Wins That Boxers Don't Get Enough Credit For.

Syntax Error
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9011
Joined: 22 Apr 2005, 08:00

Re: Wins That Boxers Don't Get Enough Credit For.

Post by Syntax Error »

Julio Cesar Chavez v Meldrick Taylor 1 - All folk ever say that there were 2 seconds left. Chavez never gets any credit for rallying back & stopping a guy who was beating him.

The referee's only concern should be the wellbeing of the fighter & not how many more seconds of punishment he can take.
littlepug
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 5351
Joined: 03 Jul 2012, 07:17

Re: Wins That Boxers Don't Get Enough Credit For.

Post by littlepug »

barkley v hearns 1 and 2 ?
Kalan
Super Middleweight
Posts: 10083
Joined: 23 Sep 2012, 23:22

Re: Wins That Boxers Don't Get Enough Credit For.

Post by Kalan »

cfang wrote: [Ali was] 15 years at the top beating the best crop of heavys ever.
THE TOP 30 HEAVYWEIGHTS TODAY...

1. Tyson Fury... 2. Anthony Joshua... 3. Luis Ortiz... 4. Deontay Wilder... 5. Wladimir Klitschko... 6. Alexander Povetkin... 7. David Haye... 8. Andy Ruiz... 9. Joseph Parker... 10. Charles Martin... 11. Bryant Jennings... 12. Erkan Teper... 13. Hughie Fury... 14. Kubrat Pulev... 15. Johann Duhaupas... 16. Ruslan Chagaev... 17. Bermane Stiverne... 18. Lucas Browne... 19. Malik Scott... 20. Carlos Takam... 21. Mike Perez... 22. Alexander Ustinov... 23. Dereck Chisora... 24. Christian Hammer... 25. Robert Helenius... 26. Steve Cunningham... 27. Artur Szpilka... 28. Otto Wallin... 29. Czar Glazkov... 30. Dominic Breazeale... 31. Amir Mansour

Some of the very TERRIBLE Heavyweight Title Challengers from the 1950’s, 60’s and 70’s...

Don Cockell... Roland LaStarza... Tommy Jackson... Tom McNeely... Pete Rademacher... Brian London... Henry Cooper... Alfredo Evangelista... Chuck Wepner... Jean Pierre Coopman... Leon Stinks... Terry Daniels... Dave Zyglewitz... Manuel Ramos... Ron Stander... Richard Dunn


Malik Scott (#19) would box all of those pathetic 50’s and 60’s swingers to death and not lose a round. Gee whiz, he’s not even a puncher and he would stop most all of those undersized and strengthless swinger from those weak eras.
BoxBuzz
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 29847
Joined: 07 Jun 2005, 16:37

Re: Wins That Boxers Don't Get Enough Credit For.

Post by BoxBuzz »

Take Manuel Ramos off your stinkin' list. Or face harsh critical feedback.
stevedoc
Super Middleweight
Posts: 3550
Joined: 24 May 2013, 07:40

Re: Wins That Boxers Don't Get Enough Credit For.

Post by stevedoc »

littlepug wrote:barkley v hearns 1 and 2 ?
I watched the 1st Rd of the first fight 5 minutes ago, hearns lands some mean hooks so fast
littlepug
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 5351
Joined: 03 Jul 2012, 07:17

Re: Wins That Boxers Don't Get Enough Credit For.

Post by littlepug »

stevedoc wrote:
littlepug wrote:barkley v hearns 1 and 2 ?
I watched the 1st Rd of the first fight 5 minutes ago, hearns lands some mean hooks so fast
poor barkely must of thought he was having a nightmare when hearns started letting his hands go ! really amazing he turned that 1st fight around
cfang
Middleweight
Posts: 946
Joined: 23 Jan 2014, 16:50

Re: Wins That Boxers Don't Get Enough Credit For.

Post by cfang »

So the fight was even and Liston got injured - how unlucky for him etc. Good job he got a rematch so he could set the record straight - oh that lasted a round. You aren't seriously suggesting that Liston wasn't tired and beaten by Ali - oh and despite the dirty trick of rubbing some horrible goo on him to blind Ali. You think Sonny was going to come on strong and stop Ali in the later rounds I guess - just like he did in the rematch!

There were two fights - one ended up with Liston quitting and the other he was embarrassed by getting decked in round 1. Ali was superior simple as that.




Kalan wrote:
cfang wrote:Ali seems to get no credit for either Liston fight. People waffle on about mafia and shoulder injury and blah blah blah ... I think also when you look at what Ali did for the rest of his career (15 years at the top beating the best crop of heavys ever), you can see the Liston fights in their true light, an aged dinosaur up against a new faster, hungrier and more determined future legend of the sport. Ali was better than Liston - full stop- they fought twice and Ali won...twice.
As you said... Liston was an aged dinosaur. But Liston also suffered a severely torn left biceps in the first fight (Liston quit with the fight dead even on the cards) and Ali should have been DQ'd in the rematch for failing to go to a neutral corner and flagrantly refusing the referee's orders to go to a neutral corner... Also the count should have been suspended when Ali failed to follow the rules---and it WASN'T... Liston never got a count from Walcott, but he resumed fighting after Ali finally went to a neutral corner and he got up... Ali attacked, but couldn't land a single follow up punch. Liston easily ducked and dodged Ali's follow up barrage so his reflexes were intact after the light knockdown punch... Ring Magazine editor, Nat Fleischer, screamed at Walcott and erroneously directed him to stop the fight.. Fleischer was NOT a boxing official or commission member.

Liston was the fall guy for the comedy of errors in that fight... His boxing license was suspended in all 50 states for "faking" a knockdown... I thought that was outrageous!!! ... Why would Liston get up and resume fighting Ali if he intended to throw the fight??? ... Why wouldn't Liston just wait for Walcott to push Ali to a neutral corner...and then come back and count him out... IF he intended to throw the fight???

NOBODY answered those questions to Liston or ANY Liston team member's satisfaction... They just kept saying "We think you faked the knockdown."
cfang
Middleweight
Posts: 946
Joined: 23 Jan 2014, 16:50

Re: Wins That Boxers Don't Get Enough Credit For.

Post by cfang »

Take the x3 times lonsdale belt title holder henry cooper off that list too. Cooper was a class fighter, just not quite good enough to be undisputed heavy champion as he lost to the 3 heavyweight champs he fought but he had some good wins too and was a solid boxer with a lot of mental strength and a great left hook. Call ing him terrible is just wrong.

Roland LaStarza wasn't terrible either - he was talented. some of the guys youve listed from today haven't even fought anyone inside the top 20 - see AJ.
Kalan wrote:
cfang wrote: [Ali was] 15 years at the top beating the best crop of heavys ever.
THE TOP 30 HEAVYWEIGHTS TODAY...

1. Tyson Fury... 2. Anthony Joshua... 3. Luis Ortiz... 4. Deontay Wilder... 5. Wladimir Klitschko... 6. Alexander Povetkin... 7. David Haye... 8. Andy Ruiz... 9. Joseph Parker... 10. Charles Martin... 11. Bryant Jennings... 12. Erkan Teper... 13. Hughie Fury... 14. Kubrat Pulev... 15. Johann Duhaupas... 16. Ruslan Chagaev... 17. Bermane Stiverne... 18. Lucas Browne... 19. Malik Scott... 20. Carlos Takam... 21. Mike Perez... 22. Alexander Ustinov... 23. Dereck Chisora... 24. Christian Hammer... 25. Robert Helenius... 26. Steve Cunningham... 27. Artur Szpilka... 28. Otto Wallin... 29. Czar Glazkov... 30. Dominic Breazeale... 31. Amir Mansour

Some of the very TERRIBLE Heavyweight Title Challengers from the 1950’s, 60’s and 70’s...

Don Cockell... Roland LaStarza... Tommy Jackson... Tom McNeely... Pete Rademacher... Brian London... Henry Cooper... Alfredo Evangelista... Chuck Wepner... Jean Pierre Coopman... Leon Stinks... Terry Daniels... Dave Zyglewitz... Manuel Ramos... Ron Stander... Richard Dunn


Malik Scott (#19) would box all of those pathetic 50’s and 60’s swingers to death and not lose a round. Gee whiz, he’s not even a puncher and he would stop most all of those undersized and strengthless swinger from those weak eras.
littlepug
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 5351
Joined: 03 Jul 2012, 07:17

Re: Wins That Boxers Don't Get Enough Credit For.

Post by littlepug »

cfang wrote:Take the x3 times lonsdale belt title holder henry cooper off that list too. Cooper was a class fighter, just not quite good enough to be undisputed heavy champion as he lost to the 3 heavyweight champs he fought but he had some good wins too and was a solid boxer with a lot of mental strength and a great left hook. Call ing him terrible is just wrong.

Roland LaStarza wasn't terrible either - he was talented. some of the guys youve listed from today haven't even fought anyone inside the top 20 - see AJ.
Kalan wrote:
cfang wrote: [Ali was] 15 years at the top beating the best crop of heavys ever.
THE TOP 30 HEAVYWEIGHTS TODAY...

1. Tyson Fury... 2. Anthony Joshua... 3. Luis Ortiz... 4. Deontay Wilder... 5. Wladimir Klitschko... 6. Alexander Povetkin... 7. David Haye... 8. Andy Ruiz... 9. Joseph Parker... 10. Charles Martin... 11. Bryant Jennings... 12. Erkan Teper... 13. Hughie Fury... 14. Kubrat Pulev... 15. Johann Duhaupas... 16. Ruslan Chagaev... 17. Bermane Stiverne... 18. Lucas Browne... 19. Malik Scott... 20. Carlos Takam... 21. Mike Perez... 22. Alexander Ustinov... 23. Dereck Chisora... 24. Christian Hammer... 25. Robert Helenius... 26. Steve Cunningham... 27. Artur Szpilka... 28. Otto Wallin... 29. Czar Glazkov... 30. Dominic Breazeale... 31. Amir Mansour

Some of the very TERRIBLE Heavyweight Title Challengers from the 1950’s, 60’s and 70’s...

Don Cockell... Roland LaStarza... Tommy Jackson... Tom McNeely... Pete Rademacher... Brian London... Henry Cooper... Alfredo Evangelista... Chuck Wepner... Jean Pierre Coopman... Leon Stinks... Terry Daniels... Dave Zyglewitz... Manuel Ramos... Ron Stander... Richard Dunn


Malik Scott (#19) would box all of those pathetic 50’s and 60’s swingers to death and not lose a round. Gee whiz, he’s not even a puncher and he would stop most all of those undersized and strengthless swinger from those weak eras.
bang on about cooper mate, he was a very good fighter :TU:
PredatorHayds
Welterweight
Posts: 4888
Joined: 08 Jul 2015, 08:23

Re: Wins That Boxers Don't Get Enough Credit For.

Post by PredatorHayds »

Cooper knocks Scott out early.
Kalan
Super Middleweight
Posts: 10083
Joined: 23 Sep 2012, 23:22

Re: Wins That Boxers Don't Get Enough Credit For.

Post by Kalan »

185-pound Cooper gets cut to ribbons by 6'4" 230lb Malik Scott... And come on... a lot of bums knocked Cooper out, not just "3 World Champs"
Kalan
Super Middleweight
Posts: 10083
Joined: 23 Sep 2012, 23:22

Re: Wins That Boxers Don't Get Enough Credit For.

Post by Kalan »

cfang wrote:So the fight was even and Liston got injured - how unlucky for him etc. Good job he got a rematch so he could set the record straight - oh that lasted a round. You aren't seriously suggesting that Liston wasn't tired and beaten by Ali - oh and despite the dirty trick of rubbing some horrible goo on him to blind Ali. You think Sonny was going to come on strong and stop Ali in the later rounds I guess - just like he did in the rematch!

There were two fights - one ended up with Liston quitting and the other he was embarrassed by getting decked in round 1. Ali was superior simple as that.
Kalan wrote:
cfang wrote:Ali seems to get no credit for either Liston fight. People waffle on about mafia and shoulder injury and blah blah blah ... I think also when you look at what Ali did for the rest of his career (15 years at the top beating the best crop of heavys ever), you can see the Liston fights in their true light, an aged dinosaur up against a new faster, hungrier and more determined future legend of the sport. Ali was better than Liston - full stop- they fought twice and Ali won...twice.
As you said... Liston was an aged dinosaur. But Liston also suffered a severely torn left biceps in the first fight (Liston quit with the fight dead even on the cards) and Ali should have been DQ'd in the rematch for failing to go to a neutral corner and flagrantly refusing the referee's orders to go to a neutral corner... Also the count should have been suspended when Ali failed to follow the rules---and it WASN'T... Liston never got a count from Walcott, but he resumed fighting after Ali finally went to a neutral corner and he got up... Ali attacked, but couldn't land a single follow up punch. Liston easily ducked and dodged Ali's follow up barrage so his reflexes were intact after the light knockdown punch... Ring Magazine editor, Nat Fleischer, screamed at Walcott and erroneously directed him to stop the fight.. Fleischer was NOT a boxing official or commission member.

Liston was the fall guy for the comedy of errors in that fight... His boxing license was suspended in all 50 states for "faking" a knockdown... I thought that was outrageous!!! ... Why would Liston get up and resume fighting Ali if he intended to throw the fight??? ... Why wouldn't Liston just wait for Walcott to push Ali to a neutral corner...and then come back and count him out... IF he intended to throw the fight???

NOBODY answered those questions to Liston or ANY Liston team member's satisfaction... They just kept saying "We think you faked the knockdown."
So just ignore the facts right????... Ignore the fact that Ali refused to go to a neutral corner and should have been DQ'd for flagrantly disobeying a referee's order... And Liston got NO COUNT because of Ali ignoring the rules... That's the reason you suspend a count if a boxer refuses to go to a neutral corner... Because the rules state the referee must count out the boxer and not the timekeeper, so the boxer knows what the count is. If referee Walcott DQ'd Ali nobody would have blamed him... A boxer should not be able to show such contempt for a referee's authority.

And even though Liston had a badly torn left biceps in the first fight -- the fight was even on the cards.
cfang
Middleweight
Posts: 946
Joined: 23 Jan 2014, 16:50

Re: Wins That Boxers Don't Get Enough Credit For.

Post by cfang »



you're picking out things and leaving out others. It's a common thing you do. The scorecards mean nothing - Ali was dominating Liston - surely you could see that Liston couldn't land his jab as Ali was moving back from it? A lot of sports people get injured because they are pushing themselves beyond their comfort zone. In sports where it's one on one, its usually due to the opponent. If Liston was seriously damaged (debatable) then it was probably him reaching for shots and Ali pulling his head back - something Liston hadn't come up against before. Also in the second fight, the referee and Ali's actions are irrelevant - do you think Liston was unlucky to lose that fight - he was decked with the first punch Ali landed. Ali beats Liston 100/100 - old vs new - bully vs genius, slow vs fast, tradition vs innovation.
Kalan wrote:
cfang wrote:So the fight was even and Liston got injured - how unlucky for him etc. Good job he got a rematch so he could set the record straight - oh that lasted a round. You aren't seriously suggesting that Liston wasn't tired and beaten by Ali - oh and despite the dirty trick of rubbing some horrible goo on him to blind Ali. You think Sonny was going to come on strong and stop Ali in the later rounds I guess - just like he did in the rematch!

There were two fights - one ended up with Liston quitting and the other he was embarrassed by getting decked in round 1. Ali was superior simple as that.
Kalan wrote:
As you said... Liston was an aged dinosaur. But Liston also suffered a severely torn left biceps in the first fight (Liston quit with the fight dead even on the cards) and Ali should have been DQ'd in the rematch for failing to go to a neutral corner and flagrantly refusing the referee's orders to go to a neutral corner... Also the count should have been suspended when Ali failed to follow the rules---and it WASN'T... Liston never got a count from Walcott, but he resumed fighting after Ali finally went to a neutral corner and he got up... Ali attacked, but couldn't land a single follow up punch. Liston easily ducked and dodged Ali's follow up barrage so his reflexes were intact after the light knockdown punch... Ring Magazine editor, Nat Fleischer, screamed at Walcott and erroneously directed him to stop the fight.. Fleischer was NOT a boxing official or commission member.

Liston was the fall guy for the comedy of errors in that fight... His boxing license was suspended in all 50 states for "faking" a knockdown... I thought that was outrageous!!! ... Why would Liston get up and resume fighting Ali if he intended to throw the fight??? ... Why wouldn't Liston just wait for Walcott to push Ali to a neutral corner...and then come back and count him out... IF he intended to throw the fight???

NOBODY answered those questions to Liston or ANY Liston team member's satisfaction... They just kept saying "We think you faked the knockdown."
So just ignore the facts right????... Ignore the fact that Ali refused to go to a neutral corner and should have been DQ'd for flagrantly disobeying a referee's order... And Liston got NO COUNT because of Ali ignoring the rules... That's the reason you suspend a count if a boxer refuses to go to a neutral corner... Because the rules state the referee must count out the boxer and not the timekeeper, so the boxer knows what the count is. If referee Walcott DQ'd Ali nobody would have blamed him... A boxer should not be able to show such contempt for a referee's authority.

And even though Liston had a badly torn left biceps in the first fight -- the fight was even on the cards.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46550
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Wins That Boxers Don't Get Enough Credit For.

Post by gilgamesh »

Syntax Error wrote:Julio Cesar Chavez v Meldrick Taylor 1 - All folk ever say that there were 2 seconds left. Chavez never gets any credit for rallying back & stopping a guy who was beating him.

The referee's only concern should be the wellbeing of the fighter & not how many more seconds of punishment he can take.
When the answer is Zero seconds of punishment he'd take and the fight is over he shouldn't stop the fight. But yes Chavez deserves massive credit for doing what he had to do for pulling that fight out of the fire, but you can't ever give Chavez full credit because Richard Steele gets the assist.
littlepug
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 5351
Joined: 03 Jul 2012, 07:17

Re: Wins That Boxers Don't Get Enough Credit For.

Post by littlepug »

gilgamesh wrote:
Syntax Error wrote:Julio Cesar Chavez v Meldrick Taylor 1 - All folk ever say that there were 2 seconds left. Chavez never gets any credit for rallying back & stopping a guy who was beating him.

The referee's only concern should be the wellbeing of the fighter & not how many more seconds of punishment he can take.
When the answer is Zero seconds of punishment he'd take and the fight is over he shouldn't stop the fight. But yes Chavez deserves massive credit for doing what he had to do for pulling that fight out of the fire, but you can't ever give Chavez full credit because Richard Steele gets the assist.
nah man taylor didn't respond, had he been able to he would of won, he didn't so he lost
orbtastic
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 12549
Joined: 05 Dec 2006, 11:22

Re: Wins That Boxers Don't Get Enough Credit For.

Post by orbtastic »

The doctor that saw him in ER after the fight didn't know who he was, looking at his injuries he assumed he'd been in a car accident.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Wins That Boxers Don't Get Enough Credit For.

Post by Counter-puncher »

littlepug wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:
Syntax Error wrote:Julio Cesar Chavez v Meldrick Taylor 1 - All folk ever say that there were 2 seconds left. Chavez never gets any credit for rallying back & stopping a guy who was beating him.

The referee's only concern should be the wellbeing of the fighter & not how many more seconds of punishment he can take.
When the answer is Zero seconds of punishment he'd take and the fight is over he shouldn't stop the fight. But yes Chavez deserves massive credit for doing what he had to do for pulling that fight out of the fire, but you can't ever give Chavez full credit because Richard Steele gets the assist.
nah man taylor didn't respond, had he been able to he would of won, he didn't so he lost

I kinda agree with you both, Chavez fanboy though I am I cant give him full credit, but Taylor could have helped himself had he reacted like someone who wasn't effectively unconscious on his feet.

Crying shame that fight gets remembered for that, and not both fighters' huge efforts
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Wins That Boxers Don't Get Enough Credit For.

Post by Counter-puncher »

orbtastic wrote:The doctor that saw him in ER after the fight didn't know who he was, looking at his injuries he assumed he'd been in a car accident.
Really, feck, didn't know that
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Wins That Boxers Don't Get Enough Credit For.

Post by Counter-puncher »

I don't think Brian Mitchell gets enough credit for schooling Tony Lopez in the rematch, one of the easier wins you'll see in a genuine unification bout IMO
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Wins That Boxers Don't Get Enough Credit For.

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

Taylor definitely doesn't get enough credit for that clear win over Chavez.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 16892
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Wins That Boxers Don't Get Enough Credit For.

Post by keithmoonhangover »

Anyone who thinks Steele acted legitimately, watch the first Hearns Barkley fight and look at the condition Hearns is in when he is allowed to continue.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Wins That Boxers Don't Get Enough Credit For.

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

keithmoonhangover wrote:Anyone who thinks Steele acted legitimately, watch the first Hearns Barkley fight and look at the condition Hearns is in when he is allowed to continue.
:TU:

This wasn't a debatable decision. Taylor got robbed.
Tomasino
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7876
Joined: 24 Apr 2010, 16:39

Re: Wins That Boxers Don't Get Enough Credit For.

Post by Tomasino »

Steele did it for Don King. As much damage as Taylor had taken, he was ahead on the cards. Another 2 mins in the ring with Chavez could have killed him, no doubt, but not 2 seconds. That damage allowed the press to cloud the robbery with doubts but Taylor should have heard the final bell. He was amazing that night.


Did Don King rip Julio Chavez off? There's lots of info about the heavyweights he shafted but never heard anything re Julio. He seemed to be well looked after.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Wins That Boxers Don't Get Enough Credit For.

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

Tomasino wrote:Steele did it for Don King. As much damage as Taylor had taken, he was ahead on the cards. Another 2 mins in the ring with Chavez could have killed him, no doubt, but not 2 seconds. That damage allowed the press to cloud the robbery with doubts but Taylor should have heard the final bell. He was amazing that night.


Did Don King rip Julio Chavez off? There's lots of info about the heavyweights he shafted but never heard anything re Julio. He seemed to be well looked after.
That duo gave Julio more love in the Randle rematch.
BroughtonRulesRefuge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2773
Joined: 16 Dec 2008, 06:55

Re: Wins That Boxers Don't Get Enough Credit For.

Post by BroughtonRulesRefuge »

[quote=]

This wasn't a debatable decision. Taylor got robbed.[/quote]

- An unfortunate sizable population on this forum should be suing their parents for failure to pass on any measurable intelligence.

Lou Duva jumped on the ring apron to scream out profanities as fans likewise erupted. Steele couldn't even hear himself think, but as he focused on Taylor, Taylor focused on Duva in his hazy state. No matter what Steele decided, he was doomed, but Taylor was done and Duva easily earned a DQ loss for him. A loss is a loss. Taylor got run over by a truck and the rematch even worse for him, end of.

Where Steele screwed up was when roger jumped into the ring after Judah fouled TUE to create a ring riot, an automatic DQ loss for TUE that would've been the end of Steele.

That was a daylight strong armed robbery captured forever for future historians to see in all of boxing's naked inglory, but at least they can have some laughs over some of the drivel deposited here.
:TU:
Post Reply