bogan whisperer wrote:
It is an agenda you are arguing against here, not fact or logic
fact is Watts is 2 levels below Pitt
Fact is Green takes a soft fight to get a KO to market Mundine 2
Fact is Pitt would rise another level if given the opportunity & smash Green to bits
Fact is all the Green fan boys here are covering his lame ass fighting Watts
Fact is Green is 43 years old.
Fact is Green hasn't fought for a year.
Fact is Green has fought only once in four and a half years.
Fact is Green is only marking time until he fights Mundine again in a multi-million dollar fight. Haven't you worked that out yet?
Fact is Green keeps in shape & doesn't go out to Pasture
Age is irrelevant & no excuse for fighting Watts
Green should do a better job at disguising ripping people off
GhostBoxing15 wrote:
fact is Watts is 2 levels below Pitt
Fact is Green takes a soft fight to get a KO to market Mundine 2
Fact is Pitt would rise another level if given the opportunity & smash Green to bits
Fact is all the Green fan boys here are covering his lame ass fighting Watts
Fact is Green is 43 years old.
Fact is Green hasn't fought for a year.
Fact is Green has fought only once in four and a half years.
Fact is Green is only marking time until he fights Mundine again in a multi-million dollar fight. Haven't you worked that out yet?
Fact is Green keeps in shape & doesn't go out to Pasture
The real truth is Green had to pull out of his last fight due to a back injury.
GhostBoxing15 wrote:
fact is Watts is 2 levels below Pitt
Fact is Green takes a soft fight to get a KO to market Mundine 2
Fact is Pitt would rise another level if given the opportunity & smash Green to bits
Fact is all the Green fan boys here are covering his lame ass fighting Watts
Fact is Green is 43 years old.
Fact is Green hasn't fought for a year.
Fact is Green has fought only once in four and a half years.
Fact is Green is only marking time until he fights Mundine again in a multi-million dollar fight. Haven't you worked that out yet?
Age is irrelevant & no excuse for fighting Watts
The real truth is age is absolutely relevant in boxing. How many boxers are at their prime at 43? Most fighters are well and truly retired by that age. 43 is old for a boxer and most who are still fighting at that age aren't a shadow of the fighter they were in their late 20s.
GhostBoxing15 wrote:
fact is Watts is 2 levels below Pitt
Fact is Green takes a soft fight to get a KO to market Mundine 2
Fact is Pitt would rise another level if given the opportunity & smash Green to bits
Fact is all the Green fan boys here are covering his lame ass fighting Watts
Fact is Green is 43 years old.
Fact is Green hasn't fought for a year.
Fact is Green has fought only once in four and a half years.
Fact is Green is only marking time until he fights Mundine again in a multi-million dollar fight. Haven't you worked that out yet?
Green should do a better job at disguising ripping people off
Green fights always create huge interest and nobody is more interested in this fight than you. You are contributing nearly ever second post in this thread and the thread is the busiest on the board here.
Last edited by Like a Boss on 12 Jun 2016, 05:05, edited 1 time in total.
Nothing surprises me with Danny Green since the Briggs affair, everyone on the take wanting to "cash in" now OZ boxing is at it lowest point, Danny Green is on the borderline of being a con man, all this bullcrap for a Exhibition fight .
All the people who have fed off Mundine & Green over the years have realised its all coming to an end & there's no next meal ticket on the horizon
Nothing surprises me with Danny Green since the Briggs affair, everyone on the take wanting to "cash in" now OZ boxing is at it lowest point, Danny Green is on the borderline of being a con man, all this bullcrap for a Exhibition fight .
All the people who have fed off Mundine & Green over the years have realised its all coming to an end & there's no next meal ticket on the horizon
The meal ticket for Mundine and Green is the rematch. It will be a multi-million dollar fight. People like you will ensure that by talking about both of them non-stop until it happens. It's the best advertising they can get and it's free. Costs them nothing.
Like a Boss wrote:
Fact is Green is 43 years old.
Fact is Green hasn't fought for a year.
Fact is Green has fought only once in four and a half years.
Fact is Green is only marking time until he fights Mundine again in a multi-million dollar fight. Haven't you worked that out yet?
Green should do a better job at disguising ripping people off
Green fights always create huge interest and nobody is more interested in this fight than you. You are contributing nearly ever second post in this thread and the thread is the busiest on the board here.
I have no interest in Green or him fighting Mundine, Green is only worried about his bank balance not the sport, this was evident when he dragged Briggs out of retirement
People should be behind supporting real fights not this sham, for the better interests of the sport. But too many people are too obsessed with wanting to see a white guy Ko an aboriginal
GhostBoxing15 wrote:
Green should do a better job at disguising ripping people off
Green fights always create huge interest and nobody is more interested in this fight than you. You are contributing nearly ever second post in this thread and the thread is the busiest on the board here.
I have no interest in Green or him fighting Mundine...
You have a huge interest in Green. You write about him incessantly. Nearly half the posts in this Green thread were made by you.
Like a Boss wrote:
Fact is Green is 43 years old.
Fact is Green hasn't fought for a year.
Fact is Green has fought only once in four and a half years.
Fact is Green is only marking time until he fights Mundine again in a multi-million dollar fight. Haven't you worked that out yet?
Fact is Green keeps in shape & doesn't go out to Pasture
The real truth is Green had to pull out of his last fight due to a back injury.
Yes, if that's what you want to believe, I'd prefer to go with no interest in the Konrad fight due to the disappointment of the Bolonti snooze fest
Last edited by GhostBoxing15 on 12 Jun 2016, 05:24, edited 1 time in total.
GhostBoxing15 wrote:
Fact is Green keeps in shape & doesn't go out to Pasture
The real truth is Green had to pull out of his last fight due to a back injury.
Yes, if that's what you want to believe, I'd prefer to go with no interest in the Konrad fight due to the disappointment of the Bolonti snooze fest
Sounds like something you have conveniently made up in a lame effort to support your anti-Green agenda. Can you provide anything that supports your little fabrication?
GhostBoxing15 wrote:
Green should do a better job at disguising ripping people off
Green fights always create huge interest and nobody is more interested in this fight than you. You are contributing nearly ever second post in this thread and the thread is the busiest on the board here.
I have no interest in Green or him fighting Mundine...
You have 76 posts here and just about every one of them is about Danny Green. He is clearly your favourite subject and I have no doubt you will be talking about Green incessantly right up to this fight and then all the way up to the likely Mundine rematch.
Like a Boss wrote:
Green fights always create huge interest and nobody is more interested in this fight than you. You are contributing nearly ever second post in this thread and the thread is the busiest on the board here.
I have no interest in Green or him fighting Mundine...
You have a huge interest in Green. You write about him incessantly. Nearly half the posts in this Green thread were made by you.
Only interest I have is to enlighten fellow boxing fans
I know how this forum works, Mundine bashers are welcome, but not an ill word can be said about Danny Green, so many Green nut huggers hang out here & they go out of there way to defend what he does
GhostBoxing15 wrote:
I have no interest in Green or him fighting Mundine...
You have a huge interest in Green. You write about him incessantly. Nearly half the posts in this Green thread were made by you.
Only interest I have is to enlighten fellow boxing fans
I know how this forum works, Mundine bashers are welcome, but not an ill word can be said about Danny Green, so many Green nut huggers hang out here & they go out of there way to defend what he does
Whether you like it or not you are extremely interested in Danny Green. You demonstrate that by continually posting about him and you are promoting him every time you do because every time you post it pushes this thread to the top of the board and highlights this fight to anyone that visits the forum.
This thread is the hottest thread on the board at present and will soon have 100 replies, and it is mostly on the back of your interest in discussing Danny Green. Keep it up. It's my thread
I'll leave you to bump the thread and discuss Danny with someone else for now Ghost. I've got some work to do. See if you can get the thread to 100 replies by the time I get back.
Like a Boss wrote:
Fact is Green is 43 years old.
Fact is Green hasn't fought for a year.
Fact is Green has fought only once in four and a half years.
Fact is Green is only marking time until he fights Mundine again in a multi-million dollar fight. Haven't you worked that out yet?
Age is irrelevant & no excuse for fighting Watts
The real truth is age is absolutely relevant in boxing. How many boxers are at their prime at 43? Most fighters are well and truly retired by that age. 43 is old for a boxer and most who are still fighting at that age aren't a shadow of the fighter they were in their late 20s.
Antonio Tarver at 42 had no problems disposing of Danny Green just as Danny Green should have no problems disposing Watts, it's called levels, but u just can't grasp it
bogan whisperer wrote:
Bolonti's losses prior to and including Green included Tony Bellew the current WBC champion, Juergen Braehmer the current WBA light heavyweight champion and Green, who as we know has held multiple belts.
Pitt has never shared the ring with anyone anywhere near as good as Bellew, Braehmer and Green.
Bolonti fought Bellew 5 years ago, not the Bellew today, Bolonti is nothing on the world stage,
Bolonti had nothing against Braemner Bellew or even a old hack in Green, ur argument has no meaning cos Bolonti has no substance at the level
So Green is nothing but "an old hack" according to you. Yet the former Australian cruiserweight champion Watts, who is 10 years younger than him, isn't a suitable opponent?
crusader wrote:I think Braehmer and Bellew would KO Pitt, and I wouldn't be surprised if they shut him out along the way (Bolonti actually won 2 against Braehmer for what it's worth).
It is an agenda you are arguing against here, not fact or logic
fact is Watts is 2 levels below Pitt
Fact is Green takes a soft fight to get a KO to market Mundine 2
Fact is Pitt would rise another level if given the opportunity & smash Green to bits
Fact is all the Green fan boys here are covering his lame ass fighting Watts
But Green is nothing but an old hack according to you. An old hack who is also ring rusty because he retired about 5 years ago and has only had one fight since.
dberry wrote:Let's be real here, Pitty is a good cruiser with smooth footwork and a good right hand but his defence is quite ordinary and he is chinny, even at his age, Greeny would starch Brad, too much experience and dannyweight would not help Pitt one bit.
If Danny Green makes Kane Watts fight at Dannyweight for the Vacant Australian Cruiserweight Title, How sad is that!
Aaron Russell is the national champion at cruiser isn't he?
GhostBoxing15 wrote:
Age is irrelevant & no excuse for fighting Watts
The real truth is age is absolutely relevant in boxing. How many boxers are at their prime at 43? Most fighters are well and truly retired by that age. 43 is old for a boxer and most who are still fighting at that age aren't a shadow of the fighter they were in their late 20s.
Antonio Tarver at 42 had no problems disposing of Danny Green just as Danny Green should have no problems disposing Watts, it's called levels, but u just can't grasp it
You are very conveniently forgetting Green, whom you describe as an old hack, was about 40 at the time himself.
Watts is 33. Green is 43. Can you do the maths on the difference or will you need a calculator?
Bolonti fought Bellew 5 years ago, not the Bellew today, Bolonti is nothing on the world stage,
Bolonti had nothing against Braemner Bellew or even a old hack in Green, ur argument has no meaning cos Bolonti has no substance at the level
So Green is nothing but "an old hack" according to you. Yet the former Australian cruiserweight champion Watts, who is 10 years younger than him, isn't a suitable opponent?
Green is an old hack on World scene
if you believe Watts is the best Cruiserweight in Australia
I'm sure Greeny won't be wanting to go 10 Rounds, otherwise he would have chosen McCracken Pitt Aloua Flanagan or Broadhurst
GhostBoxing15 wrote:
Bolonti fought Bellew 5 years ago, not the Bellew today, Bolonti is nothing on the world stage,
Bolonti had nothing against Braemner Bellew or even a old hack in Green, ur argument has no meaning cos Bolonti has no substance at the level
So Green is nothing but "an old hack" according to you. Yet the former Australian cruiserweight champion Watts, who is 10 years younger than him, isn't a suitable opponent?
Green is an old hack on World scene
if you believe Watts is the best Cruiserweight in Australia
I'm sure Greeny won't be wanting to go 10 Rounds, otherwise he would have chosen McCracken Pitt Aloua Flanagan or Broadhurst
Where did I say Watts is the best cruiserweight in Australia
If people don't say what you want to hear you just make it up
Like a Boss wrote:
The real truth is age is absolutely relevant in boxing. How many boxers are at their prime at 43? Most fighters are well and truly retired by that age. 43 is old for a boxer and most who are still fighting at that age aren't a shadow of the fighter they were in their late 20s.
Antonio Tarver at 42 had no problems disposing of Danny Green just as Danny Green should have no problems disposing Watts, it's called levels, but u just can't grasp it
You are very conveniently forgetting Green, whom you describe as an old hack, was about 40 at the time himself.
Watts is 33. Green is 43. Can you do the maths on the difference or will you need a calculator?
GhostBoxing15 wrote:
Antonio Tarver at 42 had no problems disposing of Danny Green just as Danny Green should have no problems disposing Watts, it's called levels, but u just can't grasp it
You are very conveniently forgetting Green, whom you describe as an old hack, was about 40 at the time himself.
Watts is 33. Green is 43. Can you do the maths on the difference or will you need a calculator?
40 or 38 ? Need a calculator ur self
Watts is 33. Green is 43 and an old hack according to you.
Obviously the maths was too challenging for you so I'll help you out 43-33=10
bogan whisperer wrote:
So Green is nothing but "an old hack" according to you. Yet the former Australian cruiserweight champion Watts, who is 10 years younger than him, isn't a suitable opponent?
Green is an old hack on World scene
if you believe Watts is the best Cruiserweight in Australia
I'm sure Greeny won't be wanting to go 10 Rounds, otherwise he would have chosen McCracken Pitt Aloua Flanagan or Broadhurst
Where did I say Watts is the best cruiserweight in Australia
If people don't say what you want to hear you just make it up
Well ur assuring us he is the Australian Champion like he is something
You have 76 posts here and just about every one of them is about Danny Green. He is clearly your favourite subject and I have no doubt you will be talking about Green incessantly right up to this fight and then all the way up to the likely Mundine rematch.
