James DeGale (c) vs. Rogelio Medina - April 30th 2016
Re: James DeGale (c) vs. Rogelio Medina - April 30th 2016
Chunky v Porky 
Re: James DeGale (c) vs. Rogelio Medina - April 30th 2016
DeGale told to ESPN that he is considering moving up and fighting Stevenson and Kovalev. He must be frustrate by not getting proper fights. Signing with Haymon was probably a mistake on his part as he cant deliver a sht and Eddie made it clear that he wont work hard for those guys who leave him for Al. 
http://www.pba-online.net/pba/DeGale-wa ... hts/76062/
http://www.pba-online.net/pba/DeGale-wa ... hts/76062/
-
PredatorHayds
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 4891
- Joined: 08 Jul 2015, 08:23
Re: James DeGale (c) vs. Rogelio Medina - April 30th 2016
DeGale has earnt a fortune under Haymon fighting in the states.Tarkus wrote:DeGale told to ESPN that he is considering moving up and fighting Stevenson and Kovalev. He must be frustrate by not getting proper fights. Signing with Haymon was probably a mistake on his part as he cant deliver a sht and Eddie made it clear that he wont work hard for those guys who leave him for Al.
http://www.pba-online.net/pba/DeGale-wa ... hts/76062/
He's been quoted on a few occasions saying how good the money has been stateside.
-
handsofstone
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 23231
- Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28
Re: James DeGale (c) vs. Rogelio Medina - April 30th 2016
See no reason why both DeGale and Jack are fighting on the same bill against opponents the others beat,why not stop effing about and unify now
-
TheLeprechaun
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 5173
- Joined: 27 Jun 2013, 20:42
Re: James DeGale (c) vs. Rogelio Medina - April 30th 2016
Degale stoppage at 2/5. I'd have 50 grand on to win 20 grand if I had the money.
Re: James DeGale (c) vs. Rogelio Medina - April 30th 2016
I doubt whatever he is payed is significantly better then what he would be payed in the UK, or at all better. He could have headlined shows in London that pays lots of money. But my point is that his carrier is not developing in USA as it could. DeGale always had a big ego and if he is not in big fights he is not happy. I also suspect he wants unification with Jack and he is upset that Haymon is not giving it to him.PredatorHayds wrote:DeGale has earnt a fortune under Haymon fighting in the states.Tarkus wrote:DeGale told to ESPN that he is considering moving up and fighting Stevenson and Kovalev. He must be frustrate by not getting proper fights. Signing with Haymon was probably a mistake on his part as he cant deliver a sht and Eddie made it clear that he wont work hard for those guys who leave him for Al.
http://www.pba-online.net/pba/DeGale-wa ... hts/76062/
He's been quoted on a few occasions saying how good the money has been stateside.
-
PredatorHayds
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 4891
- Joined: 08 Jul 2015, 08:23
Re: James DeGale (c) vs. Rogelio Medina - April 30th 2016
DeGale says he's getting paid a lot more in America than the headline offers in the UK.
The only way he gets paid more here is if he fights another Brit.
Financially he's been very successful under Haymon and his road warrior mentality needs to be commended.
The only way he gets paid more here is if he fights another Brit.
Financially he's been very successful under Haymon and his road warrior mentality needs to be commended.
-
handsofstone
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 23231
- Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28
Re: James DeGale (c) vs. Rogelio Medina - April 30th 2016
DeGale could fight here in the UK and sell out Bluewater,Kent at least 1 times over
-
JimJim2009
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3131
- Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 09:48
Re: James DeGale (c) vs. Rogelio Medina - April 30th 2016
Is this on sky ?
-
afcmarshall
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 390
- Joined: 16 Jul 2015, 14:03
Re: James DeGale (c) vs. Rogelio Medina - April 30th 2016
Yes but as it's not PPV it doesn't get a mentionJimJim2009 wrote:Is this on sky ?
Re: James DeGale (c) vs. Rogelio Medina - April 30th 2016
Exactly. Every time I go through the schedule I say the same thing. Two guys on the same card at the same weight with similar records fighting journeymen. Does my nut in.handsofstone wrote:See no reason why both DeGale and Jack are fighting on the same bill against opponents the others beat,why not stop effing about and unify now
-
PredatorHayds
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 4891
- Joined: 08 Jul 2015, 08:23
Re: James DeGale (c) vs. Rogelio Medina - April 30th 2016
Calling Bute a journeyman is harsh. He's got a chance against Jack.Stuarty30 wrote:Exactly. Every time I go through the schedule I say the same thing. Two guys on the same card at the same weight with similar records fighting journeymen. Does my nut in.handsofstone wrote:See no reason why both DeGale and Jack are fighting on the same bill against opponents the others beat,why not stop effing about and unify now
But porky is no more than a high level gatekeeper.
Re: James DeGale (c) vs. Rogelio Medina - April 30th 2016
I've not worded that properly mate. I just meant when I see prospects on the same card or guys with similar records fighting journeymen. Just when I am having a look through the schedule. Bute is far from a journeyman. Gave DeGale a very good fight I thought. I'd agree he's in with a shout against Jack definitely.PredatorHayds wrote:Calling Bute a journeyman is harsh. He's got a chance against Jack.Stuarty30 wrote:Exactly. Every time I go through the schedule I say the same thing. Two guys on the same card at the same weight with similar records fighting journeymen. Does my nut in.handsofstone wrote:See no reason why both DeGale and Jack are fighting on the same bill against opponents the others beat,why not stop effing about and unify now
But porky is no more than a high level gatekeeper.
-
afcmarshall
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 390
- Joined: 16 Jul 2015, 14:03
Re: James DeGale (c) vs. Rogelio Medina - April 30th 2016
anyone know what time DeGale's ring walk time is UK time?
-
wesshaw1985
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 7483
- Joined: 21 Jul 2013, 17:57
Re: James DeGale (c) vs. Rogelio Medina - April 30th 2016
Last edited by wesshaw1985 on 29 Apr 2016, 07:57, edited 1 time in total.
-
wesshaw1985
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 7483
- Joined: 21 Jul 2013, 17:57
-
wesshaw1985
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 7483
- Joined: 21 Jul 2013, 17:57
-
tigermoth87
- Welterweight
- Posts: 1799
- Joined: 21 Feb 2016, 11:23
Re: James DeGale (c) vs. Rogelio Medina - April 30th 2016
Should be an easy nights work for Degale. Bit of a mismatch really, Medina is the sort of opponent I'd expect someone like Fielding to face. Not a world champ.
Is he a mando or is it a voluntary defence?
Is he a mando or is it a voluntary defence?
Re: James DeGale (c) vs. Rogelio Medina - April 30th 2016
I thought it was a mandatory mate? I'm sure it is. Medina has won his last few by KO and has a good win over J'Leon Love so that's obviously pushed him into the mandatory position. Agree though, it's a straight forwards nights work for DeGale. I don't foresee any dramas. Gets the mandatory out the way and frees him up for (hopefully) a big fight in the summer.tigermoth87 wrote:Should be an easy nights work for Degale. Bit of a mismatch really, Medina is the sort of opponent I'd expect someone like Fielding to face. Not a world champ.
Is he a mando or is it a voluntary defence?
I always enjoy watching DeGale. He's a lovely boxer when he puts his foot down. Bit of a frustrating guy to watch because he has all the talent in the world but tends to switch off too easily and can be dictated and dragged into the wrong kind of fight.
Re: James DeGale (c) vs. Rogelio Medina - April 30th 2016
Anyone else get to 2:57 and start thinking 'just turn around a little bit more'?wesshaw1985 wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gm5ZkURDDkY
-
tigermoth87
- Welterweight
- Posts: 1799
- Joined: 21 Feb 2016, 11:23
Re: James DeGale (c) vs. Rogelio Medina - April 30th 2016
Ah, I was unsure because the Love fight was 2 years ago and his past wins were against pretty poor opponents. If he's the mando then that's fair enough.Stuarty30 wrote:I thought it was a mandatory mate? I'm sure it is. Medina has won his last few by KO and has a good win over J'Leon Love so that's obviously pushed him into the mandatory position. Agree though, it's a straight forwards nights work for DeGale. I don't foresee any dramas. Gets the mandatory out the way and frees him up for (hopefully) a big fight in the summer.tigermoth87 wrote:Should be an easy nights work for Degale. Bit of a mismatch really, Medina is the sort of opponent I'd expect someone like Fielding to face. Not a world champ.
Is he a mando or is it a voluntary defence?
I always enjoy watching DeGale. He's a lovely boxer when he puts his foot down. Bit of a frustrating guy to watch because he has all the talent in the world but tends to switch off too easily and can be dictated and dragged into the wrong kind of fight.
-
handsofstone
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 23231
- Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28
Re: James DeGale (c) vs. Rogelio Medina - April 30th 2016
Jose Uzecategui was mandated but pulled out injured so Medina got pushed uptigermoth87 wrote:Should be an easy nights work for Degale. Bit of a mismatch really, Medina is the sort of opponent I'd expect someone like Fielding to face. Not a world champ.
Is he a mando or is it a voluntary defence?
Re: James DeGale (c) vs. Rogelio Medina - April 30th 2016
Yeah you're right there man. IBF mandatories are rank awful! Just ask Kell Brook!tigermoth87 wrote:Ah, I was unsure because the Love fight was 2 years ago and his past wins were against pretty poor opponents. If he's the mando then that's fair enough.Stuarty30 wrote:I thought it was a mandatory mate? I'm sure it is. Medina has won his last few by KO and has a good win over J'Leon Love so that's obviously pushed him into the mandatory position. Agree though, it's a straight forwards nights work for DeGale. I don't foresee any dramas. Gets the mandatory out the way and frees him up for (hopefully) a big fight in the summer.tigermoth87 wrote:Should be an easy nights work for Degale. Bit of a mismatch really, Medina is the sort of opponent I'd expect someone like Fielding to face. Not a world champ.
Is he a mando or is it a voluntary defence?
I always enjoy watching DeGale. He's a lovely boxer when he puts his foot down. Bit of a frustrating guy to watch because he has all the talent in the world but tends to switch off too easily and can be dictated and dragged into the wrong kind of fight.
Re: James DeGale (c) vs. Rogelio Medina - April 30th 2016
Steven Smith got in to a mandatory position fighting bums. Good win against the Italian guy but he was over the hill. I think they make it up as they go along!tigermoth87 wrote:Ah, I was unsure because the Love fight was 2 years ago and his past wins were against pretty poor opponents. If he's the mando then that's fair enough.Stuarty30 wrote:I thought it was a mandatory mate? I'm sure it is. Medina has won his last few by KO and has a good win over J'Leon Love so that's obviously pushed him into the mandatory position. Agree though, it's a straight forwards nights work for DeGale. I don't foresee any dramas. Gets the mandatory out the way and frees him up for (hopefully) a big fight in the summer.tigermoth87 wrote:Should be an easy nights work for Degale. Bit of a mismatch really, Medina is the sort of opponent I'd expect someone like Fielding to face. Not a world champ.
Is he a mando or is it a voluntary defence?
I always enjoy watching DeGale. He's a lovely boxer when he puts his foot down. Bit of a frustrating guy to watch because he has all the talent in the world but tends to switch off too easily and can be dictated and dragged into the wrong kind of fight.
-
wesshaw1985
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 7483
- Joined: 21 Jul 2013, 17:57