The PPV Question

Taansend
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 12051
Joined: 10 Jul 2004, 17:38

The PPV Question

Post by Taansend »

It's the future.

I know a load of people hate it & fair enough but that's just the way things are.

I remember when Sky first started (I believe that Bruno v some bloke named Mike Tyson was the first big show) and everyone was up in arms about that. Now every other house has it.

I used to HATE PPV but after living in Southern California for a few years my views changed. Basically the only proper boxing fans down there are Mexicans (there's one or two who ain't but that's pretty much it) and I would go to friends houses for PPV fights. They'd cost around $60 which is 40 odd quid. We'd all toss in a tenner or so & bring some beer & it was a right laugh. After the bout the WII would come out & I'd school everyone in the Sweet Sicence :OhYes:

It ended up cheaper than a night out & we'd have a party a few times a year.

I think people in the UK & Ireland need to embrace this idea. It ends up cheap & you have a laugh with your mates.

And I'm sure everyone agrees with me :lol:
DannyMCR
Welterweight
Posts: 784
Joined: 10 Jun 2016, 11:13

Re: The PPV Question

Post by DannyMCR »

I understand what you're saying but most, if not all of Sky's recent PPV cards haven't been PPV worthy..
ShadrachSimmo
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4738
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 05:42

Re: The PPV Question

Post by ShadrachSimmo »

Seems a lot of people do embrace the idea.

There's still enough of them shelling out for the drivel these cards put out to keep it going.
Rexob
Middleweight
Posts: 6025
Joined: 20 Mar 2014, 15:17

Re: The PPV Question

Post by Rexob »

Be here for at least the next 5 years with Hearns contract with Sky.
smiling assassin
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 3225
Joined: 05 Jan 2012, 13:12

Re: The PPV Question

Post by smiling assassin »

The card is a joke. There is not 1 50/50 fight ( Murray has done nothing at super middle to suggest to me he beats groves) to look out for although Hibberts opponent I know nothing of so could be OK. I'm not against PPV but I'm dead against this one. Il take me £20 and stick it on Northern Ireland to beat Wales at least that way il lose my money with a little bit of interest
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32967
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: The PPV Question

Post by Boxerbeetle »

If I bought this PPV and invited my mates around to chip in, they'd laugh in my face and tell me they were watching the Portugal-Croatia game instead. And quite right too!
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17105
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: The PPV Question

Post by keithmoonhangover »

You're a bunch of tight bastards. It's only a couple of quid man, ha'way. :roll:
Rob nelson
Cruiserweight
Posts: 19
Joined: 11 Jul 2011, 15:34

Re: The PPV Question

Post by Rob nelson »

Your also a idiot for lining Eddie hearns pocket.
Also it's a shit undercard with only 1 50/50 fight.
ThereByTheGrace
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4016
Joined: 04 Sep 2010, 05:22

Re: The PPV Question

Post by ThereByTheGrace »

If ppv can be justified, then how can anyone justify having sky sports? You don't see any other sport than boxing being ppv its a disgrace
Rob nelson
Cruiserweight
Posts: 19
Joined: 11 Jul 2011, 15:34

Re: The PPV Question

Post by Rob nelson »

:clap: spot on mate
stevedoc
Super Middleweight
Posts: 3550
Joined: 24 May 2013, 07:40

Re: The PPV Question

Post by stevedoc »

PPV is ok if it's a massive fight with a good undercard something like Fury vs AJ with kell brook vs broner on the undercard paying to see AJ have his 17th fight against a fighter i'ave never seen isn't good enough for PPV .
reggaereggae
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4723
Joined: 21 Dec 2009, 17:01

Re: The PPV Question

Post by reggaereggae »

With the Internet and many other ways of viewing, I'm not sure PPV is the future. There are so many alternative free ways to watch, if individuals are priced out through the 'legit' channels. I think if PPV is to survive, the price must come down to about £5 a show.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17105
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: The PPV Question

Post by keithmoonhangover »

Rob nelson wrote:Your also a idiot for lining Eddie hearns pocket.
Also it's a poo undercard with only 1 50/50 fight.
I'm an idiot for wanting to watch boxing? It's only a few quid, what's the problem?
Stuarty
Middleweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: The PPV Question

Post by Stuarty »

keithmoonhangover wrote:
Rob nelson wrote:Your also a idiot for lining Eddie hearns pocket.
Also it's a poo undercard with only 1 50/50 fight.
I'm an idiot for wanting to watch boxing? It's only a few quid, what's the problem?
I didn't buy this one. I'm watching it on Kodi with Polish commentary. Flawless picture. Really miss Nick Halling that's the only thing :roll:

Anyway, I agree with you if you want to buy it then buy it. What's the issue? This is the first one I've not bought and if my mate never updated my fire stick I'd have probably caved and bought this. I very rarely get out because I'm in with the kids at weekend and buying the boxing, a few cans of beer and a takeaway is a hell of a lot cheaper than a night out.
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23228
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: The PPV Question

Post by handsofstone »

I wonder if Benn the younger will have learned some lessons after the Keleher fight?
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23228
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: The PPV Question

Post by handsofstone »

Stuarty30 wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:
Rob nelson wrote:Your also a idiot for lining Eddie hearns pocket.
Also it's a poo undercard with only 1 50/50 fight.
I'm an idiot for wanting to watch boxing? It's only a few quid, what's the problem?
I didn't buy this one. I'm watching it on Kodi with Polish commentary. Flawless picture. Really miss Nick Halling that's the only thing :roll:

Anyway, I agree with you if you want to buy it then buy it. What's the issue? This is the first one I've not bought and if my mate never updated my fire stick I'd have probably caved and bought this. I very rarely get out because I'm in with the kids at weekend and buying the boxing, a few cans of beer and a takeaway is a hell of a lot cheaper than a night out.
My sentiments exactly,my mrs has been out since half 11 on some wine tasting jolly,i was worried she'd come home pished and start her shite during the boxing but thankfully she came home told me the same story 10 times about her pal being a bitch and now she's buggered off to bed :yay:
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17105
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: The PPV Question

Post by keithmoonhangover »

handsofstone wrote:
Stuarty30 wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:
I'm an idiot for wanting to watch boxing? It's only a few quid, what's the problem?
I didn't buy this one. I'm watching it on Kodi with Polish commentary. Flawless picture. Really miss Nick Halling that's the only thing :roll:

Anyway, I agree with you if you want to buy it then buy it. What's the issue? This is the first one I've not bought and if my mate never updated my fire stick I'd have probably caved and bought this. I very rarely get out because I'm in with the kids at weekend and buying the boxing, a few cans of beer and a takeaway is a hell of a lot cheaper than a night out.
My sentiments exactly,my mrs has been out since half 11 on some wine tasting jolly,i was worried she'd come home pished and start her shite during the boxing but thankfully she came home told me the same story 10 times about her pal being a bitch and now she's buggered off to bed :yay:
Victory is yours. :OhYes:
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23228
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: The PPV Question

Post by handsofstone »

Sickening KO there,definite improvement in Benn and not just because the 1st round KO,he did look a lot more composed and less gung ho,brilliant 3 punch combo to end things,i wont get carried away but a step in the right direction
davie
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6763
Joined: 21 Aug 2010, 00:45

Re: The PPV Question

Post by davie »

Taansend wrote:It's the future.

I know a load of people hate it & fair enough but that's just the way things are.

I remember when Sky first started (I believe that Bruno v some bloke named Mike Tyson was the first big show) and everyone was up in arms about that. Now every other house has it.

I used to HATE PPV but after living in Southern California for a few years my views changed. Basically the only proper boxing fans down there are Mexicans (there's one or two who ain't but that's pretty much it) and I would go to friends houses for PPV fights. They'd cost around $60 which is 40 odd quid. We'd all toss in a tenner or so & bring some beer & it was a right laugh. After the bout the WII would come out & I'd school everyone in the Sweet Sicence :OhYes:

It ended up cheaper than a night out & we'd have a party a few times a year.

I think people in the UK & Ireland need to embrace this idea. It ends up cheap & you have a laugh with your mates.

And I'm sure everyone agrees with me :lol:
All the lads round for Bruno vs Tyson :TU:

Having to pay for it on my own because no-one gives a fornicate about Bellew vs Cleverly 2 :oo
CaptainSpacerod
Welterweight
Posts: 3381
Joined: 15 Dec 2015, 03:21

Re: The PPV Question

Post by CaptainSpacerod »

It annoys me massively that even paying £17 I still have to watch inane fuckin adverts between rounds.
Taansend
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 12051
Joined: 10 Jul 2004, 17:38

Re: The PPV Question

Post by Taansend »

CaptainSpacerod wrote:It annoys me massively that even paying £17 I still have to watch inane fuckin adverts between rounds.
Totally agree with this. Bang out of order. Really, really fuckin cheeky.

You pay for Sky, then you pay extra for this ONE BILL & they still call you a caahnt by forcing adverts down my neck.

That would piss me off more than the 17 quid.
Boxing Prospect
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6592
Joined: 25 Jun 2012, 14:35

Re: The PPV Question

Post by Boxing Prospect »

keithmoonhangover wrote:
Rob nelson wrote:Your also a idiot for lining Eddie hearns pocket.
Also it's a poo undercard with only 1 50/50 fight.
I'm an idiot for wanting to watch boxing? It's only a few quid, what's the problem?
Gonna watch the free stuff on youtube on Sunday morning?...
the patriot
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 640
Joined: 06 Aug 2005, 08:44

Re: The PPV Question

Post by the patriot »

Think last night was the first time I ain't bought the PPV. Instead logged onto Facebook joined a few boxing groups and low and behold a few kind gents were live streaming the show on there..
Picture and sound wasn't the best and I had to put up with someone's coughing in the background, but it saved me 16/17 quid.. Whatever the price was.
reggaereggae
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4723
Joined: 21 Dec 2009, 17:01

Re: The PPV Question

Post by reggaereggae »

The only PPV I have regretted NOT buying, ever, was Khan - Prescott. And only because I had to watch Khan get splattered on low def stream when I would've enjoyed him getting smashed in high def....
sgtcecil
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 979
Joined: 20 Jan 2009, 14:38

Re: The PPV Question

Post by sgtcecil »

reggaereggae wrote:The only PPV I have regretted NOT buying, ever, was Khan - Prescott. And only because I had to watch Khan get splattered on low def stream when I would've enjoyed him getting smashed in high def....
That was the moment me and my mates gained a true appreciation of the merits of sky+!
Post Reply