Cheers , might even set the alarm , it proper shags me out doing all-nighters and I said i'd never do it again.Boxerbeetle wrote:Quite possibly. Actually I might not stay up for it after all, getting tired just thinking about it.rd350lc wrote:Is it likely to be 6 am ringwalks ?Boxerbeetle wrote:Anyone planning on doing an all-nighter? I rarely do them these days as they properly affect me for about a week afterwards, but I reckon I'll stay up for this one
Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016
Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016
-
MightyWarrior
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13319
- Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01
Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016
I think Khan will make a good go of it, landing and moving impressively on Canelo for around 5 or 6 rounds, but think the bigger hard punching Mexican will realize he can just walk through Khan's punches and land enough to put his lights out in 8 or 9 rounds.
-
wesshaw1985
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 7483
- Joined: 21 Jul 2013, 17:57
Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016
Sometimes I get the feeling that those Tecate girls are not really interested in the boxing but have some other motive for being there 
Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016
Just got back to the hotel from the weigh-in. Fantastic atmosphere and seeing greats like Duran, Holyfield and Lewis up on stage was an added bonus. Would love Khan to pull it off, but he looked a bit fleshy in relative terms at the weigh-in and I'm struggling to make a case for how he's going to be able to pull this off.
-
BobD'Mello
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 126
- Joined: 15 Sep 2009, 06:29
Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016
Taansend wrote:Sometimes I get the feeling that those Tecate girls are not really interested in the boxing but have some other motive for being there
-
BobD'Mello
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 126
- Joined: 15 Sep 2009, 06:29
Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016
One thing I find weird....that people are thinking Khan is going to be slower or bulkier or clumsier because he's carrying 6 or 7 or 8 pounds more. He's going to be the same fighter, as far as I can see. Just not weight drained.
ESPN are saying Khan bulking up will see him reduce his speed and movement, and that means he'll have to trade...I don't see that happening at all. He's always had his speed in his hands, not his feet.
The extra weight shouldn't slow him down. It should make him more durable, no?
ESPN are saying Khan bulking up will see him reduce his speed and movement, and that means he'll have to trade...I don't see that happening at all. He's always had his speed in his hands, not his feet.
The extra weight shouldn't slow him down. It should make him more durable, no?
Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016
Just a thought that some more knowledgable posters may be able to expand upon for me.....
Big punchers usually lose their knockout power as they move through the weights due to obviously fighting bigger men and losing physical advantages but can anyone name a decent amount of names from the past who have had a reputation as being chinny at lower weights then became more durable as they have moved up? People uncluding Kahn himself keep suggesting that he may be more durable with the extra weight but i just cant see it.
Big punchers usually lose their knockout power as they move through the weights due to obviously fighting bigger men and losing physical advantages but can anyone name a decent amount of names from the past who have had a reputation as being chinny at lower weights then became more durable as they have moved up? People uncluding Kahn himself keep suggesting that he may be more durable with the extra weight but i just cant see it.
Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016
Yeah I agree.BobD'Mello wrote:One thing I find weird....that people are thinking Khan is going to be slower or bulkier or clumsier because he's carrying 6 or 7 or 8 pounds more. He's going to be the same fighter, as far as I can see. Just not weight drained.
ESPN are saying Khan bulking up will see him reduce his speed and movement, and that means he'll have to trade...I don't see that happening at all. He's always had his speed in his hands, not his feet.
The extra weight shouldn't slow him down. It should make him more durable, no?
Anyone got the time for this? The local time...... Is it Vegas?
-
MightyWarrior
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13319
- Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01
Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016
People were wondering about the durability of the Golden boy early on, when Oscar was knocked over twice in different fights at super feather, by relative journey men...but of course he went on to prove what a great chin he had at much higher weights.Emmseegee wrote:Just a thought that some more knowledgable posters may be able to expand upon for me.....
Big punchers usually lose their knockout power as they move through the weights due to obviously fighting bigger men and losing physical advantages but can anyone name a decent amount of names from the past who have had a reputation as being chinny at lower weights then became more durable as they have moved up? People uncluding Kahn himself keep suggesting that he may be more durable with the extra weight but i just cant see it.
-
Nightmare Roy
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 16935
- Joined: 18 May 2003, 17:29
Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016
I thinking of subscribing to BN for the first time just to see this, got a feeling Amir is gonna do a Calzaghi/Lacey job 
-
el_grande_mauro_mina
- Lightweight
- Posts: 11215
- Joined: 24 Dec 2017, 11:54
Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016
Khan on points!! 
Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016
Have they got the ref cam again? I loved seeing Khan up close after being knockdown in one of his other fights, brilliant footage. I'm still going to have a snaky bet on a Khan win though, good luck to him.
Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016
Me too- I don't care though !Taansend wrote:Sometimes I get the feeling that those Tecate girls are not really interested in the boxing but have some other motive for being there
-
wesshaw1985
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 7483
- Joined: 21 Jul 2013, 17:57
-
WildWaylon
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3223
- Joined: 02 Nov 2005, 13:35
Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016
Alvarez needs to cut the ring off and nail Khan early. Khan will pick up the rounds if he is allowed to. Khan and his camp believe they can do a Mayweather job on Canelo. They know they cant stop him but they are confident they can get a points win. its down to Canelo (or Prince Harry as my wife calls him) to land some big bombs. Alvarez v GGG is a massive fight, bigger than this one.

Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016
WildWaylon wrote:Alvarez needs to cut the ring off and nail Khan early. Khan will pick up the rounds if he is allowed to. Khan and his camp believe they can do a Mayweather job on Canelo. They know they cant stop him but they are confident they can get a points win. its down to Canelo (or Prince Harry as my wife calls him) to land some big bombs. Alvarez v GGG is a massive fight, bigger than this one.![]()
Be a good one for boxing's crap lookalikes thread
-
Syntax Error
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9025
- Joined: 22 Apr 2005, 08:00
Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016
I'm really hoping that Khan can beat Alvarez.
I think Khan will do a lot better than many think he will, especially if he boxes & doesn't go for the knockout.
I'm also sick of Canelo & his 155lb BS, although Khan will probably continue Miguel Cotto's invention if he wins!![[icon_witsend.gif] :witzend:](./images/smilies/icon_witsend.gif)
I think Khan will do a lot better than many think he will, especially if he boxes & doesn't go for the knockout.
I'm also sick of Canelo & his 155lb BS, although Khan will probably continue Miguel Cotto's invention if he wins!
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45238
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016
Cotto springs to mind. He was pretty fragile comparatively at 140, definitely seemed more durable when he moved up.Emmseegee wrote:Just a thought that some more knowledgable posters may be able to expand upon for me.....
Big punchers usually lose their knockout power as they move through the weights due to obviously fighting bigger men and losing physical advantages but can anyone name a decent amount of names from the past who have had a reputation as being chinny at lower weights then became more durable as they have moved up? People uncluding Kahn himself keep suggesting that he may be more durable with the extra weight but i just cant see it.
-
ThereByTheGrace
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 4016
- Joined: 04 Sep 2010, 05:22
Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016
Canelo points. Khan saves face not getting ko'd and canelo gets his expected win
Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016
Does anyone know what time they are due in the ring?
-
reggaereggae
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4723
- Joined: 21 Dec 2009, 17:01
Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016
Good oneRexob wrote:WildWaylon wrote:Alvarez needs to cut the ring off and nail Khan early. Khan will pick up the rounds if he is allowed to. Khan and his camp believe they can do a Mayweather job on Canelo. They know they cant stop him but they are confident they can get a points win. its down to Canelo (or Prince Harry as my wife calls him) to land some big bombs. Alvarez v GGG is a massive fight, bigger than this one.![]()
Be a good one for boxing's crap lookalikes thread
-
Mimmy
- Heavyweight

Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016
Taansend wrote:Sometimes I get the feeling that those Tecate girls are not really interested in the boxing but have some other motive for being there
I know what you mean. Similar to the conception if you play Bohemian Rapsardy backwards there is supposed to be a sign from the devil. These birds might be promoting the drug barons of Mexico or something, a hidden agenda??
-
Mimmy
- Heavyweight

Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016
ThereByTheGrace wrote:Canelo points. Khan saves face not getting ko'd and canelo gets his expected win
Why has khan taken a fight to be fed to the lions? Im not sure here, think there might be an upset. It dont make sense to me that most people not only here but in other boxing forums think khan is going to get beat up pretty bad. Why take a fight that seems a no winner. Nah, im not sure, think there might be a upset or controversial ending.
Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016
Or maybe they're just promoting the beer and trying to get some rich idiot with an overactive trouser wand to notice them and marry them. If I was rich I feckin would!mimmy123 wrote:Taansend wrote:Sometimes I get the feeling that those Tecate girls are not really interested in the boxing but have some other motive for being there
I know what you mean. Similar to the conception if you play Bohemian Rapsardy backwards there is supposed to be a sign from the devil. These birds might be promoting the drug barons of Mexico or something, a hidden agenda??