James DeGale (c) vs. Rogelio Medina - April 30th 2016

DeGale (c) vs. Medina Winner and How?

Poll ended at 12 Mar 2016, 15:30

James DeGale Stoppage
49
58%
James DeGale Decision
29
34%
Draw
2
2%
Rogelio Medina Decision
0
No votes
Rogelio Medina Stoppage
5
6%
 
Total votes: 85

samwbr
Middleweight
Posts: 10164
Joined: 11 Mar 2014, 15:34

Re: James DeGale (c) vs. Rogelio Medina - April 30th 2016

Post by samwbr »

Chunky v Porky :oops:
Tarkus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2859
Joined: 04 Jul 2010, 08:50

Re: James DeGale (c) vs. Rogelio Medina - April 30th 2016

Post by Tarkus »

DeGale told to ESPN that he is considering moving up and fighting Stevenson and Kovalev. He must be frustrate by not getting proper fights. Signing with Haymon was probably a mistake on his part as he cant deliver a sht and Eddie made it clear that he wont work hard for those guys who leave him for Al. :cry:

http://www.pba-online.net/pba/DeGale-wa ... hts/76062/
PredatorHayds
Super Welterweight
Posts: 4891
Joined: 08 Jul 2015, 08:23

Re: James DeGale (c) vs. Rogelio Medina - April 30th 2016

Post by PredatorHayds »

Tarkus wrote:DeGale told to ESPN that he is considering moving up and fighting Stevenson and Kovalev. He must be frustrate by not getting proper fights. Signing with Haymon was probably a mistake on his part as he cant deliver a sht and Eddie made it clear that he wont work hard for those guys who leave him for Al. :cry:

http://www.pba-online.net/pba/DeGale-wa ... hts/76062/
DeGale has earnt a fortune under Haymon fighting in the states.
He's been quoted on a few occasions saying how good the money has been stateside.
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23229
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: James DeGale (c) vs. Rogelio Medina - April 30th 2016

Post by handsofstone »

See no reason why both DeGale and Jack are fighting on the same bill against opponents the others beat,why not stop effing about and unify now
TheLeprechaun
Super Middleweight
Posts: 5173
Joined: 27 Jun 2013, 20:42

Re: James DeGale (c) vs. Rogelio Medina - April 30th 2016

Post by TheLeprechaun »

Degale stoppage at 2/5. I'd have 50 grand on to win 20 grand if I had the money.
Tarkus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2859
Joined: 04 Jul 2010, 08:50

Re: James DeGale (c) vs. Rogelio Medina - April 30th 2016

Post by Tarkus »

PredatorHayds wrote:
Tarkus wrote:DeGale told to ESPN that he is considering moving up and fighting Stevenson and Kovalev. He must be frustrate by not getting proper fights. Signing with Haymon was probably a mistake on his part as he cant deliver a sht and Eddie made it clear that he wont work hard for those guys who leave him for Al. :cry:

http://www.pba-online.net/pba/DeGale-wa ... hts/76062/
DeGale has earnt a fortune under Haymon fighting in the states.
He's been quoted on a few occasions saying how good the money has been stateside.
I doubt whatever he is payed is significantly better then what he would be payed in the UK, or at all better. He could have headlined shows in London that pays lots of money. But my point is that his carrier is not developing in USA as it could. DeGale always had a big ego and if he is not in big fights he is not happy. I also suspect he wants unification with Jack and he is upset that Haymon is not giving it to him.
PredatorHayds
Super Welterweight
Posts: 4891
Joined: 08 Jul 2015, 08:23

Re: James DeGale (c) vs. Rogelio Medina - April 30th 2016

Post by PredatorHayds »

DeGale says he's getting paid a lot more in America than the headline offers in the UK.

The only way he gets paid more here is if he fights another Brit.

Financially he's been very successful under Haymon and his road warrior mentality needs to be commended.
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23229
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: James DeGale (c) vs. Rogelio Medina - April 30th 2016

Post by handsofstone »

DeGale could fight here in the UK and sell out Bluewater,Kent at least 1 times over
JimJim2009
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3131
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 09:48

Re: James DeGale (c) vs. Rogelio Medina - April 30th 2016

Post by JimJim2009 »

Is this on sky ?
afcmarshall
Super Welterweight
Posts: 390
Joined: 16 Jul 2015, 14:03

Re: James DeGale (c) vs. Rogelio Medina - April 30th 2016

Post by afcmarshall »

JimJim2009 wrote:Is this on sky ?
Yes but as it's not PPV it doesn't get a mention
Stuarty
Middleweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: James DeGale (c) vs. Rogelio Medina - April 30th 2016

Post by Stuarty »

handsofstone wrote:See no reason why both DeGale and Jack are fighting on the same bill against opponents the others beat,why not stop effing about and unify now
Exactly. Every time I go through the schedule I say the same thing. Two guys on the same card at the same weight with similar records fighting journeymen. Does my nut in.
PredatorHayds
Super Welterweight
Posts: 4891
Joined: 08 Jul 2015, 08:23

Re: James DeGale (c) vs. Rogelio Medina - April 30th 2016

Post by PredatorHayds »

Stuarty30 wrote:
handsofstone wrote:See no reason why both DeGale and Jack are fighting on the same bill against opponents the others beat,why not stop effing about and unify now
Exactly. Every time I go through the schedule I say the same thing. Two guys on the same card at the same weight with similar records fighting journeymen. Does my nut in.
Calling Bute a journeyman is harsh. He's got a chance against Jack.

But porky is no more than a high level gatekeeper.
Stuarty
Middleweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: James DeGale (c) vs. Rogelio Medina - April 30th 2016

Post by Stuarty »

PredatorHayds wrote:
Stuarty30 wrote:
handsofstone wrote:See no reason why both DeGale and Jack are fighting on the same bill against opponents the others beat,why not stop effing about and unify now
Exactly. Every time I go through the schedule I say the same thing. Two guys on the same card at the same weight with similar records fighting journeymen. Does my nut in.
Calling Bute a journeyman is harsh. He's got a chance against Jack.

But porky is no more than a high level gatekeeper.
I've not worded that properly mate. I just meant when I see prospects on the same card or guys with similar records fighting journeymen. Just when I am having a look through the schedule. Bute is far from a journeyman. Gave DeGale a very good fight I thought. I'd agree he's in with a shout against Jack definitely.
afcmarshall
Super Welterweight
Posts: 390
Joined: 16 Jul 2015, 14:03

Re: James DeGale (c) vs. Rogelio Medina - April 30th 2016

Post by afcmarshall »

anyone know what time DeGale's ring walk time is UK time?
wesshaw1985
Super Middleweight
Posts: 7483
Joined: 21 Jul 2013, 17:57

Re: James DeGale (c) vs. Rogelio Medina - April 30th 2016

Post by wesshaw1985 »

Last edited by wesshaw1985 on 29 Apr 2016, 07:57, edited 1 time in total.
tigermoth87
Welterweight
Posts: 1799
Joined: 21 Feb 2016, 11:23

Re: James DeGale (c) vs. Rogelio Medina - April 30th 2016

Post by tigermoth87 »

Should be an easy nights work for Degale. Bit of a mismatch really, Medina is the sort of opponent I'd expect someone like Fielding to face. Not a world champ.

Is he a mando or is it a voluntary defence?
Stuarty
Middleweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: James DeGale (c) vs. Rogelio Medina - April 30th 2016

Post by Stuarty »

tigermoth87 wrote:Should be an easy nights work for Degale. Bit of a mismatch really, Medina is the sort of opponent I'd expect someone like Fielding to face. Not a world champ.

Is he a mando or is it a voluntary defence?
I thought it was a mandatory mate? I'm sure it is. Medina has won his last few by KO and has a good win over J'Leon Love so that's obviously pushed him into the mandatory position. Agree though, it's a straight forwards nights work for DeGale. I don't foresee any dramas. Gets the mandatory out the way and frees him up for (hopefully) a big fight in the summer.

I always enjoy watching DeGale. He's a lovely boxer when he puts his foot down. Bit of a frustrating guy to watch because he has all the talent in the world but tends to switch off too easily and can be dictated and dragged into the wrong kind of fight.
Sklar
Middleweight
Posts: 5680
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 09:06

Re: James DeGale (c) vs. Rogelio Medina - April 30th 2016

Post by Sklar »

Anyone else get to 2:57 and start thinking 'just turn around a little bit more'?
tigermoth87
Welterweight
Posts: 1799
Joined: 21 Feb 2016, 11:23

Re: James DeGale (c) vs. Rogelio Medina - April 30th 2016

Post by tigermoth87 »

Stuarty30 wrote:
tigermoth87 wrote:Should be an easy nights work for Degale. Bit of a mismatch really, Medina is the sort of opponent I'd expect someone like Fielding to face. Not a world champ.

Is he a mando or is it a voluntary defence?
I thought it was a mandatory mate? I'm sure it is. Medina has won his last few by KO and has a good win over J'Leon Love so that's obviously pushed him into the mandatory position. Agree though, it's a straight forwards nights work for DeGale. I don't foresee any dramas. Gets the mandatory out the way and frees him up for (hopefully) a big fight in the summer.

I always enjoy watching DeGale. He's a lovely boxer when he puts his foot down. Bit of a frustrating guy to watch because he has all the talent in the world but tends to switch off too easily and can be dictated and dragged into the wrong kind of fight.
Ah, I was unsure because the Love fight was 2 years ago and his past wins were against pretty poor opponents. If he's the mando then that's fair enough.
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23229
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: James DeGale (c) vs. Rogelio Medina - April 30th 2016

Post by handsofstone »

tigermoth87 wrote:Should be an easy nights work for Degale. Bit of a mismatch really, Medina is the sort of opponent I'd expect someone like Fielding to face. Not a world champ.

Is he a mando or is it a voluntary defence?
Jose Uzecategui was mandated but pulled out injured so Medina got pushed up
Stuarty
Middleweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: James DeGale (c) vs. Rogelio Medina - April 30th 2016

Post by Stuarty »

tigermoth87 wrote:
Stuarty30 wrote:
tigermoth87 wrote:Should be an easy nights work for Degale. Bit of a mismatch really, Medina is the sort of opponent I'd expect someone like Fielding to face. Not a world champ.

Is he a mando or is it a voluntary defence?
I thought it was a mandatory mate? I'm sure it is. Medina has won his last few by KO and has a good win over J'Leon Love so that's obviously pushed him into the mandatory position. Agree though, it's a straight forwards nights work for DeGale. I don't foresee any dramas. Gets the mandatory out the way and frees him up for (hopefully) a big fight in the summer.

I always enjoy watching DeGale. He's a lovely boxer when he puts his foot down. Bit of a frustrating guy to watch because he has all the talent in the world but tends to switch off too easily and can be dictated and dragged into the wrong kind of fight.
Ah, I was unsure because the Love fight was 2 years ago and his past wins were against pretty poor opponents. If he's the mando then that's fair enough.
Yeah you're right there man. IBF mandatories are rank awful! Just ask Kell Brook!
Stuarty
Middleweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: James DeGale (c) vs. Rogelio Medina - April 30th 2016

Post by Stuarty »

tigermoth87 wrote:
Stuarty30 wrote:
tigermoth87 wrote:Should be an easy nights work for Degale. Bit of a mismatch really, Medina is the sort of opponent I'd expect someone like Fielding to face. Not a world champ.

Is he a mando or is it a voluntary defence?
I thought it was a mandatory mate? I'm sure it is. Medina has won his last few by KO and has a good win over J'Leon Love so that's obviously pushed him into the mandatory position. Agree though, it's a straight forwards nights work for DeGale. I don't foresee any dramas. Gets the mandatory out the way and frees him up for (hopefully) a big fight in the summer.

I always enjoy watching DeGale. He's a lovely boxer when he puts his foot down. Bit of a frustrating guy to watch because he has all the talent in the world but tends to switch off too easily and can be dictated and dragged into the wrong kind of fight.
Ah, I was unsure because the Love fight was 2 years ago and his past wins were against pretty poor opponents. If he's the mando then that's fair enough.
Steven Smith got in to a mandatory position fighting bums. Good win against the Italian guy but he was over the hill. I think they make it up as they go along!
Post Reply