Jamie Cox wins appeal

bripez
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4877
Joined: 11 Feb 2010, 18:07

Re: Jamie Cox wins appeal

Post by bripez »

Hopefully he will have a fight lined up soon - after all he has a hefty phone bill to pay :doh:
Black Sam Bellamy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1476
Joined: 25 Sep 2008, 13:51

Re: Jamie Cox wins appeal

Post by Black Sam Bellamy »

When is Jamie due out next ? Time running out...
freddydoesdallas
Cruiserweight
Posts: 9436
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 13:48

Re: Jamie Cox wins appeal

Post by freddydoesdallas »

That doesn't change what we all thought. He's been cleared of common assault but the other charges stand which is why the jail sentence has been changed from a custodial one to a suspended one.
CharlesListon
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 888
Joined: 24 May 2010, 16:17

Re: Jamie Cox wins appeal

Post by CharlesListon »

freddydoesdallas wrote:
That doesn't change what we all thought. He's been cleared of common assault but the other charges stand which is why the jail sentence has been changed from a custodial one to a suspended one.
^^^^

This.
It's very straight-forward. He can apply to the southern area council to regain his license, but the fact is he is still serving a suspended sentence.

Usually, that means no boxing on bbbofc shows until its complete.
ShadrachSimmo
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4738
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 05:42

Re: Jamie Cox wins appeal

Post by ShadrachSimmo »

There's always the MBC.... :roll:
ste1983
Middleweight
Posts: 1762
Joined: 01 Oct 2013, 10:30

Re: Jamie Cox wins appeal

Post by ste1983 »

CharlesListon wrote:
freddydoesdallas wrote:
That doesn't change what we all thought. He's been cleared of common assault but the other charges stand which is why the jail sentence has been changed from a custodial one to a suspended one.
^^^^

This.
It's very straight-forward. He can apply to the southern area council to regain his license, but the fact is he is still serving a suspended sentence.

Usually, that means no boxing on bbbofc shows until its complete.
Not in Gavin's case though, which is the latest I can think of.
CaptainSpacerod
Welterweight
Posts: 3381
Joined: 15 Dec 2015, 03:21

Re: Jamie Cox wins appeal

Post by CaptainSpacerod »

Surely the fact that Cox has been acquitted of assault means that there is also reasonable doubt as to the girl's claims that he broke into her gaff to harm her and therefore those convictions should also be overturned leaving Jamie not serving any suspended sentences and thus free to box again.

Did the lad have a good legal team ? How could a he said she said situation result in a conviction for assault when there was no physical evidence of an assault having taken place ?
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Jamie Cox wins appeal

Post by expe »

CaptainSpacerod wrote:Surely the fact that Cox has been acquitted of assault means that there is also reasonable doubt as to the girl's claims that he broke into her gaff to harm her and therefore those convictions should also be overturned leaving Jamie not serving any suspended sentences and thus free to box again.

Did the lad have a good legal team ? How could a he said she said situation result in a conviction for assault when there was no physical evidence of an assault having taken place ?
The 600 texts a day claim should have been countered in court as well if it was bullshit, get the phone records and present them as evidence that she was lying or at the very least exaggerating and it starts to bring doubt over any other statements she made.
freddydoesdallas
Cruiserweight
Posts: 9436
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 13:48

Re: Jamie Cox wins appeal

Post by freddydoesdallas »

CaptainSpacerod wrote:Surely the fact that Cox has been acquitted of assault means that there is also reasonable doubt as to the girl's claims that he broke into her gaff to harm her and therefore those convictions should also be overturned leaving Jamie not serving any suspended sentences and thus free to box again.

Did the lad have a good legal team ? How could a he said she said situation result in a conviction for assault when there was no physical evidence of an assault having taken place ?
They had the choice to appeal all of the convictions like everyone has. They only chose to appeal the assault so I'm guessing that the evidence was more than just her word
Post Reply