Smith vs Canelo undercard BJS vs Lemieux???
Smith vs Canelo undercard BJS vs Lemieux???
Any truth to the rumour? apparently this is what Fwank wants in September in Vegas or Texas. Sticking point is HBO are not keen on Smith. Would be great if it happened 
-
Boxerbeetle
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 32967
- Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59
Re: Smith vs Canelo undercard BJS vs Lemieux???
Until Canelo fights GGG, I'm not interested in him.
Re: Smith vs Canelo undercard BJS vs Lemieux???
I feel the same. After all the talk after the Khan fight I thought he had no option but to fight GGG but his team have manoeuvred him in a different direction. It's an embarrassing move and it's all that's wrong with boxing. I firmly believe Canelo wants it and obviously GGG wants it and that makes it even more frustrating. DeLa Hoya is a knob!Boxerbeetle wrote:Until Canelo fights GGG, I'm not interested in him.
Re: Smith vs Canelo undercard BJS vs Lemieux???
x3. Except that ultimately Canelo can make his own decisions, he's big enough to insist on the fight so I put most of the blame on him.Stuarty30 wrote:I feel the same. After all the talk after the Khan fight I thought he had no option but to fight GGG but his team have manoeuvred him in a different direction. It's an embarrassing move and it's all that's wrong with boxing. I firmly believe Canelo wants it and obviously GGG wants it and that makes it even more frustrating. DeLa Hoya is a knob!Boxerbeetle wrote:Until Canelo fights GGG, I'm not interested in him.
Re: Smith vs Canelo undercard BJS vs Lemieux???
Canelo doesn't feel like he's big enough to fully compete at 160 yet hence the reluctance on his part to fight Golovkin or for Golovkin to come down to 155 ish.
-
PredatorHayds
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 4891
- Joined: 08 Jul 2015, 08:23
Re: Smith vs Canelo undercard BJS vs Lemieux???
Can't see it happening.
Would be happy if it did though.
Would be happy if it did though.
Re: Smith vs Canelo undercard BJS vs Lemieux???
x4. I have no time for Canelo at all.Flump wrote:x3. Except that ultimately Canelo can make his own decisions, he's big enough to insist on the fight so I put most of the blame on him.Stuarty30 wrote:I feel the same. After all the talk after the Khan fight I thought he had no option but to fight GGG but his team have manoeuvred him in a different direction. It's an embarrassing move and it's all that's wrong with boxing. I firmly believe Canelo wants it and obviously GGG wants it and that makes it even more frustrating. DeLa Hoya is a knob!Boxerbeetle wrote:Until Canelo fights GGG, I'm not interested in him.
-
wesshaw1985
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 7483
- Joined: 21 Jul 2013, 17:57
Re: Smith vs Canelo undercard BJS vs Lemieux???
This would be a huge card for Frank...
-
forcefraser
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5462
- Joined: 17 Jun 2008, 06:15
Re: Smith vs Canelo undercard BJS vs Lemieux???
Would people be as hard on Canelo if he wasn't ginger? Just saying like. It's gingerist and it's not nice
Re: Smith vs Canelo undercard BJS vs Lemieux???
No I can not wait until he gets smashed, he is a disgrace. I really respected him when he demanded he fight Lara to prove he is no 1 at 154 all respect gone now.forcefraser wrote:Would people be as hard on Canelo if he wasn't ginger? Just saying like. It's gingerist and it's not nice
Re: Smith vs Canelo undercard BJS vs Lemieux???
Believe it when I see it.
I really want Canelo to get smashed but I can not see anything Liam Smith has to trouble him.
I like BJS v Lemeiux though. Be very interesting if BJS can stay clear of Lemeiuxs left hook all night.
I really want Canelo to get smashed but I can not see anything Liam Smith has to trouble him.
I like BJS v Lemeiux though. Be very interesting if BJS can stay clear of Lemeiuxs left hook all night.
Re: Smith vs Canelo undercard BJS vs Lemieux???
i think Lemieux is a good ebanks jr be a tough fight if happens
Re: Smith vs Canelo undercard BJS vs Lemieux???
I've heard this from his team a few times but it's a load of bollocks... we've seen the size of him and what he's weighing during the 30 day check weigh in's and he could clearly perform at MW with zero issues.lefty wrote:Canelo doesn't feel like he's big enough to fully compete at 160 yet hence the reluctance on his part to fight Golovkin or for Golovkin to come down to 155 ish.
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 17105
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Smith vs Canelo undercard BJS vs Lemieux???
They'll fight on Cinco de Mayo next year.Boxerbeetle wrote:Until Canelo fights GGG, I'm not interested in him.
-
ClivePatrickLyons
- Middleweight
- Posts: 2811
- Joined: 07 Aug 2014, 22:10
Re: Smith vs Canelo undercard BJS vs Lemieux???
Boxerbeetle wrote:Until Canelo fights GGG, I'm not interested in him.
Spot on
-
Grilling Machine
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3166
- Joined: 16 Sep 2005, 02:28
Re: Smith vs Canelo undercard BJS vs Lemieux???
I'm sure someone's to blame.forcefraser wrote:Would people be as hard on Canelo if he wasn't ginger? Just saying like. It's gingerist and it's not nice
Re: Smith vs Canelo undercard BJS vs Lemieux???
I am ginger and feel his painGrilling Machine wrote:I'm sure someone's to blame.forcefraser wrote:Would people be as hard on Canelo if he wasn't ginger? Just saying like. It's gingerist and it's not nice
Re: Smith vs Canelo undercard BJS vs Lemieux???
Liam is no mug but the big ginger unit would batter him. Liam likes to get on the inside and throw body shots, he'd be a sitting duck.
Like the sound of Saunders V Lemieux.
Looks like i'm in the minority but i'd be happy with that as a double header.
Would obviously prefer Canelo V Golovkin
Like the sound of Saunders V Lemieux.
Looks like i'm in the minority but i'd be happy with that as a double header.
Would obviously prefer Canelo V Golovkin
Re: Smith vs Canelo undercard BJS vs Lemieux???
So why does he want smaller men to fight him above the super welterweight limit ?lefty wrote:Canelo doesn't feel like he's big enough to fully compete at 160 yet hence the reluctance on his part to fight Golovkin or for Golovkin to come down to 155 ish.
-
wesshaw1985
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 7483
- Joined: 21 Jul 2013, 17:57
Re: Smith vs Canelo undercard BJS vs Lemieux???
Vlad Hyrunov has apparently said that Ortiz vs. Ustinov is due to be part of the next Canelo PPV.
Golden Boy vs. W@rren -
Canelo vs. L.Smith
Lemieux vs. BJS
Ortiz vs. Ustinov
get Flanagan vs. Michael Perez on there aswell and that would be a cracking card...
Golden Boy vs. W@rren -
Canelo vs. L.Smith
Lemieux vs. BJS
Ortiz vs. Ustinov
get Flanagan vs. Michael Perez on there aswell and that would be a cracking card...
-
forcefraser
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5462
- Joined: 17 Jun 2008, 06:15
Re: Smith vs Canelo undercard BJS vs Lemieux???
If that double header comes off, which it won`t, I swear on my own massive knackers that I`ll go straight out and buy an Admiral Akbar mask, wear it for a month straight and shout "Old Fish eyes is still the man" at total strangers.
-
wesshaw1985
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 7483
- Joined: 21 Jul 2013, 17:57
Re: Smith vs Canelo undercard BJS vs Lemieux???
if they put it together I can see this beings the W@rrens first (and only if it fails) shot at PPV on Sky...
Re: Smith vs Canelo undercard BJS vs Lemieux???
One half's already done according to a very reliable source on CHB, although he also says that Saunders is out late August in London with Lewis Pettitt possibly fighting Abigail Medina on the undercard, so you should be safe.forcefraser wrote:If that double header comes off, which it won`t, I swear on my own massive knackers that I`ll go straight out and buy an Admiral Akbar mask, wear it for a month straight and shout "Old Fish eyes is still the man" at total strangers.
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: Smith vs Canelo undercard BJS vs Lemieux???
forcefraser wrote:If that double header comes off, which it won`t, I swear on my own massive knackers that I`ll go straight out and buy an Admiral Akbar mask, wear it for a month straight and shout "Old Fish eyes is still the man" at total strangers.
Re: Smith vs Canelo undercard BJS vs Lemieux???
Apparantly there's an agreement In place that Golovkin and Canelo will fight in September 2017. Seems fornicating crazy to me as Golovkin will be on the way to 36 but apparantly his promoter who I normally like in interviews and stuff is fine with it
http://www.BS.com/golovkins-pr ... 17--105941
It doesn't say September 2017 in that article but that's what's being said in other sources.
http://www.BS.com/golovkins-pr ... 17--105941
It doesn't say September 2017 in that article but that's what's being said in other sources.