Just watch the papers?flem1 wrote:asdfjkl wrote:Wada proved Povetkin right actually, just watch the papers, their own papers.flem1 wrote: WBC and VADA proved you wrong.![]()
Gotta love these Povetkin apologists.
Gotta love these fake champ fanboys
Just watch the papers?flem1 wrote:asdfjkl wrote:Wada proved Povetkin right actually, just watch the papers, their own papers.flem1 wrote: WBC and VADA proved you wrong.![]()
Gotta love these Povetkin apologists.
Might as well reason with a box of rocks than asdfjkl or Kalan when it comes to Povetkin. Personally I think Povetkin tested dirty on purpose to get out of the fight with Wilder. How is that for a theory? Povetkin tested clean twice a couple weeks before testing dirty. No on can seem to explain that.flem1 wrote:WBC and VADA proved you wrong.asdfjkl wrote:You're wrong, just watch the papers.flem1 wrote: Yes. You clearly don't know what you are talking about![]()
As it stands, Povetkin is a cheater.
Well pretty easy actually, Povetkin was clean all the time and currently still is...Badhusker wrote:Might as well reason with a box of rocks than asdfjkl or Kalan when it comes to Povetkin. Personally I think Povetkin tested dirty on purpose to get out of the fight with Wilder. How is that for a theory? Povetkin tested clean twice a couple weeks before testing dirty. No on can seem to explain that.flem1 wrote:WBC and VADA proved you wrong.asdfjkl wrote: You're wrong, just watch the papers.
You mean WBC and VADA were lying when they said Povetkin failed his drug test?asdfjkl wrote:Well pretty easy actually, Povetkin was clean all the time and currently still is...Badhusker wrote:Might as well reason with a box of rocks than asdfjkl or Kalan when it comes to Povetkin. Personally I think Povetkin tested dirty on purpose to get out of the fight with Wilder. How is that for a theory? Povetkin tested clean twice a couple weeks before testing dirty. No on can seem to explain that.flem1 wrote: WBC and VADA proved you wrong.
It's actually fun throwing facts at themBadhusker wrote:Might as well reason with a box of rocks than asdfjkl or Kalan when it comes to Povetkin. Personally I think Povetkin tested dirty on purpose to get out of the fight with Wilder. How is that for a theory? Povetkin tested clean twice a couple weeks before testing dirty. No on can seem to explain that.flem1 wrote:WBC and VADA proved you wrong.asdfjkl wrote: You're wrong, just watch the papers.
povetkin was sparring with a bunch of slow 5'10" cruisers expecting that to prepare him for wilder.flem1 wrote:It's actually fun throwing facts at themBadhusker wrote:Might as well reason with a box of rocks than asdfjkl or Kalan when it comes to Povetkin. Personally I think Povetkin tested dirty on purpose to get out of the fight with Wilder. How is that for a theory? Povetkin tested clean twice a couple weeks before testing dirty. No on can seem to explain that.flem1 wrote: WBC and VADA proved you wrong.![]()
But yeah, they seem to be ignoring the fact Povetkin was clean in his 3 previous test then tested positive in the 4th one.
I wonder why?
Povetkin NEVER tested dirty EVER... AGAIN!!!! Your pee is yellow sometimes, and looks more clear other times, depending on how hydrated you are... IF you're well hydrated and have a negligible trace of Meldonium in your system you'll test completely clear. But IF you're NOT well hydrated you will still test NEGATIVE with an extremely negligible and allowable trace of Meldonium, that for Povetkin was 1/15th the allowable concentrations... But ALL his tests are negative. You people definitely have rocks in your head if you can't figure out negative tests are NEGATIVE for concentrations ABOVE the allowable amount, and POSITIVE tests are positive for concentrations above the allowable amount. Americans fact spinners ran with that saying there were some trace amounts after there were NO trace amounts - when it doesn't matter because ALL the tests passed with flying colors.Badhusker wrote:Might as well reason with a box of rocks than asdfjkl or Kalan when it comes to Povetkin. Personally I think Povetkin tested dirty on purpose to get out of the fight with Wilder. How is that for a theory? Povetkin tested clean twice a couple weeks before testing dirty. No on can seem to explain that.flem1 wrote:WBC and VADA proved you wrong.asdfjkl wrote: You're wrong, just watch the papers.
Kalan and asdfjkl are the forums idiots. They are proven wrong everytime one asks why this fight never took place.flem1 wrote:It's actually fun throwing facts at themBadhusker wrote:Might as well reason with a box of rocks than asdfjkl or Kalan when it comes to Povetkin. Personally I think Povetkin tested dirty on purpose to get out of the fight with Wilder. How is that for a theory? Povetkin tested clean twice a couple weeks before testing dirty. No on can seem to explain that.flem1 wrote: WBC and VADA proved you wrong.![]()
But yeah, they seem to be ignoring the fact Povetkin was clean in his 3 previous test then tested positive in the 4th one.
I wonder why?
Yep. I agree. Both are idiots.foxdog1923 wrote:Kalan and asdfjkl are the forums idiots. They are proven wrong everytime one asks why this fight never took place.flem1 wrote:It's actually fun throwing facts at themBadhusker wrote:
Might as well reason with a box of rocks than asdfjkl or Kalan when it comes to Povetkin. Personally I think Povetkin tested dirty on purpose to get out of the fight with Wilder. How is that for a theory? Povetkin tested clean twice a couple weeks before testing dirty. No on can seem to explain that.![]()
But yeah, they seem to be ignoring the fact Povetkin was clean in his 3 previous test then tested positive in the 4th one.
I wonder why?
That wall of text you just typed sure is entertainingKalan wrote:Povetkin NEVER tested dirty EVER... AGAIN!!!! Your pee is yellow sometimes, and looks more clear other times, depending on how hydrated you are... IF you're well hydrated and have a negligible trace of Meldonium in your system you'll test completely clear. But IF you're NOT well hydrated you will still test NEGATIVE with an extremely negligible and allowable trace of Meldonium, that for Povetkin was 1/15th the allowable concentrations... But ALL his tests are negative. You people definitely have rocks in your head if you can't figure out negative tests are NEGATIVE for concentrations ABOVE the allowable amount, and POSITIVE tests are positive for concentrations above the allowable amount. Americans fact spinners ran with that saying there were some trace amounts after there were NO trace amounts - when it doesn't matter because ALL the tests passed with flying colors.Badhusker wrote:Might as well reason with a box of rocks than asdfjkl or Kalan when it comes to Povetkin. Personally I think Povetkin tested dirty on purpose to get out of the fight with Wilder. How is that for a theory? Povetkin tested clean twice a couple weeks before testing dirty. No on can seem to explain that.flem1 wrote: WBC and VADA proved you wrong.
Why would they want B sample when they admit the possibility of having meldonium within the allowed concentrations.flem1 wrote: I think you as a boxing fan should urge Povetkin and his team to test his B sample. So far they haven't even mentioned testing Pov's B sample. What's your opinion on that?
No both, same poster.flem1 wrote:Yep. I agree. Both are idiots.foxdog1923 wrote:Kalan and asdfjkl are the forums idiots. They are proven wrong everytime one asks why this fight never took place.flem1 wrote: It's actually fun throwing facts at them![]()
But yeah, they seem to be ignoring the fact Povetkin was clean in his 3 previous test then tested positive in the 4th one.
I wonder why?
Nop, here is what Wada says:flem1 wrote:You mean WBC and VADA were lying when they said Povetkin failed his drug test?asdfjkl wrote:Well pretty easy actually, Povetkin was clean all the time and currently still is...Badhusker wrote:
Might as well reason with a box of rocks than asdfjkl or Kalan when it comes to Povetkin. Personally I think Povetkin tested dirty on purpose to get out of the fight with Wilder. How is that for a theory? Povetkin tested clean twice a couple weeks before testing dirty. No on can seem to explain that.![]()
I know you are strongly hoping Pov is clean but he did fail his test, ruined Wilder's WBC defense, prevented him from earning his career high payday, and disappointed many boxing fans
Thanks for the link to the PDF. Very helpful.asdfjkl wrote:Nop, here is what Wada says:flem1 wrote:You mean WBC and VADA were lying when they said Povetkin failed his drug test?asdfjkl wrote: Well pretty easy actually, Povetkin was clean all the time and currently still is...![]()
I know you are strongly hoping Pov is clean but he did fail his test, ruined Wilder's WBC defense, prevented him from earning his career high payday, and disappointed many boxing fans
https://wada-main-prod.s3.amazonaws.com ... ice-en.pdf
From start till end, Povetkin and his team were perfectly right, Wilder might have some media and a bunch of retards behind them, doesn't mean Povetkin did anything illegal.
And I'm not Kalam or kalem or whatever his name is.
Look... Every poster with a brain knows you're not me... and knows flem, badhusker, Saad and foxdog are freakin' STUPID JERKS.. and all the evidence that come to light so far reveals that Povetkin has been the victim a high volume railroading and smear job.. For the future the name is Kalan. Like alan with a Kasdfjkl wrote:Nop, here is what Wada says:flem1 wrote:You mean WBC and VADA were lying when they said Povetkin failed his drug test?asdfjkl wrote: Well pretty easy actually, Povetkin was clean all the time and currently still is...![]()
I know you are strongly hoping Pov is clean but he did fail his test, ruined Wilder's WBC defense, prevented him from earning his career high payday, and disappointed many boxing fans
https://wada-main-prod.s3.amazonaws.com ... ice-en.pdf
From start till end, Povetkin and his team were perfectly right, Wilder might have some media and a bunch of retards behind them, doesn't mean Povetkin did anything illegal.
And I'm not Kalam or kalem or whatever his name is.
Kalan wrote:Look... Every poster with a brain knows you're not me... and knows flem, badhusker, Saad and foxdog are freakin' STUPID JERKS.. and all the evidence that come to light so far reveals that Povetkin has been the victim a high volume railroading and smear job.. For the future the name is Kalan. Like alan with a Kasdfjkl wrote:Nop, here is what Wada says:flem1 wrote: You mean WBC and VADA were lying when they said Povetkin failed his drug test?![]()
I know you are strongly hoping Pov is clean but he did fail his test, ruined Wilder's WBC defense, prevented him from earning his career high payday, and disappointed many boxing fans
https://wada-main-prod.s3.amazonaws.com ... ice-en.pdf
From start till end, Povetkin and his team were perfectly right, Wilder might have some media and a bunch of retards behind them, doesn't mean Povetkin did anything illegal.
And I'm not Kalam or kalem or whatever his name is.
asdfjkl wrote:Nop, here is what Wada says:flem1 wrote:You mean WBC and VADA were lying when they said Povetkin failed his drug test?asdfjkl wrote: Well pretty easy actually, Povetkin was clean all the time and currently still is...![]()
I know you are strongly hoping Pov is clean but he did fail his test, ruined Wilder's WBC defense, prevented him from earning his career high payday, and disappointed many boxing fans
https://wada-main-prod.s3.amazonaws.com ... ice-en.pdf
From start till end, Povetkin and his team were perfectly right, Wilder might have some media and a bunch of retards behind them, doesn't mean Povetkin did anything illegal.
And I'm not Kalam or kalem or whatever his name is.
WBC and VADA said Povetkin tested positiveKalan wrote:WADA... "Long term urinary excretion of Meddonium below 1 μg/mL down to several hundred ng/mL can persist for a number of weeks and in the low tens of ng/mL for a few months."
That's why Povetkin tested negative for disallowed concentrations (1/15th the allowable amount) in ALL his tests.. Nobody is going to be able to prove he failed any tests and if they try to fake them they'll be met in court.. by a determined Povetkin team.. There is judicial corruption as well -like there was for 20 years while Hurricane Carter languished needlessly in prison because of corrupt judges.. But I doubt if that will happen in this case.. Pacquiao beat Mayweather, De La Hoya, Shaefer, and Golden Boy in American courts on his defamation case.. I always expected he would win.. He was an extremely popular boxer who had a lot of money to pay lawyers.. He wasn't putting up with being called a cheat.. This is the same thing basically except a man is being deprived of his opportunity and he's 36 years old.
But as a stupid jerk I was only presenting facts that WBC and VADA relayed.Kalan wrote:Look... Every poster with a brain knows you're not me... and knows flem, badhusker, Saad and foxdog are freakin' STUPID JERKS.. and all the evidence that come to light so far reveals that Povetkin has been the victim a high volume railroading and smear job.. For the future the name is Kalan. Like alan with a Kasdfjkl wrote:Nop, here is what Wada says:flem1 wrote: You mean WBC and VADA were lying when they said Povetkin failed his drug test?![]()
I know you are strongly hoping Pov is clean but he did fail his test, ruined Wilder's WBC defense, prevented him from earning his career high payday, and disappointed many boxing fans
https://wada-main-prod.s3.amazonaws.com ... ice-en.pdf
From start till end, Povetkin and his team were perfectly right, Wilder might have some media and a bunch of retards behind them, doesn't mean Povetkin did anything illegal.
And I'm not Kalam or kalem or whatever his name is.
So because Wilder and the WBC work together you now act like you don't believe the 0.070 number?flem1 wrote:asdfjkl wrote:Nop, here is what Wada says:flem1 wrote: You mean WBC and VADA were lying when they said Povetkin failed his drug test?![]()
I know you are strongly hoping Pov is clean but he did fail his test, ruined Wilder's WBC defense, prevented him from earning his career high payday, and disappointed many boxing fans
https://wada-main-prod.s3.amazonaws.com ... ice-en.pdf
From start till end, Povetkin and his team were perfectly right, Wilder might have some media and a bunch of retards behind them, doesn't mean Povetkin did anything illegal.
And I'm not Kalam or kalem or whatever his name is.![]()
![]()
Again, only Ryanbinski provided the .70 mcg figure. We have yet to hear the true amount that VADA found. WBC found enough reason to postpone the fight though.
So as of now, Povetkin is a cheater
Lol and you don't have evidence of a positive test, since it simply doesn't exist.flem1 wrote:But as a stupid jerk I was only presenting facts that WBC and VADA relayed.Kalan wrote:Look... Every poster with a brain knows you're not me... and knows flem, badhusker, Saad and foxdog are freakin' STUPID JERKS.. and all the evidence that come to light so far reveals that Povetkin has been the victim a high volume railroading and smear job.. For the future the name is Kalan. Like alan with a Kasdfjkl wrote: Nop, here is what Wada says:
https://wada-main-prod.s3.amazonaws.com ... ice-en.pdf
From start till end, Povetkin and his team were perfectly right, Wilder might have some media and a bunch of retards behind them, doesn't mean Povetkin did anything illegal.
And I'm not Kalam or kalem or whatever his name is.
You have no evidence actually of Povetkin's negative test![]()
![]()
We do have WBC's statement thoughasdfjkl wrote:Lol and you don't have evidence of a positive test, since it simply doesn't exist.flem1 wrote:But as a stupid jerk I was only presenting facts that WBC and VADA relayed.Kalan wrote:
Look... Every poster with a brain knows you're not me... and knows flem, badhusker, Saad and foxdog are freakin' STUPID JERKS.. and all the evidence that come to light so far reveals that Povetkin has been the victim a high volume railroading and smear job.. For the future the name is Kalan. Like alan with a K
You have no evidence actually of Povetkin's negative test![]()
![]()
Care to explain how WBC and Wilder are working together?asdfjkl wrote:So because Wilder and the WBC work together you now act like you don't believe the 0.070 number?flem1 wrote:asdfjkl wrote: Nop, here is what Wada says:
https://wada-main-prod.s3.amazonaws.com ... ice-en.pdf
From start till end, Povetkin and his team were perfectly right, Wilder might have some media and a bunch of retards behind them, doesn't mean Povetkin did anything illegal.
And I'm not Kalam or kalem or whatever his name is.![]()
![]()
Again, only Ryanbinski provided the .70 mcg figure. We have yet to hear the true amount that VADA found. WBC found enough reason to postpone the fight though.
So as of now, Povetkin is a cheater