Ratings - please read before commenting - Archived

[mike1989]

Max Schmeling now looks like this:

Code: Select all

Light Heavyweight    1927   854    17    13     4     0   9041 Max Schmeling
Light Heavyweight    1928   823    31    23     8     0   9041 Max Schmeling
Heavyweight          1929  1133    61    45    16     0   9041 Max Schmeling
Heavyweight          1930  2002   193   111    82     0   9041 Max Schmeling
Heavyweight          1931  2581   281   177   104     0   9041 Max Schmeling
Heavyweight          1932  2629   380   243   138     0   9041 Max Schmeling
Heavyweight          1933  1691   397   259   138     0   9041 Max Schmeling
Heavyweight          1934  1620   423   276   147     0   9041 Max Schmeling
Heavyweight          1935  2556   478   298   180     0   9041 Max Schmeling
Heavyweight          1936  4062   610   364   246     0   9041 Max Schmeling
Heavyweight          1937  2639   643   397   246     0   9041 Max Schmeling
Heavyweight          1938  1970   676   430   246     0   9041 Max Schmeling
Heavyweight          1939  2534   775   463   312     0   9041 Max Schmeling

in 1933, Schmeling not included in annual rating points Nishitani ?? But this does not apply to rating Schmeling ) ... and everything is perfect. Can reset your rating of Hopkins ???

[computerrank]

in 1933, Schmeling not included in annual rating points Nishitani ?? But this does not apply to rating Schmeling ) ... and everything is perfect. Can reset your rating of Hopkins ???

Yes, Schmeling is ranked #4 in his 1933 division cluster. -> + 16 points

But his single bout in 1933 against Baer was a straight TKO loss and so he did not get any opponent rank points in 1933. -> +0 points

... and now Hopkins:

Code: Select all

Middleweight         1992   306     4     4     0     0   1414 Bernard Hopkins
Middleweight         1993   324     4     4     0     0   1414 Bernard Hopkins
Middleweight         1994   257     4     4     0     0   1414 Bernard Hopkins
Middleweight         1995   333     8     8     0     0   1414 Bernard Hopkins
Middleweight         1996   363    18    18     0     0   1414 Bernard Hopkins
Middleweight         1997   384    27    27     0     0   1414 Bernard Hopkins
Middleweight         1998   385    38    38     0     0   1414 Bernard Hopkins
Middleweight         1999   549    65    60     4     0   1414 Bernard Hopkins
Middleweight         2000   581    91    82     9     0   1414 Bernard Hopkins
Middleweight         2001  1234   223   148    75     0   1414 Bernard Hopkins
Middleweight         2002  1234   289   214    75     0   1414 Bernard Hopkins
Middleweight         2003   917   365   280    85     0   1414 Bernard Hopkins
Middleweight         2004  1094   464   346   118     0   1414 Bernard Hopkins
Middleweight         2005   677   508   368   140     0   1414 Bernard Hopkins
Light Heavyweight    2006   883   640   434   206     0   1414 Bernard Hopkins
Light Heavyweight    2007  1087   772   500   272     0   1414 Bernard Hopkins
Light Heavyweight    2008  1095   904   566   338     0   1414 Bernard Hopkins
Light Heavyweight    2009  1095   970   632   338     0   1414 Bernard Hopkins
Light Heavyweight    2010   686  1058   698   360     0   1414 Bernard Hopkins
Light Heavyweight    2011   757  1157   764   393     0   1414 Bernard Hopkins
Light Heavyweight    2012   585  1195   786   409     0   1414 Bernard Hopkins
Light Heavyweight    2013   593  1219   803   416     0   1414 Bernard Hopkins
Light Heavyweight    2014   252  1225   809   416     0   1414 Bernard Hopkins

[mike1989]

in 1933, Schmeling not included in annual rating points Nishitani ?? But this does not apply to rating Schmeling ) ... and everything is perfect. Can reset your rating of Hopkins ???

Yes, Schmeling is ranked #4 in his 1933 division cluster. -> + 16 points

But his single bout in 1933 against Baer was a straight TKO loss and so he did not get any opponent rank points in 1933. -> +0 point


you not correctly understood me )...with ratings in 1933, its just normal in this table it is not present )...:
BoxRec's Annual Ratings Men
division year r boxer
Heavyweight 1933 3116 Primo Carnera
Heavyweight 1933 3022 Max Baer
Heavyweight 1933 1858 King Levinsky
Heavyweight 1933 1518 Pierre Charles
Heavyweight 1933 1408 Ernie Schaaf
Heavyweight 1933 1362 Young Stribling
Heavyweight 1933 1104 Paulino Uzcudun
Heavyweight 1933 1098 Patsy Perroni
Heavyweight 1933 1079 Tommy Loughran
Heavyweight 1933 1026 Walter Neusel
Heavyweight 1933 1019 Jack Sharkey
for rating Hopkins thank you ! )

[computerrank]

...
you not correctly understood me )...with ratings in 1933, its just normal in this table it is not present )...:
BoxRec's Annual Ratings Men
division year r boxer
Heavyweight 1933 3116 Primo Carnera
Heavyweight 1933 3022 Max Baer
Heavyweight 1933 1858 King Levinsky
Heavyweight 1933 1518 Pierre Charles
Heavyweight 1933 1408 Ernie Schaaf
Heavyweight 1933 1362 Young Stribling
Heavyweight 1933 1104 Paulino Uzcudun
Heavyweight 1933 1098 Patsy Perroni
Heavyweight 1933 1079 Tommy Loughran
Heavyweight 1933 1026 Walter Neusel
Heavyweight 1933 1019 Jack Sharkey
for rating Hopkins thank you ! )

OK, yes, the annual ratings have to be corrected too - his TKO loss was counted as a 0 performance and so he got lost in 1933 .

[mike1989]

... and now Hopkins:

Code: Select all

Middleweight         1992   306     4     4     0     0   1414 Bernard Hopkins
Middleweight         1993   324     4     4     0     0   1414 Bernard Hopkins
Middleweight         1994   257     4     4     0     0   1414 Bernard Hopkins
Middleweight         1995   333     8     8     0     0   1414 Bernard Hopkins
Middleweight         1996   363    18    18     0     0   1414 Bernard Hopkins
Middleweight         1997   384    27    27     0     0   1414 Bernard Hopkins
Middleweight         1998   385    38    38     0     0   1414 Bernard Hopkins
Middleweight         1999   549    65    60     4     0   1414 Bernard Hopkins
Middleweight         2000   581    91    82     9     0   1414 Bernard Hopkins
Middleweight         2001  1234   223   148    75     0   1414 Bernard Hopkins
Middleweight         2002  1234   289   214    75     0   1414 Bernard Hopkins
Middleweight         2003   917   365   280    85     0   1414 Bernard Hopkins
Middleweight         2004  1094   464   346   118     0   1414 Bernard Hopkins
Middleweight         2005   677   508   368   140     0   1414 Bernard Hopkins
Light Heavyweight    2006   883   640   434   206     0   1414 Bernard Hopkins
Light Heavyweight    2007  1087   772   500   272     0   1414 Bernard Hopkins
Light Heavyweight    2008  1095   904   566   338     0   1414 Bernard Hopkins
Light Heavyweight    2009  1095   970   632   338     0   1414 Bernard Hopkins
Light Heavyweight    2010   686  1058   698   360     0   1414 Bernard Hopkins
Light Heavyweight    2011   757  1157   764   393     0   1414 Bernard Hopkins
Light Heavyweight    2012   585  1195   786   409     0   1414 Bernard Hopkins
Light Heavyweight    2013   593  1219   803   416     0   1414 Bernard Hopkins
Light Heavyweight    2014   252  1225   809   416     0   1414 Bernard Hopkins

1994 Hopkins have not accrued the points ? in 2008, Hopkins has received +66 for the best battered opoziciju of saxet close defeat Calzaghe ?? reconsider your rating of Hopkins for 2011-2013 there on my little point?) in annual, ratings me in a light heavyweight mistake in 2012??? (Hopkins and Dawson need to swap) ??

[mike1989]

in 2004 Klitschko will dositey annual, ratings me. he was in the top 20, because Holyfield is in the top 20 protective ????

[computerrank]

...
1994 Hopkins have not accrued the points ? in 2008, Hopkins has received +66 for the best battered opoziciju of saxet close defeat Calzaghe ?? reconsider your rating of Hopkins for 2011-2013 there on my little point?) in annual, ratings me in a light heavyweight mistake in 2012??? (Hopkins and Dawson need to swap) ??

- 1994: Hopkins was #9 at middleweight, but #12 at light middleweight had a bit more points, even converted to middleweight. So Hopkins was only #21 in the cluster

- 2008: had a close loss against #2 Calzaghe and got these 67 points for that

- why reconsider Hopkins 2011-2013, what is the point with it?

- 2012 Dawson lost to Ward after he closely defeated Hopkins - so Dawson fell back behind Hopkins ...

[computerrank]

for your interest:

the annuals bests and sorted by boxer ...

ann_tops_years

ann_tops_boxers

[Lennox]

I really don't know how anyone can think boxrec ratings are any good: Check out Super-middleweight. You now have Badou Jack Below George Groves.

[computerrank]

I really don't know how anyone can think boxrec ratings are any good: Check out Super-middleweight. You now have Badou Jack Below George Groves.

Lennox, I know, you are binding a winner and a loser for year in your ratings.

But I say, if the winner looses points after a fight, he might well fall back behind a boxer recently defeated before - especially, if the result was close.

Nothing is fixed in boxing - everything is moving every day ...

[JCS]

I really don't know how anyone can think boxrec ratings are any good: Check out Super-middleweight. You now have Badou Jack Below George Groves.

Split decisions aren't strong enough to block the loser IMO... especially considering Jack was (essentially) the home fighter.

[Lennox]

JCS - If you are really defending Badou Jack's position at 11 with two fighters he recently defeated now above him then I have lost all respect I had for you, because that is straight barmy.

[JCS]

JCS - If you are really defending Badou Jack's position at 11 with two fighters he recently defeated now above him then I have lost all respect I had for you, because that is straight barmy.

You're putting words in my mouth.

All I'm saying is that a split decision should NOT be a very strong barrier.. Styles, Home advantage, bad scoring.. can easily turn this win into a draw or a loss...

[mike1989]

you can reset the rating of Lomachenko ???

[computerrank]

you can reset the rating of Lomachenko ???

I posted here the complete links for all boxers on Saturday ...

for your interest:

the annuals bests and sorted by boxer ...

ann_tops_years

ann_tops_boxers

[mike1989]

thank you !!)))... and how to use them, they are not active ??? ))

[computerrank]

thank you !!)))... and how to use them, they are not active ??? ))

Just click on them ... or what is your problem ???

Here are the links as text:

http://backup.boxrec.com/~martin/ann_tops.txt
http://backup.boxrec.com/~martin/ann_tops_years.txt

[mike1989]

thank you !!)))... and how to use them, they are not active ??? ))

Just click on them ... or what is your problem ???

Here are the links as text:

http://backup.boxrec.com/~martin/ann_tops.txt
http://backup.boxrec.com/~martin/ann_tops_year.txt

how to open a particular fighter and not watch the entire table, it is difficult to understand ???

[computerrank]

thank you !!)))... and how to use them, they are not active ??? ))

Just click on them ... or what is your problem ???

Here are the links as text:

http://backup.boxrec.com/~martin/ann_tops.txt
http://backup.boxrec.com/~martin/ann_tops_years.txt

how to open a particular fighter and not watch the entire table, it is difficult to understand ???

Sorry, I made a typo ... just open the link

http://backup.boxrec.com/~martin/ann_tops_years.txt

and use the browser's search function with the boxer's name ...

The data are sorted by boxers.

[mike1989]

Sorry, I made a typo ... just open the link

http://backup.boxrec.com/~martin/ann_tops_years.txt

and use the browser's search function with the boxer's name ...

The data are sorted by boxers.

you'll excuse me, in what browser ??? in boxrec or search engine Yandex, Google???)

[computerrank]

you'll excuse me, in what browser ??? in boxrec or search engine Yandex, Google???)

Do you use firefox?

click at the link and you can see the text . yes or no?

http://backup.boxrec.com/~martin/ann_tops_years.txt

then use CTRL+F, and a search box will pop up at the lower border of the page and then write the name of a boxer like Lomachenko into the box

now you will see the data of Lomachenko ...

[mike1989]

http://backup.boxrec.com/~martin/ann_tops_years.txt

then use CTRL+F, and a search box will pop up at the lower border of the page and then write the name of a boxer like Lomachenko into the box

now you will see the data of Lomachenko ...[/quote]

thank you ! )... Lomachenko for Salido in 2014 was to receive is not +33 as at the time of the fight Salido was the second ???

[computerrank]

http://backup.boxrec.com/~martin/ann_tops_years.txt

then use CTRL+F, and a search box will pop up at the lower border of the page and then write the name of a boxer like Lomachenko into the box

now you will see the data of Lomachenko ...

thank you ! )... Lomachenko for Salido in 2014 was to receive is not +33 as at the time of the fight Salido was the second ???[/quote]

Salido was #4 in the cluster featherweight / super bantamweight

You can find all ranked bouts here:

http://backup.boxrec.com/~martin/bouts_ranks.txt

[mike1989]

http://backup.boxrec.com/~martin/ann_tops_years.txt

Salido was #4 in the cluster featherweight / super bantamweight

You can find all ranked bouts here:

http://backup.boxrec.com/~martin/bouts_ranks.txt

Yes exactly.. ) already looked )

[mike1989]

and when will be the next to respond the the rating all time ???