Negatives On Floyd's Legacy
Negatives On Floyd's Legacy
1.) He didn't fight this version of Cotto he opted to retire https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iezZiSXNB3Y
Till the day I DIE I will always say that this version of Cotto 2007-2008 would have defeated Mayweather but Floyd dodged a bullet!
Till the day I DIE I will always say that this version of Cotto 2007-2008 would have defeated Mayweather but Floyd dodged a bullet!
Re: Negatives On Floyd's Legacy
He waited and fought Cotto, Pacquiao and Mosely after they were past their best. All three of them in their pomp would have had a fair chance against Floyd. He's been well managed.
Re: Negatives On Floyd's Legacy
Prime Mosley would have knocked Floyd out. He's retired without a single win against an elite fighter in their prime.
Re: Negatives On Floyd's Legacy
To be fair he did give cotto a whole weight division advantage when they fought.
He beat prime; corrales, castillo, hatton, judah.
Near prime; pacquiao, canelo, marquez.
And at a weight disadvantage to; canelo, cotto, de la hoya.
Not a bad legacy.
He beat prime; corrales, castillo, hatton, judah.
Near prime; pacquiao, canelo, marquez.
And at a weight disadvantage to; canelo, cotto, de la hoya.
Not a bad legacy.
Re: Negatives On Floyd's Legacy
The biggest negative of his legacy is fighters protecting their 0 too much.
-
jezzamundo
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3127
- Joined: 16 Jun 2004, 13:11
Re: Negatives On Floyd's Legacy
Cotto in his prime was good, but never great and never good enough to beat Floyd.
Not fighting Pacquiao in 2010 is a far bigger negative - I slight favour Manny to win a decision in that matchup. I'd favour Mosley and De La Hoya both to beat Floyd in their respective welterweight primes, but Floyd was operating at lower weights at the time, so it's not his fault those fights didn't happen until both were past their best. I'm not sure how a fight with GGG at 154lb would have gone, but with Floyd nearing 40, I don't blame him for not wanting that action.
Floyd is great, probably best fighter of his generation and one of the 25 greatest of all time.
Not fighting Pacquiao in 2010 is a far bigger negative - I slight favour Manny to win a decision in that matchup. I'd favour Mosley and De La Hoya both to beat Floyd in their respective welterweight primes, but Floyd was operating at lower weights at the time, so it's not his fault those fights didn't happen until both were past their best. I'm not sure how a fight with GGG at 154lb would have gone, but with Floyd nearing 40, I don't blame him for not wanting that action.
Floyd is great, probably best fighter of his generation and one of the 25 greatest of all time.
Re: Negatives On Floyd's Legacy
disintelligent statements.fanman wrote:near prime; pacquiao, canelo
Re: Negatives On Floyd's Legacy
man wrote:disintelligent statements.fanman wrote:near prime; pacquiao, canelo
disintelligent
I agree btw, but that's a brilliant word in so many ways.
Re: Negatives On Floyd's Legacy
Floyd is a great fighter, but a jerk outside of the ring.
He did duck Pacquiao in 2010 and did duck Mosley at his best.
But a lot of top guys over the years have ducked fighters for one reason or the other. Marciano wasn't too interested in the other Floyd (Patterson). Dempsey would have nothing to do with a black fighter.
And one that pisses me off perhaps the most is Tyson wanted no part of of George Foreman.
He did duck Pacquiao in 2010 and did duck Mosley at his best.
But a lot of top guys over the years have ducked fighters for one reason or the other. Marciano wasn't too interested in the other Floyd (Patterson). Dempsey would have nothing to do with a black fighter.
And one that pisses me off perhaps the most is Tyson wanted no part of of George Foreman.
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 16892
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Negatives On Floyd's Legacy
Tony1244 wrote:And one that pisses me off perhaps the most is Tyson wanted no part of of George Foreman.
Re: Negatives On Floyd's Legacy
keithmoonhangover wrote:Tony1244 wrote:And one that pisses me off perhaps the most is Tyson wanted no part of of George Foreman.
Are you doubting the veracity of this?
Tyson pretty much has admitted it.
http://coxscorner.tripod.com/foreman_tyson_fl.html
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 16892
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Negatives On Floyd's Legacy
Foreman was offered the fight after the Cooney fight and turned it down.Tony1244 wrote:keithmoonhangover wrote:Tony1244 wrote:And one that pisses me off perhaps the most is Tyson wanted no part of of George Foreman.
Are you doubting the veracity of this?
Tyson pretty much has admitted it.
http://coxscorner.tripod.com/foreman_tyson_fl.html
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45213
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: Negatives On Floyd's Legacy
Ironically, there is no such word as 'disintelligent.'man wrote:disintelligent statements.fanman wrote:near prime; pacquiao, canelo
It's Unintelligent. Or if you prefer, ignorant.
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45213
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: Negatives On Floyd's Legacy
I've heard from a few sources that Tyson was terrified of Foreman.keithmoonhangover wrote:Foreman was offered the fight after the Cooney fight and turned it down.Tony1244 wrote:keithmoonhangover wrote:
Are you doubting the veracity of this?
Tyson pretty much has admitted it.
http://coxscorner.tripod.com/foreman_tyson_fl.html
Re: Negatives On Floyd's Legacy
There is none he has played a blinder ![[icon_notworthy.gif] :bow:](./images/smilies/icon_notworthy.gif)
Re: Negatives On Floyd's Legacy
Source? Sure about this?keithmoonhangover wrote:Foreman was offered the fight after the Cooney fight and turned it down.Tony1244 wrote:keithmoonhangover wrote:
Are you doubting the veracity of this?
Tyson pretty much has admitted it.
http://coxscorner.tripod.com/foreman_tyson_fl.html
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 16892
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Negatives On Floyd's Legacy
Source: George Foreman.Tony1244 wrote:Source? Sure about this?keithmoonhangover wrote:Foreman was offered the fight after the Cooney fight and turned it down.Tony1244 wrote:
Are you doubting the veracity of this?
Tyson pretty much has admitted it.
http://coxscorner.tripod.com/foreman_tyson_fl.html
Sure: Yes.
Re: Negatives On Floyd's Legacy
Mike Tyson wanted no part of GF.keithmoonhangover wrote:Source: George Foreman.Tony1244 wrote:Source? Sure about this?keithmoonhangover wrote:
Foreman was offered the fight after the Cooney fight and turned it down.
Sure: Yes.
http://www.BS.com/forums/archi ... 32372.html
Don King may have made an offer but apparently Tyson wasn't onboard.
Re: Negatives On Floyd's Legacy
It's done the rounds more than once. For all his cuddly Grill salesman persona, Foreman is a scary man, it seems.jamesmcdonnell wrote:I've heard from a few sources that Tyson was terrified of Foreman.keithmoonhangover wrote:Foreman was offered the fight after the Cooney fight and turned it down.Tony1244 wrote:
Are you doubting the veracity of this?
Tyson pretty much has admitted it.
http://coxscorner.tripod.com/foreman_tyson_fl.html
Re: Negatives On Floyd's Legacy
states wrote:It's done the rounds more than once. For all his cuddly Grill salesman persona, Foreman is a scary man, it seems.jamesmcdonnell wrote:I've heard from a few sources that Tyson was terrified of Foreman.keithmoonhangover wrote:
Foreman was offered the fight after the Cooney fight and turned it down.
I remember him as the guy who knocked Frazier and Norton into another dimension, but apparently he is now the go-to-guy if you have an invention.
Go figure...
Re: Negatives On Floyd's Legacy
He was calling out Mosley in 2003.Stuarty30 wrote:He waited and fought Cotto, Pacquiao and Mosely after they were past their best. All three of them in their pomp would have had a fair chance against Floyd. He's been well managed.
Re: Negatives On Floyd's Legacy
Well, that is most definitely true. But what I mean is that he did reinvent himself as a 'cuddly uncle' type, but deep down he was still the scary fornicator that terrified folks back in the day.Tony1244 wrote:
I remember him as the guy who knocked Frazier and Norton into another dimension, but apparently he is now the go-to-guy if you have an invention.
Go figure...
-
tiny_acres
- Middleweight
- Posts: 9463
- Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43
Re: Negatives On Floyd's Legacy
Yes he was calling Mosley out. Mosley laughed it off.gilgamesh wrote:He was calling out Mosley in 2003.Stuarty30 wrote:He waited and fought Cotto, Pacquiao and Mosely after they were past their best. All three of them in their pomp would have had a fair chance against Floyd. He's been well managed.
Can'tblame Floyd for this one.
Re: Negatives On Floyd's Legacy
Incidentally about cuddly George, I've heard several accounts of people meeting him and for the most part they are quite negative....maybe they're unrepresentative, but they do make me wonder if he really is an unfriendly guy.
Re: Negatives On Floyd's Legacy
Its easy to find negatives for most any boxer's legacy, but a few of the ones mentioned in this thread questionable, and some are laughable.
Floyd called out both Mosley and DLH in the early 2000's, and would have moved up to fight them. Neither were interested. When he did fight DLH, it was at 154, and Floyd was outweighed by 16 or 17 lbs fight night. If Floyd would have fought DLH at 147, there would not be a discussion about DLH beating him earlier. We saw a year or so later how DLH performed at 147. DLH had just turned 34, so to say he was way past his prime is a stretch, with only about 40 fights.
When Floyd fought Mosley in 2010, Pacquiao had turned him (Mosley) down for a fight with Roach saying he was too dangerous, too good of a fighter. Mosley was the #1 or #2 welter at the time. Roach and many others said Floyd would never take that fight.
When Cotto was in his "prime", never did he make an offer to fight Floyd, and had not after that either. Hell, Cotto didn't even fight the other top 140 guys at the time, when Tszyu, Ricky Hatton, Mayeather, and Arturo Gatti were all at the weight. Cotto was struggling to make 147, so the 145 lb catchweight wasn't a good idea for him. Floyd eventually fought him at 154, so like DLH, was a much better version than what Pac fought.
Pacquiao ducked the test, and pulled out of the fight because of it in 2010, and Roach later admitted the fight not happening then was on them. Still, some of you think Floyd did the ducking. For some reason, Pacquiao refused to be randomly tested during his "prime".
Floyd also gets criticized for fighting JMM, who called Floyd out after his retirement of nearly 2 years. JMM was #2pfp at the time, and the odds were only 2-1 in Floyds favor. I suppose someone will spin that as a negative on his legacy too.
Floyd called out both Mosley and DLH in the early 2000's, and would have moved up to fight them. Neither were interested. When he did fight DLH, it was at 154, and Floyd was outweighed by 16 or 17 lbs fight night. If Floyd would have fought DLH at 147, there would not be a discussion about DLH beating him earlier. We saw a year or so later how DLH performed at 147. DLH had just turned 34, so to say he was way past his prime is a stretch, with only about 40 fights.
When Floyd fought Mosley in 2010, Pacquiao had turned him (Mosley) down for a fight with Roach saying he was too dangerous, too good of a fighter. Mosley was the #1 or #2 welter at the time. Roach and many others said Floyd would never take that fight.
When Cotto was in his "prime", never did he make an offer to fight Floyd, and had not after that either. Hell, Cotto didn't even fight the other top 140 guys at the time, when Tszyu, Ricky Hatton, Mayeather, and Arturo Gatti were all at the weight. Cotto was struggling to make 147, so the 145 lb catchweight wasn't a good idea for him. Floyd eventually fought him at 154, so like DLH, was a much better version than what Pac fought.
Pacquiao ducked the test, and pulled out of the fight because of it in 2010, and Roach later admitted the fight not happening then was on them. Still, some of you think Floyd did the ducking. For some reason, Pacquiao refused to be randomly tested during his "prime".
Floyd also gets criticized for fighting JMM, who called Floyd out after his retirement of nearly 2 years. JMM was #2pfp at the time, and the odds were only 2-1 in Floyds favor. I suppose someone will spin that as a negative on his legacy too.