GGG Damaged Goods

Badhusker
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4902
Joined: 19 Jun 2010, 23:57

Re: GGG Damaged Goods

Post by Badhusker »

boxing_rocks wrote:
Badhusker wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:His resume as a Middleweight is second to none. He has a victory over future Heavyweight Champion Gene Tunney, and a victory over the defensive specialist Tiger Flowers along with numerous other great fighters. Ranking of All Time Great fighters is subjective, but Greb's resume is as good as any Middleweight that has ever lived.
X2
Greb is the only boxer to beat Tunney, and Tunney was a light heavy. I read he fought the latter part of his career with only vision in one eye. He is the best middle of all time easily, imo.
Achievement wise, probably, but there is no way he could beat Golovkin. For starters, he would likely fight as a welterweight now.
Maybe welterweight his first years of competition, but not after. Its hard to compare different times on an even playing field, but if GGG had to fight 3 times a month instead of 3 a year, with lighter gloves and only a few days, week, or 2 weeks inbetween bouts, I doubt if he would have been undefeated. Very few boxers today would have withstood the grind and wear and tear on their body. Greb did it for 13 years, and fought injured many times.
Ian1973
Middleweight
Posts: 1447
Joined: 15 Feb 2014, 14:58

Re: GGG Damaged Goods

Post by Ian1973 »

boxing_rocks wrote:
Badhusker wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:His resume as a Middleweight is second to none. He has a victory over future Heavyweight Champion Gene Tunney, and a victory over the defensive specialist Tiger Flowers along with numerous other great fighters. Ranking of All Time Great fighters is subjective, but Greb's resume is as good as any Middleweight that has ever lived.
X2
Greb is the only boxer to beat Tunney, and Tunney was a light heavy. I read he fought the latter part of his career with only vision in one eye. He is the best middle of all time easily, imo.
Achievement wise, probably, but there is no way he could beat Golovkin. For starters, he would likely fight as a welterweight now.


This is why it is practically impossible to compare eras. Does anyone seriously think Ali or Marciano or Tyson would beat the 6'9" Fury or Wilder? They would be way too small and with todays advanced training methods etc they would have next to no chance.

You can't accurately judge a middleweight from over 50 years ago with one from today. Golovkin would absolutely obliterate Greb.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: GGG Damaged Goods

Post by Counter-puncher »

Ian1973 wrote: Does anyone seriously think Ali or Marciano or Tyson would beat the 6'9" Fury or Wilder? They would be way too small and with todays advanced training methods etc they would have next to no chance.
.

so make a more accurate comparison: would Marciano at, i think 185lbs, that'd be a light heavyweight at most nowadays, would he beat Stevenson?
Badhusker
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4902
Joined: 19 Jun 2010, 23:57

Re: GGG Damaged Goods

Post by Badhusker »

Ali beat 6'6" Ernie Terrell. Dempsey beat 6'7" Jess Willard, who was about 70lbs heavier and 6" taller. Max Baer beat Primo Carnera, who was about 6'7" and about 270. Pretty much everyone Tyson fought was taller than him, and probably most outweighed him.

Sure it can happen. Marciano, Dempsey, and Patterson were small heavys, and would have been light heavys or cruisers today. They would have been competitive, for sure.

To me it is a two way street comparing guys from now to back then. Bring the guys from yesteryear to now and they would probably be outclassed due to better technique, nutrition, etc. Now, take todays guys and throw them back in time, and doubt most would have the mental toughness to get through it. Get hammered on with 4-6oz horsehair gloves for 10 or 15 rounds and have to fight next week? No air conditioning, no gatorade, no peds! Forget it. :OhYes:
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: GGG Damaged Goods

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

crusader wrote:However redoubtable Greb was, if someone came into my gym and shadowboxed like that I'd laugh my ass off.
He was clowning around. It was supposed to be funny.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: GGG Damaged Goods

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

Counter-puncher wrote:
Ian1973 wrote: Does anyone seriously think Ali or Marciano or Tyson would beat the 6'9" Fury or Wilder? They would be way too small and with todays advanced training methods etc they would have next to no chance.
.

so make a more accurate comparison: would Marciano at, i think 185lbs, that'd be a light heavyweight at most nowadays, would he beat Stevenson?
Tyson Fury wouldn't land a punch on Ali. It's comedic how people think a 6'3 210 pound man in great shape is puny. Marciano would blast Stevenson and Fury.
boxing_rocks
Welterweight
Posts: 7851
Joined: 20 May 2016, 13:11

Re: GGG Damaged Goods

Post by boxing_rocks »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
crusader wrote:However redoubtable Greb was, if someone came into my gym and shadowboxed like that I'd laugh my ass off.
He was clowning around. It was supposed to be funny.
No, he wasn't.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: GGG Damaged Goods

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

boxing_rocks wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
crusader wrote:However redoubtable Greb was, if someone came into my gym and shadowboxed like that I'd laugh my ass off.
He was clowning around. It was supposed to be funny.
No, he wasn't.
He absolutely was.
boxing_rocks
Welterweight
Posts: 7851
Joined: 20 May 2016, 13:11

Re: GGG Damaged Goods

Post by boxing_rocks »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
boxing_rocks wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
He was clowning around. It was supposed to be funny.
No, he wasn't.
He absolutely was.
Did he tell you?
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: GGG Damaged Goods

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

boxing_rocks wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
boxing_rocks wrote:
No, he wasn't.
He absolutely was.
Did he tell you?
yes
boxing_rocks
Welterweight
Posts: 7851
Joined: 20 May 2016, 13:11

Re: GGG Damaged Goods

Post by boxing_rocks »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
boxing_rocks wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
He absolutely was.
Did he tell you?
yes
Was he in the same room with Julius Caesar and Napoleon?
ClivePatrickLyons
Super Welterweight
Posts: 2811
Joined: 07 Aug 2014, 22:10

Re: GGG Damaged Goods

Post by ClivePatrickLyons »

I'm very sorry Canelo for what I was saying about you and that GGG is for real I was veryyyyyyyyyyyyyy wrong :maybe:
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: GGG Damaged Goods

Post by crusader »

ClivePatrickLyons wrote:I'm very sorry Canelo for what I was saying about you and that GGG is for real I was veryyyyyyyyyyyyyy wrong :maybe:
Sorry for the guy who gave up his belt to GGG so he could fight Liam Smith :lol:

If Canelo was serious about facing GGG we probably wouldn't be talking about this figjt
ClivePatrickLyons
Super Welterweight
Posts: 2811
Joined: 07 Aug 2014, 22:10

Re: GGG Damaged Goods

Post by ClivePatrickLyons »

crusader wrote:
ClivePatrickLyons wrote:I'm very sorry Canelo for what I was saying about you and that GGG is for real I was veryyyyyyyyyyyyyy wrong :maybe:
Sorry for the guy who gave up his belt to GGG so he could fight Liam Smith :lol:

If Canelo was serious about facing GGG we probably wouldn't be talking about this figjt

Liam Smith :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: and then GGG fights A welterweight the same reason I was bagging Canelo :brick: :brick: :brick: :brick: :brick: :brick: :brick: :brick: :brick: :brick: :brick: :brick: :brick: :brick: :brick: :brick: :brick: :brick: :brick: :brick: :brick: :brick: :brick: :brick: :brick: :brick: :brick: :brick: :brick: :brick: :brick: :brick: :brick: :brick: :brick: :brick: :brick: and now your silly comment what the f.ck is this world coming tooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo :-P :-P :-P :-P :-P
dberry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3350
Joined: 05 Jan 2010, 02:15

Re: GGG Damaged Goods

Post by dberry »

crusader wrote:
ClivePatrickLyons wrote:I'm very sorry Canelo for what I was saying about you and that GGG is for real I was veryyyyyyyyyyyyyy wrong :maybe:
Sorry for the guy who gave up his belt to GGG so he could fight Liam Smith :lol:

If Canelo was serious about facing GGG we probably wouldn't be talking about this figjt
Wait, you are now trying to debate the mentally ill.
ClivePatrickLyons
Super Welterweight
Posts: 2811
Joined: 07 Aug 2014, 22:10

Re: GGG Damaged Goods

Post by ClivePatrickLyons »

dberry wrote:
crusader wrote:
ClivePatrickLyons wrote:I'm very sorry Canelo for what I was saying about you and that GGG is for real I was veryyyyyyyyyyyyyy wrong :maybe:
Sorry for the guy who gave up his belt to GGG so he could fight Liam Smith :lol:

If Canelo was serious about facing GGG we probably wouldn't be talking about this figjt
Wait, you are now trying to debate the mentally ill.

Listen I just said sorry to Canelo for bagging him for not fighting GGG and fighting Welterweight's who by the way are 2 weight division's below Middleweight's I was shocked when Team GGG came out with the same sh.t by fighting Kell Brook A welterweight who like Khan aint even the BEST Welterweight in the World so can you figger that for me or am I mentally ill if I keep listening to people like you I will be ...............Mentally Ill :oops:
dberry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3350
Joined: 05 Jan 2010, 02:15

Re: GGG Damaged Goods

Post by dberry »

ClivePatrickLyons wrote:
dberry wrote:
crusader wrote:
Sorry for the guy who gave up his belt to GGG so he could fight Liam Smith :lol:

If Canelo was serious about facing GGG we probably wouldn't be talking about this figjt
Wait, you are now trying to debate the mentally ill.

Listen I just said sorry to Canelo for bagging him for not fighting GGG and fighting Welterweight's who by the way are 2 weight division's below Middleweight's I was shocked when Team GGG came out with the same sh.t by fighting Kell Brook A welterweight who like Khan aint even the BEST Welterweight in the World so can you figger that for me or am I mentally ill if I keep listening to people like you I will be ...............Mentally Ill :oops:
I'm talking about your typing/posting style :lol: but while we're on the subject, if all my negotiations for the past several months had been scuppered and the promoter Id been dealing with offered me a in nine weeks for an absolute truck load of cash when it looked like I might not even get another opportunity this year then I'd fight a handicapped fornicating midget, I don't know about you. A career best payday and an opportunity to broaden the fanbase in another, boxing friendly country when getting another fight this year was looking bleak would be too good an opportunity to pass up, it's not like team Golovkin chased this fight, in fact, they're in the position they're in due to chasing legit middleweight title challenges/defences.
Pureist
Super Welterweight
Posts: 1208
Joined: 06 Sep 2014, 04:11

Re: GGG Damaged Goods

Post by Pureist »

^^^^^^ couldn't agree more, when your between a rock and a hard place you do what you have to
Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13113
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: GGG Damaged Goods

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
Counter-puncher wrote:
Ian1973 wrote: Does anyone seriously think Ali or Marciano or Tyson would beat the 6'9" Fury or Wilder? They would be way too small and with todays advanced training methods etc they would have next to no chance.
.

so make a more accurate comparison: would Marciano at, i think 185lbs, that'd be a light heavyweight at most nowadays, would he beat Stevenson?
Tyson Fury wouldn't land a punch on Ali. It's comedic how people think a 6'3 210 pound man in great shape is puny. Marciano would blast Stevenson and Fury.
But...but....but...

TOO BIG TOO STRONG MODERN NUTRITION LOLZ

Also I guess Ian1973 didn't notice Fury getting decked by Pajkic and Cunningham.
boxing_rocks
Welterweight
Posts: 7851
Joined: 20 May 2016, 13:11

Re: GGG Damaged Goods

Post by boxing_rocks »

You can't compare Fury who is a good boxer with quite a few drawbacks with the ATG from 1970s, but I am sure he would beat anybody from 1920s.
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45213
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: GGG Damaged Goods

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

It makes me laugh when we hear so much about these 'advanced training methods' and yet modern heavyweights are blowing our of their arses after only 30 seconds of sustained effort, whereas the guys in the 1970's could fight at a hectic pace for 15 rounds.

If these modern training methods are so advanced, why are the modern heavyweights such poor athletes in general?
boxing_rocks
Welterweight
Posts: 7851
Joined: 20 May 2016, 13:11

Re: GGG Damaged Goods

Post by boxing_rocks »

jamesmcdonnell wrote:It makes me laugh when we hear so much about these 'advanced training methods' and yet modern heavyweights are blowing our of their arses after only 30 seconds of sustained effort, whereas the guys in the 1970's could fight at a hectic pace for 15 rounds.

If these modern training methods are so advanced, why are the modern heavyweights such poor athletes in general?
The bigger you are, the worse your conditioning is with the same training.
Ian1973
Middleweight
Posts: 1447
Joined: 15 Feb 2014, 14:58

Re: GGG Damaged Goods

Post by Ian1973 »

Riddick Blowe wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
Counter-puncher wrote:

so make a more accurate comparison: would Marciano at, i think 185lbs, that'd be a light heavyweight at most nowadays, would he beat Stevenson?
Tyson Fury wouldn't land a punch on Ali. It's comedic how people think a 6'3 210 pound man in great shape is puny. Marciano would blast Stevenson and Fury.
But...but....but...

TOO BIG TOO STRONG MODERN NUTRITION LOLZ

Also I guess Ian1973 didn't notice Fury getting decked by Pajkic and Cunningham.

I did. I also noticed Ali being floored by Cooper who despite the adoration of the British public was never world class.

Fury in the fights you mentioned was a work in progress he isn't anymore.
dberry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3350
Joined: 05 Jan 2010, 02:15

Re: GGG Damaged Goods

Post by dberry »

WOW! Just WOW!
boxing_rocks
Welterweight
Posts: 7851
Joined: 20 May 2016, 13:11

Re: GGG Damaged Goods

Post by boxing_rocks »

Ian1973 wrote:
Riddick Blowe wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
Tyson Fury wouldn't land a punch on Ali. It's comedic how people think a 6'3 210 pound man in great shape is puny. Marciano would blast Stevenson and Fury.
But...but....but...

TOO BIG TOO STRONG MODERN NUTRITION LOLZ

Also I guess Ian1973 didn't notice Fury getting decked by Pajkic and Cunningham.

I did. I also noticed Ali being floored by Cooper who despite the adoration of the British public was never world class.

Fury in the fights you mentioned was a work in progress he isn't anymore.
If Fury has reached his ceiling, then it is not high.
Post Reply