example of the sweet science.
Technician, tactician, artist. Coached to the highest level and a joy to watch
bripez
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4877
Joined: 11 Feb 2010, 18:07

Re: Gallagher fighters in big fights

Post by bripez »

pimp wrote:He's defiantly overrated as a trainer, he gets good results at British and European level
I agree - however, as his boxers are mostly in Camp Eddie these fights are hardly 50/50 affairs so as soon as they step up they invariably get beat
rio
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1173
Joined: 22 Oct 2012, 16:48

Re: Gallagher fighters in big fights

Post by rio »

Anyone see the interview where he compared his gym (which is actually khan gym) to the kronk back in the day! Laughable.
Post Reply