Juan Manuel Marquez vs Julio Cesar Chavez @130
Juan Manuel Marquez vs Julio Cesar Chavez @130
Tired of seeing the same 'ol goofy threads around here the last few days so I figured I'd put this one out there. The other day this came up in conversation on another forum. It may have been brought up on here before, but if it was I don't recall.
Who do you guys have in this fight and why?
Who do you guys have in this fight and why?
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: Juan Manuel Marquez vs Julio Cesar Chavez @130
Marquez by surprisingly wide decision in a wicked action fight. I like Morales, MAB, Floyd and Pac over JCC too. Floyd very easily. Chavez was better at 35 & 40. Not sure if it was more experience or cutting less weight, but he's pretty overrated at 130.
Edit: I should say Marquez would deserve a clear decision, probably 8-4 Marquez and Chavez wins a SD.
Edit: I should say Marquez would deserve a clear decision, probably 8-4 Marquez and Chavez wins a SD.
Re: Juan Manuel Marquez vs Julio Cesar Chavez @130
Yeah that's about the way I'd see it too. I figure Chavez would take the first few rounds, but Marquez would start timing him with counter punch after counter punch by the 3rd round and start boxing his ears off. Chavez is a tough S.O.B. that'll keep on coming so he'd take some more rounds in there, and could possibly drop Marquez at some point, but I'd definitely favor Marquez to do the better work overall as well.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Marquez by surprisingly wide decision in a wicked action fight. I like Morales, MAB, Floyd and Pac over JCC too. Floyd very easily. Chavez was better at 35 & 40. Not sure if it was more experience or cutting less weight, but he's pretty overrated at 130.
Edit: I should say Marquez would deserve a clear decision, probably 8-4 Marquez and Chavez wins a SD.
You think the fight plays out any different at 135?
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: Juan Manuel Marquez vs Julio Cesar Chavez @130
No, I like Marquez at any weight. I never saw Chavez compete at that level, he beat a ton of really good fighters to cement his ATG status; but he's more McCallum than Duran to me.gilgamesh wrote:Yeah that's about the way I'd see it too. I figure Chavez would take the first few rounds, but Marquez would start timing him with counter punch after counter punch by the 3rd round and start boxing his ears off. Chavez is a tough S.O.B. that'll keep on coming so he'd take some more rounds in there, and could possibly drop Marquez at some point, but I'd definitely favor Marquez to do the better work overall as well.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Marquez by surprisingly wide decision in a wicked action fight. I like Morales, MAB, Floyd and Pac over JCC too. Floyd very easily. Chavez was better at 35 & 40. Not sure if it was more experience or cutting less weight, but he's pretty overrated at 130.
Edit: I should say Marquez would deserve a clear decision, probably 8-4 Marquez and Chavez wins a SD.
You think the fight plays out any different at 135?
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: Juan Manuel Marquez vs Julio Cesar Chavez @130
Absolute classic, I don't think the weight changes things. I would leak more manlove-juice in this fight than I can imagine, I love both but think the style clash suits Marquez.
Re: Juan Manuel Marquez vs Julio Cesar Chavez @130
Then how would Julio do against Pac Man at 130 ?
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: Juan Manuel Marquez vs Julio Cesar Chavez @130
Yeah, I love me some Chavez but I cant argue, hes got nothing to compare with beating Pacquiao's ass three timesSaadOffTheDeck wrote:No, I like Marquez at any weight. I never saw Chavez compete at that level, he beat a ton of really good fighters to cement his ATG status; but he's more McCallum than Duran to me.gilgamesh wrote:Yeah that's about the way I'd see it too. I figure Chavez would take the first few rounds, but Marquez would start timing him with counter punch after counter punch by the 3rd round and start boxing his ears off. Chavez is a tough S.O.B. that'll keep on coming so he'd take some more rounds in there, and could possibly drop Marquez at some point, but I'd definitely favor Marquez to do the better work overall as well.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Marquez by surprisingly wide decision in a wicked action fight. I like Morales, MAB, Floyd and Pac over JCC too. Floyd very easily. Chavez was better at 35 & 40. Not sure if it was more experience or cutting less weight, but he's pretty overrated at 130.
Edit: I should say Marquez would deserve a clear decision, probably 8-4 Marquez and Chavez wins a SD.
You think the fight plays out any different at 135?
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: Juan Manuel Marquez vs Julio Cesar Chavez @130
Seamus wrote:Then how would Julio do against Pac Man at 130 ?
Again I think pacquiaos style is difficult for JCC.
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: Juan Manuel Marquez vs Julio Cesar Chavez @130
He'd get smoked.Seamus wrote:Then how would Julio do against Pac Man at 130 ?
Re: Juan Manuel Marquez vs Julio Cesar Chavez @130
In 130 Marquez by wide decision.
Re: Juan Manuel Marquez vs Julio Cesar Chavez @130
Pac W12 I would think. Faster movement, and he'd get off first on Chavez in most exchanges and get out of the way of Chavez's attack. Chavez would obviously land his share of shots, but I think Pac would've beaten him pretty comfortably.Seamus wrote:Then how would Julio do against Pac Man at 130 ?
Re: Juan Manuel Marquez vs Julio Cesar Chavez @130
How about Marquez vs Azumah Nelson in 130?Marquez W12 for me
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: Juan Manuel Marquez vs Julio Cesar Chavez @130
Yup pacs mobility means jcc can't really pin him down to unload and that left hand finds a home over and overgilgamesh wrote:Pac W12 I would think. Faster movement, and he'd get off first on Chavez in most exchanges and get out of the way of Chavez's attack. Chavez would obviously land his share of shots, but I think Pac would've beaten him pretty comfortably.Seamus wrote:Then how would Julio do against Pac Man at 130 ?
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: Juan Manuel Marquez vs Julio Cesar Chavez @130
S/D or M/DWoldemar wrote:How about Marquez vs Azumah Nelson in 130?Marquez W12 for me
-
elmersalsa
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 15706
- Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50
Re: Juan Manuel Marquez vs Julio Cesar Chavez @130
Juan Manuel Marquez was a great boxer, but, he is not in the great Julio Cesar Chavez' class.
Re: Juan Manuel Marquez vs Julio Cesar Chavez @130
Marquez's style bad for JCC.
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: Juan Manuel Marquez vs Julio Cesar Chavez @130
Agreed, Marquez was greater.elmersalsa wrote:Juan Manuel Marquez was a great boxer, but, he is not in the great Julio Cesar Chavez' class.
-
elmersalsa
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 15706
- Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50
Re: Juan Manuel Marquez vs Julio Cesar Chavez @130
That's in your view.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Agreed, Marquez was greater.elmersalsa wrote:Juan Manuel Marquez was a great boxer, but, he is not in the great Julio Cesar Chavez' class.
Chavez was the best of Mexico ever
Re: Juan Manuel Marquez vs Julio Cesar Chavez @130
I also would consider Marquez a greater overall fighter than Chavez.elmersalsa wrote:That's in your view.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Agreed, Marquez was greater.elmersalsa wrote:Juan Manuel Marquez was a great boxer, but, he is not in the great Julio Cesar Chavez' class.
Chavez was the best of Mexico ever
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: Juan Manuel Marquez vs Julio Cesar Chavez @130
Yes, I speak in my view. Chavez might make my top 5 Mexicans.elmersalsa wrote:That's in your view.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Agreed, Marquez was greater.elmersalsa wrote:Juan Manuel Marquez was a great boxer, but, he is not in the great Julio Cesar Chavez' class.
Chavez was the best of Mexico ever
-
ClivePatrickLyons
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 2811
- Joined: 07 Aug 2014, 22:10
Re: Juan Manuel Marquez vs Julio Cesar Chavez @130
Woldemar wrote:How about Marquez vs Azumah Nelson in 130?Marquez W12 for me
Nelson at Feather/Jr Light beats Marquez in a classic that goes the distance close but un for Azumah
Re: Juan Manuel Marquez vs Julio Cesar Chavez @130
Head to head is also based on styles.elmersalsa wrote:That's in your view.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Agreed, Marquez was greater.elmersalsa wrote:Juan Manuel Marquez was a great boxer, but, he is not in the great Julio Cesar Chavez' class.
Chavez was the best of Mexico ever
Re: Juan Manuel Marquez vs Julio Cesar Chavez @130
Are you a Chavez hater or just a plain berk? Chavez is hands down the GOAT Mexican fighter and he dismantles Marquez at any weight.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Yes, I speak in my view. Chavez might make my top 5 Mexicans.elmersalsa wrote:That's in your view.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
Agreed, Marquez was greater.
Chavez was the best of Mexico ever
Re: Juan Manuel Marquez vs Julio Cesar Chavez @130
There is no question that he had the best career of all Mexican boxer.This is a fact.elmersalsa wrote:That's in your view.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Agreed, Marquez was greater.elmersalsa wrote:Juan Manuel Marquez was a great boxer, but, he is not in the great Julio Cesar Chavez' class.
Chavez was the best of Mexico ever
Head to head is something else and everyone has their own opinion!
-
elmersalsa
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 15706
- Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50
Re: Juan Manuel Marquez vs Julio Cesar Chavez @130
Born of them great boxers. But, Julio Cesar Chavez was a class above Juan Manuel Marquez.