SaadOffTheDeck wrote:BAD INTENTIONS wrote:Basically, it's do anything to make the fight?
Why would you have to resort to this?
HBO is the home of Crawford and Postol (I think).
They were going to pay for more of their fights eventually, right?
So, why wouldn't they pay for the biggest fight each can make on HBO at 140?
It all doesn't add up, but whatever.
Fights like this and GGG/Lemieux on PPV are ridiculous.
They are simply HBO feelers for PPV potential.
Boxing fans are the only one get played here.
GGG was a feeler, this was outside of what they're willing to pay. Simple as that. The common denominator is that GGG and Crawford both want to be more active than HBO dates will allow. Golovkin draws big numbers now, so he's good. Terrence is just a great fighter with a shallow pool of opponents.
It should be well known that I'm some kind of communist or something ... so what I'm saying isn't my opinion, or what I think is "right"?
Isn't the real problem here lack of competition?
What if other networks and promoters were allowed to bid?
I think, given the opportunity, Showtime would buy this fight on regular cable.
Back to communism ...
I always cringe when money reductions are called for.
Not because I care about money, but because I know money doesn't go away.
Meaning, if the salaries at the bottom are reduced, it only means the salaries at the top are increasing.
The increasing wealth gap is proof of this, so I hope no one comes in to plead for the 1% ... cough Tanzio
I personally think all of this only leads to failure, but school says something else.