Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016

Post Reply

Canelo vs. Khan Winner and How?

Poll ended at 03 Feb 2016, 13:14

Canelo Stoppage
154
69%
Canelo Decision
13
6%
Draw
4
2%
Amir Khan Decision
45
20%
Amir Khan Stoppage
6
3%
 
Total votes: 222

rd350lc
Super Welterweight
Posts: 4942
Joined: 22 Nov 2014, 11:49

Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016

Post by rd350lc »

Boxerbeetle wrote:
rd350lc wrote:
Boxerbeetle wrote:Anyone planning on doing an all-nighter? I rarely do them these days as they properly affect me for about a week afterwards, but I reckon I'll stay up for this one :bag:
Is it likely to be 6 am ringwalks ?
Quite possibly. Actually I might not stay up for it after all, getting tired just thinking about it.
Cheers , might even set the alarm , it proper shags me out doing all-nighters and I said i'd never do it again.
MightyWarrior
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13319
Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01

Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016

Post by MightyWarrior »

I think Khan will make a good go of it, landing and moving impressively on Canelo for around 5 or 6 rounds, but think the bigger hard punching Mexican will realize he can just walk through Khan's punches and land enough to put his lights out in 8 or 9 rounds.
Taansend
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 12051
Joined: 10 Jul 2004, 17:38

Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016

Post by Taansend »

Sometimes I get the feeling that those Tecate girls are not really interested in the boxing but have some other motive for being there :maybe:
Deserter
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6441
Joined: 04 Sep 2003, 10:01

Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016

Post by Deserter »

Just got back to the hotel from the weigh-in. Fantastic atmosphere and seeing greats like Duran, Holyfield and Lewis up on stage was an added bonus. Would love Khan to pull it off, but he looked a bit fleshy in relative terms at the weigh-in and I'm struggling to make a case for how he's going to be able to pull this off.
BobD'Mello
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 126
Joined: 15 Sep 2009, 06:29

Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016

Post by BobD'Mello »

Taansend wrote:Sometimes I get the feeling that those Tecate girls are not really interested in the boxing but have some other motive for being there :maybe:
:TU: :lol:
BobD'Mello
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 126
Joined: 15 Sep 2009, 06:29

Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016

Post by BobD'Mello »

One thing I find weird....that people are thinking Khan is going to be slower or bulkier or clumsier because he's carrying 6 or 7 or 8 pounds more. He's going to be the same fighter, as far as I can see. Just not weight drained.

ESPN are saying Khan bulking up will see him reduce his speed and movement, and that means he'll have to trade...I don't see that happening at all. He's always had his speed in his hands, not his feet.

The extra weight shouldn't slow him down. It should make him more durable, no?
Emmseegee
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1400
Joined: 10 Sep 2010, 10:29

Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016

Post by Emmseegee »

Just a thought that some more knowledgable posters may be able to expand upon for me.....
Big punchers usually lose their knockout power as they move through the weights due to obviously fighting bigger men and losing physical advantages but can anyone name a decent amount of names from the past who have had a reputation as being chinny at lower weights then became more durable as they have moved up? People uncluding Kahn himself keep suggesting that he may be more durable with the extra weight but i just cant see it.
magwitch
Middleweight
Posts: 4753
Joined: 30 Jun 2014, 20:04

Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016

Post by magwitch »

BobD'Mello wrote:One thing I find weird....that people are thinking Khan is going to be slower or bulkier or clumsier because he's carrying 6 or 7 or 8 pounds more. He's going to be the same fighter, as far as I can see. Just not weight drained.

ESPN are saying Khan bulking up will see him reduce his speed and movement, and that means he'll have to trade...I don't see that happening at all. He's always had his speed in his hands, not his feet.

The extra weight shouldn't slow him down. It should make him more durable, no?
Yeah I agree.

Anyone got the time for this? The local time...... Is it Vegas?
MightyWarrior
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13319
Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01

Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016

Post by MightyWarrior »

Emmseegee wrote:Just a thought that some more knowledgable posters may be able to expand upon for me.....
Big punchers usually lose their knockout power as they move through the weights due to obviously fighting bigger men and losing physical advantages but can anyone name a decent amount of names from the past who have had a reputation as being chinny at lower weights then became more durable as they have moved up? People uncluding Kahn himself keep suggesting that he may be more durable with the extra weight but i just cant see it.
People were wondering about the durability of the Golden boy early on, when Oscar was knocked over twice in different fights at super feather, by relative journey men...but of course he went on to prove what a great chin he had at much higher weights.
Nightmare Roy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16936
Joined: 18 May 2003, 17:29

Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016

Post by Nightmare Roy »

I thinking of subscribing to BN for the first time just to see this, got a feeling Amir is gonna do a Calzaghi/Lacey job :box:
el_grande_mauro_mina
Lightweight
Posts: 11215
Joined: 24 Dec 2017, 11:54

Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016

Post by el_grande_mauro_mina »

Khan on points!! :yay:
Rexob
Middleweight
Posts: 6025
Joined: 20 Mar 2014, 15:17

Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016

Post by Rexob »

Have they got the ref cam again? I loved seeing Khan up close after being knockdown in one of his other fights, brilliant footage. I'm still going to have a snaky bet on a Khan win though, good luck to him.
bripez
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4877
Joined: 11 Feb 2010, 18:07

Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016

Post by bripez »

Taansend wrote:Sometimes I get the feeling that those Tecate girls are not really interested in the boxing but have some other motive for being there :maybe:
Me too- I don't care though !
WildWaylon
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3223
Joined: 02 Nov 2005, 13:35

Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016

Post by WildWaylon »

Alvarez needs to cut the ring off and nail Khan early. Khan will pick up the rounds if he is allowed to. Khan and his camp believe they can do a Mayweather job on Canelo. They know they cant stop him but they are confident they can get a points win. its down to Canelo (or Prince Harry as my wife calls him) to land some big bombs. Alvarez v GGG is a massive fight, bigger than this one. :bag: :bag:
Rexob
Middleweight
Posts: 6025
Joined: 20 Mar 2014, 15:17

Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016

Post by Rexob »

WildWaylon wrote:Alvarez needs to cut the ring off and nail Khan early. Khan will pick up the rounds if he is allowed to. Khan and his camp believe they can do a Mayweather job on Canelo. They know they cant stop him but they are confident they can get a points win. its down to Canelo (or Prince Harry as my wife calls him) to land some big bombs. Alvarez v GGG is a massive fight, bigger than this one. :bag: :bag:

Be a good one for boxing's crap lookalikes thread :lol:
Syntax Error
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9025
Joined: 22 Apr 2005, 08:00

Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016

Post by Syntax Error »

I'm really hoping that Khan can beat Alvarez.

I think Khan will do a lot better than many think he will, especially if he boxes & doesn't go for the knockout.

I'm also sick of Canelo & his 155lb BS, although Khan will probably continue Miguel Cotto's invention if he wins! :witzend:
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45238
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

Emmseegee wrote:Just a thought that some more knowledgable posters may be able to expand upon for me.....
Big punchers usually lose their knockout power as they move through the weights due to obviously fighting bigger men and losing physical advantages but can anyone name a decent amount of names from the past who have had a reputation as being chinny at lower weights then became more durable as they have moved up? People uncluding Kahn himself keep suggesting that he may be more durable with the extra weight but i just cant see it.
Cotto springs to mind. He was pretty fragile comparatively at 140, definitely seemed more durable when he moved up.
ThereByTheGrace
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4016
Joined: 04 Sep 2010, 05:22

Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016

Post by ThereByTheGrace »

Canelo points. Khan saves face not getting ko'd and canelo gets his expected win
Sisyphus
Welterweight
Posts: 93
Joined: 07 May 2016, 09:10

Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016

Post by Sisyphus »

Does anyone know what time they are due in the ring?
reggaereggae
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4723
Joined: 21 Dec 2009, 17:01

Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016

Post by reggaereggae »

Rexob wrote:
WildWaylon wrote:Alvarez needs to cut the ring off and nail Khan early. Khan will pick up the rounds if he is allowed to. Khan and his camp believe they can do a Mayweather job on Canelo. They know they cant stop him but they are confident they can get a points win. its down to Canelo (or Prince Harry as my wife calls him) to land some big bombs. Alvarez v GGG is a massive fight, bigger than this one. :bag: :bag:

Be a good one for boxing's crap lookalikes thread :lol:
Good one :TU: :lol:
Mimmy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016

Post by Mimmy »

Taansend wrote:Sometimes I get the feeling that those Tecate girls are not really interested in the boxing but have some other motive for being there :maybe:

I know what you mean. Similar to the conception if you play Bohemian Rapsardy backwards there is supposed to be a sign from the devil. These birds might be promoting the drug barons of Mexico or something, a hidden agenda??
Mimmy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016

Post by Mimmy »

ThereByTheGrace wrote:Canelo points. Khan saves face not getting ko'd and canelo gets his expected win

Why has khan taken a fight to be fed to the lions? Im not sure here, think there might be an upset. It dont make sense to me that most people not only here but in other boxing forums think khan is going to get beat up pretty bad. Why take a fight that seems a no winner. Nah, im not sure, think there might be a upset or controversial ending.
Stuarty
Middleweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016

Post by Stuarty »

mimmy123 wrote:
Taansend wrote:Sometimes I get the feeling that those Tecate girls are not really interested in the boxing but have some other motive for being there :maybe:

I know what you mean. Similar to the conception if you play Bohemian Rapsardy backwards there is supposed to be a sign from the devil. These birds might be promoting the drug barons of Mexico or something, a hidden agenda??
Or maybe they're just promoting the beer and trying to get some rich idiot with an overactive trouser wand to notice them and marry them. If I was rich I feckin would!
Post Reply