Negatives On Floyd's Legacy

bnovelist
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 987
Joined: 23 Nov 2009, 02:37

Negatives On Floyd's Legacy

Post by bnovelist »

1.) He didn't fight this version of Cotto he opted to retire https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iezZiSXNB3Y

Till the day I DIE I will always say that this version of Cotto 2007-2008 would have defeated Mayweather but Floyd dodged a bullet!
Stuarty
Super Welterweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: Negatives On Floyd's Legacy

Post by Stuarty »

He waited and fought Cotto, Pacquiao and Mosely after they were past their best. All three of them in their pomp would have had a fair chance against Floyd. He's been well managed.
Ricky_
Middleweight
Posts: 8896
Joined: 16 Oct 2013, 08:03

Re: Negatives On Floyd's Legacy

Post by Ricky_ »

Prime Mosley would have knocked Floyd out. He's retired without a single win against an elite fighter in their prime.
fanman
Super Middleweight
Posts: 619
Joined: 05 Jun 2013, 19:56

Re: Negatives On Floyd's Legacy

Post by fanman »

To be fair he did give cotto a whole weight division advantage when they fought.
He beat prime; corrales, castillo, hatton, judah.
Near prime; pacquiao, canelo, marquez.
And at a weight disadvantage to; canelo, cotto, de la hoya.
Not a bad legacy.
ElJefe
Middleweight
Posts: 2545
Joined: 22 Apr 2014, 13:13

Re: Negatives On Floyd's Legacy

Post by ElJefe »

The biggest negative of his legacy is fighters protecting their 0 too much.
jezzamundo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3127
Joined: 16 Jun 2004, 13:11

Re: Negatives On Floyd's Legacy

Post by jezzamundo »

Cotto in his prime was good, but never great and never good enough to beat Floyd.

Not fighting Pacquiao in 2010 is a far bigger negative - I slight favour Manny to win a decision in that matchup. I'd favour Mosley and De La Hoya both to beat Floyd in their respective welterweight primes, but Floyd was operating at lower weights at the time, so it's not his fault those fights didn't happen until both were past their best. I'm not sure how a fight with GGG at 154lb would have gone, but with Floyd nearing 40, I don't blame him for not wanting that action.

Floyd is great, probably best fighter of his generation and one of the 25 greatest of all time.
man
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3197
Joined: 09 Jul 2007, 10:38

Re: Negatives On Floyd's Legacy

Post by man »

fanman wrote:near prime; pacquiao, canelo
disintelligent statements.
Ricky_
Middleweight
Posts: 8896
Joined: 16 Oct 2013, 08:03

Re: Negatives On Floyd's Legacy

Post by Ricky_ »

man wrote:
fanman wrote:near prime; pacquiao, canelo
disintelligent statements.

disintelligent :lol:

I agree btw, but that's a brilliant word in so many ways.
Tony1244
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 24708
Joined: 03 Jun 2010, 21:31

Re: Negatives On Floyd's Legacy

Post by Tony1244 »

Floyd is a great fighter, but a jerk outside of the ring.

He did duck Pacquiao in 2010 and did duck Mosley at his best.

But a lot of top guys over the years have ducked fighters for one reason or the other. Marciano wasn't too interested in the other Floyd (Patterson). Dempsey would have nothing to do with a black fighter.

And one that pisses me off perhaps the most is Tyson wanted no part of of George Foreman.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 16892
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Negatives On Floyd's Legacy

Post by keithmoonhangover »

Tony1244 wrote:And one that pisses me off perhaps the most is Tyson wanted no part of of George Foreman.
:doh:
Tony1244
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 24708
Joined: 03 Jun 2010, 21:31

Re: Negatives On Floyd's Legacy

Post by Tony1244 »

keithmoonhangover wrote:
Tony1244 wrote:And one that pisses me off perhaps the most is Tyson wanted no part of of George Foreman.
:doh:

Are you doubting the veracity of this?


Tyson pretty much has admitted it.

http://coxscorner.tripod.com/foreman_tyson_fl.html
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 16892
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Negatives On Floyd's Legacy

Post by keithmoonhangover »

Tony1244 wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:
Tony1244 wrote:And one that pisses me off perhaps the most is Tyson wanted no part of of George Foreman.
:doh:

Are you doubting the veracity of this?


Tyson pretty much has admitted it.

http://coxscorner.tripod.com/foreman_tyson_fl.html
Foreman was offered the fight after the Cooney fight and turned it down.
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45213
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Negatives On Floyd's Legacy

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

man wrote:
fanman wrote:near prime; pacquiao, canelo
disintelligent statements.
Ironically, there is no such word as 'disintelligent.'

It's Unintelligent. Or if you prefer, ignorant.
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45213
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Negatives On Floyd's Legacy

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

keithmoonhangover wrote:
Tony1244 wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:
:doh:

Are you doubting the veracity of this?


Tyson pretty much has admitted it.

http://coxscorner.tripod.com/foreman_tyson_fl.html
Foreman was offered the fight after the Cooney fight and turned it down.
I've heard from a few sources that Tyson was terrified of Foreman.
Rexob
Middleweight
Posts: 6025
Joined: 20 Mar 2014, 15:17

Re: Negatives On Floyd's Legacy

Post by Rexob »

There is none he has played a blinder :bow:
Tony1244
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 24708
Joined: 03 Jun 2010, 21:31

Re: Negatives On Floyd's Legacy

Post by Tony1244 »

keithmoonhangover wrote:
Tony1244 wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:
:doh:

Are you doubting the veracity of this?


Tyson pretty much has admitted it.

http://coxscorner.tripod.com/foreman_tyson_fl.html
Foreman was offered the fight after the Cooney fight and turned it down.
Source? Sure about this?
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 16892
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Negatives On Floyd's Legacy

Post by keithmoonhangover »

Tony1244 wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:
Tony1244 wrote:

Are you doubting the veracity of this?


Tyson pretty much has admitted it.

http://coxscorner.tripod.com/foreman_tyson_fl.html
Foreman was offered the fight after the Cooney fight and turned it down.
Source? Sure about this?
Source: George Foreman.

Sure: Yes.
Tony1244
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 24708
Joined: 03 Jun 2010, 21:31

Re: Negatives On Floyd's Legacy

Post by Tony1244 »

keithmoonhangover wrote:
Tony1244 wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:
Foreman was offered the fight after the Cooney fight and turned it down.
Source? Sure about this?
Source: George Foreman.

Sure: Yes.
Mike Tyson wanted no part of GF.

http://www.BS.com/forums/archi ... 32372.html

Don King may have made an offer but apparently Tyson wasn't onboard.
states
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3554
Joined: 26 Jun 2004, 13:40

Re: Negatives On Floyd's Legacy

Post by states »

jamesmcdonnell wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:
Tony1244 wrote:

Are you doubting the veracity of this?


Tyson pretty much has admitted it.

http://coxscorner.tripod.com/foreman_tyson_fl.html
Foreman was offered the fight after the Cooney fight and turned it down.
I've heard from a few sources that Tyson was terrified of Foreman.
It's done the rounds more than once. For all his cuddly Grill salesman persona, Foreman is a scary man, it seems.
Tony1244
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 24708
Joined: 03 Jun 2010, 21:31

Re: Negatives On Floyd's Legacy

Post by Tony1244 »

states wrote:
jamesmcdonnell wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:
Foreman was offered the fight after the Cooney fight and turned it down.
I've heard from a few sources that Tyson was terrified of Foreman.
It's done the rounds more than once. For all his cuddly Grill salesman persona, Foreman is a scary man, it seems.

I remember him as the guy who knocked Frazier and Norton into another dimension, but apparently he is now the go-to-guy if you have an invention.

Go figure...
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46550
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Negatives On Floyd's Legacy

Post by gilgamesh »

Stuarty30 wrote:He waited and fought Cotto, Pacquiao and Mosely after they were past their best. All three of them in their pomp would have had a fair chance against Floyd. He's been well managed.
He was calling out Mosley in 2003.
states
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3554
Joined: 26 Jun 2004, 13:40

Re: Negatives On Floyd's Legacy

Post by states »

Tony1244 wrote:
I remember him as the guy who knocked Frazier and Norton into another dimension, but apparently he is now the go-to-guy if you have an invention.

Go figure...
Well, that is most definitely true. But what I mean is that he did reinvent himself as a 'cuddly uncle' type, but deep down he was still the scary fornicator that terrified folks back in the day.
tiny_acres
Middleweight
Posts: 9463
Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43

Re: Negatives On Floyd's Legacy

Post by tiny_acres »

gilgamesh wrote:
Stuarty30 wrote:He waited and fought Cotto, Pacquiao and Mosely after they were past their best. All three of them in their pomp would have had a fair chance against Floyd. He's been well managed.
He was calling out Mosley in 2003.
Yes he was calling Mosley out. Mosley laughed it off.
Can'tblame Floyd for this one.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Negatives On Floyd's Legacy

Post by crusader »

Incidentally about cuddly George, I've heard several accounts of people meeting him and for the most part they are quite negative....maybe they're unrepresentative, but they do make me wonder if he really is an unfriendly guy.
Badhusker
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4902
Joined: 19 Jun 2010, 23:57

Re: Negatives On Floyd's Legacy

Post by Badhusker »

Its easy to find negatives for most any boxer's legacy, but a few of the ones mentioned in this thread questionable, and some are laughable.

Floyd called out both Mosley and DLH in the early 2000's, and would have moved up to fight them. Neither were interested. When he did fight DLH, it was at 154, and Floyd was outweighed by 16 or 17 lbs fight night. If Floyd would have fought DLH at 147, there would not be a discussion about DLH beating him earlier. We saw a year or so later how DLH performed at 147. DLH had just turned 34, so to say he was way past his prime is a stretch, with only about 40 fights.

When Floyd fought Mosley in 2010, Pacquiao had turned him (Mosley) down for a fight with Roach saying he was too dangerous, too good of a fighter. Mosley was the #1 or #2 welter at the time. Roach and many others said Floyd would never take that fight.

When Cotto was in his "prime", never did he make an offer to fight Floyd, and had not after that either. Hell, Cotto didn't even fight the other top 140 guys at the time, when Tszyu, Ricky Hatton, Mayeather, and Arturo Gatti were all at the weight. Cotto was struggling to make 147, so the 145 lb catchweight wasn't a good idea for him. Floyd eventually fought him at 154, so like DLH, was a much better version than what Pac fought.

Pacquiao ducked the test, and pulled out of the fight because of it in 2010, and Roach later admitted the fight not happening then was on them. Still, some of you think Floyd did the ducking. For some reason, Pacquiao refused to be randomly tested during his "prime".

Floyd also gets criticized for fighting JMM, who called Floyd out after his retirement of nearly 2 years. JMM was #2pfp at the time, and the odds were only 2-1 in Floyds favor. I suppose someone will spin that as a negative on his legacy too.
Post Reply